References
- American Psychological Association, Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 271–285.
- BarberJ. P., MuranJ. C., McCarthyK. S., & KeefeJ. R. (2013). Research on dynamic therapies. In M. J.Lambert (Ed.), Garfield and Bergin's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 443–494). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
- Barkham, M., Hardy, G. E., & Mellor-Clark, J. (Eds.). (2010). Developing and delivering practice-based evidence. Chichester: Wiley.
- BeinartH. (2014). Building and sustaining the supervisory relationship. In C. E.Watkins, Jr. & D.Milne (Eds.), Wiley international handbook of clinical supervision (pp. 257–281). Oxford: Wiley.
- BermanE. (1997). Relational psychoanalysis: A historical perspective. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 51, 185–203.
- BernardJ. M., & GoodyearR. K. (2014). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
- BinderJ. L., & StruppH. H. (1997). Supervision of psychodynamic therapies. In C. E.Watkins, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 44–62). New York, NY: Wiley.
- BordinE. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy, 16, 252–260.
- BordinE. S. (1983). A working alliance model of supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 11, 35–42.
- BowerP., & GilbodyS. (2010). The current view of evidence and evidence-based practice. In M.Barkham, G. E.Hardy, & J.Mellor-Clark (Eds.), Developing and delivering practice-based evidence (pp. 1–20). Oxford: Wiley.
- ChessickR. D. (1971). How the resident and supervisor disappoint each other. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 25, 272–283.
- CookH., & BuirskiP. (1990). Countertransference in psychoanalytic supervision: An heuristic model. Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, 8, 77–87.
- Crits-ChristophP., GibbonsM. B. C., & MukherjeeD. (2013). Psychotherapy process-outcome research. In M. J.Lambert (Ed.), Garfield and Bergin's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 298–340). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
- CrowellM. G. (2007). Some thoughts on the countertransference resistance of the psychoanalytic supervisor. Modern Psychoanalysis, 32(1), 1–10.
- DewaldP. A. (1969). Learning problems in psychoanalytic supervision: Diagnosis and management. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 10, 107–121.
- DoehrmanM. J. (1976). Parallel process in supervision and psychotherapy. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 40(1), 1–104.
- Driver, C., & Martin, E. (Eds.). (2002). Supervising psychotherapy: Psychoanalytic and psychodynamic perspectives. London: Sage.
- Driver, C., & Martin, E. (Eds.). (2005). Supervision and the analytic attitude. London: Whurr.
- EitingonM. (1923). Report on the Berlin psycho-analytical poliklinik. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 4, 254–269.
- EitingonM. (1926). An address to the International Training Commission. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 7, 130–134.
- EksteinR., & WallersteinR. (1958). The teaching and learning of psychotherapy. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- EllisM. V., & LadanyN. (1997). Inferences concerning supervisees and clients in clinical supervision: An integrative review. In C. E.Watkins, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 447–507). New York, NY: Wiley.
- EmchM. (1955). The social context of supervision. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 36, 298–306.
- FlemingJ., & BenedekT. F. (1964). Supervision: A method of teaching psychoanalysis. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 33, 71–96.
- FlemingJ., & BenedekT. F. (1966). Psychoanalytic supervision: A method of clinical teaching. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.
- FonagyP., RothA., & HiggittA. (2005). Psychodynamic psychotherapies: Evidence-based practice and clinical wisdom. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 69(1), 1–58.
- Frawley-O'DeaM. G. (2003). Supervision is a relationship too: A contemporary approach to psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 13, 355–366.
- Frawley-O'DeaM. G., & SarnatJ. E. (2001). The supervisory relationship: A contemporary psychodynamic approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- FriedlanderM. L., SiegelS., & BrenockK. (1989). Parallel process in counseling and supervision: A case study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 149–157.
- GedimanH. K., & WolkenfeldF. (1980). The parallelism phenomenon in psychoanalysis and supervision: Its reconsideration as a triadic system. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 49, 234–255.
- GoodyearR. K. (2014). Supervision as pedagogy: Attending to its essential instructional and learning processes. The Clinical Supervisor, 33, 82–99. doi:10.1080/07325223.2014.918914.
- GundersonJ. G., & GabbardG. (1999). Making the case for psychoanalytic therapies in the current psychiatric environment. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 47, 679–704.
- HeimannP. (1950). On countertransference. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 31, 81–84.
- HessA. K. (2008). Psychotherapy supervision: A conceptual review. In A. K.Hess, K. D.Hess, & T. H.Hess (Eds.), Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 3–22). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
- HymanM. (2008). Psychoanalytic supervision. In A. K.Hess, K. D.Hess, & T. H.Hess (Eds.), Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 97–113). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
- InmanA. G., HutmanH., PendseA., DevdasL., LuuL., & EllisM. V. (2014). Current trends concerning supervisors, supervisees, and clients in clinical supervision. In C. E.Watkins, Jr. & D.Milne (Eds.), Wiley international handbook of clinical supervision (pp. 61–102). Oxford: Wiley.
- JackelM. M. (1982). Supervision in dynamic psychotherapy. In M.Blumenfield (Ed.), Applied supervision in psychotherapy (pp. 5–43). New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.
- JacobsD., DavidP., & MeyerD. J. (1995). The supervisory encounter: A guide for teachers of psychodynamic psychotherapy and analysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- LadanyN., ConstantineM. G., MillerK., EricksonC. D., & Muse-BurkeJ. L. (2000). Supervisor countertransference: A qualitative investigation into its identification and description. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 102–115.
- Lane, R. C. (Ed.). (1990). Psychoanalytic approaches to supervision. New York, NY: Brunner.
- LeichsenringF. (2005). Are psychodynamic and psychoanalytic therapies effective? A review of empirical data. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86, 841–868.
- LeichsenringF., & KleinS. (2014). Evidence for psychodynamic psychotherapy in specific mental disorders: A systematic review. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 28, 4–32.
- LeichsenringF., & RabungS. (2008). Effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 300, 1551–1565.
- LeichsenringF., & RabungS. (2011). Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in complex mental disorders: Update of a meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 199, 15–22.
- Levy, R. A., & Ablon, S. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of evidence-based psychodynamic psychotherapy. New York, NY: Springer.
- McKinneyM. (2000). Relational perspectives and the supervisory triad. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 17, 565–584.
- MilneD. L. (2009). Evidence-based clinical supervision: Principles and practice. Oxford: Wiley.
- MilneD. (2014). Towards an evidence-based approach to clinical supervision. In C. E.Watkins, Jr. & D.Milne (Eds.), Wiley international handbook of clinical supervision (pp. 38–60). Oxford: Wiley.
- MilneD., LeckC., JamesI., WilsonM., ProcterR., RammL., … WeetmanJ. (2012). High fidelity in clinical supervision research. In I.Fleming & L.Steen (Eds.), Supervision and clinical psychology: Theory, practice and perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 142–158). London: Routledge.
- MilneD., & ReiserR. P. (2012). A rationale for evidence-based clinical supervision. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 42, 139–150.
- MothersoleG. (1999). Parallel process: A review. The Clinical Supervisor, 18, 107–122.
- NevoI., & Slonim-NevoE. (2011). The myth of evidence-based practice: Towards evidence-informed practice. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 1176–1197.
- PawlJ. H., & St. JohnM. (1998). How you are is as important as what you do in making a positive difference for infants, toddlers, and their families. Washington, DC: Zero to Three Press.
- Rock, M. H. (Ed.). (1997). Psychodynamic supervision. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
- SarnatJ. (2010). Key competencies of the psychodynamic psychotherapist and how to teach them in supervision. Psychotherapy, 47, 20–27.
- SarnatJ. (2012). Supervising psychoanalytic psychotherapy: Present knowledge, pressing needs, future possibilities. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 42, 151–160.
- SchlesingerH. J. (1981). General principles of psychoanalytic supervision. In R. S.Wallerstein (Ed.), Becoming a psychoanalyst: A study of psychoanalytic supervision (pp. 29–38). New York, NY: International Universities Press.
- SearlesH. F. (1955). The informational value of the supervisor's emotional experience. Psychiatry, 8, 135–146.
- ShedlerJ. (2010). The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 65, 98–109.
- SolnitA. J. (1970). Learning from psychoanalytic supervision. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 51, 359–362.
- StrongS. R., HillsH., & NelsonB. (1988). Interpersonal communication rating scale (rev. ed.). Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University.
- SzecsödyI. (1990). Supervision: A didactic or mutative situation. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 4, 245–261.
- SzecsodyI. (1994). Supervision: A complex tool for psychoanalytic learning. Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 17, 119–129.
- SzecsodyI. (1997). (How) Is learning possible in supervision? In B.Martindale, M.Morner, M. E. C.Rodriguez, & J.Vidit (Eds.), Supervision and its vicissitudes (pp. 101–116). London: Karnac.
- SzecsodyI. (2012). More research is essential on how to increase competence in supervision and supervision training. Nordic Psychology, 64, 218–226.
- SzecsodyI. (2014). Supervision should be a mutual learning experience. Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 36, 119–129.
- TeitelbaumS. H. (1990). Supertransference: The role of the supervisor's blind spots. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 7, 243–258.
- TeitelbaumS. H. (2001). The changing scene in supervision. In S.Gill (Ed.), The supervisory alliance (pp. 3–18). Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
- TraceyT. J. G., BludworthJ., & Glidden-TraceyC. E.(2012). Are there parallel processes in psychotherapy supervision? An empirical examination. Psychotherapy, 49, 330–343.
- Wallerstein, R. S. (Ed.). (1981). Becoming a psychoanalyst: A study of psychoanalytic supervision. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
- Watkins, Jr.C. E. (2011a). Celebrating psychoanalytic supervision: Considering a century of seminal contribution. The Psychoanalytic Review, 98, 401–418.
- Watkins, Jr.C. E. (2011b). Does psychotherapy supervision contribute to patient outcomes? Considering thirty years of research. The Clinical Supervisor, 30, 235–256.
- Watkins, Jr.C. E. (2011c). Toward a tripartite vision of supervision for psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapies: Alliance, transference-countertransference configuration, and real relationship. The Psychoanalytic Review, 98, 557–590.
- Watkins, Jr.C. E. (2013a). The beginnings of psychoanalytic supervision: The crucial role of Max Eitingon. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 73, 254–270.
- Watkins, Jr.C. E. (2013b). The contemporary practice of effective psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 30, 300–328.
- Watkins, Jr.C. E. (2014a). The learning alliance in psychoanalytic supervision: A fifty-year retrospective and prospective. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 31, 525–556. doi:10.1037/a0034039.
- Watkins, Jr.C. E. (2014b). Psychoanalytic supervision in the new millennium: On pressing needs and impressing possibilities. International Forum of Psychoanalysis. doi:10.1080/0803706x.2013.779748.
- Watkins, Jr.C. E. (2014c). The supervisory alliance as quintessential integrative variable. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 44, 151–161.
- ZachrissonA. (2011). Dynamics of psychoanalytic supervision: A heuristic model. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 92, 943–961.