Quantifying geometrically necessary dislocation with surface roughness effect in copper (111) under indentation

References

• Nix WD, Gao H. Indentation size effects in crystalline materials: a law for strain gradient plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids. 1997;46(3):411–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Ngan AHW. Depth dependence of hardness in copper single crystals measured by nanoindentation. Scr Mater. 2001;44(2):237–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Zhang F, Hwang KC, et al. A model of size effects in nano-indentation. J Mech Phys Solids. 2006;54(8):1668–1686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JY, Lee JJ, Lee YH, et al. Surface roughness effect in instrumented indentation: a simple contact depth model and its verification. J Mater Res. 2006;21(12):2975–2978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit F, Vandeneede V, Cambier F. Relevance of instrumented micro-indentation for the assessment of hardness and Young’s modulus of brittle materials. Mater Sci Eng A. 2007;456(1–2):252–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleck NA, Hutchinson JW. Strain gradient plasticity. Adv Appl Mech. 1997;33(C):295–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElhaney KW, Vlassak JJ, Nix WD. Determination of indenter tip geometry and indentation contact area for depth-sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res. 1998;13(5):1300–1306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir E, Raabe D, Zaafarani N, et al. Investigation of the indentation size effect through the measurement of the geometrically necessary dislocations beneath small indents of different depths using EBSD tomography. Acta Mater. 2009;57(2):559–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kysar JW, Gan YX, Morse TL, et al. High strain gradient plasticity associated with wedge indentation into face-centered cubic single crystals: geometrically necessary dislocation densities. J Mech Phys Solids. 2007;55(7):1554–1573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang D, Zhao L, Wang H, et al. The role of rough surface in the size-dependent behavior upon nano-indentation. Mech Mater. 2021;157(March):103836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JY, Kang SK, Lee JJ, et al. Influence of surface-roughness on indentation size effect. Acta Mater. 2007;55(10):3555–3562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuah HG, Ripin ZM. Quantifying the surface roughness effect in microindentation using a proportional specimen resistance model. J Mater Sci. 2013;48(18):6293–6306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang WG, Su JJ, Feng XQ. Effect of surface roughness on nanoindentation test of thin films. Eng Fract Mech. 2008;75(17):4965–4972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berke P, El Houdaigui F, Massart TJ. Coupled friction and roughness surface effects in shallow spherical nanoindentation. Wear. 2010;268(1–2):223–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter C, Antretter T, Daniel R, et al. Finite element simulation of the effect of surface roughness on nanoindentation of thin films with spherical indenters. Surf Coatings Technol. 2007;202(4–7):1103–1107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Y, Wang X, Zhao M. Size effect measurement and characterization in nanoindentation test. J Mater Res. 2004;19(1):208–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelletier H, Gauthier C, Schirrer R. Relationship between contact geometry and average plastic strain during scratch tests on amorphous polymers. Tribol Int. 2010;43(4):796–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang TY, Xu WH, Zhao MH. The role of plastic deformation of rough surfaces in the size-dependent hardness. Acta Mater. 2004;52(1):57–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuah HG, Tan WH, Chang BP, et al. The influence of surface roughness on material dislocation of microindentation using bonded interface technique. Tribol - Mater Surf Interfaces. 2019;13(4):191–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durst K, Backes B, Göken M. Indentation size effect in metallic materials: correcting for the size of the plastic zone. Scr Mater. 2005;52(11):1093–1097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaafarani N, Raabe D, Singh RN, et al. Three-dimensional investigation of the texture and microstructure below a nanoindent in a Cu single crystal using 3D EBSD and crystal plasticity finite element simulations. Acta Mater. 2006;54(7):1863–1876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Raabe D, Klüber C, et al. Orientation dependence of nanoindentation pile-up patterns and of nanoindentation microtextures in copper single crystals. Acta Mater. 2004;52(8):2229–2238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rester M, Motz C, Pippan R. Microstructural investigation of the volume beneath nanoindentations in copper. Acta Mater. 2007;55(19):6427–6435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays C, Kendall EG. An analysis of knoop microhardness. Metallography. 1973;6(4):275–282.
   Google Scholar
• Cook RF, Pharr GM. Direct observation and analysis of indentation cracking in glasses and ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc. 1990;73(4):787–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerner MF, Nix WD. A method for interpreting the data from depth-sensing indentation instruments.J Mater Res. 1986;1(4):601–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Bradt RC. The microhardness indentation load/size effect in rutile and cassiterite single crystals. J Mater Sci. 1993;28(4):917–926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye JF. Some geometrical relations in dislocated crystals. Acta Metall. 1953;1(2):153–162.
   Google Scholar
• Yang B, Vehoff H. Dependence of nanohardness upon indentation size and grain size - a local examination of the interaction between dislocations and grain boundaries. Acta Mater. 2007;55(3):849–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes DA, Hansen N, Bammann DJ. Geometrically necessary boundaries, incidental dislocation boundaries and geometrically necessary dislocations. Scr Mater. 2003;48(2):147–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kartini SE, Ismail R, et al. Analysis of the contact area of smooth and rough surfaces in contact with sphere indenter using finite element method. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Grilli N, Tarleton E, Cocks ACF. Coupling a discrete twin model with cohesive elements to understand twin-induced fracture. Int J Fract. 2021;227(2):173–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuah HG, Ripin ZM. Modeling of microindentation with consideration of the surface roughness. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci. 2013;44(13):5676–5687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu Al-Rub RK. Prediction of micro and nanoindentation size effect from conical or pyramidal indentation. Mech Mater. 2007;39(8):787–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao H, Huang Y. Geometrically necessary dislocation and size-dependent plasticity. Scr Mater. 2003;48(2):113–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muránsky O, Balogh L, Tran M, et al. On the measurement of dislocations and dislocation substructures using EBSD and HRSD techniques. Acta Mater. 2019;175:297–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Yang L, Dong X, et al. Dynamic constitutive distortional law of materials—micro mechanism based on dislocation dynamics. Dyn Mater. Elsevier. 2019: 221–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817321-3.00006-1.
   Google Scholar
• Fleck NA, Muller GM, Ashby MF, et al. Strain gradient plasticity: theory and experiment. Acta Metall Mater. 1994;42(2):475–487.
   Google Scholar
• Beake BD, Goel S. Incipient plasticity in tungsten during nanoindentation: dependence on surface roughness, probe radius and crystal orientation. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater. 2018;75:63–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar