A fuzzy clustering approach to evaluate individual competencies from REFLEX data

References

• J. Allen and R. van der Veldon (eds.), The Flexible Professional in the Knowledge Society: New Challenges for Higher Education, High Educ. Dyn., 35, Springer, Dordrecht, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• A.G. Aracil and D.P. Montero, Fuzzy cluster analysis on Spanish public universities, Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación 49, 2010, pp. 976–994.
   Google Scholar
• L. Bai, J. Liang, C. Dang, and F. Cao, A novel fuzzy clustering algorithm with between-cluster information for categorical data, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 215 (2013), pp. 55–73. doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2012.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.J. Bartholomew, Latent Variable Models and Factor Analysis, Charles Griffin & Co. Ltd., London, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• R.E. Bellman and L.A. Zadeh, Decision-making in fuzzy environment, Manage. Sci. 17 (1970), pp. B141–B164. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Benati and S. Stefani, The academic journal ranking problem: A fuzzy-clustering approach, J. Classification 28 (2008), pp. 7–20. doi: 10.1007/s00357-011-9072-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Berkman, B. Singer, and K.G. Manton, Black/white differences in health status and mortality among the elderly, Demography 26 (1989), pp. 661–678. doi: 10.2307/2061264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. C. Bezdek, Mathematical models for systematics and taxonomy, in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Numerical Taxonomy, G. Estabrook, ed., W. H. Freeman, S. Francisco, 1974, pp. 143–166.
   Google Scholar
• J.C. Bezdek, Partition structures: A tutorial, in The Analysis of Fuzzy Information, Author ed., Vol. 3, Chapter 6, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1987, pp. 81–107.
   Google Scholar
• J.C. Bezdek and J.D. Harris, Convex decomposition of fuzzy partitions, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 67 (1979), pp. 490–512. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(79)90039-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.C. Borman, Format and training effects on rating accuracy and raters errors, J. Appl. Psychol. 64 (1979), pp. 410–421. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.64.4.410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Buntine and A. Jakulin, Applying discrete PCA in data analysis, UAI '04 Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 2004, pp. 59–66. Available at http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1036851.
   Google Scholar
• J. Calmand, J-F. Giret, C. Guégnard, and J-J. Paul, Why Grande Écoles are so valued? 2009. Available at http://www.decowe.org/static/uploaded/htmlarea/files/Why_Grande_Ecoles_are_so_valued.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• G. Casella, An introduction to empirical Bayes data analysis, Amer. Stat. 39 (1985), pp. 83–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Cassidy, C.F. Pieper, and B.J. Carroll, Subtypes of mania determined by grade of membership analysis, Neuropsychopharmacology 25 (2001), pp. 373–383. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(01)00223-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cedefop, Skill mismatch identifying priorities for future research, Cedefop working paper No. 3, 2009. Available at http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/EN/Files/6103_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• E.C. Cuervo and J.M.P. Andrade, Modeling abilities in 3-IRT models, Rev. Columbiana. Estad. 27 (2004), pp. 27–41.
   Google Scholar
• G. Cumming and S. Finch, Inference by eye: Confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data., Am. Psychol. 60 (2005), pp. 170–180. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.2.170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. DeAngelis, Why we overestimate our competence, Am. Psychol. Assoc. 34 (2003), pp. 60. Available at http://www.apa.org/monitor/feb03/overestimate.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Decision System, Inc., User Documentation for DSIGoM, Version 1.0, 1999. Available at http://dsisoft.com/grade_of_membership.html.
   Google Scholar
• P. D'Urso and R. Massari, Fuzzy clustering of human activity patterns, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 215 (2013), pp. 29–54. doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2012.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.A. Erosheva, Comparing latent structures of grade of membership, Rasch, and latent class models, Psychometrika 70 (2005), pp. 619–628. doi: 10.1007/s11336-001-0899-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Erosheva, S. Fienberg, and C. Joutard, Describing disability through individual-level mixture models for multivariate binary data, Ann. Appl. Stat. 1 (2007), pp. 502–537. doi: 10.1214/07-AOAS126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.E. Fienberg and A. Rinaldo, Three centuries of categorical data analysis: Log-linear models and maximum likelihood estimation, J. Statist. Plann. Inference 137 (2007), pp. 3430–3445. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2007.03.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Flores-Sintas, J.M. Cadenas, and F. Martin, Membership functions in the fuzzy C-means algorithm, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 101 (1999), pp. 49–58. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00062-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.A. Games and J.F. Howell, Pairwise multiple comparison procedures with unequal N's and/or variances: A Monte Carlo study, J. Educ. Study. 1 (1976), pp. 113–125.
   Google Scholar
• I.C. Gormley and T.B. Murphy, A grade of membership model for rank data, Bayesian Anal. 4 (2009), pp. 265–295. doi: 10.1214/09-BA410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, R.G., StataCorp., A stata module for grade of membership (GoM) analysis, SBIR grant number 1R43AG025710, 2004. Available at https://www.sbir.gov/sbirsearch/detail/317523#.
   Google Scholar
• S.J. Haberman, Book review on statistical applications using fuzzy sets, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 90 (1995), pp. 1131–1133. doi: 10.2307/2291362
   Google Scholar
• D. Harris, Comparison of 1-, 2-, and 3-Parameter IRT Models, Instructional Topics in Educational Measurement, Published by National Council on Measurement in Education, Springer, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• S.J. Heine, D.R. Lehman, H.R. Markus, and S. Kitayama, Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychol. Rev. 106 (1999), pp. 766–794. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.A. Jacquez and P. Greif, Numerical parameters identifiability and estimability: Integrating identifiability, estimability and optimal sampling design, Math. Biosci. 77 (1985), pp. 201–227. doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(85)90098-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Kasumov, Metric properties of fuzzy partitions, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 81 (1996), pp. 365–378. doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(95)00203-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Krishnamurthy, High-dimensional clustering with sparse Gaussian mixture models, 2011. Available at http://www.cs.cmu.edu/∼akshaykr/files/sgmm_paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• B. Li and D. Wang, Application of fuzzy cluster analysis for academic title evaluation, in Springer Computer and Information Science (CCIS), Proceedings 243, International Conference on Information and Computer Applications, Part I, C. Liu, J. Chang, and A. Yang, eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2011, pp.  221–226.
   Google Scholar
• O. Luaces, J. Diez, A. Alonso-Betanzos, A. Troncoso, and A. Bahamonde, A factorization approach to evaluate open-response assignments in MOOCs using preference learning on peer assessment, Knowledge-Based Syst. 85 (2015), pp. 322–328. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.G. Manton, M.A. Woodbury, and H.D. Tolley, Statistical Applications Using Fuzzy Sets, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• K.G. Manton and X. Gu, Disability declines and trends in medicare expenditures, Ageing Horiz. 2 (2005), pp. 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• M.M. Marini, X. Li, and P.L. Fan, Characterizing latent factor analytic and grade of membership models, Sociol. Methods 26 (1996), pp. 133–164. doi: 10.2307/271021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. McGuiness and P.J. Sloane, Labour market mismatch among UK graduates: An analysis using REFLEX data, Econ. Educ. Rev. 30 (2011), pp. 130–145. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. McLachlan and D. Peel, Finite Mixture Models, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• P. McNamee, A comparison of grade of membership measure with alternative health indicators in explaining costs for older people, Health Econ. 13 (2004), pp. 379–395. doi: 10.1002/hec.833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Namey, G. Guest, L. Thairu, and L. Johnson, Data reduction techniques for large qualitative data sets, 2007. Available at http://www.stanford.edu/∼thairu/07_184.Guest.1sts.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• S. Nascimento, Fuzzy Clustering via Proportional Membership Model, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• K. Petersson, Graduates from higher education in Europe, Stat. Swed, 2007. Available at http://www.fdewb.unimaas.nl/roa/reflex/documents%20public/publications/REFLEX_Sweden.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• REFLEX Master Questionnaire. Available at http://www.fdewb.unimaas.nl/roa/reflex/index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• REFLEX project. Available at http://www.fdewb.unimaas.nl/roa/reflex/.
   Google Scholar
• REFLEX. Available at http://roa.sbe.maastrichtuniversity.nl/?page_id=3727.
   Google Scholar
• E. Reis, A. Suleman, J.G. Dias, D. Nogueira, and C.M. Borges, A new complexity measure to classify ambulatory patients in rehabilitation facilities for financing purposes, Proceedings of the 59th ISI World Statistics Congress, Hong Kong, China, 25–30 August 2013, pp. 4497–4502.
   Google Scholar
• E.H. Ruspini, A new approach to clustering, Inf. Control. 15 (1969), pp. 22–32. doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(69)90591-9
   Google Scholar
• N.B. Sahah, J. Bradley, S. Balakrishnan, A. Parekh, K. Ramchandran, and M. Wainwright, KDD workshop on data mining for educational assessment and feedback, 2014. Available at https://www.google.pt/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=-2pAV6K9JZLY8gfx_YPIAg#q=some+scallin+laws+for+mooc+assess.
   Google Scholar
• N. Sánchez-Sánches and S. McGuinness, Decomposing the impacts of overeducation and overskilling on earnings and job satisfaction: An analysis using REFLEX data, Educ. Econ. 23 (2015), pp. 419–432. doi: 10.1080/09645292.2013.846297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Sathler, R. Monte-Mór, J.A.M. Carvalho, C.J. Machado, and A. Costa, Application of the grade of membership model (GoM) to delineate an urban hierarchy in Brazilian Amazonia, XXVI IUSSP International Population Conference, Marrakech 2009, 27 September – 2 October. Available at http://iussp2009.princeton.edu/download.aspx?submissionId=93326.
   Google Scholar
• D.O. Sawyer, I.C. Leite, and R. Alexandrino, Perfis de Utilizaç ao de Serviços de Saúde no Brasil, Cienc & Saúde Coletiva 7 (2002), pp. 757–776. doi: 10.1590/S1413-81232002000400012
   Google Scholar
• J. Serrano-Guerrero, F.P. Romero, and J.A. Olivas, Hiperion: A fuzzy approach for recommendation educational activities based on the acquisition of competences, Inf. Sci. 248 (2013), pp. 114–129. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Singer, Grade of membership representations: Concept and problems, on Anderson, in Probability, Statistics and Mathematics: Essays in Honor of Samuel Karlin, T.W. Athreya, K.B. and Iglechardt, D., eds., Academic Press, San Diego, 1989, pp. 317–334.
   Google Scholar
• H. Suen, Peer assessment for massive open online courses (MOOCs), The Int. Rev. of Res. in open and Distrib. Learning, 15 (2014). Available at http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1680/2904.
   Google Scholar
• A. Suleman, A convex semi-nonnegative matrix factorisation approach to fuzzy c-means clustering, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 270 (2015), pp. 90–110. doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2014.07.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Suleman and F. Suleman, Ranking by competence using a Fuzzy approach, Qual. Quant. 46 (2012), pp. 323–339. doi: 10.1007/s11135-010-9357-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.G. Talbot and L.M. Talbot, Business radar: Opportunity analysis and metric estimation using a fuzzy grade of membership model, Technol Rev. J. (2003), pp. 87–112.
   Google Scholar
• A.C. Tamhane, A comparison of procedures for multiple comparisons of means with unequal variances, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 74 (1979), pp. 471–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.L. Thorpe and A. Favia, Data analysis using item response theory methodology: An introduction to selected programs and applications, Psychol. Faculty Scholarship, Paper 20, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• R. van der Veldon, Acknowledgements, in The Flexible Professional in the Knowledge Society: New Challenges for Higher Education, J. Allen and R. van der Veldon, eds., High Educ. Dyn., 35. Springer, Dordrecht, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• K.W. Wachter, Grade of membership models in low dimensions, Statist. Paper 40 (1999), pp. 439–457. doi: 10.1007/BF02934635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.A. Woodbury and J. Clive, Clinical pure types as a fuzzy partition, J. Cybern. 4 (1974), pp. 111–121. doi: 10.1080/01969727408621685
   Google Scholar
• M.A. Woodbury, J. Clive, and A. Garson, Jr, Mathematical typology: A grade of membership technique for obtaining disease definition, Comp. Biomed. Res. 11 (1978), pp. 277–298. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(78)90012-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• H. Xiong, M. Steinbach, P.-N. Tan, and V. Kumar, HICAP: Hierarchical clustering with pattern preservation, Proceedings of the Fourth SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, 2004, pp. 279–290.
   Google Scholar
• L.A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Inf. Control 8 (1965), pp. 338–353. doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Zarinbal, M.H.F. Zarandi, and I.B. Turksen, Relative entropy Fuzzy c-means clustering, Inf. Sci.260 (2014), pp. 74–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar