Microstructural modification and ageing behaviour of the Al–17Si–5Cu alloy using a novel approach

References

• Dey S. Elevated temperature lubricated wear of Al–Si alloys [electronic theses and dissertations]. 2012. Available from https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/457.
   Google Scholar
• Menzie WD, Barry JJ, Bleiwas DI, et al. The global flow of aluminum from 2006 through 2025. U.S. Geological Survey. Open-File Report 2010–1256, 2010. p. 1–73. Available from http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2010/1256/.
   Google Scholar
• Shabel BS, Granger DA, Truckner WG. Friction and wear of aluminum–silicon alloys. In: Blau PJ, editor. ASM handbook. Materials Park (OH): ASM International; 1992. p. 785–794 (Friction, lubrication, and wear technology; vol. 18).
   Google Scholar
• Gu T, Pan Y, Lu T, et al. Effects of boron addition on the morphology of silicon phases in Al–Si casting alloys. Mater Charact. 2018;141:115–119. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2018.04.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao J, Zhang J, Liu R, et al. Modification of eutectic Si and the microstructure in an Al–7Si alloy with barium addition. Mater Sci Eng A. 2018;728:72–79. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2018.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timpel M, Wanderka N, Schlesiger R, et al. The role of strontium in modifying aluminium–silicon alloys. Acta Mater. 2012;60:3920–3928. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li JH, Barrirero J, Engstler M, et al. Nucleation and growth of eutectic Si in Al–Si alloys with Na addition. Metall Mater Trans A. 2015;46A:1300–1311. doi: 10.1007/s11661-014-2702-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salleh MS, Omar MZ, Syarif J, et al. An overview of semisolid processing of aluminium alloys. ISRN Mater Sci. 2013;2013:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2013/679820
   Google Scholar
• Natori K, Utsunomiya H, Tanaka T. Improvement in formability of semi-solid cast hypoeutectic Al–Si alloys by equal-channel angular pressing. J Mater Process Technol. 2017;240:240–248. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.09.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama Y, Miyazaki T. Effect of eutectic Si particle morphology on ECAP formability and mechanical properties of AC4CH aluminium casting alloys. Mater Trans. 2011;52:2045–2051. doi: 10.2320/matertrans.L-M2011822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammar HR, Moreau C, Samuel AM, et al. Influences of alloying elements, solution treatment time and quenching media on quality indices of 413-type Al–Si casting alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008;489:426–438. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2007.12.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed AMA, Samuel FH. A review on the heat treatment of Al–Si–Cu/Mg casting alloys. In: Czerwinski Frank, editor. Heat treatment – conventional and novel applications. Croatia: InTech; 2012. p. 229–246.
   Google Scholar
• Mondolfo LF. Aluminium alloys: structure and properties. London: Butter Worths; 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Barresi J, Kerr MJ, Wang H, et al. Effect of magnesium, iron, and cooling rate on mechanical properties of Al–7Si–Mg foundry alloys. AFS Trans. 2000;108:563–570.
   Google Scholar
• Gauthier J, Louchez PR, Samuel FH. Heat treatment of 319.2 aluminium automotive alloy: part 1, solution heat treatment. Cast Metals. 1995;8:91–106. doi: 10.1080/09534962.1995.11819197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier J, Louchez PR, Samuel FH. Heat treatment of 319.2 aluminium automotive alloy: part 2, ageing behaviour. Cast Metals. 1995;8:107–114. doi: 10.1080/09534962.1995.11819198
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed AMA, Samuel AM, Samuel FH, et al. Influence of additives on the microstructure and tensile properties of near-eutectic Al–10.8% Si cast alloy. Mater Design. 2009;30:3943–3957. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.05.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowell N, Shivkumar S. Solution treatment effects in cast Al–Si–Cu alloys (95-107). AFS Trans. 1995;103:721–726.
   Google Scholar
• Ouellet P, Samuel FH. Effect of Mg on the ageing behavior of Al–Si–Cu 319 type aluminum casting alloys. J Mater Sci. 1999;34:4671–4697. doi: 10.1023/A:1004645928886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G, Bain X, Wang W, et al. Influence of Cu and minor elements on solution treatment of Al–Si–Mg–Cu cast alloys. Mater Lett. 2003;57:4083–4087. doi: 10.1016/S0167-577X(03)00270-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolowski JH, Sun X-C, Byczynski G, et al. The removal of copper-phase segregation and the subsequent improvement in mechanical properties of cast 319 aluminium alloys by a two-stage solution heat treatment. J Mater Process Technol. 1995;53:385–392. doi: 10.1016/0924-0136(95)01995-Q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolowski JH, Djurdjevic MB, Kierkus CA, et al. Improvement of 319 aluminum alloy casting durability by high temperature solution treatment. J Mater Process Technol. 2001;109:174–180. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00793-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standard test methods for determining average grain size. ASTM E112 – 10. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Shukla N, Roy H, Show BK. Tribological behavior of a 0.33% C dual-phase steel with pre I/C hardening and tempering treatment under abrasive wear condition. Tribol Trans. 2016;59:593–603. doi: 10.1080/10402004.2015.1094841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das P, Show BK, Rathore A, et al. Wear behaviour of cooling slope rheocast A356 Al alloy. Tribol Trans. 2015;58:1054–1066. doi: 10.1080/10402004.2015.1040905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standard test methods for tensile testing of metallic materials. E8/E8M-9. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson GK, Hall WH. X-ray line broadening from filed aluminium and wolfram. Acta Metall. 1953;1:22–31. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(53)90006-6
   Google Scholar
• Suryanarayana C, Norton MG. X-ray diffraction – a practical approach. New York: Springer; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Warren BE. X-ray diffraction. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley; 1969.
   Google Scholar