Fabrication methods and property analysis of metal foams – a technical overview

References

• De Meller MA. Produit métallique pour l'obtention d'objets laminés, moulés ou autres, et procédés pour sa fabrication. French Patent. 1925;615(147):1926.
   Google Scholar
• Banhart J. Light-metal foams – history of innovation and technological challenges. Adv Eng Mater. 2013;15(3):82–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister J. Verfahren zur Herstellung poröser Metallkörper. German Patent. 1991;40(18):360.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister J, Schrader H. Verfahren zur Herstellung aufschäumbarer Metallkörper und Verwendung derselben. German Patent. 1992;41(01):630.
   Google Scholar
• Banhart J. Manufacture characterization and application of cellular metals and metal foams. Prog Mater Sci. 2001;46:599–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banhart J, Ashby M, Fleck N. Metal foams and porous metal structures. Conference on Metal Foams and Porous Metal Structures. Vol. 14. 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Banhart J, Ashby M, Fleck N. International conference on cellular metals and metal foaming technology. 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Binks BP, Horozov TS, eds. Colloidal particles at liquid interfaces. Cambridge University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Degischer H-P, Kriszt B. Handbook of cellular metals. Vol. 71. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson LJ. Cellular solids. MRS Bull. 2003;28(4):270–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banhart J, Weaire D. On the road again: metal foams find favor. Phys Today. 2002;55(7):37–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banhart J, Norman AF, Mortensen A. Proceedings of the International Conference on Cellular Metals: Manufacturing, Properties, Applications (MetFoam’03). 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Du R, Jin X, Hubner R, et al. Engineering self-supported noble metal foams toward electrocatalysis and beyond. Adv Energy Mater. 2020;10(11):1901945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atwater MA, Guevara LN, Darling KA, et al. Solid state porous metal production: a review of the capabilities, characteristics, and challenges. Adv Eng Mater. 2018;20(7):1700766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao B, Gain AK, Ding W, et al. A review on metallic porous materials: pore formation, mechanical properties, and their applications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2018;95(5):2641–2659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung A, Diebels S. Micromechanical characterization of metal foams. Adv Eng Mater. 2019;21(8):1900237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashby MF, Gibson LJ. Cellular solids: structure and properties. Cambridge, UK: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge; 1997. p. 175–231.
   Google Scholar
• Kiser M, He MY, Zok FW. The mechanical response of ceramic microballoon reinforced aluminium matrix composites under compressive loading. Acta Mater. 1999;47(9):2685–2694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohatgi PK, Gupta N, Schultz BF, et al. The synthesis, compressive properties, and applications of metal matrix syntactic foams. Jom. 2011;63(2):36–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin I, Kenny LD, Sang H. Method of producing lightweight foamed metal. Patent NumberUS 4973358; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny LD, Thomas M. Process for shape casting of particle stabilized metal foam. U.S. Patent No. 5,281,251; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Ruch W, Kirkevag B. International Patent Application PCT/NO90/00115 (1990). 1991: 91-01387.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd DJ, McLeod AD, Morris PL, et al. Melt process for the production of metal-matrix composite materials with enhanced particle/matrix wetting. U.S. Patent No. 5,028,392; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash O, Sang H, Embury JD. Structure and properties of Al SiC foam. Mater Sci Eng A. 1995;199(2):195–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akiyama S, Ueno H, Imagawa K, et al. Foamed metal and method of producing same. U.S. Patent No. 4,713,277; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Miyoshi T, Itoh M, Akiyama S, et al. ALPORAS aluminium foam: production process, properties, and applications. Adv Eng Mater. 2000;2(4):179–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz DS, Shih DS, Evans AG, et al. Materials Research Society, Symposium Proceedings, Volume 521. Porous and Cellular Materials for Structural Applications. Materials Research Society Warrendale PA; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Shapovalov VI. Method for manufacturing porous articles. U.S. Patent No. 5,181,549; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Sridhar S, Russell KC. Advances in porous materials. MRS Symp. Proc. Vol. 371. 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Simone AE, Gibson LJ. The compressive behaviour of porous copper made by the GASAR process. J Mater Sci. 1997;32(2):451–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO, ASTM. ISO/ASTM 52900: 2015 additive manufacturing–general principles–terminology. ASTM F2792-10e1. 2015;1:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• du Plessis A, Razavi SM, Benedetti M, et al. Properties and applications of additively manufactured metallic cellular materials: a review. Prog Mater Sci. 2021;125:100918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milewski JO. Additive manufacturing of metals. Vol. 258. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Murr LE, Gaytan SM, Ramirez DA, et al. Metal fabrication by additive manufacturing using laser and electron beam melting technologies. J Mater Sci Technol. 2012;28(1):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koike R, Matsumoto T, Kakinuma Y, et al. A basic study on metal foam fabrication with titanium hydride in direct energy deposition. Procedia Manuf. 2018;18:68–73.
   Google Scholar
• Koike R, Matsumoto T, Aoyama T, et al. Fabrication method for stainless steel foam block in directed energy deposition. CIRP Ann. 2020;69(1):173–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim DS, Seo JY, Yoon HS, et al. Additive manufacturing of porous metals using laser melting of Ti6Al4V powder with a foaming agent. Mater Res Express. 2018;5(8):086518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim DS, Seo JY. Fabrication of porous metals layered by laser-assisted melting of sprayed Ti6Al4V powder and foaming agent mixture. Mater Lett. 2018;219:243–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Changdar A, Chakraborty SS. Laser processing of metal foam-A review. J Manuf Process. 2021;61:208–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Nava E, Smith CJ, Derguti F, et al. The effect of density and feature size on mechanical properties of isostructural metallic foams produced by additive manufacturing. Acta Mater. 2015;85:387–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang B, Hong S, Yoo C, et al. 3D porous metal structure manufacturing using UV pulsed laser and copper formate solution. Appl Phys A. 2018;124(9):1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustapha KA, Shikh Anuar F, Mohd Saat FA, et al. Production of open-cell foam using additive manufacturing method and porous morphology effects. International Conference and Exhibition on Sustainable Energy and Advanced Materials. Springer, Singapore; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Takeuchi T, Koike R, Kakinuma Y, et al. Basic study of fabrication conditions for foam stainless in directed energy deposition. Proceedings of International Conference on Leading Edge Manufacturing in 21st century: LEM21 2021.10. The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Moser S, Kenel C, Wehner LA, et al. 3D ink-printed, sintered porous silicon scaffolds for battery applications. J Power Sources. 2021;507:230298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park H, Choe H, Dunand DC. Microstructure and compressive properties of 3D-extrusion-printed, aluminized cobalt-based superalloy microlattices. Mater Sci Eng A. 2021;815:141262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song B, Kenel C, Dunand DC. 3D ink-extrusion printing and sintering of Ti, Ti-TiB and Ti-TiC microlattices. Addit Manuf. 2020;35:101412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matheson K, Cross K, Javahery I, et al. Comparison of conventional open-cell aluminium foam and its additively manufactured twin. Materials Science and Technology Conference and Exhibition 2016, MS and T 2016. Vol. 2; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter JA, Passaleva N, Haring M, et al. 3D printing of hierarchical porous steel and iron-based materials. Adv Mater Technol. 2022; 8(3): 2200971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdez M, Kozuch C, Faierson EJ, et al. Induced porosity in super alloy 718 through the laser additive manufacturing process: microstructure and mechanical properties. J Alloys Compd. 2017;725:757–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Cormier D, West H, et al. Non-stochastic Ti–6Al–4V foam structures with negative Poisson's ratio. Mater Sci Eng A. 2012;558:579–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenel C, Geisendorfer NR, Shah RN, et al. Hierarchically-porous metallic scaffolds via 3D extrusion and reduction of oxide particle inks with salt space-holders. Addit Manuf. 2021;37:101637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu C, Liu T, Guo W, et al. 3D printing of powder-based inks into functional hierarchical porous TiO2 materials. Adv Eng Mater. 2020;22(3):1901088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atwater MA, Guevara LN, Darling KA, et al. Solid state porous metal production: a review of the capabilities, characteristics, and challenges. Adv Eng Mater. 2018;20(7):1700766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostafaei A, Kimes KA, Stevens EL, et al. Microstructural evolution and magnetic properties of binder jet additive manufactured Ni-Mn-Ga magnetic shape memory alloy foam. Acta Mater. 2017;131:482–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyanaji H, Ma D, Atwater MA, et al. Binder jetting additive manufacturing of copper foam structures. Addit Manuf. 2020;32:100960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koizumi T, Kido K, Kita K, et al. German patent 40 18 360 German patent 40 18 360, 1990. Mater Trans. 2011;52(4):728–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bram M, Stiller C, Buchkremer HP, et al. Preparation and characterization of high-porosity titanium, stainless steel, and superalloy parts. Metal Foams Porous Metal Struct. 1999;ISBN 3-9805748-7-3:197-202.
   Google Scholar
• Wazen RM, Lefebvre LP, Baril E, et al. Initial evaluation of bone ingrowth into a novel porous titanium coating. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomat. 2010;94(1):64–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin I, Kenny LD, Sang H. Lightweight foamed metal and its production. International Patent Application WO91/03578; 1991: 21.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas M, Kenny LD. Production of particle-stabilized metal foams. PCT Patent WO 94.017218; 1994: 21.
   Google Scholar
• Von Zeppelin F, Hirscher M, Stanzick H, et al. Desorption of hydrogen from blowing agents used for foaming metals. Compos Sci Technol. 2003;63(16):2293–2300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gui MC, Wang DB, Wu JJ, et al. Deformation and damping behaviors of foamed Al–Si–SiCp composite. Mater Sci Eng A. 2000;286(2):282–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang L, Wang H, Yang D, et al. Effects of scandium additions on mechanical properties of cellular Al-based foams. Intermetallics. 2012;28:71–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang DH, Yang SR, Ma AB, et al. Compression properties of cellular AlCu5Mn alloy foams with wide range of porosity. J Mater Sci. 2009;44(20):5552–5556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguirre-Perales LY, Jung I-H, Drew RA. Foaming behavior of powder metallurgical Al–Sn foams. Acta Mater. 2012;60(2):759–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabiei A, O’Neill AT, Neville BP. Processing and development of a new high strength metal foam. MRS Online Proc Lib (OPL). 2004;851:NN11 -4.
   Google Scholar
• Prabhu B, Suryanarayana C, An L, et al. Synthesis and characterization of high volume fraction Al–Al2O3 nanocomposite powders by high-energy milling. Mater Sci Eng A. 2006;425(1-2):192–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Y, Li AB, Zhang XX, et al. Enhancement of the mechanical strength of aluminium foams by SiC nanoparticles. Mater Lett. 2015;148:79–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Ding J, Xia X, et al. Fabrication and characterization of closed-cell aluminium foams with different contents of multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Mater Des. 2015;88:359–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Yang X, Zhang M, et al. A novel approach to obtain in-situ growth carbon nanotube reinforced aluminium foams with enhanced properties. Mater Lett. 2015;161:763–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Yu S, Zhu X, et al. Effect of Al2O3 short fiber on the compressive properties of Zn–22Al foams. Mater Lett. 2008;62(21-22):3636–3638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu JA, Yu SR, Hu ZQ, et al. Deformation and energy absorption characteristic of Al2O3 f/Zn–Al composite foams during compression. J Alloys Compd. 2010;506(2):620–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty M, Garcia-Moreno F, Banhart J. Foamability of MgAl2O4 (spinel)-reinforced aluminium alloy composites. Metall Mater Trans A. 2011;42(9):2898–2908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo C, Zou T, Shi C, et al. Compressive properties and energy absorption of aluminium composite foams reinforced by in-situ generated MgAl2O4 whiskers. Mater Sci Eng A. 2015;645:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrino L, Durante M, Franchitti S, et al. Mechanical performance analysis of hybrid metal-foam/composite samples. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2012;60(1):181–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drolet JP. A novel production method of metal foam. Int. J. Powder Met. 1977;13:223–227.
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni SB, Ramakrishnan P. Foamed aluminium. J Powder Metall. 1973;9(1):41–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Product data sheet of SEAC B.V., Netherlands; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Product data sheet of Sumitomo Electric, Japan; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Paserin V, Marcuson S, Shu J, et al. CVD technique for Inco nickel foam production. Adv Eng Mater. 2004;6(6):454–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres Y, Rodriguez JA, Arias S, et al. Processing, characterization and biological testing of porous titanium obtained by space-holder technique. J Mater Sci. 2012;47(18):6565–6576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limper A, Harhues T, Keller R, et al. Two-level porosity electrodes from metal-polymer dispersions. Electrochem Commun. 2022;135:107205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu X, Lu Z, Zhai W. Enhancing the flow resistance and sound absorption of open-cell metallic foams by creating partially-open windows. Acta Mater. 2021;206:116666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh R, Lee PD, Jones JR, et al. Hierarchically structured titanium foams for tissue scaffold applications. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(12):4596–4604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dmitruk A, Kapłon H, Naplocha K. Mechanical and thermal properties of aluminium foams manufactured by investment casting method. Arch Foundry Eng. 2022;22(1):37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Movahedi N, Murch GE, Belova IV, et al. Functionally graded metal syntactic foam: fabrication and mechanical properties. Mater Des. 2019;168:107652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiele K-H. A contribution to the chemistry of organotransition metal halides. Pure Appl Chem. 1972;30(3-4):575–586.
   Google Scholar
• de la Muela S, Garcia Cambronero LE, Malheiros LF ,et al. New aluminium syntactic foam: synthesis and mechanical characterization. Materials (Basel). 2022;15(15):5320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolat Ç, Bekar C, Göksenli A. Mechanical and physical characteristics of bubble alumina reinforced aluminium syntactic foams made through recyclable pressure infiltration technique. Gazi Univ J Sci. 2022;35(1): 184–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spratt M, Newkirk JW, Chandrashekhara K. Aluminium matrix syntactic foam fabricated with additive manufacturing. 2017: 242.
   Google Scholar
• Rohatgi PK, Gupta N, Schultz BF, et al. The synthesis, compressive properties, and applications of metal matrix syntactic foams. Jom. 2011;63(2):36–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spratt M, Newkirk JW, Chandrashekhara K. Fabrication of metal matrix syntactic foams by a laser additive manufacturing process. Mater Sci Technol Conf Exhibit. 2016; 2: 1319-1326.
   Google Scholar
• Neville BP, Rabiei A. Composite metal foams processed through powder metallurgy. Mater Des. 2008;29(2):388–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabiei A, O’Neill AT. A study on processing of composite metal foam via casting. Mater Sci Eng A. 2005;404(1-2):159–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabiei A. Composite metal foam and methods of preparation thereof. U.S. Patent No. 9,208,912; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Májlinger K, Orbulov IN. Characteristic compressive properties of hybrid metal matrix syntactic foams. Mater Sci Eng A. 2014;606:248–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bálint A, Szlancsik A. Mechanical properties of iron hollow sphere reinforced metal matrix syntactic foams. Mater Sci Forum; 2015;812.
   Google Scholar
• Orbulov IN, Szlancsik A, Kemeny A, et al. Compressive mechanical properties of low-cost, aluminium matrix syntactic foams. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf. 2020;135:105923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmhus D, Busse M. Potential new matrix alloys for production of PM aluminium foams. Adv Eng Mater. 2004;6(6):391–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini SM, Habibolahzadeh A, Petranova V, et al. Influence of nano-SiCp on the foamability and microstructure of Al/TiH2 foam sheet manufactured by continual annealing and roll-bonding process. Mater Des. 2016;97:483–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asavavisithchai S, Kennedy AR. Effect of powder oxide content on the expansion and stability of PM-route Al foams. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2006;297(2):715–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asavavisithchai S, Kennedy AR. The effect of compaction method on the expansion and stability of aluminium foams. Adv Eng Mater. 2006;8(9):810–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee M, Garcia-Moreno F, Jimenez C, et al. Microporosity in aluminium foams. Acta Mater. 2017;131:156–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzun A, Turker M. The effect of production parameters on the foaming behavior of spherical-shaped aluminium foam. Mater Res. 2014;17:311–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeenager VK, Pancholi V. Influence of cell wall microstructure on the energy absorption capability of aluminium foam. Mater Design (1980-2015). 2014;56:454–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirjan M, Bozorg M. Properties and corrosion behavior of Al based nanocomposite foams produced by the sintering-dissolution process. Int J Miner Metall Mater. 2018;25(1):94–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haesche M, Lehmhus D, Weise J, et al. Carbonates as foaming agent in chip-based aluminium foam precursor. J Mater Sci Technol. 2010;26(9):845–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulin I, Sustarsic B, Kevorkijan V, et al. Synthesis of aluminium foams by the powder-metallurgy process: compacting of precursors. Mater Tehnol. 2011;45(1):13–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priprava IK, Poroznostjo Z, Izdelanih ZD, et al. Synthesis and characterisation of closed cells aluminium foams containing dolomite powder as foaming agent. Materiali Tehnologije. 2010;44(6):363–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koizumi T, Kido K, Kita K, et al. Foaming agents for powder metallurgy production of aluminium foam. Mater Trans. 2011;52(4):728–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D-W, Jie LI, Tao LI, et al. Preparation and characterization of aluminium foams with ZrH2 as foaming agent. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China. 2011;21(2):346–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surace R, De Filippis LA, Ludovico AD, et al. Experimental analysis of the effect of control factors on aluminium foam produced by powder metallurgy. Est J Eng. 2007;13(2):156–167.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura T, Gnyloskurenko SV, Sakamoto K, et al. Development of new foaming agent for metal foam. Mater Trans. 2002;43(5):1191–1196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirah AH, Nurulakmal MS, Anasyida AS. The effect of space holder content and decomposition methods in fabrication of aluminium foams by powder metallurgy method using carbamide space holder. AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 1756. No. 1. AIP Publishing LLC; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Gaillard C, Despois JF, Mortensen A. Processing of NaCl powders of controlled size and shape for the microstructural tailoring of aluminium foams. Mater Sci Eng A. 2004;374(1-2):250–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Despois JF, Marmottant A, Salvo L, et al. Influence of the infiltration pressure on the structure and properties of replicated aluminium foams. Mater Sci Eng A. 2007;462(1-2):68–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed SH, Aljubouri AA. Manufacturing of aluminium foam as a light weight structural material. Eng Tech J. 2016;34(5):697–702.
   Google Scholar
• Yang X, Hu Q, Du J, et al. Compression fatigue properties of open-cell aluminium foams fabricated by space-holder method. Int J Fatigue. 2019;121:272–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertürk AT. Production of aluminium glass fiber reinforced foam synthesized by space-holder technique. Acta Phys Pol A. 2016;129(4):592–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain Z, Suffin NSA. Microstructure and mechanical behaviour of aluminium foam produced by sintering dissolution process using NaCl space holder. J Eng Sci. 2011;7:37–49.
   Google Scholar
• Jamal NA, Maizatul O, Anuar H, et al. Preliminary development of porous aluminium via powder metallurgy technique: Vorentwicklung von porösem Aluminium durch Pulvermetallurgie. Materialwiss Werkstofftech. 2018;49(4):460–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michailidis N, Stergioudi F, Tsouknidas A, et al. Compressive response of Al-foams produced via a powder sintering process based on a leachable space-holder material. Mater Sci Eng A. 2011;528(3):1662–1667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao NQ, Jiang B, Du XW, et al. Effect of Y2O3 on the mechanical properties of open cell aluminium foams. Mater Lett. 2006;60(13-14):1665–1668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vendra LJ, Rabiei A. A study on aluminium–steel composite metal foam processed by casting. Mater Sci Eng A. 2007;465(1-2):59–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Avila M, Portanova M, Rabiei A. Ballistic performance of composite metal foams. Compos Struct. 2015;125:202–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajak DK, Kumaraswamidhas LA, Das S. Technical overview of aluminium alloy foam. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2017;49(1):68–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashby MF, Lu T. Metal foams: A survey. Sci China Ser B: Chem. 2003;46(6):521–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajak DK, Kumaraswamidhas LA, Das S. Investigation and characterisation of aluminium alloy foams with TiH2 as a foaming agent. Mater Sci Technol. 2016;32(13):1338–1345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul A, Ramamurty U. Strain rate sensitivity of a closed-cell aluminium foam. Mater Sci Eng A. 2000;281(1-2):1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Ma H, Zhao L, et al. Studies on the dynamic compressive properties of open-cell aluminium alloy foams. Scr Mater. 2006;54(1):83–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raj RE, Parameswaran V, Daniel BSS. Comparison of quasi-static and dynamic compression behavior of closed-cell aluminium foam. Mater Sci Eng A. 2009;526(1-2):11–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamada T, Kanahashi H, Miyoshi T, et al. Effects of the strain rate and alloying on the compression characteristics of closed cell aluminium foams. Mater Trans. 2009;50(6):1418–1425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Burgueno R, Vanderklok AJ, et al. Compressive behavior of aluminium/copper hybrid foams under high strain rate loading. Mater Sci Eng A. 2014;592:111–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto P, Peixinho N, Silva F, et al. Compressive properties and energy absorption of aluminium foams with modified cellular geometry. J Mater Process Technol. 2014;214(3):571–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeenager VK, Pancholi V. Influence of cell wall microstructure on the energy absorption capability of aluminium foam. Mater Design (1980-2015). 2014;56:454–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabiei A, Vendra L, Reese N, et al. Processing and characterization of a new composite metal foam. Mater Trans. 2006;47(9):2148–2153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katona B, Szlancsik A, Tabi T, et al. Compressive characteristics and low frequency damping of aluminium matrix syntactic foams. Mater Sci Eng A. 2019;739:140–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung A, Koblischka MR, Lach E, et al. Hybrid metal foams. Int J Mater Sci. 2012;2(4):97–107.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer M, Zhao L, Lugscheider E. Surface refinement of metal foams. Adv Eng Mater. 2002;4(10):791–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedayati R, Rubio Carpio A, Luesutthiviboon S, et al. Role of polymeric coating on metallic foams to control the aeroacoustic noise reduction of airfoils with permeable trailing edges. Materials (Basel). 2019;12(7):1087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giani L, Cristiani C, Groppi G, et al. Washcoating method for Pd/γ-Al2O3 deposition on metallic foams. Appl Catal, B. 2006;62(1-2):121–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y-H, Shang X-Y. Recent progress in porous TiNb-based alloys for biomedical implant applications. Mater Sci Technol. 2020;36(4):385–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song JL, Zhao YL, He XJ, et al. Microstructure and properties of ultrasonic assisted copper coated graphite foams. Mater Sci Technol. 2013;29(11):1389–1393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Biest OO, Vandeperre LJ. Electrophoretic deposition of materials. Annu Rev Mater Res. 1999;29:327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskinen J. Cathodic-arc and thermal-evaporation deposition. Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering. Elsevier Ltd.; 2014. p. 3–55.
   Google Scholar
• Neacşu IA, Nicoara AI, Vasile OR, et al. Inorganic micro-and nanostructured implants for tissue engineering. Nanobiomaterials in Hard Tissue Engineering. William Andrew Publishing; 2016. p. 271–295.
   Google Scholar
• Brinker CJ, Hurd AJ. Fundamentals of sol-gel dip-coating. J Phys III. 1994;4(7):1231–1242.
   Google Scholar
• Yusop AHM, Daud NM, Nur H, et al. Controlling the degradation kinetics of porous iron by poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) infiltration for use as temporary medical implants. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeifer M. Manufacturing process considerations. Mater Enabled Des. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2009. p. 115–160.
   Google Scholar
• Rúa JM, Zuleta AA, Ramirez J, et al. Micro-arc oxidation coating on porous magnesium foam and its potential biomedical applications. Surf Coat Technol. 2019;360:213–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oriňaková R, Gorejova R, Kralova ZO, et al. Evaluation of mechanical properties and hemocompatibility of open cell iron foams with polyethylene glycol coating. Appl Surf Sci. 2020;505:144634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haverová L, Orinakova R, Orinak A, et al. An in vitro corrosion study of open cell iron structures with PEG coating for bone replacement applications. Metals (Basel). 2018;8(7):499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcantar NA, Aydil ES, Israelachvili JN. Polyethylene glycol–coated biocompatible surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res: Off J Soc Biomater Jpn Soc Biomater Aust Soc Biomater Korean Soc Biomater. 2000;51(3):343–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorejová R, Orinakova R, Orsagova Kralova Z, et al. In vitro corrosion behavior of biodegradable iron foams with polymeric coating. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(1):184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao X, Zhou N, Wan L, et al. Polyethyleneimine-coating enhances adenoviral transduction of mesenchymal stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;447(3):383–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrubovčáková M, Kupkova M, Dzupon M, et al. Biodegradable polylactic acid and polylactic acid/hydroxyapatite coated iron foams for bone replacement materials. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2017;12(12):11122–11136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julmi S, Kruger AK, Waselau AC, et al. Processing and coating of open-pored absorbable magnesium-based bone implants. Mater Sci Eng: C. 2019;98:1073–1086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elieh-Ali-Komi D, Hamblin MR. Chitin and chitosan: production and application of versatile biomedical nanomaterials. Int J Adv Res (Indore). 2016;4(3):411.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ray S, Thormann U, Eichelroth M, et al. Strontium and bisphosphonate coated iron foam scaffolds for osteoporotic fracture defect healing. Biomaterials. 2018;157:1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orinaková R, Orinak A, Kupkova M, et al. In vitro degradation and cytotoxicity evaluation of iron biomaterials with hydroxyapatite film. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2015;10:8158–8174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen Z, Zhang L, Chen C, et al. A construction of novel iron-foam-based calcium phosphate/chitosan coating biodegradable scaffold material. Mater Sci Eng: C. 2013;33(3):1022–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su Y, Champagne S, Trenggono A, et al. Development and characterization of silver containing calcium phosphate coatings on pure iron foam intended for bone scaffold applications. Mater Des. 2018;148:124–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Wang X, Wang D, et al. A novel approach to fabricate Zn coating on Mg foam through a modified thermal evaporation technique. J Mater Sci Technol. 2018;34(9):1558–1563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar