Bayesian deconvolution of oil well test data using Gaussian processes

References

• A. Acuna, I. Ershaghi, Y.C. Yortsos, P.E. Program, and L. Angeles, Fractal analysis of pressure transients in the geysers geothermal field, Proceedings of the 17th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering SGP-TR-141 (1992), pp. 87–93.
   Google Scholar
• B. Amizic, L. Spinoulas, R. Molina, and A.K. Katsaggelos, Compressive blind image deconvolution, IEEE T. Image Process. 22 (2013), pp. 3994–4006. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2013.2266100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Andrecut, Pressure rate deconvolution methods for well test analysis, Mod. Phys. Lett. B 23 (2009), pp. 1027–1051. doi: 10.1142/S0217984909019272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Bay, Fundamentals of Linear State Space Systems, McGraw-Hill, Stanford, CA, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• M.J. Bayarri, J.O. Berger, A. Forte, and G. García-Donato, Criteria for Bayesian model choice with application to variable selection, Ann. Stat. 40 (2012), pp. 1550–1577. doi: 10.1214/12-AOS1013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M. Bernardo and A.F.M. Smith, Bayesian Theory, Wiley, New York, NY, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• N. Bissantz, L. Dümbgen, H. Holzmann, and A. Munk, Non-parametric confidence bands in deconvolution density estimation, J. R. Stat. Soc. B. 69 (2007), pp. 483–506. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.599.x
   Google Scholar
• D. Bourdet, Well test analysis: the use of advanced interpretation models, in Handbook of Petroleum Exploration and Production, J. Cubitt, ed., chap. 3, Handbook of Petroleum Exploration and Production, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2002, p. 416.
   Google Scholar
• T.F. Chan and C.K. Wong, Total variation blind deconvolution, IEEE T. Image Process. 7 (1998), pp. 370–375. doi: 10.1109/83.661187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Chang and Y.C. Yortsos, Pressure-transient analysis of fractal reservoirs, SPE Form. Eval. 5 (1990), p. 631.
   Google Scholar
• G. Christakos, Random Field Models in Earth Sciences, Academic Press, Inc., Boston, MA, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• J. Christen, C. Fox, D. Pérez-Ruiz, and M. Santana-Cibrian, On optimal direction gibbs sampling, Arxiv preprint (2012) Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.4062v1.
   Google Scholar
• O.O. Duru and R.N. Horne, Simultaneous interpretation of pressure, temperature, and flow-rate data using Bayesian inversion methods, SPE Reser. Eval. Eng. (2011), pp. 225–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Flamenco-Lopez and R. Camacho-Velazquez, Determination of fractal parameters of fracture networks using pressure-transient data, SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering SPE82607, (2003) pp. 39–47.
   Google Scholar
• A. Gelman, X. Meng, and H. Stern, Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies, Stat. Sinica 6 (1996), pp. 733–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I.I. Gihman and A.V. Skorohod, The Theory of Stochastic Processes, Vol. 1, Springer, New York, NY, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• A. Goldenshluger, On pointwise adaptive nonparametric deconvolution, Bernoulli 5 (1999), pp. 907–925. doi: 10.2307/3318449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Gregson, F. Heide, M. Hullin, M. Rouf, and W. Heidrich, Stochastic Deconvolution, in 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2013, pp. 1043–1050.
   Google Scholar
• A.C. Gringarten, From straight lines to deconvolution: the evolution of the state of the art in well test analysis, SPE102079 (2008), pp. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• J.A. Hoeting, D. Madigan, A.E. Raftery, and C.T. Volinsky, Bayesian model averaging: A tutorial, Stat. Sci. 14 (1999), pp. 382–417. doi: 10.1214/ss/1009212519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Holsclaw, B. Sansó, H. Lee, D. Higdon, K. Heitmann, U. Alam, and S. Habib, Gaussian process modeling of derivative curves, Techonmetrics 55 (2012), pp. 57–67. doi: 10.1080/00401706.2012.723918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Ilk, P.P. Valkó, and T.A. Blasingame, A deconvolution method based on cumulative production for continuously measured flowrate and pressure data, SPE111269 (2007), pp. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• T.D. Johnson, Bayesian deconvolution analysis of pulsatile hormone concentration profiles, Biometrics 59 (2003), pp. 650–660. doi: 10.1111/1541-0420.00075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I.M. Johnstone, G. Kerkyacharian, D. Picard, and M. Raimondo, Wavelet deconvolution in a periodic setting, J. R. Stat. Soc. B. 66 (2004), pp. 547–573. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2004.02056.x
   Google Scholar
• V. Kolehmainen, M. Lassas, K. Niinimäki, and S. Siltanen, Sparsity-promoting Bayesian inversion, Inverse Probl. 28 (2012), p. 025005. Available at: http://stacks.iop.org/0266-5611/28/i=2/a=025005. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/28/2/025005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Kuchuk, M. Onur, and F. Hollander, Pressure transient formation and well testing convolution, deconvolution and nonlinear estimation, Developments in Petroleum Science, Vol. 57, Elsevier, San Diego, CA, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• M.M. Levitan, Practical application of pressure/rate deconvolution to analysis of real well tests, SPE84390 (2005), pp. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• M.M. Levitan, G.E. Crawford, and A. Hardwick, Practical considerations for pressure-rate deconvolution of well-test data, SPE90680 (2006), pp. 35–47.
   Google Scholar
• B. Minasny and A.B. McBratney, The Matèrn function as a general model for soil variograms, Geoderma 128 (2005), pp. 192–207. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Onur, M. Çnar, D. Ilk, P.P. Valko, T.A. Blasingame, and P. Hegeman, An investigation of recent deconvolution methods for well-test data analysis, SPE 102575 (2008), pp. 226–247.
   Google Scholar
• A. Palafox, M. Capistrán, and J. Christen, Effective parameter dimension via Bayesian model selection in the inverse acoustic scattering problem, Math. Probl. Eng. 2014 (2014), p. 427203, Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/427203. doi: 10.1155/2014/427203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Rasmussen, Gaussian processes to speed up hybrid monte carlo for expensive Bayesian integrals, in Bayesian Statistics 7, Oxford University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Schlumberger, Well Test Interpretation, Schlumberger testing Services, Schlumberger, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• M.A. van de Wiel and K. In Kim, Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution, Biometrics 63 (2007), pp. 806–815. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00736.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.V. von Schroeter, F. Hollaender, A.C. Gringarten, and H. Álzaga Ruiz, Deconvolution of Well Test Data as a Nonlinear Total Least Squares Problem, SPE71574 (2001), pp. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• M.J. Wichura, Algorithm as 241: The percentage points of the normal distribution, Appl. Stat. 37 (1988), pp. 477–484. doi: 10.2307/2347330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar