Analysis of the type of cesarean scar pregnancy impacted on the effectiveness and safety of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage treatment

Reference

• Gonzalez N, Tulandi T. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(5):731–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah JS, Nasab S, Papanna R, et al. Management and reproductive counseling in cervical, caesarean scar and interstitial ectopic pregnancies over 11 years: identifying the need for a modern management algorithm. Hum Reprod Open. 2019;2019(4):hoz028.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Papillon-Smith J, Sobel ML, Niles KM, et al. Surgical management algorithm for caesarean scar pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017;39(8):619–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Family Planning Subgroup, Chinese Society of Obstetrics and Gynocology, Chinese Medical Association. Expert opinion of diagnosis and treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (2016). Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2016;51:568–572.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Birch Petersen K, Hoffmann E, Rifbjerg Larsen C, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(4):958–967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsi F, Arnone P, Chen W, et al. High intensity focused ultrasound ablation: a new therapeutic option for solid tumors. J Cancer Res Ther. 2010;6(4):414–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues DB, Stauffer PR, Vrba D, et al. Focused ultrasound for treatment of bone tumours. Int J Hyperthermia. 2015;31(3):260–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JS, Hong GY, Lee KH, et al. Safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for uterine fibroids and adenomyosis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019;45(12):3214–3221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JS, Hong GY, Park BJ, et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound combined with hysteroscopic resection to treat retained placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2016;59(5):421–425.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang L, Du Y, Zhao C. High-intensity focused ultrasound combined with dilatation and curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43(1):98–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Zhang Y, He J, et al. Outcomes of subsequent pregnancies in patients following treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy with high intensity focused ultrasound followed by ultrasound-guided dilation and curettage. Int J Hyperth. 2019;36(1):926–931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Y, Xiong C, Dong C, et al. Approaches in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy and risk factors for intraoperative hemorrhage: a retrospective study. Front Med. 2021;24(8):682368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang L, Zhao L, Shi H. Clinical efficacy of combined hysteroscopic and laparoscopic surgery and reversible ligation of the uterine artery for excision and repair of uterine scar in patients with type II and III cesarean scar pregnancy. Med Sci Monit. 2020;26:e924076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Y, Wu X, Zhu Q, et al. Combined laparoscopy and hysteroscopy vs. uterine curettage in the uterine artery embolization-based management of cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14:116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu LP. Therapeutic approach for the cesarean scar pregnancy. Medicine. 2018;97(18):e0476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Pang Y, Ma Y, et al. A comparison between laparoscopy and hysteroscopy approach in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. Medicine. 2020;99(43):e22845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan Y, Pu D, Zhan P, et al. Focused ultrasound ablation surgery combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage in the treatment and management of cesarean scar pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;258:168–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le A, Shan L, Xiao T, et al. Transvaginal surgical treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287(4):791–796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hois EL, Hibbeln JF, Alonzo MJ, et al. Ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean section scar treated with intramuscular methotrexate and bilateral uterine artery embolization. J Clin Ultrasound. 2008;36(2):123–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim CW, Shim HS, Jang H, et al. The effects of uterine artery embolization on ovarian reserve. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;206:172–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsen K, Hrobjartsson A, Korsholm M, et al. Fertility after uterine artery embolization of fibroids: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;297(1):13–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao J, Zhang S, Wang F, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: noninvasive and effective treatment with high-intensity focused ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(4):e3511–e3517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Deng X, Wan Y, et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. Medicine. 2015;94(18):e854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu F, Chen WZ, Bai J, et al. Tumor vessel destruction resulting from high-intensity focused ultrasound in patients with solid malignancies. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002;28(4):535–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copelan A, Hartman J, Chehab M, et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound: current status for image-guided therapy. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2015;32(4):398–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu CN, Tang L, Sun Y, et al. Clinical outcome of high-intensity focused ultrasound as the preoperative management of cesarean scar pregnancy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;59(3):387–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Guo Q, Pu Y, et al. Outcome of high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization in the treatment and management of cesarean scar pregnancy a retrospective study. Medicine. 2017;96(30):e7687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslan M, Yavuzkir Ş. Suction curettage and Foley balloon as a first-line treatment option for caesarean scar pregnancy and reproductive outcomes. Int J Womens Health. 2021;2313:239–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu YM, Guo YR, Zhou MY, et al. Indwelling intrauterine Foley balloon catheter for intraoperative and postoperative bleeding in cesarean scar pregnancy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(1):94–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang Q, Qin Y, Zhou Q, et al. Hysteroscopic  treatment and reproductive outcomes in cesarean scar pregnancy: experience at a single institution. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(6):1559–1566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Xiao S, Zhu X, et al. Analysis of the reproductive outcome of patients with cesarean scar pregnancy treated by high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization: a retrospective cohort study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(5):883–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar