Time scales and planning history: medium- and long-term interpretations of downtown Toronto planning and development

Bibliography

• Alexander, E. Approaches to Planning: Introducing Current Planning Theories, Concepts and Issues. Luxembourg: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P. Planning Theory. 2nd ed. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Alvater, E., and J. Hoffmann. “The West German State Derivation Debate: The Relation between Economy and Politics as a Problem of Marxist State Theory.” Social Text 24 (1990): 134–155. doi: 10.2307/827831
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, D., J. Guldi, and J. Baudry. “Le retour de la longue durée: une perspective.” Annales, Histoire, Sciences Sociales 2 (avril 2015): 289–318.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, M. The Historian’s Craft. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1992 [1941].
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, M. La société féodale. Paris: Albin Michel, 1998 [1939–1940].
   Google Scholar
• Boudreau, J-A., R. Keil, and D. Young. Changing Toronto: Governing Urban Neoliberalism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bounce, S. 2004. “The Emergence of ‘Smart Growth’ Intensification in Toronto: Environment and Economy in the New Official Plan.” Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability 9 (2004): 177–191. doi: 10.1080/1354983042000199525
   Google Scholar
• Bourne, L. S., J. N. H. Britton, and D. Leslie. “The Greater Toronto Region: The Challenges of Economic Restructuring, Social Diversity, and Globalization.” In Canadian Urban Regions: Trajectories of Growth and Change, edited by L. S. Bourne, T. Hutton, R. G. Shearmur, and J. Simmons, 236–268. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bozikovic, A. “Google’s Sidewalk Labs Signs Deal for ‘Smart City’ Makeover of Toronto’s Waterfront.” The Globe and Mail, October 17, 2017. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/toronto/google-sidewalk-toronto-waterfront/article36612387/.
   Google Scholar
• Braudel, F. Capitalism and Material Life 1400–1800. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Braudel, F. The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II. London: Collins, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Braudel, F. “History and Social Sciences: The Longue Durée.” In On History, 25–54. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Braudel, F. On History. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Braudel, F. Civilization and Capitalism, 15th–18th Century, Volume III: The Perspective of the World. London: Collins, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Braudel, F. Memory and the Mediterranean. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, C. “Google’s Sidewalk Labs Has Big Plans to Remake Toronto, But Some Say the Whole Thing Is a Big Mistake.” Financial Post, January 26, 2018. https://www.business.financialpost.com/technology/googles-sidewalk-labs-has-big-plans-to-remake-toronto-but-some-say-the-whole-is-a-mistake.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., M. Tait, and C. Watkins. “Is There Space for Better Planning in a Neoliberal World? Implications for Planning Practice and Theory.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 34 (2014): 45–59. doi: 10.1177/0739456X13514614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cangiani, M. “Karl Polanyi’s Institutional Theory: Market Society and Its ‘Disembedded’ Economy.” Journal of Economic Issues 45 (2011): 177–198. doi: 10.2753/JEI0021-3624450110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caulfield, J. The Tiny Perfect Mayor: David Crombie and Toronto’s Reform Aldermen. Toronto: Lorimer, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• CBRE Ltd. New Office Development: Toronto CBD. Toronto: CBRE, 2013. www.cbre.ca/AssetLibrary/TorontoOfficeDevelopment-Sep2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D. “The Climate of History: Four Theses.” Critical Inquiry 35 (2009): 197–222. doi: 10.1086/596640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, S. “Beware of Google’s Intensions.” Wired, February 1, 2018. https://www.wired.com/story/sidewalk-labs-toronto-google-risks/.
   Google Scholar
• CUI (Canadian Urban Institute). The New Geography of Office Location and the Consequences of Business as Usual in the GTA. Toronto: CUI, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, G. Karl Polanyi: The Limits of the Market. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Darchen, S. “The Creative City and the Redevelopment of the Toronto Entertainment District: A BIA-led Regeneration Process.” International Planning Studies 18 (2013): 188–203. doi: 10.1080/13563475.2013.774147
   Google Scholar
• Data Management Group. 2011, 2006, 1996 and 1986 Travel Survey Summaries for the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area. Toronto: DAG, University of Toronto, 2011. www.dmg.utoronto.ca/transportation-tomorrow/tts-demographic-and-trabel-summaries/2011travel-summaries-gtha
   Google Scholar
• Desfor, G., and J. Laidley, eds. Reshaping Toronto’s Waterfront. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• DRIÉA (Direction générale et interdépartementale de l’équipement et de l’aménagement) Île-de-France. Le schéma directeur d’aménagement et d’urbanisme de la Région de Paris. Paris: DRIÉA, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. S., and J. DeFilippis. “Introduction: The Structure and Debates of Planning Theory.” In Readings in Planning Theory, 4th ed., edited by S. S. Fainstein and J. DeFilippis, 1–18. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Febvre, L. Combats pour l’histoire. Paris: Armand Colin, 1952.
   Google Scholar
• Filion, P. “The Neighbourhood Improvement Plan, Montreal and Toronto: Contrasts between a Participatory and Centralised Approach to Urban Policy Making.” Urban History Review 17 (1988): 16–28. doi: 10.7202/1017698ar
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filion, P. “Rupture or Continuity? Modern and Post-Modern Planning in Toronto.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 23 (1999): 421–444. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.00206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filion, P. “Balancing Concentration and Dispersion? Public Policy and Urban Structure in Toronto.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 18 (2000): 163–189. doi: 10.1068/c2m
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filion, P., and C. Sanderson. “Institutional Arrangements and Planning Outcomes: Inter-Agency Competition on the Toronto Waterfront.” In Canada in Cities: The Politics and Policy of Federal-Local Governance, edited by C. Andrew and K. Graham, 131–163. Montréal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Frisken, F. The Public Metropolis: The Political Dynamics of Urban Expansion in the Toronto Region, 1924–2003. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Gad, G., and D. W. Holdsworth. “Building for City, Region and Nation: Office Development in Toronto 1834–1984.” In Forging a Consensus: Historical Essays on Toronto, edited by V. L. Russell, 272–319. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Globe and Mail. 1955. “Editorial: Tighten the Zoning Bylaw.” February 15, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Globe and Mail. 1957. “Board Votes to Ease Apartment Zoning.” September 14, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Globe and Mail. 1958. “New City Hall Judges Urge Redevelopment of Downtown Area.” May 15, 29.
   Google Scholar
• Globe and Mail. 1969. “Zoning Change Favoured.” October 7, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, H. C. Report of the Royal Commission on Metropolitan Toronto. Toronto: Government of Ontario, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Grenier, J-Y. “Expliquer et comprendre la construction du temps de l’histoire économique.” In Les formes de l’expérience: une autre histoire sociale, edited by B. Lepetit, 238–242. Paris: Albin Michel, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Guldi, J. and D. Armitage. The History Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gurvich, G. Déterminismes sociaux et liberté humaine: vers l’étude sociologique des cheminements de la liberté. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Hackworth, J. The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology, and Governance in American Urbanism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design Since 1880. 4th ed. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. “Planning through Debate: The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory.” Town Planning Review 63 (1992): 143–162. doi: 10.3828/tpr.63.2.422x602303814821
   Google Scholar
• Hirsh, J., and J. Kannankulam. “The Spaces of Capital: The Political Form of Capitalism and the Internationalization of the State.” Antipode 43 (2011): 12–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00809.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, G., and D. L. A. Gordon. Planning Canadian Communities: An Introduction to the Principles, Practice, and Participants. Toronto: Nelson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, J., and S. Picciotto, eds. State and Capital: A Marxist Debate. London: Edward Arnold, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, C. 2014. “Big Ideas: Learning the Lessons of St. Lawrence Neighbourhood.” Toronto Star, May 3.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, B. “Toronto’s Cultural Renaissance.” Canadian Journal of Communication 30 (2005): 169–186. doi: 10.22230/cjc.2005v30n2a1417
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. State Theory: Putting Capitalist States in their Place. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. “Fordism and Post-Fordism: A Critical Reformulation.” In Pathways to Regionalism and Industrial Development, edited by A. J. Scott and M. J. Storper, 43–65. London: Routledge, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. “Bringing the State Back In (Yet Again): Reviews, Revisions, Rejections, and Redirections.” International Review of Sociology 11 (2001): 149–173. doi: 10.1080/713674035
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. State Power: A Strategic-Relational Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, J., and J. Spelt. The Changing Face of Toronto: A Study in Urban Geography. Ottawa: Queen’s Printer, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, R. “Transit Oriented Development in Copenhagen Denmark: From the Finger Plan to Ørestad.” Journal of Transport Geography 48 (2012): 163–174.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R. E. “Introduction: Fernand Braudel, the Longue Durée and World-System Analysis.” In The Longue Durée and World-System Analysis, edited by R. E. Lee, 1–8. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lemon, J. T. Toronto since 1918: An Illustrated History. Toronto: James Lorimer, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, L. 1975. “Chief Purpose Has Been to Protect Property Values.” Globe and Mail, October 1, 47.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, L. 1976. “Aldermanic Ups and Downs in the Great Zoning Debate.” Globe and Mail, February 2, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Lorinc, J. “Sidewalk Labs Launches Its Dog and Pony Show.” Spacing, February 20, 2018. https://www.spacing.ca/toronto/2018/02/20/lorinc-sidewalk-labs-launches-dog-pony-show/.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V. “New Institutionalism and Urban Politics.” In Theories of Urban Politics, edited by J. S. Davies and D. L. Inbroscio, 91–105. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• McArthur, J. 1993. “Real Estate Has Long Way to Climb Back Up.” Toronto Star, November 17, C2.
   Google Scholar
• Metro Toronto. Official Plan for the Urban Structure. Toronto: Metro Toronto, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Metro Toronto Planning Board. Proposed Official Plan of the Metropolitan Toronto Planning Area: Draft. Toronto: MTPB, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Metro Toronto Planning Board. Metropolitan Plan for the Metropolitan Toronto Planning Area, Supplement. Toronto: MTPB, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• MTARTS (Metropolitan Toronto and Region Transportation Study). Choices for a Growing Region. Toronto: Government of Ontario, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• MTARTS (Metropolitan Toronto and Region Transportation Study). Transportation for the Region Study: Statement of Principles and Recommendations. Toronto: Government of Ontario, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Monocle. 2014. “Most Liveable City: Copenhagen.” http://monocle.com/film/affairs/most-liveable-city-copenhagen/.
   Google Scholar
• Moos, M. “‘Generationed’ Space: Societal Restructuring and Young Adults’ Changing Residential Location Pattern.” The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien 58 (2014): 11–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0064.2013.12052.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moos, M. “From Gentrification to Youthification? The Increasing Importance of Young Age in Delineating High-Density Living.” Urban Studies 53 (2016): 2903–2920. doi: 10.1177/0042098015603292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mourard, L., and F. Fourquet. La naissance des villes nouvelles: anatomie d’une décision (1961–1969). Paris: Presses ponts et chaussées, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Nowlan, D. M., and N. Nowlan. The Bad Trip: The Untold Story of the Spadina Expressway. Toronto: House of Anansi, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario (Government of). Design for Development: The Toronto-Centred Region. Toronto: Government of Ontario, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario (Government of, Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing). Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe. Toronto: Government of Ontario, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ostler, T. Downtown Toronto: Trends, Issues, Intensification. Toronto: City of Toronto, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Pain, K., and B. E. Prentice. “Canadian Cities.” In Global Urban Analysis: A Survey of Cities in Globalization, edited by P. J. Taylor, P. Ni, B. Derudder, M. Hoyler, J. Huany, and F. Witlox, 251–255. London: Earthscan, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, T. 2012. “Why Corporations Are Flocking Back to Downtown Toronto?” The Globe and Mail, November 10.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Pigg, S. 2011. “Why Toronto Businesses Are Moving Downtown.” Toronto Star, September 23, C1.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press, 2001 [1944].
   Google Scholar
• Polèse, M., and R. Shearmur. “Culture, Language, and the Location of High-Order Service Functions: The Case of Montreal and Toronto.” Economic Geography 80 (2004): 329–350. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2004.tb00241.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer, S. W. “Time after Time: Narratives of the Longue Durée in the Anthropocene.” Transatlantica: American Studies Journal 1 (2015). https://journals.openedition.org/transatlantica/7344
   Google Scholar
• Schettkat, R., and L. Yocarini. “The Shift to Services Employment: A Review of the Literature.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 17 (2006): 127–147. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2005.04.002
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, J. Up Against City Hall. Toronto: James Lorimer, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, J. The Shape of the City: Toronto Struggles with Modern Planning. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, J. The Shape of the Suburb: Toronto Struggles with Modern Planning. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, J. How We Changed Toronto: The Inside Story of Twelve Creative, Tumultuous Years in Civic Life, 1969–1980. Toronto: James Lorimer, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Sidewalk Labs. Vision. October 17, 2017. https://sidewalktoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Sidewalk-Labs-Vision-Sections-of-RPF-Submission.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, A. “Taking Path Dependence Seriously: An Historical Institutionalist Research Agenda in Planning History.” Planning Perspectives 30 (2015): 17–38. doi: 10.1080/02665433.2013.874299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, A. “Institutions and Urban Space: Land, Infrastructure and Governance in the Production of Urban Property.” Planning Theory and Practice 19 (2018): 21–38. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2017.1408136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, J. M. Great Cities and their Traffic. London: Gollancz, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Tomich, D. “The Order of Historical Time: The Longue Durée and Micro-History.” In The Longue Durée and World-System Analysis, edited by R. E. Lee, 9–34. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Toronto (City of, Planning Board). Third Report and Official Plan. Toronto: City of Toronto, 1949.
   Google Scholar
• Toronto (City of, Planning Board). Urban Renewal: A Study of the City of Toronto. Toronto: City of Toronto, 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Toronto (City of, Planning Board). The Changing City: A Forecast of Planning Issues for the City of Toronto. Toronto: City of Toronto, 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Toronto (City of, Planning Board). Plan for Downtown Toronto. Toronto: City of Toronto, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Toronto (City of, Planning Board). Improvement Programme for Residential Areas. Toronto: City of Toronto, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Toronto (City of, Planning Board). Don Vale Urban Renewal Scheme. Toronto: City of Toronto, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Toronto (City of, Planning Board). Proposals for a New Plan for Toronto. Toronto: City of Toronto, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Toronto (City of, Planning Board). Trefann Court Urban Renewal Scheme: Redevelopment Plan. Toronto: City of Toronto, 1966a.
   Google Scholar
• Toronto (City of, Development Department). Redevelopment Plan for Alexandra Park. Toronto: City of Toronto, 1966b.
   Google Scholar
• Toronto (City of, Planning Board). Neighbourhood Improvement Program. Toronto: City of Toronto, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Toronto (City of, Joint Committee on NIP). Criteria and Priorities for the Neighbourhood Improvement Program. Toronto: City of Toronto, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Toronto (City of, Planning Board). Central Area Plan Review. Toronto: City of Toronto, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Toronto (City of, Planning Board). Central Area Plan. Toronto: City of Toronto, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Toronto (City of). Toronto Official Plan (Office Consolidation, Originally Adopted in 2006). Toronto: City of Toronto, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Toronto (City of). Profile Toronto: Toronto Employment Survey. Toronto: City of Toronto, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Toronto Daily Star. 1945. “Editorial: Vote Yes on the Subway Station.” December 29, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Toronto Daily Star. 1948. “Editorial: A $65 Million Transit Project.” March 6, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Toronto Daily Star. 1955. “Editorial: Apartment Muddle Thickens.” April 11, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Urban Strategies Inc. and Hariri Pontarini Architects. Tall Buildings: Inviting Change in Downtown Toronto. Toronto: City of Toronto, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Verma, N. Institutions and Planning. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006 (Current Research in Urban and Regional Studies).
   Google Scholar
• Walks, A. “Canada’s Housing Bubble Story: Mortgage Securitization, the State, and the Global Financial Crisis.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (2014): 256–284. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01184.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, S. Planning the Twentieth-Century City: The Advanced Capitalist World. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, S. V., R. Freestone, and C. Silver. “The ‘New’ Planning History: Reflections, Issues and Directions.” Town Planning Review 82 (2011): 231–262. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2011.16
   Google Scholar
• White, R. Planning Toronto: The Planners, the Plans, their Legacies 1940–1980. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Winsa, P. 2010. “Room in the Sky: ‘Inclusionary Zoning’ Could Make Families with Children Less Scarce in Toronto’s High-rise Condos.” Toronto Star, June 14, GT2.
   Google Scholar
• Wintrob, S. 2011. “City of Mass Construction: Toronto’s Unstoppable Condos Show No Signs of Slowing Down.” National Post, January 25, PH6.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. “Our Common Past: An Interpretation of Canadian Planning History.” Plan Canada 34 (July 1994): 12–34.
   Google Scholar
• Woodlief, A. “The Path Dependent City.” Urban Affairs Review 33 (1998): 405–437. doi: 10.1177/107808749803300308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar