Sensitivity analysis for the identifiability with application to latent random effect model for the mixed data

References

• A. Agresti, Categorical Data and Analysis, Wiley, New York, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• J.A. Anderson and J.D. Pemberton, The grouped continuous model for multivariate ordered categorical variables and covariate adjustment, Biometrics 41 (1985), pp. 875–885. doi: 10.2307/2530960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Bahrami Samani and M. Ganjali, A multivariate latent variable model for mixed-data from continuous and ordinal responses with possibility of missing responses, Appl. Appl. Math.: Int. J. 5(10) (2010), pp. 1564–1584.
   Google Scholar
• E. Bahrami Samani, M. Ganjali, and A. Khodadadi, A latent variable model for mixed continuous and ordinal responses, J. Stat. Theory Appl. 7 (2008), pp. 337–348.
   Google Scholar
• E. Bahrami Samani and Zh. Thamasebinejad, Joint modelling of mixed correlated nominal, ordinal and continuous responses, J. Stat. Res. 45(1) (2011), pp. 37–47.
   Google Scholar
• P. Catalano and L.M. Ryan, Bivariate latent variable models for clustered discrete and continuous outcomes, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 50(3) (1992), pp. 1078–1095.
   Google Scholar
• R.D. Cook, Assessment of local influence (with discussion), J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. 48 (1986), pp. 133–169.
   Google Scholar
• D.R. Cox and N. Wermuth, Response models for mixed binary and quantitative variables, Biometrika 79(3) (1992), pp. 441–461. doi: 10.1093/biomet/79.3.441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.R. De Leon and K.C. Carri'ere, General mixed-data model: Extension of general location and grouped continuous models, Can. J. Stat. 35 (2007), pp. 533–548. doi: 10.1002/cjs.5550350405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.R. De Leon and B. Wu, Copula-based regression models for a bivariate mixed discrete and continuous outcome, Stat. Med. 30(2) (2011), pp. 175–185. doi: 10.1002/sim.4087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.J. Diggle, P. Heagerty, K.Y. Liang, and S.L. Zeger, Analysis of Longitudinal Data, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• A.A. Ding, Identifiability conditions for covariate effects model on survival times under informative censoring, Stat. Probab. Lett. 80 (2010), pp. 911–915. doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2010.01.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.M. Fitzmaurice and N.M. Laird, Regression models for bivariate discrete and continuous outcome with clustering, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90 (1995), pp. 845–852. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.A. Harvile and R.W. Mee, A mixed model procedure for analyzing ordered categorical data, Biometrics 40 (1984), pp. 393–408. doi: 10.2307/2531393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.J. Heckman, Dummy endogenous variable in a simultaneous equation system, Econometrica 46(6) (1978), pp. 931–959. doi: 10.2307/1909757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Iannario and D. Piccolo, A new statistical model for the analysis of customer satisfaction, Qual. Technol. Quant. Manage. 7 (2010), pp. 149–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.A. Kaciroti, T.E. Raghunathan, M.A. Schork, N.M. Clark, and M. Gong, A Bayesian approach for clustered longitudinal ordinal outcome with nonignorable missing data: Evaluation of an asthma education program, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 474 (2006), pp. 435–446. doi: 10.1198/016214505000001221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.J. Krzanowski, Distance between populations using mixed continuous and categorical variables, Biometrika 70 (1983), pp. 235–243. doi: 10.1093/biomet/70.1.235
   Google Scholar
• P. McCullagh, Regression models for ordinal data (with discussion), J. R. Stat. Soc. B 42 (1980), pp. 109–142.
   Google Scholar
• G. Molenberghs, H. Geys, and M. Buyse, Evaluation of surrogate endpoints in randomized experiments with mixed discrete and continuous outcomes, Stat. Med. 20 (2001), pp. 3023–3038. doi: 10.1002/sim.923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Olkin and R.F. Tate, Multivariate correlation models with mixed discrete and continuous variables, Ann. Math. Stat. 32 (1961), pp. 448–465. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177705052
   Google Scholar
• A.T. Pinto and S.L.T. Normand, Correlated bivariate continuous and binary outcomes: Issues and applications, Stat. Med. 28 (2009), pp. 1753–1773. doi: 10.1002/sim.3588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.Y. Poon and S.Y. Lee, Maximum likelihood estimation of multivariate polyserial and polychoric correlation coefficients, Psychometrika 52(3) (1987), pp. 409–430. doi: 10.1007/BF02294364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.M. Regan and P.J. Catalano, Combined continuous and discrete outcomes, in Topics in Modelling of Clustered Data, M. Aerts, H. Geys, G. Molenberghs, and L.M. Ryan, eds., Chapman and Hall, London, 2002, pp. 233–261.
   Google Scholar
• M.D. Sammel, L.M. Ryan, and J.M. Legler, Latent variable models for mixed discrete and continuous outcomes, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B: Methodol. 59 (1997), pp. 667–678. doi: 10.1111/1467-9868.00090
   Google Scholar
• T.K. Sengul, D.S. Stoffer, and N.L. Day, A residuals-based transition model for longitudinal analysis with estimation in the presence of missing data, Stat. Med. 26 (2007), pp. 3330–3341. doi: 10.1002/sim.2757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Tutz, Modeling of repeated ordered measurements by isotonic sequential regression, Stat. Model. 5 (2005), pp. 269–287. doi: 10.1191/1471082X05st101oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Verbeke and G. Molenberghs, Linear Mixed Models in Practice: A SAS Oriented Approach, Springer, New York, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• W. Wang, Identifiability of linear mixed effects models, Electron. J. Stat. 7 (2013), pp. 244–263. doi: 10.1214/13-EJS770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar