Corporate Social Responsibility perception versus human values: a structural equation modeling approach

References

• G. Alexander and R.A. Buchholz, Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance, Acad. Manage. J. 21 (1982), pp. 479–486. doi: 10.2307/255728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.W. Allport, Pattern and Growth in Personality, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• A. Argandoña, Fostering values in organisations, J. Bus. Ethics 45 (2003), pp. 15–28. doi: 10.1023/A:1024164210743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Arlow, Personal characteristics in college students’ evaluations of business ethics and corporate social responsibility, J. Bus. Ethics 10 (1991), pp. 3–69. doi: 10.1007/BF00383694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Arratia Figueroa, Ética, solidaridad y “aprendizaje servicio” en la Educación Superior, Acta Biotécnica 14 (2008), pp. 61–67.
   Google Scholar
• K.E. Aupperle, A.B. Carroll, and J.D. Hatfield, An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability, Acad. Manage. J. 28 (1985), pp. 446–463. doi: 10.2307/256210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.A. Baden, I.A. Harwood, and D.G. Woodward, The effect of buyer pressure on suppliers in SMEs to demonstrate CSR practices: An added incentive or counter productive? Eur. Manage. J. 27 (2009), pp. 429–441. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2008.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Bakan, The Duality of Human Existence, Rand McNally, Chicago, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• E.R. Balotsky, and D.S. Steingard, How Teaching Business Ethics Makes a Difference: Findings from an Ethical Learning Model, J. Buss. Eth. Educ. 3 (2016), pp. 5–34.
   Google Scholar
• D.W. Barclay, C.A. Higgins, and R. Thompson, The partial least squares approach to causal modelling: Personal computer adoption and use as illustration, Technol. Stud. 2 (1995), pp. 285–309.
   Google Scholar
• William M. Baum, Understanding Behaviorism: Science, Behavior, and Culture, HarperCollins College Publishers, New York, NY, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• J.M. Becker, K. Klein, and M. Wetzels, Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using reflective-formative type models, Long Range Plann. 5 (2012), pp. 359–394. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2012.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Bigné-Alcaniz, R. Chumpitaz, L. Andreu, and V. Swaen, Percepción de la Responsabilidad Social Corporativa: Un análisis Cross-Cultural. Universia Bus. Rev. 19 (2005), pp. 14–27.
   Google Scholar
• E. Bigné-Alcaniz and R. Curras-Perez, Does corporate social responsibility image influence on purchase intent? The role of consumer company identification, Universia Bus. Rev. 19 (2008), pp. 10–23.
   Google Scholar
• R. Bird, A.D. Hall, F. Momentè, and F. Reggiani, What corporate social responsibility activities are valued by the market? J. Bus. Ethics 76 (2007), pp. 189–206. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9268-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.H. Bond, Finding universal dimension of individual variation in multi-cultural studies of values: The Rokeach and Chinese value surveys, J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 55 (1988), pp. 1009–1115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Cassel, P. Hackl, and A.H. Westlund, Robustness of partial least squares method for estimating latent variable quality sturctures, J. Appl. Stat. 26 (1999), pp. 435–446. doi: 10.1080/02664769922322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Ceja, El papel de la mujer en la empresa familiar: el reconocimiento de un rol crítico pero a veces invisible, Newsletter 28 (2008), pp. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• W.W. Chin, Issues and opinión on structural equation modelling, Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 22 (1998), pp. 7–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.W. Chin, The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling, in Modern Methods for Business Research, G.A. Marcoulides, ed., Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, HJ, 1998, pp. 295–236.
   Google Scholar
• N. Chodorow, What is the relation between psychoanalytic feminism and the psychoanalytic psychology of women? in Theoretical Perspectives on Sexual Difference, D. Rhode, ed., Yale University Press, New Haven, 1990, pp. 181–197.
   Google Scholar
• D.Y. Choi and E.R. Gray, Socially responsible entrepreneurs: What do they do to create and build their companies? Bus. Horizons 51 (2008), pp. 341–352. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2008.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Coate and K. Frey, Some evidence on the ethical disposition of accounting students: Context and gender implications, Teach. Bus. Ethics 4 (2000), pp. 379–404. doi: 10.1023/A:1009827807550
   Google Scholar
• A. Dahlsrud, How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions, Corp. Soc. Resp. Env. Ma. 15 (2008), pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1002/csr.132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. DeSalvia and G. Gemmill, An exploratory study of the personal value systems of college students and managers, Acad. Manage. J. 14 (1971), pp. 227–238. doi: 10.2307/255309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DTI, Business and Society: Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2002, HMSO, London, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, Green paper: Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility, Brussels, 2001, COM (2001), 366 final.
   Google Scholar
• M. Fernando, Corporate social responsibility in the wake of the Asian tsunami: Effect of time on the genuineness of CSR initiatives, Eur. Manage. J. 28 (2010), pp. 68–79. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2009.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Fornell and J. Cha, Partial least squares, in Advanced Methods of Marketing, R. Bagozzi, ed., Blackwell, Cambridge, UK, 1994, pp. 52–78.
   Google Scholar
• S. Geisser, A predictive approach to the random effects model, Biometrika 61 (1974), pp. 101–107. doi: 10.1093/biomet/61.1.101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Gilligan, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• M. Rosario González-Rodríguez, M. Carmen Díaz-Fernández, and B. Simonetti, The social, economic and environmental dimensions of corporate social responsibility: The role played by consumers and potential entrepreneurs, Int. Bus. Rev. 24 (2015), pp. 836–848. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Goodhue, W. Lewis, and R. Thompson, Does PLS have advantages for small sample size or non-normal data? Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 36 (2012), pp. 891–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.B. Green, How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis, Multivar. Behav. Res. 26 (1991), pp. 499–510. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.J. Griffin and J.F. Mahon, The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate. Twenty-five years of incomparable research, Bus. Society 36 (1997), pp. 5–31. doi: 10.1177/000765039703600102
   Google Scholar
• S. Guimond, N.R.S. Brunot Branscombe, A.P. Buunk, A. Chatard, M. Désert, D.M. Garcia, S. Haque, D. Martinot, and V. Yzerbyt, Culture, gender, and the self: Variations and impact of social comparison processes, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 92 (2007), pp. 1118–1134. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.F. Hair, W.C. Black, B.J. Babin, and R.E. Anderson, Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• J.F. Hair, G.T. Hult, C.M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM), Sage, London, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• J.F. Hair, C.M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, PLS: Indeed a silver bullet, J. Mark. Theory Pract. 19 (2011), pp. 139–151. doi: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
   Google Scholar
• J.F. Hair, C.M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance, Long Range Plann. 46 (2013), pp. 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Harwood, S. Humby, and A. Harwood, On the resilience of corporate social responsibility, Eur. Manage. J. 29 (2011), pp. 283–290. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2011.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Henseler, C.M. Ringle, and R.R. Sinkovics, The use of partial least squares path modelling in international marketing, Adv. Int. Market. 20 (2009), pp. 277–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Hofstede, Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• J. Hulland, Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies, Strategic Manage. J. 20 (1999), pp. 195–204. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195::AID-SMJ13>3.0.CO;2-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.E. Ibrahim, M. Joseph, and K.I.N. Ibeh, Customers’ perception of electronic service delivery in the UK retail banking sector, Int. J. Bank Market. 24 (2006), pp. 475–493. doi: 10.1108/02652320610712094
   Google Scholar
• L.R. Kahle, Social values and consumer behavior: Research from the list of values, in The Psychology of Values: The Ontario Symposium, C. Seligman, J.M. Olson, and M.P. Zanna, eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, 1996, vol. 8, pp. 135–151.
   Google Scholar
• L.R. Kahle, S.E. Beatty, and P. Homer, Alternative measurement approaches to consumer values: The list of values (lov) and values and life style (vals), J. Consum. Res. 13 (1986), pp. 405–409. doi: 10.1086/209079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Koivula, Basic human values in the workplace, Soc. Psychol. Stud. 17 (2008), pp. 1–141.
   Google Scholar
• K.C. Lam and G.C. Shi, Factors affecting ethical attitudes in Mainland China and Hong Kong, J. Bus. Ethics 77 (2008), pp. 463–479. doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9360-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Longenecker, J. McKinney, and C. Moore, The generation Gap in business ethics, Bus. Horizons 32 (1989), pp. 9–14. doi: 10.1016/0007-6813(89)90076-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Moskowitz, Choosing socially responsible stocks, Bus. Society 1 (1972), pp. 71–75.
   Google Scholar
• J.C. Nunally, Psycometric Theory, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• J.C. Nunnally and I. Berstein, Psycometric Theory, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• T. Parsons and R.F. Bales, Family, Socialization and Interaction Process, The Free Press, Glencoe, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• E. Pohjanheimo, Arvojen muutos, työ ja sosiaalinen tausta. Tutkimus työikäisistä pyhtääläisistä 1982–1993 (Research reports No 1). Study of University of Helsinki, Department of Social Psychology, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• A. Pomering and L.W. Johnson, Advertising corporate social responsibility initiatives to communicate corporate image. Inhibiting scepticism to enhance persuasion, Corp. Commun. Int. J. 14 (2009), pp. 326–340.
   Google Scholar
• M. Puohiniemi, Täsmäelämä ja uusyhteisöllisyyden aika, Limor kustannus, Vantaa, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• D.V. Rama, S.P. Ravenscroft, S.K. Wolcott, and E. Zlotkowski, Service-learning outcomes: Guidelines for educators and researchers, Issues in Accounting Education 15 (2000), pp. 657–692. doi: 10.2308/iace.2000.15.4.657
   Google Scholar
• W. Reinartz, M. Haenlein, M.P. Schloderer, and M. Schwaiger, The value-relevance of corporate reputation during the financial crisis, J. Prod. Brand Manag. 19 (2010), pp. 389–400. doi: 10.1108/10610421011085703
   Google Scholar
• C.M. Ringle, S. Wende, and A. Will, SmartPLs 2.0, 2005. Computer software available at http://www.smartpls.de.
   Google Scholar
• S. Roberts, R. Lawson, and J. Nicholls, Generating regional scale improvements in SME corporate responsibility performance. Lessons from responsibility Northwest, J. Bus. Ethics 67(3) (2006), pp. 275–286. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9184-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Rokeach, The Nature of Human Values, The Free Press, New York, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• M. Rokeach, Understanding Human Values, Free Press, New York, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• R.M. Ryckman and D.M. Houston, Value priorities in American and British female and Male university students, J. Soc. Psychol. 143 (2003), pp. 127–138. doi: 10.1080/00224540309598435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.H. Schwartz, Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries, in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, M. P. Zonna, ed., Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1992, pp. 1–66.
   Google Scholar
• S.H. Schwartz, Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? J. Soc. Issues 50 (1994), pp. 19–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.H. Schwartz, Value priorities and behaviour: Applying a theory of integrated value systems, in The Psychology of Values: The Ontario Symposium, C. Seligman, J.M. Olson, and M.P. Zanna, eds., Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1996, vol. 8, pp. 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• S.H. Schwartz, A theory of cultural values and some implications for work”, Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev. 48 (1999), pp. 23–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1999.tb00047.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.H. Schwartz, Robustness and fruitfulness of a theory of universals in individual human values, in Valores e comportamento nas organizacións (Values and Behavior in Organisations), A. Tamayo and J. Porto, eds., Vozes, Petropolis, Brazil, 2005a, pp. 56–95.
   Google Scholar
• S.H. Schwartz, Basic human values: Their content and structure across countries, in Valores e comportamento nas organizações, A. Tamayo and J.B. Porto, eds., Vozes, Petrópolis, Brazil, 2005b, pp. 21–55.
   Google Scholar
• S.H. Schwartz, Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations, in Measuring Attitudes Cross Nationally - Lessons from the European Social Survey, R. Jowell, C. Roberts, R. Fitzgerald, and G. Eva, eds., Sage, London, 2006, pp. 169–203.
   Google Scholar
• S.H. Schwartz and A. Bardi, Influences of adaptation to communist rule on value priorities in Eastern Europe, Pol. Psychol. 18 (1997), pp. 385–410. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.H. Schwartz and A. Bardi, Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective, J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 32 (2001), pp. 268–290. doi: 10.1177/0022022101032003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.H. Schwartz and W. Bilsky, Toward a universal psychological structure of human values, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 53 (1987), pp. 550–562. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.H. Schwartz and W. Bilsky, Toward a theory of the universal structure and content of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58 (1990), pp. 878–891. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.H. Schwartz and K. Boehnke, Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis, J. Res. Person. 38 (2004), pp. 230–255. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00069-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.H. Schwartz, G. Melech, A. Lehmann, S. Burgess, and M. Harris, Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement, J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 32 (2001), pp. 519–542. doi: 10.1177/0022022101032005001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.H. Schwartz and T. Rubel, Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multi-method studies, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 89 (2005), pp. 1010–1028. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.1010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.W. Scott, Deconstructing equality-versus-difference: Or, the uses of poststructuralist theory for feminism, Feminist Studies. 14 (1988), pp. 32–50. doi: 10.2307/3177997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.E. Siltaoja, Value priorities as combining core factors between CSR and reputation – a qualitative study, J. Bus. Ethics 68 (2006), pp. 91–111. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9042-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.F. Skinner, The operational analysis of psychological terms, Behav. Brain Sci. 7 (1984), pp. 547–581. Retrieved 2008-01-10. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00027187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Sobczak, G. Debucquet, and C. Havard, The impact of higher education on students’ and young managers’ perception of companies and CSR: An exploratory analysis, Corp. Gov. 6 (2006), pp. 463–474. doi: 10.1108/14720700610689577
   Google Scholar
• G. Stevens, Ethical inclinations of tomorrow’s citizens: Actions speak louder? J. Bus. Edu. 59 (1984), pp. 147–152.
   Google Scholar
• M. Stone, Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions, J. R. Stat. Soc. 36 (1974), pp. 111–147.
   Google Scholar
• A. Ullmann, Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationship among social performance, social disclosure and economic performance, Acad. Manag. Rev. 10 (1985), pp. 450–477.
   Google Scholar
• L. Wang and H. Juslin, The effects of value on the perception of corporate social responsibility implementation: A study of Chinese youth, Corp. Soc. Resp. Env. Ma. 18 (2011), pp. 246–262. doi: 10.1002/csr.250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Wang and H. Juslin, Values and corporate social responsibility perceptions of Chinese university students, J. Acad. Ethics 10 (2012), pp. 57–82. doi: 10.1007/s10805-012-9148-5
   Google Scholar
• J.B. Watson, Behaviorism, W W Norton & Co., New York, NY, US, 1930.
   Google Scholar
• J. Weber and S.M. Glyptis, Measuring the impact of a business ethics course and community service experience on students’ values and opinions, Teach. Bus. Ethics 4 (2000), pp. 341–358. doi: 10.1023/A:1009862806641
   Google Scholar
• P.S. Weber, J.E. Weber, B.J. Sleeper, and K.C. Schneider, Self-efficacy toward service, civic participation and the business student: Scale development and validation, J. Bus. Ethics 49 (2004), pp. 359–369. doi: 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000020881.58352.ab
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Wold, Model Construction and Evaluation When Theoretical Knowledge is Scarce: An Example of the use of Partial Least Squares, Faculteé des Sciences Économiques et Sociales, Université de Gèneve, Genève, Cahiers du Départament D’Econométrie, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• A. Wong, F. Long, and S. Elankumaran, Business students’ perception of corporate social responsibility: The United States, China, and India, Corp. Soc. Resp. Env. Ma. 17 (2010), pp. 299–310. doi: 10.1002/csr.216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar