489
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Examining the effect of social influence on student performance through network autocorrelation models

, &
Pages 115-127 | Received 31 Jan 2014, Accepted 06 May 2015, Published online: 04 Jun 2015

References

  • G. Adelfio, G. Boscaino, and V. Capursi. A new indicator for higher education student performance, Higher Educ. 68 (2014), pp. 653–668.
  • L. Anselin, Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1988.
  • M. Attanasio and V. Capursi, eds., Statistical Methods for the Evaluation of University Systems, Physica, Heidelberg, 2011.
  • S. Bianconcini and S. Cagnone, A general multivariate latent growth model with applications to student achievement, J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 37 (2012), pp. 339–364. doi: 10.3102/1076998610396886
  • Bologna Working Group, A framework for qualifications of the European Higher Education Area. Bologna Working Group Report on Qualifications Frameworks (Copenhagen, Danish Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation), 2005.
  • S.P. Borgatti, A. Mehra, D.J. Brass, and G. Labianca, Network analysis in the social sciences, Science323 (2009), pp. 892–895. doi: 10.1126/science.1165821
  • Y. Bramoullé, H. Djebbari, and B. Fortin, Identification of peer effects through social networks, J. Econom. 150 (2009), pp. 41–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.12.021
  • C.T. Butts, Social network analysis: A methodological introduction, Asian J. Social Psychol. 11 (2008), pp. 13–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2007.00241.x
  • M. Byrne and B. Flood, Examining the relationships among background variables and academic performance of first year accounting students at an Irish University, J. Account. Educ. 26 (2008), pp. 202–212. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2009.02.001
  • S. Celant, The analysis of students' academic achievement: the evaluation of peer effects through relational links, Qual. Quant. 47 (2012), pp. 615–631. doi: 10.1007/s11135-011-9536-8
  • W. Cheng, W. Ickes, and L. Verhofstadt, How is family support related to students' GPA scores? A longitudinal study, Higher Educ. 64 (2012), pp. 399–420. doi: 10.1007/s10734-011-9501-4
  • A. Chevalier, S. Gibbons, A. Thorpe, M. Snell, and S. Hoskins, Students' academic self-perception, Econom. Educ. Rev. 28 (2009), pp. 716–727. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.06.007
  • D. Contini, Immigrant background peer effects in Italian schools, Social Sci. Res. 42 (2013), pp. 1122–1142. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.02.003
  • M. De Paola and V. Scoppa, Peer group effects on the academic performance of Italian students, Appl. Econ. 42 (2010), pp. 2203–2215. doi: 10.1080/00036840701765478
  • A.K. Dills and R. Hernández-Julián, Course scheduling and academic performance, Econ. Educ. Rev. 27 (2008), pp. 646–654. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.08.001
  • P. Doreian, Linear models with spatially distributed data: spatial disturbances or spatial effects?, Sociol. Methods Res. 9 (1980), pp. 29–60. doi: 10.1177/004912418000900102
  • P. Doreian, When the data points are not independent, in Developments in Data Analysis, A. Ferligoj and A. Kramberger, eds., Metodoloski zvezki, 1996, pp. 27–46.
  • P. Doreian, K. Teuter, and C.-H Wang, Network autocorrelation models: some Monte Carlo results, Sociol. Methods Res. 13 (1984), pp. 155–200. doi: 10.1177/0049124184013002001
  • M.M. Dow, Galton's problem as multiple network autocorrelation effects cultural trait transmission and ecological constraint, Cross-cult. Res. 41 (2007), pp. 336–363.
  • M.M. Dow, M.L. Burton, and D.R. White, Network autocorrelation: a simulation study of a foundational problem in regression and survey research, Social Netw. 4 (1982), pp. 169–200. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(82)90031-4
  • M. Enea and M. Attanasio, An association model for bivariate data with application to the analysis of university students' success, J. Appl. Stat. (2015), pp. 1–12 ( ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1080/02664763.2014.998407
  • G. Foster, Teacher effects on student attrition and performance in mass-market tertiary education, Higher Educ. 60 (2010), pp. 301–319. doi: 10.1007/s10734-009-9301-2
  • K. Fujimoto, C. -P. Chou, and T.W. Valente, The network autocorrelation model using two-mode data: Affiliation exposure and potential bias in the autocorrelation parameter, Social Netw. 33 (2011), pp. 231–243. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2011.06.001
  • G. Huon, B. Spehar, P. Adam, and W. Rifkin, Resource use and academic performance among first year psychology students, Higher Educ. 53 (2007), pp. 1–27. doi: 10.1007/s10734-005-1727-6
  • V.E. Johnson, An alternative to traditional GPA for evaluating student performance, Statist. Sci. 12 (1997), pp. 251–269. doi: 10.1214/ss/1030037959
  • D. Kember, Q.W. Jamieson, M. Pomfret, and E.T.T. Wong, Learning approaches, study time and academic performance, Higher Educ. 29 (1995), pp. 329–343. doi: 10.1007/BF01384497
  • D. Kennedy, Writing and Using Learning Outcomes: A Practical Guide, University College Cork, 2007.
  • R.Th.A.J. Leenders, Longitudinal behavior of network structure and actor attributes: modeling interdependence of contagion and selection, in Evolution of Social Networks, P. Doreian and F. Stokman, eds., Routledge, The Netherlands, 1997, pp. 165–184.
  • R.Th.A.J. Leenders, Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: Constructing the weight matrix, Social Netw. 24 (2002), pp. 21–47. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8733(01)00049-1
  • A. Lizzio, K. Wilson, and R. Simons, University students' perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: implications for theory and practice, Studies Higher Educ. 27 (2002), pp. 27–52. doi: 10.1080/03075070120099359
  • C.F. Manski, Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem, Rev. Econ. Stud. 60 (1993), pp. 531–542. doi: 10.2307/2298123
  • S. Maroulis and L.M. Gomez, Does ‘Connectedness’ matter? Evidence from a social network analysis within a small-school reform, Teachers College Record 110 (2008), pp. 1901–1929.
  • P. Marsden, Survey methods for network data, in The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis, J. Scott and P.J. Carrington, eds., Sage, London, 2011, pp. 370–388.
  • P.V. Marsden and N.E. Friedkin, Network studies of social influence, Sociol. Methods Res. 22 (1993), pp. 127–151. doi: 10.1177/0049124193022001006
  • C. Mills, J. Heyworth, L. Rosenwax, S. Carr, and M. Rosenberg, Factors associated with the academic success of first year health science students, Adv. Health Sci. Educ. 14 (2009), pp. 205–217. doi: 10.1007/s10459-008-9103-9
  • M.S. Mizruchi and E.J. Neuman, The effect of density on the level of bias in the network autocorrelation model, Social Netw. 30 (2008), pp. 190–200. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2008.02.002
  • A.J. O'Malley, The analysis of social network data: an exciting frontier for statisticians, Stat. Med. 32 (2013), pp. 539–555. doi: 10.1002/sim.5630
  • O. Poldin, D. Valeeva, and M. Yudkevich, How social ties affect peer group effects: Case of university students, Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BPR 15, 2013.
  • M.G. Ramírez Ortiz, J.R. Caballero Hoyos, and M.G. Ramírez López, The social networks of academic performance in a student context of poverty in Mexico, Social Netw. 26 (2004), pp. 175–188. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2004.01.010
  • B. Rienties, S. Beausaert, T. Grohnert, S. Niemantsverdriet, and P. Kommers, Understanding academic performance of international students: the role of ethnicity, academic and social integration, Higher Educ. 63 (2012), pp. 685–700. doi: 10.1007/s10734-011-9468-1
  • B. Sacerdote, Peer effects in education: How might they work, how big are they and how much do we know thus far? in Handbook of the Economics of Education, E.A. Hanushek, S.J. Machin and L. Woessmann, eds., Vol. 3, Elsevier, St. Louis, MO, 2011, pp. 249–277.
  • A. Skrondal and P. Laake, Regression among factor scores, Psychometrika 66 (2001), pp. 563–575. doi: 10.1007/BF02296196
  • K.C. Soh, Grade point average: what's wrong and what's the alternative?, J. Higher Educ. Policy Manag. 33 (2010), pp. 27–36. doi: 10.1080/1360080X.2011.537009
  • J.D. Vermunt, Relations between student learning patterns and personal and contextual factors and academic performance, Higher Educ. 49 (2005), pp. 205–234. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-6664-2
  • S. Wasserman and K. Faust, Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994.
  • E.A. Weihua, Models and methods to identify peer effects, in The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis, J. Scott and P.J. Carrington, eds., Sage, London, 2011, pp. 514–532.
  • B. Zhang, A.C. Thomas, P. Doreian, D. Krackhardt, and R. Krishnan, Contrasting multiple social network autocorrelations for binary outcomes, with applications to technology adoption, ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst. 3 (2013), pp. 1–21.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.