Short- and long-run rolling causality techniques and optimal window-wise lag selection: an application to the export-led growth hypothesis

References

• A.N. Ajmi, G.C. Aye, M. Balcilar, and R. Gupta, Causality between exports and economic growth in South Africa: Evidence from linear and nonlinear tests, University of Pretoria, Working Paper: 2013–39, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Arai and E. Kurozumi, Testing for the null hypothesis of cointegration with a structural break, Econometric Rev. 26 (2007), pp. 705–739. doi: 10.1080/07474930701653776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Balcilar and Z.A. Ozdemir, The export-output growth nexus in Japan: A bootstrap rolling window approach, Empir. Econ. 44 (2013), pp. 639–660. doi: 10.1007/s00181-012-0562-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Bruneau and E. Jondeau, Long-run causality, with an application to international links between long-term interest rates, Oxford Bull. Econ. Stat. 61 (1999), pp. 545–568. doi: 10.1111/1468-0084.00143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.L. Carrion-i-Silvestre and A. Sanso, Testing the null of cointegration with structural break, Oxford Bull. Econ. Stat. 68 (2006), pp. 623–646.
   Google Scholar
• A.B. Dar, N. Bhanja, A. Samantaraya, and A.K. Tiwari, Export led growth or growth led export hypothesis in India: Evidence based on time-frequency approach, Asian Econ. Financ. Rev. 3 (2013), pp. 869–880.
   Google Scholar
• J.-M. Dufour, Monte Carlo tests with nuisance parameters: A general approach to finite-sample inference and nonstandard asymptotics, J. Econometrics 133 (2006), pp. 443–477. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.-M. Dufour and E. Renault, Short run and long run causality in time series: Theory, Econometrica 66 (1998), pp. 1099–1125. doi: 10.2307/2999631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Elliott, T.J. Rothenberg, and J.H. Stock, Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root, Econometrica 64 (1996), pp. 813–836. doi: 10.2307/2171846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Feder, On exports and economic growth, J. Dev. Econ. 12 (1982), pp. 59–73. doi: 10.1016/0304-3878(83)90031-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.W.J. Granger, Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross spectral methods, Econometrica 37 (1969), pp. 424–438. doi: 10.2307/1912791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.W.J. Granger, Developments in the study of cointegrated economic variables, Oxford Bull. Econ. Stat. 48 (1986), pp. 213–228. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.1986.mp48003002.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.B. Hill, Efficient tests of long-run causation in trivariate VAR processes with a rolling window study of the money-income relationship, J. Appl. Econometrics. 22 (2007), pp. 747–765. doi: 10.1002/jae.925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Johansen, Statistical analysis of cointegrating vectors, J. Econom. Dynam. Control 12 (1988), pp. 213–254. doi: 10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Kaldor, Strategic Factors in Economic Development, New York State School of Industrial and Labour Relations, Cornell University, Ithaca, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• A. Karmann and A. Ludwig, A two-step approach to examine the dynamics of market convergence, Appl. Econom. Lett. 21 (2014), pp. 284–288. doi: 10.1080/13504851.2013.851765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kejriwal, Cointegration with structural breaks: An application to the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle, Stud. Nonlinear Dyn. Econom. 12 (2008), pp. 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kejriwal and P. Perron, The limit distribution of the estimates in cointegrated regression models with multiple structural changes, J. Econometrics 146 (2008), pp. 59–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kejriwal and P. Perron, Testing for multiple structural changes in cointegrated regression models, J. Business Econom. Stat. 28 (2010), pp. 503–522. doi: 10.1198/jbes.2009.07220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Kochhar, U. Kumar, R. Rajan, A. Subramanian, and I. Tokatlidis, India’s pattern of development: What happened, what follows? J. Monetary Econ. 53 (2006), pp. 981–1019. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2006.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.O. Krueger, Liberalization Attempts and Consequences, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• A.O. Krueger, Trade policy as an input to development, Am. Econ. Rev. 70 (1980), pp. 188–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.R. Krugman, Import protection as export promotion, in Monopolistic Competition in International Trade, H. Kierzkowski, ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1984, pp. 180–193.
   Google Scholar
• D. Kwiatkowski, P.C.B. Phillips, P. Schmidt, and Z. Shin, Testing the null of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?, J. Econometrics 54 (1992), pp. 159–178. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Lancaster, Intra-industry trade under perfect monopolistic competition, J. Int. Econ. 10 (1980), pp. 151–175. doi: 10.1016/0022-1996(80)90052-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Ludwig, Testing the null of cointegration with a structural break: Optimal kernel and bandwidth selection, Econ. Bull. 33 (2013), pp. 2828–2839.
   Google Scholar
• R. McKinnon, Foreign exchange constraints in economic development and efficient aid allocation, Econ. J. 74 (1964), pp. 388–409. doi: 10.2307/2228486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.S. Papola, Structural changes in the Indian economy – emerging patterns and implications, ISID Working Paper, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• B.P. Paul and A. Das, Export-led growth in India and the role of liberalisation, J. Appl. Econom. Res. 6 (2012), pp. 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• G.W. Schwert, Tests for unit roots: A Monte Carlo investigation, J. Business Econom. Stat. 7 (1989), pp. 147–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.S. Sephton, Response surface estimates of the KPSS stationarity test, Econom. Lett. 47 (1995), pp. 255–261. doi: 10.1016/0165-1765(94)00561-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.P. Singh and L. Konya, Cointegration and causality between Indian exports, imports and GDP, Asia Pacific J. Econ. Business 10 (2006), pp. 20–35.
   Google Scholar
• J.H. Stock and M.W. Watson, A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems, Econometrica 61 (1993), pp. 783–820. doi: 10.2307/2951763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.F. Tang, A revisitation of the export-led growth hypothesis in Malaysia using the leveraged bootstrap simulation and rolling causality techniques, J. Appl. Stat. 40 (2013), pp. 2332–2340. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2013.810195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.K. Tiwari and A. Ludwig, The export-led growth hypothesis for India: Examining causality by a new approach in the time–frequency domain, Appl. Econom. Lett. (2014), published online.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.Y. Toda and T. Yamamoto, Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes, J. Econometrics 66 (1995), pp. 225–250. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01616-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Zivot and D.W.K. Andrews, Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit root hypothesis, J. Business Econom. Stat. 10 (1992), pp. 251–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar