References
- A. Abbasi, J. Altmann, and L. Hossain, Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures, J. Inform. 5 (2011), pp. 594–607. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2011.05.007
- R. Albert and A.-L. Barabási, Statistical mechanics of complex networks, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 (2002), pp. 47–97. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47
- J. Beirlant and J.H.J. Einmahl, Asymptotics for the Hirsch index, Scand. J. Stat. 37 (2010), pp. 355–364. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9469.2010.00694.x
- L. Bornmann and H.-D. Daniel, The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance?, EMBO Rep. 10 (2009), pp. 2–6. doi: 10.1038/embor.2008.233
- S. Coles, An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values, Springer-Verlag, London, 2001.
- R. Costas and M. Bordons, The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level, J. Inform. 1 (2007), pp. 193–203. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2007.02.001
- F. De Battisti and S. Salini, Robust analysis of bibliometric data, Stat. Methods Appl. 22 (2013), pp. 269–283. doi: 10.1007/s10260-012-0217-0
- D. De Stefano, V. Fuccella, M.P. Vitale, and S. Zaccarin, The use of different data sources in the analysis of co-authorship networks and scientific performance, Soc. Netw. 35 (2013), pp. 370–381. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2013.04.004
- D. De Stefano, G. Giordano, and M.P. Vitale, Issues in the analysis of co-authorship networks, Qual. Quant. 45 (2011), pp. 1091–1107. doi: 10.1007/s11135-011-9493-2
- M.G. Everett and S.P. Borgatti, Categorical attribute based centrality: E–I and G–F centrality, Soc. Netw. 34 (2012), pp. 562–569. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2012.06.002
- L.C. Freeman, Centrality in networks: I. Conceptual clarification, Soc. Netw. 1 (1979), pp. 215–239. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
- S. Goyal, M.J. Van der Leij, and J.L. Moraga-González, Economics: An emerging small world, J. Pol. Econ. 114 (2006), pp. 403–412. doi: 10.1086/500990
- D. Hicks, The difficulty of achieving full coverage of International Social Science literature and the bibliometric consequences, Scientometrics 44 (1999), pp. 193–215. doi: 10.1007/BF02457380
- J.E. Hirsch, An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 (2005), pp. 16569–16572. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102
- I.-S. Kang, S.-H. Na, S. Lee, H. Jung, P. Kim, W.-K. Sung, and J.-H. Lee, On co-authorship for author disambiguation, Inform. Process. Manage. 45 (2009), pp. 84–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2008.06.006
- D. Krackhardt and R.N. Stern, Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation, Soc. Psychol. Q. 51 (1988), pp. 123–140. doi: 10.2307/2786835
- R. Lambiotte and P. Panzarasa, Communities, knowledge creation, and information diffusion, J. Inform. 3 (2009), pp. 80–190. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.007
- S. Lee and B. Bozeman, The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity, Soc. Stud. Sci. 35 (2005), pp. 673–702. doi: 10.1177/0306312705052359
- G. Melin, Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level, Res. Pol. 29 (2000), pp. 31–40. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00031-1
- G. Melin and O. Persson, Studying research collaboration using co-authorships, Scientometrics 36 (1996), pp. 363–377. doi: 10.1007/BF02129600
- J. Moody, The structure of a social science: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999, Am. Sociol. Rev. 69 (2004), pp. 213–238. doi: 10.1177/000312240406900204
- M.E.J. Newman, Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101 (2004), pp. 5200–5205. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307545100
- S. Wasserman and K. Faust, Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994.
- D.J. Watts, Networks, dynamics, and the small-world phenomenon, Am. J. Sociol. 105 (1999), pp. 493–527. doi: 10.1086/210318