424
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Economics, Business & Finance

Determining the relationship between stock return and financial performance: an analysis on Turkish deposit banks

ORCID Icon
Pages 2643-2657 | Received 17 May 2020, Accepted 02 Nov 2020, Published online: 24 Nov 2020

References

  • M. Amiri, M. Zandieh, B. Vahdani, R. Soltani, and V. Roshanaei, An integrated eigenvector–DEA–TOPSIS methodology for portfolio risk evaluation in the forex spot market. Expert Syst. Appl. 37 (2010), pp. 509–516.
  • M.E. Atukalp, Efficiency Analysis of Banks in Borsa Istanbul Banking Index, Proceedings of International Congress of Management, Economy and Policy, Istanbul/Turkey, 2017, pp. 239–254.
  • E. Beccalli, B. Casu, and C. Girardone, Efficiency and stock performance in European banking. J. Bus. Finance Account. 1–2 (2006), pp. 245–262.
  • I. Chamodrakas, I. Leftheriotis, and D. Martakos, In-depth analysis and simulation study of an ınnovative fuzzy approach for ranking alternatives in multiple attribute decision making problems based on TOPSIS. Appl. Soft Comput 11 (2011), pp. 900–907.
  • F. Cheng-Min, and W. Rong-Tsu, Considering the financial ratios on the performance evaluation of highway bus industry. Transp. Rev 21 (2001), pp. 449–467.
  • Data from: The Banks Association of Turkey, Selected Ratios, 2018; dataset available at https://www.tbb.org.tr/tr/bankacilik/banka-ve-sektor-bilgileri/istatistiki-raporlar/59.
  • D. Diakoulaki, G. Mavrotas, and L. Papayannakis, Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the CRITIC method. Comput. Oper. Res. 22 (1995), pp. 763–770.
  • M. Doumpos, and C. Zopounidis, Multi-criteria classification methods in financial and banking decisions. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 9 (2002), pp. 567–581.
  • C. Erdem, and M.S. Erdem, Turkish banking efficiency and its relation to stock performance. Appl. Econom. Lett. 15 (2008), pp. 207–211.
  • J. Estrada, Law and Behavioral Economics, Working Paper. (2001). Available at https://blog.iese.edu/jestrada/files/2012/06/LBE.pdf
  • E.F. Fama, Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. J. Finance 25 (1970), pp. 383–417.
  • R. Gao, H.O. Nam, W.I. Ko, and H. Jang, National options for a sustainable nuclear energy system: MCDM evaluation using an improved integrated weighting approach. Energies 10 (2017), pp. 1–24.
  • A. Göktaş, and Ö İşçi, Comparison of the most commonly used measures of association for doubly ordered square contingency tables via simulation. Metodološki zvezki 8 (2011), pp. 17–37.
  • C.L. Hwang, and K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 1981.
  • C. Ioannidis, P. Molyneux, and F. Pasiouras, The Relationship Between Bank Efficiency and Stock Returns: Evidence from Asia and Latin America, Univ. Bath, Sch. Manag. Work. Pap. 2008.10.
  • G.R. Jahanshahloo, F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, and M. Izadikhah, An algorithmic method to extend TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data. Appl. Math. Comput. 175 (2006), pp. 1375–1384.
  • S. Kasman, and A. Kasman, Efficiency, productivity and stock performance: evidence from the Turkish banking sector. Panoeconomicus 58 (2011), pp. 355–372.
  • J. Kirkwood, and D. Nahm, Australian banking efficiency and its relation to stock returns, Econ. Record. 82 (2006), pp. 253–267.
  • M. Kumaraswamy, and R. Ramaswamy, Performance evaluation of software projects using criteria importance through inter-criteria correlation technique. Int. J. Soft Comput.and Softw. Eng. 6 (2016), pp. 28–36.
  • M.Z.A. Majid, and F. Sufian, Bank Efficiency and Share Prices in China: Empirical Evidence from a Three-Stage Banking Model, MPRA Paper 12120.
  • H. Řezanková, Cluster analysis and categorical data. Stat. 89 (2009), pp. 73–86.
  • H. Rjoub, I. Cıvcır, and N.G. Resatoglu, Micro and macroeconomic determinants of stock prices: the case of Turkish banking sector. Rom. J. Econ. Forecast. 20 (2017), pp. 150–166.
  • H.Y. Wu, G.H. Tzeng, and Y.H. Chen, A fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating banking performance based on balanced scorecard. Expert Syst. Appl. 36 (2009), pp. 10135–10147.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.