Intersubjectivity in therapeutic interaction: a pragmatic analysis

REFERENCES

• Angus, L., & McLeod, J. (2004). Handbook of narrative psychotherapy: Practice, theory, research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• BCPSG. (2007). The foundational level of psychodynamic meaning: Implicit process in relation to conflict, defence and the dynamic unconscious. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 88, 843–860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beebe, B., Jaffe, J., Marjkese, S., Buck, K., Cen, H., & Cohen, P. (2010). The origins of 12 month attachment: A microanalysis of 4-month mother-infant interaction. Attachment & Human Development, 12, 3–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beebe, B., & Lachmann, M. F. (2002). Infant research and adult treatment: Co-constructing interactions. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biven, L., & Panksepp, J. (2008). Commentary on ‘Toward a neuroscience of empathy: Integrating affective and cognitive perspectives’. Neuropsychoanalysis, 9, 141–146.
   Google Scholar
• Bruschweiler-Stern, N., Harrison, A. M., Lyons-Ruth, K., Morgan, A. C., Nahum, J. P., & Sander, L. W. (2002). Explicating the implicit: The local level and the microprocess of change in the analytic situation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 83, 1051–1062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (1998). The teleological origins of mentalistic action explanations: A developmental hypothesis. Developmental Science, 1, 255–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2007). ‘Obsessesed with goals’: Functions and mechanisms of teleological interpretation of actions in humans. ActaPsychologica, 124, 60–78.
   Google Scholar
• Decety, J., & Chaminade, T. (2003). When the self represents the other: A new cognitive neuroscience view on psychological identification. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 577–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimaggio, G., Semarari, A., Carcione, A., Nicolo, G., & Procacci, D. (2007). Psychotherapy of personality disorders: Metacognition, states of mind and interpersonal cycles. Hove, Sussex: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J., & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.). (2006). Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Farrer, C., & Frith, C. D. (2002). Experiencing oneself vs another person as being the cause of an action: The neural correlates of the experience of agency. NeuroImage, 15, 596–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E., & Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization and the development of the self. New York, NY: Other Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P., & Luyten, P. (2009). A developmental, mentalization-based approach to the understanding and treatment of borderline personality disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 1355–1381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P., Target, M., Steele, H., & Steele, M. (1998). Reflective function manual, version 5 (Unpublished manuscript).
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, T., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: Sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenological Cognitive Science, 8, 465–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 14–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallese, V. (2007). Before and below ‘theory of mind’: Embodied simulation and the neural correlates of social cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 362, 659–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gergely, G., & Watson, J. (1996). The social biofeedback model of parental affective mirroring. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 77, 1181–1212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36, 41–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, T. (2006). Who speaks? Who looks? Who feels?International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87, 497–518.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hendriks-Jansen, H. (1996). Catching ourselves in the act: Situated activity, interactive emergence, evolution and human thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2002). The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile questioning. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1427–1446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, J., Beebe, B., Feldstein, S., Crown, C., & Jasnow, M. D. (2001). Rhythms of dialogue in infancy: Coordinated timing in development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 66 (2), 1–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology, Vols I & II. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye, K. (1982). Organism, apprentice and person. In E. Z.Tronick (Ed.), Social interchange in infancy (pp. 183–196). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knox, J. (2010). Self-agency in psychotherapy: Attachment, autonomy and intimacy. New York, NY; London: WW Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, W. (1997). Some further steps in narrative analysis. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 395–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labov, W., & Waletsky, J. (1967/1997). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 3–38.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. J., & Barley, D. E. (2001). Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 38, 357–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepper, G. (2000). Categories in talk and text. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2006). On the human ‘interaction engine’. In N.Enfield & S.Levinson (Eds.), Roots of sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 36–69). Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Luborsky, L. (1984). Principles of psychoanalytic psychotherapy: A manual for supportive-expressive treatment. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Luborsky, L., Mintz, J., Auerbach, A., Christoph, P., Bachrach, H., Todd, T., … O'Brien, C. P. (1980). Predicting the outcome of psychotherapy: Findings of the Penn Psychotherapy Project. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 471–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons-Ruth, K. (1999). The two-person unconscious: Intersubjective dialogue, enactive relational representation, and the emergence of new forms of relational organization. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 19, 576–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind self and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzoff, A. N. (2005). Imitation and other minds: The ‘like me’ hypothesis. In S.Hurley & N.Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science (Vol. 2, pp. 55–77). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzoff, A. N., & Gopnik, A. (1993). The role of imitation in understanding persons and developing a theory of mind. In S.Baron-Cohen, H.Tager-Flusberg, & D.Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism (pp. 335–366). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2008). Mirrors in the brain: How our minds share actions and emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures in conversation (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safran, J., Muran, C., & Eubanks-Carter, C. (2011). Repairing alliance ruptures. Psychotherapy, 48, 80–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defence of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1295–1345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. (2006). Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language and the arena in which culture is enacted. In N.Enfield & S.Levinson (Eds.), Roots of sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction. (pp. 70–96). Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schore, A. N. (1994). Affect regulation and the origin of the self. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schore, A. N. (2003). Affect disregulation and disorders of the self. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tronick, E. (2007). The neurobiological and social–emotional development of children. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Uddin, L. Q., Iacoboni, M., Lange, C., & Keenan, J. P. (2007). The self and social recognition: The role of cortical midline structures and mirror neurons. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 153–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhagen, A. (2005). Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar