From social movement learning to sociomaterial movement learning? Addressing the possibilities and limits of new materialism

References

• Alaimo, S. and Heckman, S. (2008) ‘Introduction: Emerging models of materiality in feminist theory’. In: S. Alaimo and S. Heckman (eds), Material Feminisms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Assiter, A. (1984) ‘Althusser and structuralism’, The British Journal of Sociology, 35(2), pp. 272–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2013) Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, N. and Szeman, I. (2005) ‘Interview with Hardt and Negri: What is the multitude?’, Cultural Studies, 19(3), pp. 372–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, L. (2011) The Democracy of Objects. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2012) Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheah, P. (2010) ‘Non-dialectical materialism’. In: D. Coole and S. Frost (eds), New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency and Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 70–91.
   Google Scholar
• Chiew, F. (2014) ‘Post-human ethics with Cary Wolfe and Karen Barad: Animal compassion as trans-species entanglement’, Theory, Culture and Society, 31(4), pp. 51–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coole, D. and Frost, S. (2010a) ‘Introducing the new materialisms’. In: D. Coole and S. Frost (eds) New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency and Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 3–46.
   Google Scholar
• Coole, D. and Frost, S. (eds) (2010b) New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency and Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, A. (2012) ‘Assemblage and social movements: Tibet Support Groups and the spatialities of political organisation’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37, pp. 273–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. (2006) A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. (2008) ‘Deleuze, materialism and politics’. In: I. Buchanan and N. Thoburn (eds) Deleuze and Politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 160–77.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1988) Spinoza: Practical Philosophy. San Francisco: City Lights Books.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (2009 [1968]) Difference and Repetition. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Dolphijn, R and van der Tuin, I. (2012a) New Materialism: Interviews and Cartographies. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R. (2010) ‘The end of lifelong learning? A post-human condition’, Studies in the Education of Adults, 42(1), pp. 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R. and Fenwick, T. (2014) ‘Critique and politics: A sociomaterialist intervention’, Educational Philosophy and Theory. At: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2014.930681.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T. (2010) ‘Accountability practices in adult education: Insights from actor-network theory’, Studies in the Education of Adults, 42(2), pp. 170–85.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T. and Edwards, R. (2013) ‘Performative ontologies: Sociomaterial approaches to researching adult education and lifelong learning’, European Journal for the Research of Education into Adults, 4(1), pp. 49–63.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., Edwards, R. and Sawchuck, P. (2011) Emerging Approaches to Educational Research: Tracing the Sociomaterial. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1972) The Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (2011 [1930–32]) Prison Notebooks Volume Two: Fourth Notebook, Philosophy and Ideology. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B., Clover, D., Crowther, J and Scandrett, E. (2011) ‘Social movement learning: A contemporary re-examination’, Studies in the Education of Adults, (43)2, pp. 113–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M. and Negri, A. (2004) Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. (2009) Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. Victoria: Re:press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (1996) Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2006) The Limits to Capital. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2010) The Enigma of Capital. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2012) Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2014) Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism. London: Profile.
   Google Scholar
• Holst, J. (2011) ‘Frameworks for understanding the politics of social movements’, Studies in the Education of Adults, 43(2), pp. 117–27.
   Google Scholar
• Hornborg, A. (2013) ‘Technology as fetish: Marx, Latour and the cultural foundations of capitalism’, Theory, Culture and Society, 31(4), pp. 119–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth, D. (2000) Discourse. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kilgore, D.W. (1999) ‘Understanding learning in social movements: A theory of collective learning’, International Journal of Lifelong Education, 18(3), pp. 191–202.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2005) On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004) ‘Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern’, Critical Inquiry, 30, pp. 225–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macherey, P. (1996) ‘The encounter with Spinoza’. In: P. Patton (ed.) Deleuze: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 139–61.
   Google Scholar
• May, T. (2013) ‘Humanism and solidarity’, Parrhesia, 18, pp. 11–21.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. (2009) ‘Translocal assemblages: Space, power and social movements’, Geoforum, pp. 561–7.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. (2011) ‘The city as a machine for learning’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36, pp. 360–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2005) On the Political. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ranciàre, J. (1999) Dis-agreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott-Cato, M. and Hillier, J. (2010) ‘How could we study climate-related social innovation? Applying Deleuzian philosophy to Transition Towns’, Environmental Politics, 19(6), pp. 869–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St Pierre, E.A. (2013) ‘The posts continue: Becoming’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), pp. 646–57.
   Google Scholar
• Zielinska, M., Kowzan, P. and Prusinowska, M. (2011) ‘Social movement learning: From radical imagination to disempowerment?’, Studies in the Education of Adults, 43(2), pp. 251–67.
   Google Scholar
• Zukas, M. (2009) ‘Editors, journals and the education of adults: Actors and actor-networks’, Studies in the Education of Adults, 41(1), pp. 1–5.
   Google Scholar