Detecting the Guttman effect with the help of ordinal correspondence analysis in synchrotron X-ray diffraction data analysis

References

• R. Alvarez, M. Bécue, J.J. Lanero, and O. Valencia, Results stability in textual analysis: Its application to the study of the Spanish investiture speeches, 6es Journées internationales d'Analyse Statistique des Données Textuelles, 2002, pp. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• R. Alvarez, M. Bécue, and O. Valencia, Etude de la stabilité des valeurs propres de l'AFC d'un tableau lexical au moyen de procédures de rééchantillonnage, 7es Journées internationales d'Analyse Statistique des Données Textuelles, 2004, pp. 42–51.
   Google Scholar
• R. Alvarez, M. Bécue, and O. Valencia, Partial bootstrap in CA: Correction of the coordinates. Application to textual data, 8es Journées internationales d'Analyse Statistique des Données Textuelles, 2006, pp. 43–53.
   Google Scholar
• T.W. Anderson, An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• A. Baccini, Etude comparative des représentations graphiques en analyses factorielles des correspondances simples et multiples, Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Laboratoire de Statistique et Probabilités, Rapport No 02-84 1984, pp. 1–64.
   Google Scholar
• E.J. Beh, Simple correspondence analysis of ordinal cross-classifications using orthogonal polynomials, Biom. J. 39 (1997), pp. 589–613. doi: 10.1002/bimj.4710390507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.J. Beh, A comparative study of scores for correspondence analysis with ordered categories, Biom. J. 40 (1998), pp. 413–429. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4036(199808)40:4<413::AID-BIMJ413>3.0.CO;2-V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.J. Beh, Partitioning chi-squared statistics for singly ordered two-way contingency tables, Aust. N. Z. J. Stat. 43 (2001), pp. 327–333. doi: 10.1111/1467-842X.00179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.J. Beh, Simple correspondence analysis of nominal-ordinal contingency tables, J. Appl. Math. Decis. Sci. 2008 (2008) 1–17. doi: 10.1155/2008/218140
   Google Scholar
• E.J. Beh and R. Lombardo, Correspondence Analysis Theory, Practice and New Strategies, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, Chichester, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• P. Bekker and J. de Leeuw, Relations between variants of non-linear principal components analysis, in Component and Correspondence Analysis – Dimension Reduction by Functional Approximation, J. L. A. van Rijckevorsel and J. de Leeuw eds., John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1988 pp. 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• S. Ben Hammou and G. Saporta, Sur la normalité asymptotique des valeurs propres en ACM sous l'hypothèse d'indépendance des variables, Revue De Statistique Appliquée. 46 (1998), pp. 21–35.
   Google Scholar
• S. Ben Hammou and G. Saporta, On the connection between the distribution of eigenvalues in multiple correspondence analysis and log-linear models, Proceedings of CARME2003, Barcelona, 2003, pp. 41–79.
   Google Scholar
• J.-P. Benzécri, L'Analyse Des Données, Vol. 2, Dunod, Paris, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• J.-P. Benzécri, Sur l'analyse des tableaux binaires associés à une correspondance multiple [BIN. MULT.], Les Cahiers De L'analyse Des Données 2 (1977), pp. 55–71.
   Google Scholar
• J.-P. Benzécri, Sur le calcul des taux d'inertie dans l'analyse d'un questionnaire, addendum et erratum à [BIN. MULT.], Les Cahiers De L'analyse Des Données 4 (1979), pp. 377–378.
   Google Scholar
• J.-P. Benzécri, Histoire Et Préhistoire De L'Analyse Des Données, Bordas, Paris, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• S. Camiz, The Guttman effect: its interpretation and a new redressing method, Data Anal. Bull. 5 (2005), pp. 7–34.
   Google Scholar
• S. Camiz and G.C. Gomes, Joint correspondence analysis versus multiple correspondence analysis: A solution to an undetected problem, in Classification and Data Mining, Studies in Classification, Data Analysis and Knowledge Organization, A. Giusti, G. Ritter and M. Vichi, eds., Springer, Berlin, pp. 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• S. Cornu, L. Quénard, I. Cousin, and A. Samouëlian, Experimental approach of lessivage: Quantification and mechanisms, Geoderma 213 (2014), pp. 357–370. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Diana and C. Tommasi, Cross-validation methods in principal component analysis: A comparison, Statist. Methods Appl. 11 (2002), pp. 71–82. doi: 10.1007/BF02511446
   Google Scholar
• §. Dray, On the number of principal components: A test of dimensionality based on measurements of similarity between matrices, Comput. Statist. Data. Anal. 52 (2008), pp. 2228–2237. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2007.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. El Karoui and E. Purdom, The bootstrap, covariance matrices and PCA in moderate and high-dimensions, 2016. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.00948v1.
   Google Scholar
• V. Elisseeff, Possibilité du scalogramme dans l'étude des bronzes chinois archaïques, Mathématiques Et Sci. Humaines. 11 (1965), pp. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• P.L. Emerson, Numerical construction of orthogonal polynomials from a general recurrence formula, Biometrics 24 (1968), pp. 695–701. doi: 10.2307/2528328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Gautschi, On generating orthogonal polynomials, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 3 (1982), pp. 289–317. doi: 10.1137/0903018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Gautschi, Is the recurrence relation for orthogonal polynomials alwaws stable? BIT 33 (1993), pp. 277–284. doi: 10.1007/BF01989750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Gautschi, Orthogonal polynomials: Applications and computation, Acta Numer. 5 ( 1996), pp. 45–119. doi: 10.1017/S0962492900002622
   Google Scholar
• J.C. Gower, Fisher's optimal scores and multiple correspondence analysis, Biometrics 46 (1990), pp. 947–961. doi: 10.2307/2532440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.J. Greenacre, Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis, Academic Press, Orlando, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• M.J. Greenacre, Correspondence analysis of multivariate categorical data by weighted least squares, Biometrika 75 (1988), pp. 457–467. doi: 10.1093/biomet/75.3.457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Guttman, The Cornell technique for scale and intensity analysis, Educ. Psychol. Meas. 7 (1947), pp. 247–279. doi: 10.1177/001316444700700204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Guttman and E.A. Suchman, Intensity and a zero point for attitude analysis, Am. Sociol. Rev. 12 (1947), pp. 57–67. doi: 10.2307/2086491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.J. Haberman, Log-Linear models for frequency tables with ordered classifications, Biometrics 30 (1974), pp. 589–600. doi: 10.2307/2529224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Hendrickse, L. Spreeuwers, and R. Veldhuis, A bootstrap approach to eigenvalues correction, Ninth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 2009. Available at https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2009.111.
   Google Scholar
• A. Hendrikse, R. Veldhuis, and L. Spreeuwers, Smooth eigenvalue correction, EURASIP. J. Adv. Signal. Process. 117 (2013), pp. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• M.O. Hill and H.G. Gauch, Detrended correspondence analysis: An improved ordination technique, Vegetatio 42 (1980), pp. 47–58. doi: 10.1007/BF00048870
   Google Scholar
• D.A. Jackson and K.M. Somers, Putting things in order: The ups and downs of detrended correspondence analysis, Am. Nat. 137 (1991), pp. 704–712. doi: 10.1086/285189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Josse and S. Holmes, Measuring multivariate association and beyond, Stat. Surveys 10 (2016), pp. 132–167. doi: 10.1214/16-SS116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Josse and F. Husson, Selecting the number of components in principal component analysis using cross-validation approximations, Comput. Statist. Data. Anal. 56 (2012), pp. 1869–1879. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2011.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Josse, J. Pagès, and F. Husson, Testing the significance of the RV coefficient, Comput. Statist. Data. Anal. 53 (2008), pp. 82–91. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2008.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.G. Knox, Effects of detrending and rescaling on correspondence analysis: Solution stability and accuracy, Vegetatio 83 (1989), pp. 129–136. doi: 10.1007/BF00031685
   Google Scholar
• L. Lebart, A. Morineau, and M. Piron, Statistique Exploratoire Multidimensionnelle, Dunod, Paris, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• L. Lebart and G. Saporta, Historical elements of correspondence analysis and multiple correspondence analysis, in Visualization and Verbalization of Data, J. Blasius and M. Greenacre eds, CRC Press, Chapman & Hall, New York, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• R. Lombardo and E. Beh, Simple and multiple correspondence analysis for ordinal-scale variables using orthogonal polynomials, J. Appl. Stat. 37 (2010), pp. 2101–2116. doi: 10.1080/02664760903247692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Lombardo and J. Meulman, Multiple correspondence analysis via polynomial transformations of ordered categorical variables, J. Classif. 27 (2010), pp. 191–210. doi: 10.1007/s00357-010-9056-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Mair and J. de Leeuw, A general framework for multivariate analysis with optimal scaling: The R package ‘aspect’, J. Stat. Softw. 32 (2010), pp. 1–23. doi: 10.18637/jss.v032.i09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Manté, Etude par l'Analyse des Données de la mémoire d'un champ météorologique, Thèse de 3 ème cycle, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• C. Manté, G. Bernard, P. Bonhomme, and D. Nerini, Application of ordinal correspondence analysis for submerged aquatic vegetation monitoring, J. Appl. Stat. 40 (2013), pp. 1619–1638. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2013.789494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Michailidis and J. de Leeuw, The Gifi system of descriptive multivariate analysis, Stat. Sci. 13 (1998), pp. 307–336. doi: 10.1214/ss/1028905828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.C.W. Rayner and D.J. Best, Smooth extensions of Pearson' s product moment correlation and Spearman's Rho, Statist. Probab. Lett. 30 (1996), pp. 171–177. doi: 10.1016/0167-7152(95)00216-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.C.W. Rayner and D.J. Best, Analysis of singly ordered two-way contingency tables, J. Appl. Math. Decis. Sci. 4 (2000), pp. 83–98. doi: 10.1155/S1173912600000055
   Google Scholar
• P. Sarnacchiaro, A. D'Ambra, and L. D'Ambra, CATANOVA for ordinal variables using orthogonal polynomials with different scoring methods, J. Appl. Stat. 43 (2016), pp. 2490–2502. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2016.1184627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Tenenhaus and F. Young, An analysis and synthesis of multiple correspondence analysis, optimal scaling, dual scaling, homogeneity analysis and other methods for quantifying categorical multivariate data, Psychometrika 50 (1985), pp. 91–119. doi: 10.1007/BF02294151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.J.F. Ter Braak, CANOCO – a FORTRAN Program for Canonical Community Ordination by [Partial] [Detrended] [Canonical] Correspondence Analysis, Principal Components Analysis and Redundancy Analysis (Version 2.1), Agriculture Mathematics Group, Wageningen, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfram Research, Inc., Mathematica, Version 12.1, Champaign, IL, 2020.
   Google Scholar