Effect of microstructure morphology on mechanical properties of quenching and partitioning steel

References

• Speer J, Matlock DK, De Cooman BC, et al. Carbon partitioning into austenite after martensite transformation. Acta Mater. 2003;51:2611–2622. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00059-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speer JG, Edmonds DV, Rizzo FC, et al. Partitioning of carbon from supersaturated plates of ferrite, with application to steel processing and fundamentals of the bainite transformation. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci. 2004;8:219–237. doi: 10.1016/j.cossms.2004.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cooman BC. Structure–properties relationship in TRIP steels containing carbide-free bainite. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci. 2004;8:285–303. doi: 10.1016/j.cossms.2004.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speer JG, De Moor E, Findley KO, et al. Analysis of microstructure evolution in quenching and partitioning automotive sheet steel. Metall Mater Trans A. 2011;42:3591–3601. doi: 10.1007/s11661-011-0869-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Gao H, Nakashima H, et al. In-situ EBSD study of deformation behavior of retained austenite in a low-carbon quenching and partitioning steel via uniaxial tensile tests. Mater Charact. 2016;118:431–437. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2016.06.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo EJ, Cho L, De Cooman BC. Kinetics of the partitioning of carbon and substitutional alloying elements during quenching and partitioning (Q&P) processing of medium Mn steel. Acta Mater. 2016;107:354–365. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.01.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Knijf D, Petrov R, Föjer C, et al. Effect of fresh martensite on the stability of retained austenite in quenching and partitioning steel. Mater Sci Eng: A 2014;615:107–115. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.07.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo EJ, Cho L, Estrin Y, et al. Microstructure-mechanical properties relationships for quenching and partitioning (Q&P) processed steel. Acta Mater. 2016;113:124–139. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.04.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal G, Ghosh SK, Bera S, et al. Effect of partial and full austenitisation on microstructure and mechanical properties of quenching and partitioning steel. Mater Sci Eng: A 2016;676:56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.08.094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugimoto K, Misu M, Kobayashi M, et al. Effects of second phase morphology on retained austenite morphology and tensile properties in a TRIP-aided dual-phase steel sheet. ISIJ Int. 1993;33:775–782. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.33.775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark A, Westphal M, Boyd D, et al. Microstructural design of multiphase advanced high strength steels. Can Metall Quart. 2009;48:237–245. doi: 10.1179/cmq.2009.48.3.237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong XC, Chen B, Huang MX, et al. The effect of morphology on the stability of retained austenite in a quenched and partitioned steel. Scripta Mater. 2013;68:321–324. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding R, Tang D, Zhao A. A novel design to enhance the amount of retained austenite and mechanical properties in low-alloyed steel. Scripta Mater. 2014;88:21–24. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding R, Tang D, Zhao A, et al. Effect of intercritical temperature on quenching and partitioning steels originated from martensitic pre-microstructure. J Mater Res. 2014;29:2525–2533. doi: 10.1557/jmr.2014.285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding R, Tang D, Zhao A, et al. A new type of quenching and partitioning processing developed from martensitic pre-microstructure. Mater Manuf Process 2014;29:704–709. doi: 10.1080/10426914.2014.912304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumura O, Sakuma Y, Takechi H. Enhancement of elongation by retained austenite in intercritically annealed 0.4C-1.5Si-0.8Mn steel. ISIJ Int. 1987;27:570–579. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational1966.27.570
   Google Scholar
• Maruyama H. X-ray measurement of retained austenite volume fraction. J Jpn Soc Heat Treat. 1977;17:198–204.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson DJ, Holmes B. Effect of alloying additions on the lattice parameter of austenite. J Iron Steel Inst. 1970;208:469–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro Cerda FM, Sabirov I, Goulas C, et al. Austenite formation in 0.2 C and 0.45 C steels under conventional and ultrafast heating. Mater Design. 2017;116:448–460. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santofimia MJ, Zhao L, Sietsma J. Microstructural evolution of a low-carbon steel during application of quenching and partitioning heat treatments after partial austenitization. Metall Mater Trans A. 2009;40A:46–57. doi: 10.1007/s11661-008-9701-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santofimia MJ, Zhao L, Petrov R, et al. Characterization of the microstructure obtained by the quenching and partitioning process in a low-carbon steel. Mater Charact. 2008;59:1758–1764. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2008.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghassemi-Armaki H, Maaß R, Bhat SP, et al. Deformation response of ferrite and martensite in a dual-phase steel. Acta Mater. 2014;62:197–211. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han J, Da Silva AK, Ponge D, et al. The effects of prior austenite grain boundaries and microstructural morphology on the impact toughness of intercritically annealed medium Mn steel. Acta Mater. 2017;122:199–206. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.09.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang J, Lawrence B, Boyd JD, et al. Effect of microstructure on retained austenite stability and work hardening of TRIP steels. Mater Sci Eng: A 2011;528:4516–4521. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.02.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Findley KO. Quantitative assessment of the effects of microstructure on the stability of retained austenite in TRIP steels. Acta Mater. 2013;61:1895–1903. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar