Institutionalizing EU strategic spatial planning into domestic planning systems: trajectories of change in Italy and England

Bibliography

• Allmendinger, Phil, and Graham Haughton. “Challenging Localism.” Town & Country Planning 80, no. 7–8 (2011): 314–317.
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, Phil, and Graham Haughton. “The Evolution and Trajectories of English Spatial Governance: ‘Neoliberal’ Episodes in Planning.” Planning Practice & Research 28, no. 1 (2013): 6–26. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.699223
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, Phil, and Graham Haughton. “Post Political Spatial Planning in England: A Crisis of Consensus.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 37, no. 1 (2012): 89–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00468.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, Mark. “Intervention or Interference? Central Government Involvement in the Plan-Making Process in Six English Regions.” The Town Planning Review 70, no. 1 (1999): 1–24. doi: 10.3828/tpr.70.1.u22870752lh2x474
   Google Scholar
• Baker, Mark, and Cecilia Wong. “The Delusion of Strategic Spatial Planning: What’s Left after the Labour Government’s English Regional Experiment?” Planning Practice & Research 28, no. 1 (2013): 83–103. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.694314
   Google Scholar
• Boddy, Martin, and Hannah Hickman. “The ‘Cambridge Phenomenon’ and the Challenge of Planning Reform.” The Town Planning Review 87, no. 1 (2016): 31–52. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2016.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhme, Kai, and Christer Bengs, eds. From Trends to Visions: The European Spatial Development Perspective. Stockholm: Nordregio, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, Kai, and Bas Waterhout. “The Europeanization of Planning.” In European Spatial Research and Planning, edited by A. Faludi, 227–250. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, Tanja A., and Thomas Risse. “When Europe Hits Home: Europeanization and Domestic Change.” European Integration Online Papers (EIoP) 4, no. 15 (2000). Accessed March 10, 2016. http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2000-015a.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, C., A. Jordan, V. Gravey, N. Berny, S. Bulmer, N. Carter, R. Cowell, et al. The EU Referendum and the UK Environment: An Expert Review. How Has EU Membership Affected the UK and What Might Change in the Event of a Vote to Remain or Leave? (2016) Accessed September 4, 2017. http://environmentEUref.blogspot.co.uk/.
   Google Scholar
• Capoccia, Giovanni, and R. Daniel Kelemen. “The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism.” World Politics 59, no. 3 (2007): 341–369. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100020852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CLGC (Communities and Local Government Committee). Abolition of Regional Spatial Strategies: A Planning Vacuum. London: TSO, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, Ruth B, and David Collier. Shaping the Political Arena. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Colomb, Claire. “The Added Value of Transnational Cooperation: Towards a New Framework for Evaluating Learning and Policy Change.” Planning, Practice and Research 22, no. 3 (2007): 347–372. doi: 10.1080/02697450701666712
   Google Scholar
• Conservative Party. “ Control Shift: Returning Power to Local Communities, Responsibility Agenda.” Policy Green Paper 9 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Conservative Party. Open Source Planning. London: Conservative Central Office, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Cotella, Giancarlo, and Umberto Janin Rivolin. “Europeanization of Spatial Planning Through Discourse and Practice in Italy.” disP 47, no. 3 (2011): 42–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell, Richard. “The EU Referendum, Planning and the Environment: Where Now for the UK?” Town Planning Review 88, no. 2 (2017): 153–171. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2017.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell, Richard, and S. Owens. “Land Use Planning.” In The EU Referendum and the UK Environment: An Expert Review. How Has EU Membership Affected the UK and What Might Change in the Event of a Vote to Remain or Leave? (2016), edited by C. Burns, A. Jordan, V. Gravey, N. Berny, S. Bulmer, N. Carter, R. Cowell, et al., 58–67. Accessed September 4, 2017. http://environmentEUref.blogspot.co.uk/.
   Google Scholar
• Dabinett, Gordon. “Doing Strategic Planning Differently? The Yorkshire and Humber Regional Spatial Strategy.” In Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning, edited by Simin Davoudi and Strange Ian, 147–180. London: Routledge , 2009.
   Google Scholar
• De Luca, Giuseppe, and Valeria Lingua. “Evolution in Regional Planning: The Italian Path.” ICONARP 2, no. 2 (2014): 14–33.
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, Stephanie, Claire Colomb, and Vincent Nadin. European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation. London: Routledge, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, Stephanie, Dominic Stead, and Wil Zonneveld. “The Europeanization of Spatial Planning Through Territorial Cooperation.” Planning Practice and Research, Special Issue 22, no. 3 (2007): 291–307. doi: 10.1080/02697450701688245
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, Andreas. “EUropeanisation or Europeanisation of Spatial Planning?” Planning Theory & Practice 15, no. 2 (2014): 155–169. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2014.902095
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, Andreas. “Positioning European Spatial Planning.” European Planning Studies 10, no. 7 (2002): 897–909. doi: 10.1080/0965431022000013284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, Andreas, and Bas Waterhout. The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective: No Masterplan. London: Routledge, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Fedeli, Valeria. “Planning in Italy, Seventy Years after the First National Planning Law.” disP 48, no. 2 (2012): 106–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedeli, Valeria, and Francesco Gastaldi, eds. Pratiche strategiche di pianificazione. Riflessioni a partire da nuovi spazi urbani in costruzione. Milano: FrancoAngeli, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Giannakourou, Georgia. “The Europeanization of National Planning: Explaining the Causes and the Potentials of Change.” Planning Practice & Research 27, no. 1 (2012): 117–135. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.661195
   Google Scholar
• Glasson, John, and Tim Marshall. Regional Planning. London: Routledge, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, E.R. “Institutions and Their Design.” In The Theory of Institutional Design, edited by E.R. Goodin, 1–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Gualini Enrico. “‘New Programming’ and the Influence of Transnational Discourses in the Reform of Regional Policy in Italy.” European Planning Studies 9, no. 6 (2001): 755–771. doi: 10.1080/09654310120073801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gualini, Enrico. “Challenges to Multi-level Governance: Contradictions and Conflicts in the Europeanization of Italian Regional Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 10, no. 4 (2003): 616–636. doi: 10.1080/1350176032000101280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gualini, Enrico. Multi-level Governance and Institutional Change: The Europeanization of Regional Policy in Italy. Farnham: Ashgate, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, Graham, Phil Allmendinger, and Stijn Oosterlynck. “Spaces of Neoliberal Experimentation: Soft Spaces, Postpolitics, and Neoliberal Governmentality.” Environment and Planning A 45 (2013): 217–234. doi: 10.1068/a45121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, Graham, and Phil Allmendinger. “Spatial Planning and the New Localism.” Planning Practice & Research, Special Number 28, no. 1 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Janin Rivolin, Umberto. “Conforming and Performing Planning Systems in Europe: An Unbearable Cohabitation.” Planning Practice & Research 23, no. 2 (2008): 167–186. doi: 10.1080/02697450802327081
   Google Scholar
• Janin Rivolin, Umberto. “Shaping European Spatial Planning. How Italy’s Experience Can Contribute.” Town Planning Review 74, no. 1 (2003): 51–76. doi: 10.3828/tpr.74.1.4
   Google Scholar
• Janin Rivolin, Umberto, and Andreas Faludi. “Southern Perspectives on European Spatial Planning.” European Planning Studies 13 (2005): 195–331. doi: 10.1080/0965431042000321785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunzmann, Klaus R. “Spatial Planning: For Whom?” CRIOS 2 (2011): 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Lenschow, Andrea, Duncan Liefferink, and Sietske Veenman. “When the Birds Sing. A Framework for Analysing Domestic Factors Behind Policy Convergence.” Journal of European Public Policy 12, no. 5 (2005): 797–816. doi: 10.1080/13501760500161373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingua, Valeria. “ Strategic Planning in England in the Era of Localism.” Paper presented at the XXIX AESOP Congress “Definite Space – Fuzzy Responsibility”, Prague, July 13–16, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Lingua, Valeria. “When A Planning Tier … Disappears! La cooperazione interistituzionale per la pianificazione di area vasta: temi e problemi tra Italia e Inghilterra.” Urbanistica Informazioni 4 (2013): 449–451.
   Google Scholar
• Lingua, Valeria, and Loris Servillo. “The Modernization of the Italian Planning System.” In Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe, edited by M. Reimer, P. Getimis, and H. Blotevogel, 127–148. London: Routledge, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, Alex, and Mark Tewdwr-Jones. “Is Planning ‘under Attack’? Chronicling the Deregulation of Urban and Environmental Planning in England.” European Planning Studies 22, no. 2 (2014): 345–361. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.741574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis, Albrechts, Healey Patsy, and Klaus R. Kunzmann. “Strategic Spatial Planning and Regional Governance in Europe.” Journal of the American Planning Association 69, no. 2 (2003): 113–129. doi: 10.1080/01944360308976301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, James, and K. Ann Thelen. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, Vincent. “The Emergence of the Spatial Planning Approach in England.” Planning Practice and Research 22 (2007): 43–62. doi: 10.1080/02697450701455934
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, Vincent, and Dominic Stead. “European Spatial Planning Systems, Social Models and Learning.” disP – The Planning Review 44, no. 172 (2008): 35–47. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2008.10557001
   Google Scholar
• ODPM. Planning Policy Statement 1: Delivering Sustainable Development. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Olesen, Kristian. “The Neoliberalisation of Strategic Spatial Planning.” Planning Theory 13, no. 3 (2014): 288–303. doi: 10.1177/1473095213499340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. P. “The many faces of Europeanization.” Journal of Common Market Studies 40, no. 5 (2002): 921–952. doi: 10.1111/1468-5965.00403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PAS (Planning Advisory Service). Doing Your Duty. Examples of Early Practice, 2013. Accessed March 14, 2016. http://www.pas.gov.uk/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=dadcbbda-29f4-4561-a1ed-2e208762bde6&groupId=332612.
   Google Scholar
• PAS (Planning Advisory Service). A Simple Guide for Strategic Planning and the Duty to Cooperate, 2012. Accessed March 14, 2016. http://www.pas.gov.uk/documents/332612/1099327/Simple+Guide+to+Strategic+Planning+and+the+Duty+to+Cooperate+%2878kb+8+pages%29/98b14aa0-5eec-49f9-8341-1f3c1d687cfa.
   Google Scholar
• Raco, M. “Sustainable Development, Rolled-Out Neoliberalism and Sustainable Communities.” Antipode 37 (2005): 324–347. doi: 10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00495.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli, Claudio M. “Europeanization, Policy Learning, and New Modes of Governance.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 10, no. 3 (2008): 239–254. doi: 10.1080/13876980802231008
   Google Scholar
• Salet, Willem, and Enrico Gualini, eds. Framing Strategic Urban Projects: Learning from Current Experience in European Urban Regions. London: Routledge, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Servillo, Loris, and Valeria Lingua. “The Innovation of the Italian Planning System: Actors, Path Dependencies, Cultural Contradictions and a Missing Epilogue.” European Planning Studies 22, no. 2 (2014): 400–417. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.752443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Servillo, Loris, and Pieter Van den Broeck. “The Social Construction of Planning Systems. A Strategic-Relational Institutionalist Approach.” Planning Practice & Research 27, no. 1 (2012): 41–61. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.661179
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, David, and Olivier Sykes. “European Spatial Development Policy and Evolving Forms of Territorial Mobilisation in the United Kingdom.” Planning Practice & Research 20, no. 2 (2005): 183–199. doi: 10.1080/02697450500414694
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, David, and Olivier Sykes. “Investigating the Application of the European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP) to Regional Planning in the United Kingdom.” Town Planning Review 74, no. 1 (2003): 31–50. doi: 10.3828/tpr.74.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, Andre. “Taking Path Dependence Seriously: An Historical Institutionalist Research Agenda in Planning History.” Planning Perspectives 30, no. 1 (2015): 17–38. doi: 10.1080/02665433.2013.874299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, Dominic, and Giancarlo Cotella. “Differential Europe: Domestic Actors and Their Role in Shaping Spatial Planning Systems.” disP 47, no. 186 (2011): 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, Dominic, and Evert Meijers. “Spatial Planning and Policy Integration: Concepts, Facilitators and Inhibitors.” Planning Theory & Practice 10, no. 3 (2009): 317–332. doi: 10.1080/14649350903229752
   Google Scholar
• Swain, C., T. Marshall, and T. Baden, eds. English Regional Planning 2000-2012: Lessons for the Future. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Taxpayers Alliance. “ The Case for Abolishing Regional Development Agencies.” Structure of Government, 3, 2008. Accessed February 2, 2016. https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/taxpayersalliance/pages/224/attachments/original/1427898375/structure_of_government_3_the_case_for_abolishing_rdas_e.pdf?1427898375.
   Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, Mark, Kevin Bishop, and David Wilkinson. “Euroscepticism, Political Agendas and Spatial Planning: British National and Regional Planning Policy in Uncertain Times.” European Planning Studies 8, no. 5 (2000): 651–668. doi: 10.1080/713666425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, Mark, Nick Gallent, and Janet Morphet. “An Anatomy of Spatial Planning: Coming to Terms with the Spatial Element in UK Planning.” European Planning Studies 18, no. 2 (2010): 239–257. doi: 10.1080/09654310903491572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, Mark, and Williams Richard. The European Dimension of British Planning. London: Routledge, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. “Veto Players and Institutional Analysis.” Governance 13, no. 4 (2000): 441–474. doi: 10.1111/0952-1895.00141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vettoretto, Luciano. “Planning Cultures in Italy – Reformism, Laissez-Faire and Contemporary Trends.” In Planning Cultures in Europe, edited by Jörg Knieling and Frank Othengrafen, 189–204. Farnham: Ashgate, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Waterhout, Bas, The Institutionalisation of European Spatial Planning. Delft: Delft University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Zanon, Bruno. “Scaling Down and Scaling Up Processes of Territorial Governance. Cities and Regions Facing Institutional Reform and Planning Challenges.” Urban Planning & Research 6, no. 1 (2013): 19–39.
   Google Scholar