Power analysis of independence testing for three-way contingency tables of small sizes

References

• A. Agresti, Categorical Data Analysis, Wiley, New York, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• A. Agresti and A. Gottard, Independence in multi-way contingency tables: S.N. Roy’s breakthroughs and later developments, J. Statist. Plann. Inference 137 (2007), pp. 3216–3226. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2007.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Alin, Comparison of ordinary and penalized power-divergence test statistics for small and moderate samples in three-way contingency tables via simulation, Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput. 37 (2008), pp. 1593–1602. doi: 10.1080/03610910802050894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.J. Anderson, The analysis of three-way contingency tables by three-mode association models, Psychometrika 61 (1996), pp. 465–483. doi: 10.1007/BF02294550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Bonnini, Testing for heterogeneity with categorical data: Permutation solution vs. bootstrap method, Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 43 (2014), pp. 906–917. doi: 10.1080/03610926.2013.799376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Bonnini, Combined tests for comparing mutabilities of two populations, in Topics in Statistical Simulation, Book of Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Simulation 2013, Rimini, 21–25 May 2013, Springer, New York, 2014, pp. 67–78.
   Google Scholar
• S. Bonnini, Nonparametric test on process capability, in Nonparametric Statistics, Proceedings of the second ISNPS Conference, R. Cao, W. Gonzalez Manteiga, and J. Romo, eds., Cadiz, June 2014, Springer, Switzerland, 2016, pp. 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• S. Bonnini, Multivariate approach for comparative evaluations of customer satisfaction with application to transport services, Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput. 45 (2016), pp. 1554–1568. doi: 10.1080/03610918.2014.941685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.J. Beh and P.J. Davy, Partitioning Pearson’s chi-squared statistic for a completely ordered three-way contingency table, Aust. N. Z. J. Stat. 40 (1998), pp. 465–477. doi: 10.1111/1467-842X.00050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Blitzstein and P. Diaconis, A sequential importance sampling algorithm for generating random graphs with prescribed degrees, Internet Math. 6 (2011), pp. 489–522. doi: 10.1080/15427951.2010.557277
   Google Scholar
• S. Bonnini, L. Corain, M. Marozzi, and L. Salmaso, Nonparametric Hypothesis Testing. Rank and Permutation Methods with Applications in R, Wiley, Chichester, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• S. Bonnini, N. Prodi, L. Salmaso, and C. Visentin, Permutation approaches for stochastic ordering, Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 43 (2014), pp. 2227–2235. doi: 10.1080/03610926.2013.788888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Chen, P. Diaconis, S.P. Holmes, and J.S. Liu, Sequential Monte Carlo methods for statistical analysis of tables, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 100 (2005), pp. 109–120. doi: 10.1198/016214504000001303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Chen, I.H. Dinwoodie, and S. Sullivant, Sequential importance sampling for multiway tables, Ann. Statist. 34 (2006), pp. 523–545. doi: 10.1214/009053605000000822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.J. Conover, Practical Nonparametric Statistics, Wiley, New York, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• N. Cressie and T. Read, Multinomial goodness-of-fit tests, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C. Appl. Stat. Ser B Methodol 46 (1984), pp. 440–464.
   Google Scholar
• M. Cryan and M. Dyer, A polynomial-time algorithm to approximately count contingency tables when the number of rows is constant, J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 67 (2003), pp. 291–310. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0000(03)00014-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Cryan, M. Dyer, L.A. Goldberg, M. Jerrum, and R. Martin, Rapidly mixing Markov chains for sampling contingency tables with a constant number of rows, SIAM J. Comput. 36 (2006), pp. 247–278. doi: 10.1137/S0097539703434243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.A. De Loera and S. Onn, Markov bases of three-way tables are arbitrarily complicated, J. Symbolic Comput. 41 (2006), pp. 173–181. doi: 10.1016/j.jsc.2005.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Desalvo and J.Y. Zhao, Random sampling of contingency tables via probabilistic divide-and-conquer, ArXiv preprint (2016).
   Google Scholar
• P. Diaconis and B. Sturmfels, Algebraic algorithms for sampling from conditional distributions, Ann. Statist. 26 (1998), pp. 363–397. doi: 10.1214/aos/1030563990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Dobra and S. Sullivant, A divide-and-conquer algorithm for generating Markov bases of multi-way tables, Comput. Statist. 19 (2004), pp. 347–366. doi: 10.1007/BF03372101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.S. Fishman, Counting contingency tables via multistage Markov chain Monte Carlo, J. Comput. Graph. Statist. 21 (2012), pp. 713–738. doi: 10.1080/10618600.2012.680369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.A. Giancristofaro and S. Bonnini, Moment-based multivariate permutation tests for ordinal categorical data, J. Nonparametr. Stat. 20 (2008), pp. 383–393. doi: 10.1080/10485250802195440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.A. Giancristofaro, S. Bonnini, and F. Pesarin, A permutation approach for testing heterogeneity in two-sample categorical variables, Stat. Comput. 19 (2009), pp. 209–216. doi: 10.1007/s11222-008-9085-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.A. Giancristofaro, S. Bonnini, L. Corain, and D. Vidotto, Environmental odor perception: Testing regional differences on heterogeneity with application to odor perceptions in the area of Este (Italy), Environmetrics 26 (2015), pp. 418–430. doi: 10.1002/env.2341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.A. Giancristofaro, S. Bonnini, L. Corain, and L. Salmaso, Dependency and truncated forms of combinations in multivariate combination-based permutation tests and ordered categorical variables, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 86 (2016), pp. 3608–3619. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2016.1177826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.A. Giancristofaro, S. Bonnini, and L. Salmaso, Employment status and education/employment relationship of PhD graduates from the University of Ferrara, J. Appl. Stat. 36 (2009), pp. 1329–1344. doi: 10.1080/02664760802638108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Gokhale and S. Kullback, The information in contingency tables, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York and Basel, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• M. Goldstein, E. Wolf, and W. Dillon, On a test of independence for contingency tables, Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 5 (1976), pp. 159–169. doi: 10.1080/03610927808827340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Goodman and W. Kruskal, Measures of association for cross classifications, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 49 (1954), pp. 732–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.N. Gray and J.S. Williams, Goodman and Kruskal’s tau b: Multiple and partial analogs, Sociol. Methods. Res. 10 (1981), pp. 50–62. doi: 10.1177/004912418101000105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.A. Harshman, Foundations of the PARAFAC procedure: Models and conditions for an explanatory multi-modal factor analysis, UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, Vol. 16, 1970, pp. 1–84.
   Google Scholar
• M. Hollander and D.A. Wolfe, Nonparametric Statistical Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, Sydney, Tokyo, Mexico City, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• S. Kang and M.D. Larsen, Tests of independence in incomplete multi-way tables using likelihood functions, J. Korean Statist. Soc. 41 (2012), pp. 189–198. doi: 10.1016/j.jkss.2011.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Lombardo, Three-way association measure decompositions: The Delta index, J. Statist. Plann. Inference 141 (2011), pp. 1789–1799. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2010.11.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Lombardo and E.J. Beh, Simple and multiple correspondence analysis for ordinal-scale variables using orthogonal polynomials, J. Appl. Stat. 37 (2010), pp. 2101–2116. doi: 10.1080/02664760903247692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Marcotorchino, Utilisation des Comparaisons par Pairesen Statistique des Contingences, Partie (I), Etude IBM F069, France, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• K. Matusita, Decision rules, based on the distance for problems of fit, two samples and estimation, Ann. Math. Stat. 26 (1955), pp. 631–640. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177728422
   Google Scholar
• M.C. Pardo, An empirical investigation of Cressie and Read tests for the hypothesis of independence in three-way contingency tables, Kybernetika 32 (1996), pp. 175–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Pesarin, Multivariate Permutation Tests with Applications in Biostatistics, Wiley, Chichester, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• F. Pesarin and L. Salmaso, Permutation Tests for Complex Data: Theory, Applications and Software, Wiley, Chichester, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• M.L. Puri, and P.K. Sen, Nonparametric Methods in Multivariate Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• R. Siciliano and A. Mooijaart, Three-factor association models for three-way contingency tables, Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 24 (1997), pp. 337–356. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9473(97)87024-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Simonetti, E.J. Beh, and L. D’Ambra, The analysis of dependence for three ways contingency tables with ordinal variables: A case study of patient satisfaction data, J. Appl. Stat. 37 (2010), pp. 91–103. doi: 10.1080/02664760802653552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Sulewski, Two-by-two contingency table as a goodness-of-fit test, Comput. Methods Sci. Technol. 15 (2009), pp. 203–211. doi: 10.12921/cmst.2009.15.02.203-211
   Google Scholar
• P. Sulewski, Modyfikacja testu niezależności, Wiadomości Statystyczne 10 (2013), pp. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• P. Sulewski, Moc testów niezależności w tablicy dwudzielczej 2×2, Wiadomości Statystyczne 8 (2016), pp. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• P. Sulewski, Moc testów niezależności w tablicy dwudzielczej większej niż 2×2, Przegląd Statystyczny 63 (2016), pp. 191–209.
   Google Scholar
• P. Sulewski and R. Motyka, Power analysis of independence testing for contingency tables, Sci. J. Polish Naval Acad. 56 (2015), pp. 37–46.
   Google Scholar
• L.R. Tucker, Implications of factor analysis of three-way matrices for measurement of change, in Problems in Measuring Change, C. W. Harris, ed., Univ. Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1963, pp. 122–137.
   Google Scholar
• R. Yoshida, J. Xi, S. Wei, F. Zhou, and D. Haws, Semigroups and sequential importance sampling for multiway tables, ArXiv preprint (2011), arXiv:1111.6518.
   Google Scholar