Unbiased one-dimensional university ranking – application-based preference ordering

References

• S. Alonso, F. Chiclana, F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, J. Alcala-Fdez and C. Porcel, A consistency based procedure to estimate missing pair-wise preference values, Tech. Rep., Department of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of Granada, Granada, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• K.J. Arrow, Social Choice and Individual Values, Wiley, New York, 1951.
   Google Scholar
• H. Braun, On Solving Travelling Salesman Problems by Genetic Algorithms, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 496, pp. 129–133.
   Google Scholar
• A. Farkas, P. Lancaster, and P. Rózsa, Consistency adjustments for pairwise comparison matrices, Numer. Linear Algebra Appl. 10 (2003), pp. 689–700. doi:10.1002/nla.318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Fedrizzi and S. Giove, Incomplete pairwise comparison and consistency optimization, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 183 (2007), pp. 303–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Goldstein and D.J. Spiegelhalter, League tables and their limitations: Statistical issues in comparisons of institutional performance, J. R. Statist. Soc. Ser. A (Stat. Soc.) 159 (1996), pp. 385–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Kemeny, Mathematics without numbers, Daedalus 88 (1959), pp. 577–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kendall, Rank Correlation Methods, 3rd ed., Hafner, New York, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• C. Kuang-hua and P. Liao, A comparative study on world university rankings: A bibliometric survey, Scientometrics 92(1) (2012), pp. 89–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.N. Langville and C.D. Meyer, Who's# 1?: The Science of Rating and Ranking, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• G. Leckie and H. Goldstein, The limitations of using school league tables to inform school choice, J. R. Statist. Soc.: Ser. A (Stat. Soc.) 172(4) (2009), pp. 835–851.
   Google Scholar
• R. Martí and G. Reinelt, The Linear Ordering Problem: Exact and Heuristic Methods in Combinatorial Optimization, Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 175, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• D. McFadden, Modeling the choice of residential location, in Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location, A. Karlqvist, L. Lundqvist, F. Snickars, and J. Weibull (eds.) North Holland, Amsterdam, 1978, pp. 75–96.
   Google Scholar
• M. Mitchell, An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• L. Page, US pattent, US6285999 B1, Sep 4, 2001, available at http://google.com/patents/US6285999.
   Google Scholar
• P. Paruolo, S. Michaela, and A. Saltelli, Ratings and rankings: Voodoo or science? J. R. Statist. Soc.: Ser. A (Stat. Soc.) 176(3) (2012), pp. 609–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.L. Plackett, The analysis of permutations, Appl. Stat. 24 (1975), pp. 193–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Shin, R. Toutkoushian, and U. Teichler (eds.), University Rankings, Theoretical Basis. Methodology and Impacts on Global Higher Education, Springer, Dordrecht, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• H. Stern, Models for distributions on permutations, J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 85(410) (1990), pp. 558–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Tanino, Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 12 (1984), pp. 117–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Á. Török, On the economics of university ranking lists: Intuitive remarks on intuitive comparisons, in Universities, Knowledge Transfer and Regional Development. Geography, Entrepreneurship and Policy, Attila Varga ed., Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Northampton, MA, 2009, pp. 219–242.
   Google Scholar
• A. Usher and S. Massimo, A World of Difference: A Global Survey of University League Tables, Educational Policy Institute, Toronto, ON, 2006; available at www.educationalpolicy.org.
   Google Scholar
• F.A. van Vught and F. Ziegele (eds.), Multidimensional Ranking: The Design and Development of U-Multirank Series: Higher Education Dynamics, Vol. 37, 2012; available at http://ec.europa.eu/education/higher-education/doc/multirank_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• L. Waltman, C. Calero-Medina, J. Kosten, Ed C.M. Noyons, R.J.W. Tijssen, N.J. van Eck, Th.N. van Leeuwen, A.F.J. van Raan, M.S. Visser, and P. Wouters, The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation, J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 63(12) (2012), pp. 2419–2432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar