On improved volatility modelling by fitting skewness in ARCH models

References

• D. Alberg, H. Shalit, and R. Yosef, Estimating stock market volatility using asymmetric garch models, Appl. Financ. Econ. 18 (2008), pp. 1201–1208. doi: 10.1080/09603100701604225
   Google Scholar
• J. Arlt and M. Arltová, Financial time series and their features, Acta Oeconomica Pragensia 9 (2001), pp. 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• N. Balakrishnan, Permanents, order statistics, outliers, and robustness, Rev. Mat. Complut. 20 (2007), pp. 7–107. doi: 10.5209/rev_REMA.2007.v20.n1.16528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Black, Studies of stock price volatility changes, Proceedings of the 1976 Meetings of the American Statistical Association, Business and Economics Statistics Section, 1976, pp. 177–181.
   Google Scholar
• T. Bollerslev, Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity, J. Econom. 31 (1986), pp. 307–327. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Bucevska, An empirical evaluation of garch models in value-at-risk estimation: Evidence from the macedonian stock exchange, BIT 4 (2013), pp. 49–64.
   Google Scholar
• G. Casella and R. Berger, Statistical Inference, 2nd ed., Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• A. Cedilnik, A. Blejec, and K. Košmelj, Ratio of two random variables: A note on the existence of its moments, Metodološki Zvezki 1 (2006), pp. 1–7. Available at http://mrvar.fdv.uni-lj.si/pub/mz/mz3.1/cedilnik.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• B. Cheng and S.T. Rachev, Multivariate stable futures prices, Math. Financ. 5 (1995), pp. 133–153. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9965.1995.tb00106.x
   Google Scholar
• A.A. Christie, The stochastic behavior of common stock variances: Value, leverage and interest rate effects, J. Financ. Econ. 10 (1982), pp. 407–432. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304405X82900186. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(82)90018-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Coffie, Modelling and forecasting the conditional heteroscedasticity of stock returns using asymmetric models: Empirical evidence from Ghana and Nigeria, J. Account. Financ. 15(5) (2015), pp. 109–123.
   Google Scholar
• R. D'Agostino, Transformation to normality of the null distribution of g1, Biometrika 57 (1970), pp. 679–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Davidson and J. MacKinnon, Graphical methods for investigating the size and power of hypothesis tests, The Manchester School 66 (1998), pp. 1–26. doi: 10.1111/1467-9957.00086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Engle, Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of united kingdom inflation, Econometrica 50 (1982), pp. 987–1007. doi: 10.2307/1912773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Engle and V. Ng, Measuring and testing the impact of news on volatility, J. Financ. 48 (1993), pp. 1749–1778. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05127.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Fan and Q. Yao, Nonlinear Time Series: Nonparametric and Parametric Methods, Nonlinear Time Springer, New York, 2003. Available at https://books.google.sk/books?id=1AJkT1j97jAC.
   Google Scholar
• P. Greenwood and M. Nikulin, A Guide to Chi-Squared Testing, A Wiley-Interscience Publication, Wiley, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• S. Gulati and J. Neus, Goodness of fit statistics for the exponential distribution when the data are grouped, Commun. Statist. 32(3) (2003), pp. 681–700. doi: 10.1081/STA-120018558
   Google Scholar
• S. Gulati and S. Shapiro, Goodness of fit tests for the logistic distribution, J. Stat. Theory. Pract. 3 (2009), pp. 567–576. doi: 10.1080/15598608.2009.10411947
   Google Scholar
• C. Harvey and A. Siddique, Autoregressive conditional skewness, J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 34 (1999), pp. 465–487. doi: 10.2307/2676230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.R. Heathcote, S.T. Rachev, and B. Cheng, Testing multivariate symmetry, J. Multivar. Anal. 54 (1995), pp. 91–112. doi: 10.1006/jmva.1995.1046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Jondeau and M. Rockinger, Conditional volatility, skewness, and kurtosis: Existence and persistence, Tech. Rep., Working paper 77, Banque de France, 2000
   Google Scholar
• P.K. Jordanova and M. Stehlík, Logarithm of ratios of two order statistics and regularly varying tails, (2019). Available at arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.07770.
   Google Scholar
• A. Leon, G. Rubio, and G. Serna, Autoregressive conditional volatility,skewness and kurtosis, Tech. Rep. Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Economicas, WP-AD 2004-13, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• J.C. Liu, Stationarity of a family of GARCH processes, Econom. J. 12 (2009), pp. 436–446. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-423X.2009.00294.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Mandelbrot, The variation of certain speculative prices, J. Bus. 36 (1963), pp. 394–419. doi: 10.1086/294632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Mantalos and A. Karagrigoriou, Testing for skewness in ar conditional volatility models for financial return series, Working Papers 2012:4, Örebro University, School of Business, 2012. Availabe at https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/oruesi/2012_004.html
   Google Scholar
• S. Mittnik and S.T. Rachev, Stable distributions for asset returns, Appl. Math. Lett. 2 (1989), pp. 301–304. doi: 10.1016/0893-9659(89)90074-8
   Google Scholar
• S. Mittnik and S.T. Rachev, Alternative multivariate stable distributions and their applications to financial modeling, in Stable Processes and Related Topics, S. Cambanis, G. Samorodnitsky, and M.S. Taqqu, eds., Progress in Probabilty, vol. 25, Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 1991, pp. 107–119.
   Google Scholar
• S. Mittnik and S.T. Rachev, Modeling asset returns with alternative stable distributions, Econom. Rev. 12 (1993), pp. 261–330. doi: 10.1080/07474939308800266
   Google Scholar
• A. Panorska, S. Mittnik, and S. Rachev, Stable garch models for financial time series, Appl. Math. Lett. 8 (1995), pp. 33–37. doi: 10.1016/0893-9659(95)00063-V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Politis, Model-free vs. model-based volatility prediction, J. Financ. Econom. 5 (2007), pp. 358–359. doi: 10.1093/jjfinec/nbm004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Premaratne and A. Bera, Modeling asymmetry and excess kurtosis in stock return data, Illinois Research & Reference Working Paper No. 00-123, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN 3-900051-07-0, 2004. Availabel at http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• J. Ramberg and B. Schmeiser, An approximate method for generating asymmetric random variables, Commun. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 17 (1974), pp. 78–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.H. Rice, The expected value of the ratio of correlated random variables, 2015, unpublished note. Available at http://www.faculty.biol.ttu.edu/Rice/ratio-derive.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• W. Richter, L. Střelec, H. Ahmadinezhad, and M. Stehlík, Geometric aspects of robust testing for normality and sphericity, Stoch. Anal. Appl. 35 (2017), pp. 511–532. doi: 10.1080/07362994.2016.1273785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.J. Siouris and A. Karagrigoriou, A low price correction for improved volatility estimation and forecasting, Risks 5 (2017), pp. 45. Available at http://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/5/3/45. doi: 10.3390/risks5030045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Stehlík, L. Střelec, and M. Thulin, On robust testing for normality in chemometrics, Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 130 (2014), pp. 98–108. doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2013.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Su, H. Huang, and Y. Lin, Gjr-garch model in value-at-risk of financial holdings, Appl. Financ. Econ. 21 (2011), pp. 1819–1829. doi: 10.1080/09603107.2011.595677
   Google Scholar
• A. Toma and S. Leoni-Aubin, Robust tests based on dual divergence estimators and saddlepoint approximations, J. Multivar. Anal. 101 (2010), pp. 1143–1155. doi: 10.1016/j.jmva.2009.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar