Estimating the earthquake occurrence rates in Corinth Gulf (Greece) through Markovian arrival process modeling

References

• Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Seismological Network, Data from: Permanent Regional Seismological Network operated by the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, International Federation of Digital Seismograph Networks. Other/Seismic Network, 1981; dataset available at http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.7914/SN/HT.
   Google Scholar
• J.R. Artalejo, A. Gómez-Corral, and Q.M. He, Markovian arrivals in stochastic modelling: A survey and some new results, SORT 34 (2010), pp. 101–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Asmussen and G. Koole, Marked point processes as limits of markovian arrival streams, J. Appl. Probab. 30 (1993), pp. 365–372. doi: 10.2307/3214845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.E. Baum and T. Petrie, Statistical inference for probabilistic functions of finite state markov chains, Ann. Math. Stat. 37 (1966), pp. 1554–1563. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177699147
   Google Scholar
• L. Bodrog, P. Buchholz, A. Heindl, A. Horváth, G. Horváth, I. Kolossváry, A. Mészáros, Z. Németh, J. Papp, P. Reinecke, M. Telek, and M. Vécsei, Program packages for computations with PH, ME distributions and MAP, RAP processes, User Manual; 2014. Available at http://webspn.hit.bme.hu/telek/tools/butools/.
   Google Scholar
• P. Buchholz, J. Kriege, and I. Felko, Input Modeling with Phase-Type Distributions and Markov Models: Theory and Applications, Springer, Cham, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• K.P. Burnham and D.R. Anderson, Model Selection and Multimodel Inference, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• I. Chakravarti, R. Laha, and J. Roy, Handbook of Methods of Applied Statistics-Volume 1: Techniques of Computation, Descriptive Methods, and Statistical Inference, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York-London-Sydney, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• K. Christensen and Z. Olami, Variation of the Gutenberg-Richter b values and nontrivial temporal correlations in a Spring-Block model for earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res. 97 (1992), pp. 8729–8735. doi: 10.1029/92JB00427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Console, G. Falcone, V. Karakostas, M. Murru, E. Papadimitriou, and D. Rhoades, Renewal models and coseismic stress transfer in the Corinth Gulf, Greece, fault system, J. Geophys. Res. 118 (2013), pp. 3655–3673. doi: 10.1002/jgrb.50277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Console, A. Nardi, R. Carluccio, M. Murru, G. Falcone, and T. Parsons, A physics-based earthquake simulator and its application to seismic hazard assessment in Calabria (Southern Italy) region, Acta Geophys. 65 (2017), pp. 243–257. doi: 10.1007/s11600-017-0020-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.D. Cordeiro and J.P. Kharoufeh, Batch markovian arrival processes (BMAP), in Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• A.P. Dempster, N.M. Laird, and D.B. Rubin, Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 39 (1977), pp. 1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.A. Harris, Introduction to special section: Stress triggers, stress shadows, and implications for seismic hazard, J. Geophys. Res. 103 (1998), pp. 24347–24358. doi: 10.1029/98JB01576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q.M. He, Construction of continuous time Markovian arrival processes, J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 19 (2010), pp. 351–366. doi: 10.1007/s11518-010-5139-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q.M. He, Fundamentals of Matrix-Analytic Methods, Springer, New York, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Q.M. He and M.F. Neuts, Markov chains with marked transitions, Stoch. Process. Appl. 74 (1998), pp. 37–52. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4149(97)00109-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Horváth and H. Okamura, A fast EM algorithm for fitting marked Markovian arrival processes with a new special structure, in Comput. Perform. Eng. EPEW, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 8168, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013, pp. 119–133.
   Google Scholar
• G. Horváth and M. Telek, BuTools 2: A rich toolbox for Markovian performance evaluation, in Proceedings of the 10th EAI International Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools, ICST, ValueTools 2016, Brussels, Belgium, 2016, pp. 137–142.
   Google Scholar
• G.C. King, R.S. Stein, and J. Lin, Static stress changes and the triggering of earthquakes, B. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84 (1994), pp. 935–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Kourouklas, E. Papadimitriou, V. Karakostas, and G. Tsaklidis, Long range correlations and probability distribution of the earthquake interevent time in Greece, in Proceedings of the 29th Panhellenic Statistics Conference on Risk Analysis in Enviroment and Economics. Bulletin of the Greek Statistical Institute, 2016, pp. 307–321.
   Google Scholar
• S. Kullback and R.A. Leibler, On information and sufficiency, Ann. Math. Statist. 22 (1951), pp. 79–86. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177729694
   Google Scholar
• K. Leptokaropoulos, M. Staszek, S. Cielesta, P. Urban, D. Olszewska, and G. Lizurek, Time-dependent seismic hazard in Bobrek coal mine, Poland, assuming different magnitude distribution estimations, Acta Geophys. 65 (2017), pp. 493–505. doi: 10.1007/s11600-016-0002-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Lu, Markov modulated Poisson process associated with state-dependent marks and its applications to the deep earthquakes, Ann. I. Stat. Math. 64 (2012), pp. 87–106. doi: 10.1007/s10463-010-0302-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Lu, A continuous-time HMM approach to modeling the magnitude-frequency distribution of earthquakes, J. Appl. Stat. 44 (2017), pp. 71–88. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2016.1161736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.M. Lucantoni, K.S. Meier-Hellstern, and M.F. Neuts, A single-server queue with server vacations and a class of non-renewal arrival processes, Adv. Appl. Probab. 22 (1990), pp. 676–705. doi: 10.2307/1427464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Mangira, R. Console, E. Papadimitriou, and G. Vasiliadis, A restricted linked stress release model (LSRM) for the Corinth Gulf (Greece), Tectonophysics 723 (2018), pp. 162–171. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2017.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Mangira, G. Vasiliadis, and E. Papadimitriou, Application of a linked stress release model in Corinth Gulf and Central Ionian Islands (Greece), Acta Geophys. 65 (2017), pp. 517–531. doi: 10.1007/s11600-017-0031-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.V. Matthews, W.L. Ellsworth, and P.A. Reasenberg, A Brownian model for recurrent earthquakes, B. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92 (2002), pp. 2233–2250. doi: 10.1785/0120010267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.J. Michael, Viscoelasticity, postseismic slip, fault interactions, and the recurrence of large earthquakes, B. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95 (2005), pp. 1594–1603. doi: 10.1785/0120030208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.F. Neuts, A versatile Markovian point process, J. Appl. Probab. 16 (1979), pp. 764–779. doi: 10.2307/3213143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.F. Neuts and J.M. Li, An algorithm for the P(n,t) matrices of a continuous BMAP, in Matrix-Analytic Methods in Stochastic Models, S. Chakravarthy and A.S. Alfa, eds., Vol. 183, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1997, pp. 7–19.
   Google Scholar
• S.P. Nishenko and R. Buland, A generic recurrence interval distribution for earthquake forecasting, B. Seismol. Soc. Am. 77 (1987), pp. 1382–1399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Ogata and K. Katsura, Point-process models with linearly parametrized intensity for application to earthquake data, J. Appl. Probab. 23 (1986), pp. 291–310. doi: 10.2307/3214359
   Google Scholar
• H. Okamura and T. Dohi, Faster maximum likelihood estimation algorithms for Markovian arrival processes, in Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Quantitative Evaluation of Systems (QEST2009), Vol. 9., Budapest, Hungary, 2009, pp. 73–82.
   Google Scholar
• D. Olszewska, S. Lasocki, and K. Leptokaropoulos, Non-stationarity and internal correlations of the occurrence process of mining-induced seismic events, Acta Geophys. 65 (2017), pp. 507–515. doi: 10.1007/s11600-017-0024-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Orfanogiannaki, D. Karlis, and G. Papadopoulos, Identifying seismicity levels via Poisson hidden Markov models, Pure Appl. Geophys. 167 (2010), pp. 919–931. doi: 10.1007/s00024-010-0088-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Pertsinidou, G. Tsaklidis, E. Papadimitriou, and N. Limnios, Application of hidden semi-Markov models for the seismic hazard assessment of the North and South Aegean Sea, Greece, J. Appl. Stat. 44 (2017), pp. 1064–1085. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2016.1193724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Pievatolo and R. Rotondi, Statistical identification of seismicity phases, Geophys. J. Int. 173 (2008), pp. 942–957. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03773.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Rigo, H. Lyon-Caen, R. Armijo, A. Deschamps, D. Hatzfeld, K. Makropoulos, P. Papadimitriou, and I. Kassaras, A microseismic study in the western part of the Gulf of Corinth (Greece): Implications for large-scale normal faulting mechanisms, Geophys. J. Int. 126 (1996), pp. 663–688. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1996.tb04697.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Rikitake, Probability of a great earthquake to recur in the Tokai district, Japan: Reevaluation based on newly-developed paleoseismology, plate tectonics, tsunami study, micro-seismicity and geodetic measurements, Earth Planets Space 51 (1999), pp. 147–157. doi: 10.1186/BF03352219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Shaochuan and D. Vere-Jones, Large occurrence patterns of New Zealand deep earthquakes: Characterization by use of a switching Poisson model, Pure App. Geophys. 168 (2011), pp. 1567–1585. doi: 10.1007/s00024-011-0263-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.S. Stein, The role of stress transfer in earthquake occurrence, Nature 402 (1999), pp. 605–609. doi: 10.1038/45144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.A. Stephens, EDF statistics for goodness of fit and some comparisons, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 69 (1974), pp. 730–737. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1974.10480196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Votsi, N. Limnios, G. Tsaklidis, and E. Papadimitriou, Estimation of the expected number of earthquake occurrences based on semi-Markov models, Methodol. Comput. Appl. Probab. 14 (2012), pp. 685–703. doi: 10.1007/s11009-011-9257-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Votsi, N. Limnios, G. Tsaklidis, and E. Papadimitriou, Hidden markov models revealing the stress field underlying the earthquake generation, Phys. A 392 (2013), pp. 2868–2885. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2012.12.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Votsi, N. Limnios, G. Tsaklidis, and E. Papadimitriou, Hidden semi-Markov modeling for the estimation of earthquake occurrence rates, Commun. Statist. Theory Methods 43 (2014), pp. 1484–1502. doi: 10.1080/03610926.2013.857414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Wang, M. Bebbington, and D. Harte, Markov-modulated Hawkes process with stepwise decay, Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 64 (2012), pp. 521–544. doi: 10.1007/s10463-010-0320-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Wang, J. Zhuang, K. Obara, and H. Tsuruoka, Hidden Markov modelling of sparse time series from non-volcanic tremor observations, J. R. Stat. Soc. C Appl. Stat. 66 (2017), pp. 691–715. doi: 10.1111/rssc.12194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Wessel and W.H. Smith, New, improved version of generic mapping tools released, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 79 (1998), pp. 579–579. doi: 10.1029/98EO00426
   Google Scholar
• Z. Xiaogu and D. Vere-Jones, Further applications of the stochastic stress release model to historical earthquake data, Tectonophysics 229 (1994), pp. 101–121. doi: 10.1016/0040-1951(94)90007-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Zhuang, Statistical modelling of seismicity patterns before and after the 1990 Oct 5 Cape Palliser earthquake, New Zealand, New Zeal. J. Geol. Geop. 43 (2000), pp. 447–460. doi: 10.1080/00288306.2000.9514901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Zöller, S. Hainzl, Y. Ben-Zion, and M. Holschneider, Earthquake activity related to seismic cycles in a model for a heterogeneous strike-slip fault, Tectonophysics 423 (2006), pp. 137–145. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2006.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar