238
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Property rights and coastal protection: the case of Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council

&
Pages 275-300 | Received 16 Oct 2012, Accepted 19 Jul 2013, Published online: 19 Sep 2013

Bibliography

  • Agins v. City of Tiburon, 447 U.S. 255, 260 (1980).
  • American Planning Association. The Four Supreme Court Land-use Decisions of 2005: Separating Fact from Fiction. Planning Advisory Service Report 535. Chicago: American Planning Association, 2005.
  • Ausness, Richard C. “Wild Dunes and Serbonian Bogs: The Impact of the Lucas Decision on Shoreline Protection Programs.” Denver University Law Review 70, no. 3 (1992): 437–471.
  • Babcock, Hope M. “Should Lucas V. South Carolina Coastal Council Protect Where the Wild Things Are – of Beavers, Bob-o-Links, and Other Things that Go Bump in the Night.” Iowa Law Review 85, no. 3 (1999): 849–905.
  • Beach, Dana, and Connolly, Kim Diana “A Retrospective on Lucas V. South Carolina Coastal Council: Public Policy Implications for the 21st Century.” Southeastern Environmental Law Journal 12, no. 1 (2003): 1–22.
  • Been, Vicki. “Lucas V. The Green Machine: Using the Takings Clause to Promote More Efficient Regulation?” In Property Stories, edited by Gerald Korngold and Andrew Morriss, 221–257. New York: Foundation Press 2004.
  • Berman v. Parker, 348 U.S. 26 (1954).
  • Blue Ribbon Committee on Beachfront Management. South Carolina Blue Ribbon Committee on Beachfront Management. Charleston: Blue Ribbon Committee on Beachfront Management, 1987.
  • Brinkley, Christina. “Coalition Plans to Push Takings Law.” The Wall Street Journal, December 18, sec. S (1996): S1.
  • Bush, David M., Deborah F. Pilkey, William J. Neal, and Orrin H. Pilkey Living by the Rules of the Sea. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1996.
  • Callies, David L. “Taking the Taking Issue into the Twenty-first Century.” In After Lucas: Land Use Regulation and the Taking of Property without Compensation, edited by David Callies 1–9. Chicago: American Bar Association, 1993.
  • Charleston County Auditor. “Charleston County Online Property Records.” Accessed June 15, 2010. http://prcweb.charlestoncounty.org/searchrecords.html
  • Crossett, Kristen M., Thomas J. Culliton, Peter C. Wiley, and Timothy R. Goodspeed Population Trends along the Coastal United States: 1980–2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Management and Budget Office, 2004.
  • Donato, Christopher D. “Appraisals of Lots 22 and 24, Block A, Beachwood East, Wild Dines Beach and Racquet Club, Isle of Palms, South Carolina,” Atlantic Appraisals, August 4, 1989.
  • Dunlap, David W. “Resolving Property ‘Takings’.” New York Times, June 30 (1992).
  • Echeverria, John. “A Troubling New Ruling on Property Rights.” Christian Science Monitor, July 16 (1992).
  • First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987).
  • Hadacheck v. Sebastian, 239 U.S. 394 (1915).
  • Hall, Peter Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design in the Twentieth Century. 3rd ed. Massachusetts: Blackwell, 2002.
  • Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff, 467 U.S. 229 (1984).
  • Heckel, Robert “The Manoa Valley Special District Ordinance: Community-Based Planning in the Post-Lucas Era.” University of Hawai'i Law Review 1, no. 19 (1997): 449–476.
  • Ingwerson, Marshall. “High Court Rules on Property.” Christian Science Monitor (July 1, 1992).
  • Jacobs, Harvey Martin. “Preface.” In Who Owns America? Social Conflict over Property Rights, edited by Harvey Jacobs, ix–xvi. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1998.
  • Jones, Christopher, and Eiser, William. “A Review of the South Carolina Method for Establishing Coastal Setback Lines.” In Barrier Islands: Process and Management, edited by Donald Stauble, 284. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1989.
  • Kana, Timothy W. “The South Carolina Coast II: Development and Beach Management.” In Barrier Islands: Process and Management, edited by Donald Stauble, 274–283. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1989.
  • Kana, Timothy W., and South Carolina Sea Grant Consortium. Beach Erosion in South Carolina. Charleston, SC: South Carolina Sea Grant Consortium, 1988.
  • Kelly, Eric. “Lessons from Lucas.” Planning and Zoning News 10, no. 9 (1992): 13
  • Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005).
  • Kendall, Douglas T. “Preserving South Carolina's Beaches: The Role of Local Planning in Managing Growth in Coastal South Carolina.” South Carolina Environmental Law Journal 9, no. 61 (2000): 61
  • Keystone Bituminous Coal Association v. De Benedictis, 480 U.S. 470 (1987).
  • Korakandy, Ramakrishnan Coastal Zone Management: A Study of the Political Economy of Sustainable Development. Delhi: Kalpaz Publications, 2005.
  • Lawton v. Steele, 152 U.S. 133 (1894).
  • Lennon, Gered Living with the South Carolina Coast. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1996.
  • Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A, 554 U.S. 528 (2005).
  • Lucas, David Lucas vs. the Green Machine. Alexander, NC: Alexander Books, 1995.
  • Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992).
  • Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992) (Blackmun, J. dissenting).
  • Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992) (Souter, J. dissenting).
  • Mandelker, Daniel R. Planning and Control of Land Development: Cases and Materials. New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis, 2011.
  • Mandelker, Daniel R. “Of Mice and Missiles: A True Account of Lucas V. South Carolina Coastal Council.” Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law 8, no. 2 (1992): 285–306.
  • Mandelker, Daniel R., Carol Necole Brown, Stuart Meck, Dwight H. Merriam, Jr. Peter W. Salsich, Nancy E. Stroud, and Julie A. Tappendorf. Planning and Control of Land Development: Cases and Materials. 8th ed. (San Francisco: Lexis Nexis, 2011).
  • McClendon, Dennis. “Lucas Ruling: Shifting Sands.” Planning Magazine 58, no. 8 (1992): 30
  • Meck, Stuart. “Notes on Planning Statute Reform in the United States: Guideposts for the Road Ahead.” In Planning Reform in the New Century, edited by Daniel Mandelker, 31–57. Chicago: Planners Press, 2005.
  • Merriam, Dwight. “Rules for the Relevant Parcel.” University of Hawaii Law Review 25, no. 2 (2003): 353–415.
  • Mugler v. Kansas, 123 U.S. 623 (1887).
  • Nelson, Ross “Beachfront Management on the Isle of Palms, South Carolina.” Coastal Management 26, no. 4 (1998): 315–325. doi: 10.1080/08920759809362362
  • Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987).
  • O'Leary, Rosemary “Five Trends in Government Liability under Environmental Laws: Implications for Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 53, no. 6 (1993): 542–549. doi: 10.2307/977364
  • Order for David H. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, Charleston County, SC, County of Common Pleas, (C/A No. 88-CP-10-66).
  • Pelham, Thomas G. “Innovative Growth Control Measures: The Potential Impacts of Recent Federal Legislation and the Lucas Decision.” Urban Lawyer 25, no. 4 (1993): 881–892.
  • Platt, Rutherford H. “Evolution of Coastal Hazards Policies in the United States.” Coastal Management 22, no. 3 (1994): 265–284. doi: 10.1080/08920759409362236
  • Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York, 438 U.S. 104 (1978).
  • Pennsylvania Coal v. Mahon, 260 U.S. 393 (1922).
  • Randall, Martin M. “Coastal Development Run Amuck: A Policy of Retreat May Be the Only Hope.” Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation 18, no. 1 (2003): 145–185.
  • Records of registered nonprofit organizations from Washington D.C. show that the organization has since been dissolved. Washington, D.C. Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs, n.d. “Online Organization Registration.” Accessed June 8, 2010. http://mblr.dc.gov/corp/lookup/status.asp?id=180870
  • Rinehart, James R., and Pompe, Jeffrey J. “Property Rights and Coastal Protection: Lucas and the U.S. Supreme Court.” Society & Natural Resources 8, no. 2 (1995): 169–176. doi: 10.1080/08941929509380910
  • San Remo Hotel, L.P. v. City and County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (2005).
  • South Carolina Office of Coastal Zone Management. “Chapter 1: The Coast of South Carolina.” In South Carolina Coastal Zone Management Program and Final Impact Statement, I-1-52, edited by South Carolina Office of Coastal Zone Management, I–41. South Carolina: South Carolina Office of Coastal Zone Management, 1977.
  • Stauble, Donald. “Barrier Islands – Dynamic Coastal Landforms Requiring Complex Management Decisions, a Symposium Introduction and Overview.” In Barrier Islands: Process and Management, edited by Donald Stauble 63–77. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1989.
  • Sutton, Victoria. “Constitutional Taking Doctrine – Did Lucas Really Make a Difference?” Environmental Law Review 18, no. 2 (2001): 505–517. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2123661. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2001. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2123661
  • Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. V. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, Inc., 535 U.S. 302 (2002).
  • U.S. Census Bureau, ed. “USA Counties.” U.S. Census Bureau. Accessed December 3, 2011. http://censtats.census.gov/cgi-bin/usac/usatable.pl
  • U.S. Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs. “Online Organization Registration.” U.S. Department of Comsumer and Regulatory Affairs. Accessed June 8, 2910. http://mblr.dc.gov/corp/lookup/status.asp?id=180870
  • UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization). “International Legal Principles of Coastal Zone Management.” United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Accessed June 4. http://www.unesco.org/csi/act/russia/legalpro5.htm
  • United States National Ocean Service, Special Projects. Population Trends along the Coastal United States: 1980-2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Management and Budget Office, 2004.
  • Wild Dunes Beach and Racquet Club and Research Planning Institute. The Shore at Wild Dunes. Isle of Palms, SC: Wild Dunes Beach and Racquet Club. 1988 S.C. Acts 634 §48-39-280(b), n.d.
  • Mark, Wyckoff “The Implications of Lucas on Planning and Zoning.” Planning and Zoning News 10, no. 9 (1992): 11–13, 17.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.