Rapid online plant leaf area change detection with high-throughput plant image data

References

• J. Adams, Y. Qiu, Y. Xu, and J.C. Schnable, Plant segmentation by supervised machine learning methods, Plant Phenome J. 3 (2020), pp. e20001.
   Google Scholar
• M.S.M. Asaari, S. Mertens, S. Dhondt, D. Inzé, N. Wuyts, and P. Scheunders, Analysis of hyperspectral images for detection of drought stress and recovery in maize plants in a high-throughput phenotyping platform, Comput. Electron. Agric. 162 (2019), pp. 749–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Bashyam, S. Das Choudhury, A. Samal, and T. Awada, Visual growth tracking for automated leaf stage monitoring based on image sequence analysis, Remote. Sens. (Basel) 13 (2021), pp. 961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Behmann, J. Steinrücken, and L. Plümer, Detection of early plant stress responses in hyperspectral images, ISPRS. J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 93 (2014), pp. 98–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Bosc, F. Heitz, J.P. Armspach, I. Namer, D. Gounot, and L. Rumbach, Automatic change detection in multimodal serial mri: application to multiple sclerosis lesion evolution, NeuroImage 20 (2003), pp. 643–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Boyd, N. Parikh, and E. Chu, Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning Via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers, Now Publishers Inc, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• A. Chawade, J. van Ham, H. Blomquist, O. Bagge, E. Alexandersson, and R. Ortiz, High-throughput field-phenotyping tools for plant breeding and precision agriculture, Agronomy 9 (2019), pp. 258.
   Google Scholar
• S. Das Choudhury, A. Samal, and T. Awada, Leveraging image analysis for high-throughput plant phenotyping, Front. Plant. Sci. 10 (2019), pp. 508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Fahlgren, M.A. Gehan, and I. Baxter, Lights, camera, action: high-throughput plant phenotyping is ready for a close-up, Curr. Opin. Plant. Biol. 24 (2015), pp. 93–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.R. Fernie and J. Gutierrez-Marcos, From genome to phenome: genome-wide association studies and other approaches that bridge the genotype to phenotype gap, Plant. J. 97 (2019), pp. 5–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.T. Furbank and M. Tester, Phenomics–technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck, Trends. Plant. Sci. 16 (2011), pp. 635–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Gamon, J. Penuelas, and C. Field, A narrow-waveband spectral index that tracks diurnal changes in photosynthetic efficiency, Remote. Sens. Environ. 41 (1992), pp. 35–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Ge, G. Bai, V. Stoerger, and J.C. Schnable, Temporal dynamics of maize plant growth, water use, and leaf water content using automated high throughput rgb and hyperspectral imaging, Comput. Electron. Agric. 127 (2016), pp. 625–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, J.H. Friedman, and J.H. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2, Springer, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• N. Itoh and J. Kurths, Change-point detection of climate time series by nonparametric method, in Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, Vol. 1. Citeseer, 2010, pp. 445–448
   Google Scholar
• T.L. Lai, Sequential changepoint detection in quality control and dynamical systems, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodo, 57 (1995), pp. 613–644.
   Google Scholar
• T.L. Lai and H. Xing, Sequential change-point detection when the pre-and post-change parameters are unknown, Seq. Anal. 29 (2010), pp. 162–175.
   Google Scholar
• M. Lavielle and G. Teyssiere, Adaptive detection of multiple change-points in asset price volatility, in Long Memory in Economics, Springer, 2007, pp. 129–156
   Google Scholar
• J. Li, Nonparametric adaptive cusum chart for detecting arbitrary distributional changes, J. Qual. Technol. 53 (2021), pp. 154–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Li and P. Qiu, Nonparametric dynamic screening system for monitoring correlated longitudinal data, IIE Trans. 48 (2016), pp. 772–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Liu, R. Zhang, and Y. Mei, Scalable sum-shrinkage schemes for distributed monitoring large-scale data streams, Stat. Sin. 29 (2019), pp. 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Lorden, Procedures for reacting to a change in distribution, Ann. Math. Stat. 42 (1971), pp. 1897–1908.
   Google Scholar
• G. Lorden and M. Pollak, Sequential change-point detection procedures that are nearly optimal and computationally simple, Seq. Anal. 27 (2008), pp. 476–512.
   Google Scholar
• A. Mazis, S.D. Choudhury, P.B. Morgan, V. Stoerger, J. Hiller, Y. Ge, and T. Awada, Application of high-throughput plant phenotyping for assessing biophysical traits and drought response in two oak species under controlled environment, For. Ecol. Manage. 465 (2020), pp. 118101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Milioto, P. Lottes, and C. Stachniss, Real-time semantic segmentation of crop and weed for precision agriculture robots leveraging background knowledge in CNNs, in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2018, pp. 2229–2235
   Google Scholar
• G.V. Moustakides, Optimal stopping times for detecting changes in distributions, Ann. Stat. 14 (1986), pp. 1379–1387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.S. Page, Continuous inspection schemes, Biometrika 41 (1954), pp. 100–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Pandey, Y. Ge, V. Stoerger, and J.C. Schnable, High throughput in vivo analysis of plant leaf chemical properties using hyperspectral imaging, Front. Plant. Sci. 8 (2017), pp. 1348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Pollak, Optimal detection of a change in distribution, Ann. Stat. 13 (1985), pp. 206–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Pommerening and A. Muszta, Relative plant growth revisited: towards a mathematical standardisation of separate approaches, Ecol. Modell. 320 (2016), pp. 383–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Qiu, Big data? statistical process control can help!, Am. Stat. 74 (2020), pp. 329–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Ramsay, N. Heckman, and B. Silverman, Spline smoothing with model-based penalties, Behav. Res. Methods. Instrum. Comput. 29 (1997), pp. 99–106.
   Google Scholar
• D.K. Ray, N.D. Mueller, P.C. West, and J.A. Foley, Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050, PLoS. ONE. 8 (2013), pp. e66428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Roberts, Control chart tests based on geometric moving averages, Technometrics 1 (1959), pp. 239–250.
   Google Scholar
• S. Roberts, A comparison of some control chart procedures, Technometrics 8 (1966), pp. 411–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Römer, M. Wahabzada, A. Ballvora, F. Pinto, M. Rossini, C. Panigada, J. Behmann, J. Léon, C. Thurau, C. Bauckhage, and K. Kersting, Early drought stress detection in cereals: simplex volume maximisation for hyperspectral image analysis, Funct. Plant. Biol. 39 (2012), pp. 878–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Rouse, R. Haas, J. Schell, and D. Deering, Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with erts, NASA Special Publication 351 (1974), pp. 309.
   Google Scholar
• W.A. Shewhart, Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product, Macmillan and Co Ltd, London, 1931.
   Google Scholar
• A.N. Shiryaev, On optimum methods in quickest detection problems, Theory Probab. its Appl. 8 (1963), pp. 22–46.
   Google Scholar
• A. Singh, B. Ganapathysubramanian, A.K. Singh, and S. Sarkar, Machine learning for high-throughput stress phenotyping in plants, Trends. Plant Sci. 21 (2016), pp. 110–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Wang, Y. Qiu, Y. Zhou, Z. Liang, and J.C. Schnable, A high-throughput phenotyping pipeline for image processing and functional growth curve analysis, Plant Phenomics 2020 (2020), pp. 8. doi:10.34133/2020/7481687.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Xu, Y. Qiu, and J.C. Schnable, Functional modeling of plant growth dynamics, Plant Phenome. J. 1 (2018), pp. 1–10.
   Google Scholar