New approach to estimate coverage parameter in 3D FEM shot peening simulation

References

• Baiker S. Shot peening: a dynamic application and its future. 4th ed. Metal Finishing News; 2014. Available from: http://www.mfn.li/books/
   Google Scholar
• Elias CN, Lima JHC, Da Silva MP, et al. Titanium dental implants with different morphologies. Surf Eng. 2002;18(1):46–49. doi: 10.1179/026708401225001200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaysser W. Surface modifications in aerospace applications. Surf Eng. 2001;17(4):305–312. doi: 10.1179/026708401101517926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan K, Xie LC, Jiang CH, et al. Thermostability of S30432 shot peened surface layer. Surf Eng. 2013;29(1):61–64. doi: 10.1179/1743294412Y.0000000070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagheri S, Guagliano M. Review of shot peening processes to obtain nanocrystalline surfaces in metal alloys. Surf Eng. 2009;25(1):3–14. doi: 10.1179/026708408X334087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Závodská D, Guagliano M, Bokuvka O, et al. Effect of shot peening on the fatigue properties of 40NiCrMo7 steel. Manuf Technol. 2016;16(1):295–299.
   Google Scholar
• Trško L, Guagliano M, Lukáč P, et al. Effects of severe shot peening on the surface state of AW 7075 Al alloy. Kovove Mater. 2015;53(4):239–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murugaratnam K, Utili S, Petrinic N. A combined DEM-FEM numerical method for Shot Peening parameter optimisation. Adv Eng Softw. 2015;79:13–26. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasemi A, Hassani-Gangaraj SM, Mahmoudi AH, et al. Shot peening coverage effect on residual stress profile by FE random impact analysis. Surf Eng. 2016;32(11):1–10. doi: 10.1080/02670844.2016.1192336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majzoobi GH, Azizi R, Nia A Alavi. A three-dimensional simulation of shot peening process using multiple shot impacts. J Mater Process Technol. 2005;164–165:1226–1234. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffner K, Droste G, Helling C. Simulation of residual stresses by shot peening. Comput Struct. 1999;72(1):329–340. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7949(99)00012-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemenz M, Schulze V, Rohr I, et al. Application of the FEM for the prediction of the surface layer characteristics after shot peening. J Mater Process Technol. 2009;209(8):4093–4102. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang X, Wang T, Platts J. Multiple impact modelling for shot peening and peen forming. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf. 2010;224(5):689–697. doi: 10.1243/09544054JEM1672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim T, Lee JH, Lee H, et al. An area-average approach to peening residual stress under multi-impacts using a three-dimensional symmetry-cell finite element model with plastic shots. Mater Des. 2010;31(1):50–59. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.07.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemenz M, Hochrainer T, Delonnoy L, et al. Similarity rules for the shot peening process based on finite element simulations. Proc Int Conf Shot Peen ICSP. 2005;ICSP-9:94–99; Doc ID: 2005057.
   Google Scholar
• Bagherifard S, Ghelichi R, Guagliano M. On the shot peening surface coverage and its assessment by means of finite element simulation: a critical review and some original developments. Appl Surf Sci. 2012;259:186–194. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao HY, Larose S, Perron C, et al. On the potential applications of a 3D random finite element model for the simulation of shot peening. Adv Eng Softw. 2009;40(10):1023–1038. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagherifard S, Ghelichi R, Guagliano M. A numerical model of severe shot peening (SSP) to predict the generation of a nanostructured surface layer of material. Surf Coat Technol. 2010;204(24):4081–4090. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.05.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk D, Abyaneh MY. Theoretical basis of shot peening coverage control. Shot Peen. 1995;9(2):5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Vielma AT, Llaneza V, Belzunce FJ. Effect of coverage and double peening treatments on the fatigue life of a quenched and tempered structural steel. Surf Coat Technol. 2014;249:75–83. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.03.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scuracchio BG, de Lima NB, Schön CG. Role of residual stresses induced by double peening on fatigue durability of automotive leaf springs. Mater Des. 2013;47:672–676. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meguid SA, Shagal G, Stranart JC. 3D FE analysis of peening of strain-rate sensitive materials using multiple impingement model. Int J Impact Eng. 2002;27(2):119–134. doi: 10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00043-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prevéy PS, Cammett JT. The effect of shot peening coverage on residual stress, cold work and fatigue in a Ni-Cr-Mo low alloy steel. Proc Int Conf Shot Peen. 2002; ICSP-8; Doc ID: 2002038.
   Google Scholar
• Meguid SA, Yang F, Zhuo C, et al. 3D FE analysis of shot peening of strain-rate sensitive materials accounting for multiple and repeated impingement. Paper presented at: 13th International Conference on Fracture 2013, ICF 2013, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Schijve J. Fatigue of structures and materials. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw LL, Tian J-W, Ortiz AL, et al. A direct comparison in the fatigue resistance enhanced by surface severe plastic deformation and shot peening in a C-2000 superalloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2010;527(4–5):986–994. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.10.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gharbi F, Sghaier S, Al-Fadhalah KJ, et al. Effect of ball burnishing process on the surface quality and microstructure properties of aisi 1010 steel plates. J Mater Eng Perform. 2011;20(6):903–910. doi: 10.1007/s11665-010-9701-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagherifard S, Guagliano M. Fatigue behavior of a low-alloy steel with nanostructured surface obtained by severe shot peening. Eng Fract Mech. 2012;81:56–68. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar