Introduction: historical institutionalist perspectives on European spatial planning

Bibliography

• Adams, Neil, Giancarlo Cotella, and Richard Nunes. Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Building on EU Enlargement. London and New York: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, Philip. “Culture, Planning and Path Dependence: Some Reflections on the Problems of Comparison.” Town Planning Review 82, no. 1 (2011): 13–28. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2011.4
   Google Scholar
• Chokor, Boyowa A. “External European Influences and Indigenous Social Values in Urban Development and Planning in the Third World: The Case of Ibadan, Nigeria.” Planning Perspectives 8, no. 3 (1993): 283–306. doi: 10.1080/02665439308725776
   Google Scholar
• Collier, Ruth B., and David Collier. Shaping the Political Arena. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Colomb, Claire. “The Added Value of Transnational Cooperation: Towards a New Framework for Evaluating Learning and Policy Change.” Planning, Practice and Research 22, no. 3 (2007): 347–372. doi: 10.1080/02697450701666712
   Google Scholar
• Dabinett, Gordon. “Transnational Spatial Planning—Insights from Practices in the European Union: Practice Review.” Urban Policy and Research 24, no. 2 (2006): 283–290. doi: 10.1080/08111140600704723
   Google Scholar
• Dabinett, Gordon, and Tim Richardson. “The Europeanization of Spatial Strategy: Shaping Regions and Spatial Justice Through Governmental Ideas 1.” International Planning Studies 10, no. 2–3 (2005): 201–218. doi: 10.1080/13563470500378549
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, Martin, and Jurian Edelenbos. “An Insider’s Look Into Policy Transfer in Transnational Expert Networks.” European Planning Studies 15, no. 5 (2007): 687–706. doi: 10.1080/09654310701213996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duempelmann, Sonja. “Creating Order with Nature: Transatlantic Transfer of Ideas in Park System Planning in Twentieth-Century Washington DC, Chicago, Berlin and Rome.” Planning Perspectives 24, no. 2 (2009): 143–173. doi: 10.1080/02665430902734277
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, Stefanie, Claire Colomb, and Vincent Nadin. European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation. London: Routledge, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, Stefanie, D. Dominic Stead, and Wil Zonneveld. “The Europeanization of Spatial Planning Through Territorial Cooperation.” Planning Practice and Research 22, no. 3 (2007): 291–307. doi: 10.1080/02697450701688245
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, Andreas. “European Spatial Planning: A Contested Field.” Built Environment 27, no. 4 (2001): 244–252.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, Andreas. “European Territorial Cooperation and Learning: Reflections by the Guest Editor on the Wider Implications.” disP-The Planning Review 44, no. 172 (2008): 3–10. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2008.10556998
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, Andreas, and Bas Waterhout. The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective: No Masterplan. London and New York: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Giannakourou, Georgia. “Transforming Spatial Planning Policy in Mediterranean Countries: Europeanization and Domestic Change.” European Planning Studies 13, no. 2 (2005): 319–331. doi: 10.1080/0365431042000321857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, Sara, and Patsy Healey. “A Sociological Institutionalist Approach to the Study of Innovation in Governance Capacity.” Urban Studies 42, no. 11 (2005): 2055–2069. doi: 10.1080/00420980500279778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hachmann, Verena. “Promoting Learning in Transnational Networks.” disP-The Planning Review 44, no. 172 (2008): 11–20. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2008.10556999
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Peter A., and Rosemary C. R. Taylor. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44, no. 5 (1996): 936–957. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, Patsy. “The New Institutionalism and the Transformative Goals of Planning.” Institutions and Planning 61 (2007): 61–87.
   Google Scholar
• Hein, Carola. “The Exchange of Planning Ideas from Europe to the USA After the Second World War: Introductory Thoughts and a Call for Further Research.” Planning Perspectives 29, no. 2 (2014): 143–151. doi: 10.1080/02665433.2014.886522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunzmann, Klaus. “The Europeanization of Spatial Planning.” In Regional Development and Spatial Planning in an Enlarged European Union, edited by Neil Adams, Jeremy Alden, and Neil Harris, 43–64. London and New York: Routledge, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Lingua, Valeria, and Loris Servillo. “The Modernisation of the Italian Planning System.” In Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes, edited by Mario Reimer, Panagotis Getimis, and Hans Blotevogel, 127–148. London and New York: Routledge, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, Vincent, and Dominic Stead. “European Spatial Planning Systems, Social Models and Learning.” disP – The Planning Review 44, no. 172 (2008): 35–47. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2008.10557001
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, Claudio M. “Whither Europeanization? Concept Stretching and Substantive Change.” European Integration Online Papers (EIoP) 4, no. 8 (2000): 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, Mario, Panagotis Getimis, and Hans Blotevogel. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. London and New York: Routledge, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Rivolin, Umberto J., and Andreas Faludi. “The Hidden Face of European Spatial Planning: Innovations in Governance.” European Planning Studies 13, no. 2 (2005): 195–215. doi: 10.1080/0965431042000321785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salet, Willem, and Andreas Faludi. The Revival of Strategic Spatial Planning. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Servillo, Loris, and Pieter Van Den Broeck. “The Social Construction of Planning Systems: A Strategic-Relational Institutionalist Approach.” Planning Practice and Research 27, no. 1 (2012): 41–61. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.661179
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, David, and Oliver Sykes. “Investigating the Application of the European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP) to Regional Planning in the United Kingdom.” Town Planning Review 74, no. 1 (2003): 31–50. doi: 10.3828/tpr.74.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, André. “Taking Path Dependence Seriously: An Historical Institutionalist Research Agenda in Planning History.” Planning Perspectives 30, no. 1 (2015): 17–38. doi: 10.1080/02665433.2013.874299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, Dominic, and Giancarlo Cotella. “Differential Europe: Domestic Actors and Their Role in Shaping Spatial Planning Systems.” disP – The Planning Review 47, no. 186 (2012): 13–21. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2011.10557140
   Google Scholar
• Stead, Dominic, J. Jochem de Vries, and Tuna Tasan-Kok. “Planning Cultures and Histories: Influences on the Evolution of Planning Systems and Spatial Development Patterns.” European Planning Studies 23, no. 11 (2015): 2127–2132. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1016402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, Mark, and Donald McNeill. “The Politics of City-Region Planning and Governance.” European Urban and Regional Studies 7, no. 2 (2000): 119–134. doi: 10.1177/096977640000700202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, Mark, and Richard Williams. The European Dimension of British Planning. London and New York: Routledge, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Waterhout, Bas. “Episodes of Europeanization of Dutch National Spatial Planning.” Planning, Practice and Research 22, no. 3 (2007): 309–327. doi: 10.1080/02697450701666696
   Google Scholar
• Zonneveld, Wil. “The Europeanization of Dutch National Spatial Planning: An Uphill Battle.” disP-The Planning Review 41, no. 163 (2005): 4–15. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2005.10556936
   Google Scholar