179
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Flexible latent trait aggregation to analyze employability after the Ph.D. in Italy

, &
Pages 180-194 | Received 31 Jan 2014, Accepted 27 Jul 2015, Published online: 02 Sep 2015

References

  • T. Agasisti and C. Perez-Esparrells, Comparing efficiency in a cross-country perspective: The case of Italian and Spanish state universities, High. Educ. 59 (2010), pp. 85–103. doi: 10.1007/s10734-009-9235-8
  • A. Agresti, Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2002.
  • F. Aiello and M. Attanasio, How to Transform a Batch of Simple Indicators to Make Up a Unique One, Proceedings of the XLII SIS Scientific Meeting, Padova, Italy, 2004, pp. 308–328.
  • D. Andrich, A rating formulation for ordered response categories, Psychometrika 43 (1978), pp. 561–573. doi: 10.1007/BF02293814
  • D. Andrich, The Rasch Model Explained, Applied Rasch Measurement: A Book of Exemplars, Springer, Dordrecht, NL, 2005, 27–59.
  • G. Ballarino and S. Colombo, Occupational outcomes of PhD graduates in Northern Italy, Ital. J. Sociol. Ed. 2 (2010), pp. 149–171.
  • K.A. Bender and J.S. Heywood, Educational Mismatch Among PhDs: Determinants and Consequences, Science and Engineering Careers in the United States: An Analysis of Markets and Employment, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2009, 229–255.
  • K.A. Bender and J.S. Heywood, Educational mismatch and the careers of scientists, Ed. Econ. 19 (2011), pp. 253–274. doi: 10.1080/09645292.2011.577555
  • S. Campostrini, After the PhD: A Study of Career Paths, Job and Training Satisfaction among PhD Graduates from an Italian University, Statistical Methods for the Evaluation of University Systems, Springer, Heidelberg, DE, 2011, 209–222.
  • G. Capano, Looking for serendipity: the problematical reform of government within Italy's universities, Higher Ed. 55 (2008), pp. 481–504. doi: 10.1007/s10734-007-9069-1
  • A. Chevalier, Graduate Over-Education in the UK, Centre for the Economics of Education, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, 2000.
  • CILEA, Laureati STELLA, indagine occupazionale post-dottorato, dottori di ricerca 2007–2008, Tech. Rep., CILEA, Segrate, 2010.
  • CILEA, Laureati STELLA, indagine occupazionale post-dottorato, dottori di ricerca 2008–2009, Tech. Rep., CILEA, Segrate, 2011.
  • CNVSU, Progetto per la ricognizione, raccolta e analisi dei dati esistenti sul dottorato di ricerca e per l'indagine sull'inserimento professionale dei dottori di ricerca, Tech. Rep., ADI – Associazione Dottorandi e Dottori di Ricerca Italiani, 2006.
  • C. Cook, F. Health, and R.L. Thompson, A meta-analysis of response rates in web-or internet-based surveys, Educ. Psychol. Meas. 60 (2000), pp. 821–836. doi: 10.1177/00131640021970934
  • G. Croce and E. Ghignoni, Overeducation and Spatial Flexibility in Italian Local Labour Markets, 2011. Available at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/29670.
  • A. D'Agostino and G. Ghellini, Labour Market Outcomes for Ph.D. Graduates, Statistical Methods for the Evaluation of University Systems, Springer, Heidelberg, DE, 2011, 209–222.
  • C. Dehon, A. McCathie, and V. Verardi, Uncovering excellence in academic rankings: A closer look at the Shanghai ranking, Scientometrics 83 (2010), pp. 515–524. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0076-0
  • A. Di Paolo, (Endogenous) occupational choices and job satisfaction among recent PhD recipients: evidence from Catalonia, XREAP2012-21, 2012.
  • A. Djokovic, V. Jeremic, and Z. Radojicic, Towards efficient elementary school education: A serbian perspective, Actual Prob. Econ. 137 (2012), pp. 294–300.
  • G.L. Gaeta, Was it worth it? An empirical analysis of over-education among Ph. D. recipients in Italy, Tech. Rep., 2013.
  • C. Girotti, C. Luzzatto, and F. Mauriello, Verso il monitoraggio degli esiti occupazionali dei dottori di ricerca, in XI Rapporto sulla condizione occupazionale dei laureati. Occupazione e occupabilità dei laureati. A dieci anni dalla Dichiarazione di Bologna, AlmaLaurea, Chap. 5, Il Mulino, 2010.
  • R.K. Hambleton, H. Swaminathan, and H. Jane Rogers, Fundamentals of Item Response Theory, Sage publications, Newbury Park, CA, 1991.
  • ISTAT, L'indagine sui dottori di ricerca: un'esperienza pilota, Tech. Rep. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica, 2009.
  • V. Jeremić, M. Bulajic, M. Martić, and Z. Radojičić, A fresh approach to evaluating the academic ranking of world universities, Scientometrics 87 (2011), pp. 587–596. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0361-6
  • V. Jeremić, M. Jovanović-Milenković, Z. Radojičić, and M. Martić, Excellence with leadership: The crown indicator of SCImago institutions rankings IBER report, El Profesional de la información 22 (2013), pp. 474–480. doi: 10.3145/epi.2013.sep.13
  • F.N. Kerlinger, Foundations of Behavioral Research, 3rd ed., New York, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1986.
  • M. Kittleson, Determining effective follow-up of e-mail surveys, Am. J. Health Behav. 21 (1997), pp. 193–196.
  • J.A. Krosnick, Survey research, Annu. Rev. Psychol. 50 (1999), pp. 537–567. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.537
  • H.-F. Lee, M. Miozzo, and P. Laredo, Career patterns and competences of PhDs in science and engineering in the knowledge economy: The case of graduates from a UK research-based university, Res. Pol. 39 (2010), pp. 869–881. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.001
  • G.N. Masters, A Rasch model for partial credit scoring, Psychometrika 47 (1982), pp. 149–174. doi: 10.1007/BF02296272
  • D.D. Nulty, The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done?, Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 33 (2008), pp. 301–314. doi: 10.1080/02602930701293231
  • C. Quintano, R. Castellano, and A. D'Agostino, Graduates in economics and educational mismatch: The case study of the University of Naples Parthenope, J. Educ. Work 21 (2008), pp. 249–271. doi: 10.1080/13639080802214118
  • Z. Radojicic and V. Jeremic, Quantity or quality: What matters more in ranking higher education institutions?, Curr. Sci. 103 (2012), pp. 158–162.
  • G. Rasch, Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, Copenhagen, The Danish Institute of Educational Research, 1960.
  • J. Rey-Rocha, M.J. Martín-Sempere, J. Martínez-Frías, and F. López-Vera, Some misuses of journal impact factor in research evaluation, Cortex 37 (2001), pp. 595–597. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70603-8
  • J.T.E. Richardson, Instruments for obtaining student feedback: A review of the literature, Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 30 (2005), pp. 387–415. doi: 10.1080/02602930500099193
  • I. Stolz, D. Hendel, and A.S. Horn, Ranking of rankings: Benchmarking twenty-five higher education ranking systems in Europe, High. Educ. 60 (2010), pp. 507–528. doi: 10.1007/s10734-010-9312-z
  • R. Van de Schoot, M. Yerkes, and H. Sonneveld, The employment status of doctoral recipients: An exploratory study in the Netherlands, Int. J. Dr. Stud. 7 (2012), pp. 331–348.
  • F. Weimiao and Y. Zheng, Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review, Comput. Hum. Behav. 26 (2010), pp. 132–139. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.015

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.