409
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Papers

Toward a research-informed, evidence-based psychoanalytic supervision

Pages 5-19 | Received 13 May 2014, Accepted 12 Oct 2014, Published online: 06 Dec 2014

References

  • American Psychological Association, Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 271–285.
  • BarberJ. P., MuranJ. C., McCarthyK. S., & KeefeJ. R. (2013). Research on dynamic therapies. In M. J.Lambert (Ed.), Garfield and Bergin's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 443–494). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Barkham, M., Hardy, G. E., & Mellor-Clark, J. (Eds.). (2010). Developing and delivering practice-based evidence. Chichester: Wiley.
  • BeinartH. (2014). Building and sustaining the supervisory relationship. In C. E.Watkins, Jr. & D.Milne (Eds.), Wiley international handbook of clinical supervision (pp. 257–281). Oxford: Wiley.
  • BermanE. (1997). Relational psychoanalysis: A historical perspective. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 51, 185–203.
  • BernardJ. M., & GoodyearR. K. (2014). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
  • BinderJ. L., & StruppH. H. (1997). Supervision of psychodynamic therapies. In C. E.Watkins, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 44–62). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • BordinE. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy, 16, 252–260.
  • BordinE. S. (1983). A working alliance model of supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 11, 35–42.
  • BowerP., & GilbodyS. (2010). The current view of evidence and evidence-based practice. In M.Barkham, G. E.Hardy, & J.Mellor-Clark (Eds.), Developing and delivering practice-based evidence (pp. 1–20). Oxford: Wiley.
  • ChessickR. D. (1971). How the resident and supervisor disappoint each other. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 25, 272–283.
  • CookH., & BuirskiP. (1990). Countertransference in psychoanalytic supervision: An heuristic model. Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, 8, 77–87.
  • Crits-ChristophP., GibbonsM. B. C., & MukherjeeD. (2013). Psychotherapy process-outcome research. In M. J.Lambert (Ed.), Garfield and Bergin's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 298–340). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • CrowellM. G. (2007). Some thoughts on the countertransference resistance of the psychoanalytic supervisor. Modern Psychoanalysis, 32(1), 1–10.
  • DewaldP. A. (1969). Learning problems in psychoanalytic supervision: Diagnosis and management. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 10, 107–121.
  • DoehrmanM. J. (1976). Parallel process in supervision and psychotherapy. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 40(1), 1–104.
  • Driver, C., & Martin, E. (Eds.). (2002). Supervising psychotherapy: Psychoanalytic and psychodynamic perspectives. London: Sage.
  • Driver, C., & Martin, E. (Eds.). (2005). Supervision and the analytic attitude. London: Whurr.
  • EitingonM. (1923). Report on the Berlin psycho-analytical poliklinik. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 4, 254–269.
  • EitingonM. (1926). An address to the International Training Commission. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 7, 130–134.
  • EksteinR., & WallersteinR. (1958). The teaching and learning of psychotherapy. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • EllisM. V., & LadanyN. (1997). Inferences concerning supervisees and clients in clinical supervision: An integrative review. In C. E.Watkins, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 447–507). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • EmchM. (1955). The social context of supervision. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 36, 298–306.
  • FlemingJ., & BenedekT. F. (1964). Supervision: A method of teaching psychoanalysis. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 33, 71–96.
  • FlemingJ., & BenedekT. F. (1966). Psychoanalytic supervision: A method of clinical teaching. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.
  • FonagyP., RothA., & HiggittA. (2005). Psychodynamic psychotherapies: Evidence-based practice and clinical wisdom. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 69(1), 1–58.
  • Frawley-O'DeaM. G. (2003). Supervision is a relationship too: A contemporary approach to psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 13, 355–366.
  • Frawley-O'DeaM. G., & SarnatJ. E. (2001). The supervisory relationship: A contemporary psychodynamic approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • FriedlanderM. L., SiegelS., & BrenockK. (1989). Parallel process in counseling and supervision: A case study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 149–157.
  • GedimanH. K., & WolkenfeldF. (1980). The parallelism phenomenon in psychoanalysis and supervision: Its reconsideration as a triadic system. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 49, 234–255.
  • GoodyearR. K. (2014). Supervision as pedagogy: Attending to its essential instructional and learning processes. The Clinical Supervisor, 33, 82–99. doi:10.1080/07325223.2014.918914.
  • GundersonJ. G., & GabbardG. (1999). Making the case for psychoanalytic therapies in the current psychiatric environment. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 47, 679–704.
  • HeimannP. (1950). On countertransference. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 31, 81–84.
  • HessA. K. (2008). Psychotherapy supervision: A conceptual review. In A. K.Hess, K. D.Hess, & T. H.Hess (Eds.), Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 3–22). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • HymanM. (2008). Psychoanalytic supervision. In A. K.Hess, K. D.Hess, & T. H.Hess (Eds.), Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 97–113). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • InmanA. G., HutmanH., PendseA., DevdasL., LuuL., & EllisM. V. (2014). Current trends concerning supervisors, supervisees, and clients in clinical supervision. In C. E.Watkins, Jr. & D.Milne (Eds.), Wiley international handbook of clinical supervision (pp. 61–102). Oxford: Wiley.
  • JackelM. M. (1982). Supervision in dynamic psychotherapy. In M.Blumenfield (Ed.), Applied supervision in psychotherapy (pp. 5–43). New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.
  • JacobsD., DavidP., & MeyerD. J. (1995). The supervisory encounter: A guide for teachers of psychodynamic psychotherapy and analysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • LadanyN., ConstantineM. G., MillerK., EricksonC. D., & Muse-BurkeJ. L. (2000). Supervisor countertransference: A qualitative investigation into its identification and description. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 102–115.
  • Lane, R. C. (Ed.). (1990). Psychoanalytic approaches to supervision. New York, NY: Brunner.
  • LeichsenringF. (2005). Are psychodynamic and psychoanalytic therapies effective? A review of empirical data. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86, 841–868.
  • LeichsenringF., & KleinS. (2014). Evidence for psychodynamic psychotherapy in specific mental disorders: A systematic review. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 28, 4–32.
  • LeichsenringF., & RabungS. (2008). Effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 300, 1551–1565.
  • LeichsenringF., & RabungS. (2011). Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in complex mental disorders: Update of a meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 199, 15–22.
  • Levy, R. A., & Ablon, S. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of evidence-based psychodynamic psychotherapy. New York, NY: Springer.
  • McKinneyM. (2000). Relational perspectives and the supervisory triad. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 17, 565–584.
  • MilneD. L. (2009). Evidence-based clinical supervision: Principles and practice. Oxford: Wiley.
  • MilneD. (2014). Towards an evidence-based approach to clinical supervision. In C. E.Watkins, Jr. & D.Milne (Eds.), Wiley international handbook of clinical supervision (pp. 38–60). Oxford: Wiley.
  • MilneD., LeckC., JamesI., WilsonM., ProcterR., RammL., … WeetmanJ. (2012). High fidelity in clinical supervision research. In I.Fleming & L.Steen (Eds.), Supervision and clinical psychology: Theory, practice and perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 142–158). London: Routledge.
  • MilneD., & ReiserR. P. (2012). A rationale for evidence-based clinical supervision. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 42, 139–150.
  • MothersoleG. (1999). Parallel process: A review. The Clinical Supervisor, 18, 107–122.
  • NevoI., & Slonim-NevoE. (2011). The myth of evidence-based practice: Towards evidence-informed practice. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 1176–1197.
  • PawlJ. H., & St. JohnM. (1998). How you are is as important as what you do in making a positive difference for infants, toddlers, and their families. Washington, DC: Zero to Three Press.
  • Rock, M. H. (Ed.). (1997). Psychodynamic supervision. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
  • SarnatJ. (2010). Key competencies of the psychodynamic psychotherapist and how to teach them in supervision. Psychotherapy, 47, 20–27.
  • SarnatJ. (2012). Supervising psychoanalytic psychotherapy: Present knowledge, pressing needs, future possibilities. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 42, 151–160.
  • SchlesingerH. J. (1981). General principles of psychoanalytic supervision. In R. S.Wallerstein (Ed.), Becoming a psychoanalyst: A study of psychoanalytic supervision (pp. 29–38). New York, NY: International Universities Press.
  • SearlesH. F. (1955). The informational value of the supervisor's emotional experience. Psychiatry, 8, 135–146.
  • ShedlerJ. (2010). The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 65, 98–109.
  • SolnitA. J. (1970). Learning from psychoanalytic supervision. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 51, 359–362.
  • StrongS. R., HillsH., & NelsonB. (1988). Interpersonal communication rating scale (rev. ed.). Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University.
  • SzecsödyI. (1990). Supervision: A didactic or mutative situation. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 4, 245–261.
  • SzecsodyI. (1994). Supervision: A complex tool for psychoanalytic learning. Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 17, 119–129.
  • SzecsodyI. (1997). (How) Is learning possible in supervision? In B.Martindale, M.Morner, M. E. C.Rodriguez, & J.Vidit (Eds.), Supervision and its vicissitudes (pp. 101–116). London: Karnac.
  • SzecsodyI. (2012). More research is essential on how to increase competence in supervision and supervision training. Nordic Psychology, 64, 218–226.
  • SzecsodyI. (2014). Supervision should be a mutual learning experience. Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 36, 119–129.
  • TeitelbaumS. H. (1990). Supertransference: The role of the supervisor's blind spots. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 7, 243–258.
  • TeitelbaumS. H. (2001). The changing scene in supervision. In S.Gill (Ed.), The supervisory alliance (pp. 3–18). Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
  • TraceyT. J. G., BludworthJ., & Glidden-TraceyC. E.(2012). Are there parallel processes in psychotherapy supervision? An empirical examination. Psychotherapy, 49, 330–343.
  • Wallerstein, R. S. (Ed.). (1981). Becoming a psychoanalyst: A study of psychoanalytic supervision. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
  • Watkins, Jr.C. E. (2011a). Celebrating psychoanalytic supervision: Considering a century of seminal contribution. The Psychoanalytic Review, 98, 401–418.
  • Watkins, Jr.C. E. (2011b). Does psychotherapy supervision contribute to patient outcomes? Considering thirty years of research. The Clinical Supervisor, 30, 235–256.
  • Watkins, Jr.C. E. (2011c). Toward a tripartite vision of supervision for psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapies: Alliance, transference-countertransference configuration, and real relationship. The Psychoanalytic Review, 98, 557–590.
  • Watkins, Jr.C. E. (2013a). The beginnings of psychoanalytic supervision: The crucial role of Max Eitingon. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 73, 254–270.
  • Watkins, Jr.C. E. (2013b). The contemporary practice of effective psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 30, 300–328.
  • Watkins, Jr.C. E. (2014a). The learning alliance in psychoanalytic supervision: A fifty-year retrospective and prospective. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 31, 525–556. doi:10.1037/a0034039.
  • Watkins, Jr.C. E. (2014b). Psychoanalytic supervision in the new millennium: On pressing needs and impressing possibilities. International Forum of Psychoanalysis. doi:10.1080/0803706x.2013.779748.
  • Watkins, Jr.C. E. (2014c). The supervisory alliance as quintessential integrative variable. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 44, 151–161.
  • ZachrissonA. (2011). Dynamics of psychoanalytic supervision: A heuristic model. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 92, 943–961.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.