Research status of magnesium alloys by micro-arc oxidation: a review

References

• Nagels J, Stokdijk M, Rozing PM. Stress shielding and bone resorption in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12:35–39. doi: 10.1067/mse.2003.22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saris NE, Mervaala E, Karppanen H, et al. Magnesium. Clin Chim Acta. 2000;294:1–26. doi: 10.1016/S0009-8981(99)00258-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mordike BL, Ebert T. Magnesium: properties-applications-potential. Mater Sci Eng A. 2001;302:37–45. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01351-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray JE, Luan B. Protective coatings on magnesium and its alloys – a critical review. J Alloys Compd. 2002;336:88–113. doi: 10.1016/S0925-8388(01)01899-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song G. Control of biodegradation of biocompatible magnesium alloys. Corros Sci. 2007;49:1696–1701. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2007.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez-Lopez M, Pereda MD, Del Valle JA, et al. Corrosion behaviour of AZ31 magnesium alloy with different grain sizes in simulated biological fluids. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:1763–1771. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.04.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aung NN, Zhou W. Effect of grain size and twins on corrosion behaviour of AZ31B magnesium alloy. Corros Sci. 2010;52:589–594. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2009.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambat R, Aung NN, Zhou W. Evaluation of microstructural effects on corrosion behaviour of AZ91D magnesium alloy. Corros Sci. 2000;42:1433–1455. doi: 10.1016/S0010-938X(99)00143-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Wang X, Zhang T, et al. Role of β Phase during microarc oxidation of Mg Alloy AZ91D and corrosion resistance of the oxidation coating. J Mater Sci Technol. 2013;29:1129–1133. doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2013.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte F, Kaese V, Haferkamp H, et al. In vivo corrosion of four magnesium alloys and the associated bone response. Biomaterials. 2005;26:3557–3563. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte F, Fischer J, Nellesen J, et al. In vivo corrosion and corrosion protection of magnesium alloy LAE442. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:1792–1799. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.10.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zartner P, Cesnjevar R, Singer H, et al. First successful implantation of a biodegradable metal stent into the left pulmonary artery of a preterm baby. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005;66:590–594. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Li M, Chen Q, et al. Effects of Sr and Sn on microstructure and corrosion resistance of Mg–Zr–Ca magnesium alloy for biomedical applications. Mater Des. 2012;39:379–383. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baril G, Blanc C, Pébere N. AC impedance spectroscopy in characterizing time-dependent corrosion of AZ91 and AM50 magnesium alloys characterization with respect to their microstructures. J Electrochem Soc. 2001;148:B489. doi: 10.1149/1.1415722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verstraeten SV, Aimo L, Oteiza PI. Aluminium and lead: molecular mechanisms of brain toxicity. Arch Toxicol. 2008;82:789–802. doi: 10.1007/s00204-008-0345-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Wen C, Mushahary D, et al. Mg–Zr–Sr alloys as biodegradable implant materials. Acta Biomater. 2012;8:3177–3188. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.04.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staiger MP, Pietak AM, Huadmai J, et al. Magnesium and its alloys as orthopedic biomaterials: a review. Biomaterials. 2006;27:1728–1734. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hantzsche K, Bohlen J, Wendt J, et al. Effect of rare earth additions on microstructure and texture development of magnesium alloy sheets. Scr Mater. 2010;63:725–730. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.12.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Yan C, Wang F, et al. Study on the environmentally friendly anodizing of AZ91D magnesium alloy. Surf Coat Technol. 2002;161:36–43. doi: 10.1016/S0257-8972(02)00342-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamaka SV, Knörnschild G, Snihirova DV, et al. Complex anticorrosion coating for ZK30 magnesium alloy. Electrochim Acta. 2009;55:131–141. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Li Q, Fan J, et al. Novel composite films prepared by sol–gel technology for the corrosion protection of AZ91D magnesium alloy. Prog Org Coat. 2009;66:328–335. doi: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2009.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Q, Guo X, Dang X, et al. Preparation and properties of composite MAO/ECD coatings on magnesium alloy. Colloid Surf B Biointerfs. 2013;102:321–326. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.07.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voevodin AA, Yerokhin AL, Lyubimov VV, et al. Characterization of wear protective Al Si O coatings formed on Al-based alloys by micro-arc discharge treatment. Surf Coat Technol. 1996;86–87:516–521. doi: 10.1016/S0257-8972(96)03069-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veys-Renaux D, Barchiche CE, Rocca E. Corrosion behavior of AZ91 Mg alloy anodized by low-energy micro-arc oxidation: effect of aluminates and silicates. Surf Coat Technol. 2014;251:232–238. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.04.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Bosta MMS, Ma K. Suggested mechanism for the MAO ceramic coating on aluminium substrates using bipolar current mode in the alkaline silicate electrolytes. Appl Surf Sci. 2014;308:121–138. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.04.120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou Q, Li W, Zhang G, et al. Preparation and characterisation of black ceramic coating on AZ91D magnesium alloy by plasma electrolytic oxidation with reduced energy consumption. Mater Res Innovations. 2015;19:S2-23–S2-27. doi: 10.1179/1432891715Z.0000000001309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie X, Leyland A, Song HW, et al. Thickness effects on the mechanical properties of micro-arc discharge oxide coatings on aluminium alloys. Surf Coat Technol. 1999;116-119:1055–1060. doi: 10.1016/S0257-8972(99)00089-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrabal R, Matykina E, Skeldon P, et al. Coating formation by plasma electrolytic oxidation on ZC71/SiC/12p-T6 magnesium metal matrix composite. Appl Surf Sci. 2009;255:5071–5078. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.12.070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai J, Cao F, Chang L, et al. The preparation and corrosion behaviors of MAO coating on AZ91D with rare earth conversion precursor film. Appl Surf Sci. 2011;257:3804–3811. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.11.153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein RO, Zhang P, Nie X, et al. The effect of current mode and discharge type on the corrosion resistance of plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) coated magnesium alloy AJ62. Surf Coat Technol. 2011;206:1990–1997. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.08.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran JA, Clyne TW. The thermal conductivity of plasma electrolytic oxide coatings on aluminium and magnesium. Surf Coat Technol. 2005;199:177–183. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.11.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang H, Sun Q, Xin T, et al. Influence of Co(CH3COO)2 concentration on thermal emissivity of coatings formed on titanium alloy by micro-arc oxidation. Curr Appl Phys. 2012;12:284–290. doi: 10.1016/j.cap.2011.06.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang RF, Shan DY, Chen RS, et al. Effects of electric parameters on properties of anodic coatings formed on magnesium alloys. Mater Chem Phys. 2008;107:356–363. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2007.07.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei D, Zhou Y, Jia D, et al. Effect of applied voltage on the structure of microarc oxidized TiO2-based bioceramic films. Mater Chem Phys. 2007;104:177–182. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2007.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin X, Tan L, Zhang Q, et al. The in vitro degradation process and biocompatibility of a ZK60 magnesium alloy with a forsterite-containing micro-arc oxidation coating. Acta Biomater. 2013;9:8631–8642. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.12.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang J, Hu L, Hao J. Improvement of corrosion properties of microarc oxidation coating on magnesium alloy by optimizing current density parameters. Appl Surf Sci. 2007;253:6939–6945. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun X, Jiang Z, Yao Z, et al. The effects of anodic and cathodic processes on the characteristics of ceramic coatings formed on titanium alloy through the MAO coating technology. Appl Surf Sci. 2005;252:441–447. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayati MR, Moshfegh AZ, Golestani-Fard F. Effect of electrical parameters on morphology, chemical composition, and photoactivity of the nano-porous titania layers synthesized by pulse-microarc oxidation. Electrochim Acta. 2010;55:2760–2766. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.12.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv G, Chen H, Gu W, et al. Effects of current frequency on the structural characteristics and corrosion property of ceramic coatings formed on magnesium alloy by PEO technology. J Mater Process Technol. 2008;208:9–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang Y, Zhao X, Jiang K, et al. The influences of duty cycle on the bonding strength of AZ31B magnesium alloy by microarc oxidation treatment. Surf Coat Technol. 2010;205:1789–1792. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YM, Jia DC, Guo LX, et al. Effect of discharge pulsating on microarc oxidation coatings formed on Ti6Al4V alloy. Mater Chem Phys. 2005;90:128–133. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.10.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui XJ, Lin XZ, Liu CH, et al. Microstructure and properties of MAO coatings for AZ91D magnesium alloy in varies work mode. Trans Tech Publ. 2013;747:178–183.
   Google Scholar
• Arrabal R, Matykina E, Hashimoto T, et al. Characterization of AC PEO coatings on magnesium alloys. Surf Coat Technol. 2009;203:2207–2220. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein RO, Northwood DO, Nie X. The influence of pulse timing and current mode on the microstructure and corrosion behaviour of a plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) coated AM60B magnesium alloy. J Alloys Compd. 2012;541:41–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butyagin PI, Khokhryakov YV, Mamaev AI. Microplasma systems for creating coatings on aluminium alloys. Mater Lett. 2003;57:1748–1751. doi: 10.1016/S0167-577X(02)01062-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Forno A, Bestetti M. Effect of the electrolytic solution composition on the performance of micro-arc anodic oxidation films formed on AM60B magnesium alloy. Surf Coat Technol. 2010;205:1783–1788. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.05.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang J, Guo B, Tian J, et al. Effect of potassium fluoride in electrolytic solution on the structure and properties of microarc oxidation coatings on magnesium alloy. Appl Surf Sci. 2005;252:345–351. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta P, Tenhundfeld G, Daigle EO, et al. Electrolytic plasma technology: science and engineering – an overview. Surf Coat Technol. 2007;201:8746–8760. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.11.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rama Krishna L, Poshal G, Sundararajan G. Influence of electrolyte chemistry on morphology and corrosion resistance of micro arc oxidation coatings deposited on magnesium. Metall Mater Trans A. 2010;41:3499–3508. doi: 10.1007/s11661-010-0412-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazek-Kęsik A, et al. Surface characterisation of Ti–15Mo alloy modified by a PEO process in various suspensions. Mater Sci Eng C. 2014;39:259–272. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfoori A, Mirdamadi S, Khavandi A, et al. Biodegradation behavior of micro-arc oxidized AZ31 magnesium alloys formed in two different electrolytes. Appl Surf Sci. 2012;261:92–100. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.07.105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan YK, Chen CZ, Wang DG, et al. Effects of phosphates on microstructure and bioactivity of micro-arc oxidized calcium phosphate coatings on Mg–Zn–Zr magnesium alloy. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013;109:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.03.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durdu S, Aytaç A, Usta M. Characterization and corrosion behavior of ceramic coating on magnesium by micro-arc oxidation. J Alloys Compd. 2011;509:8601–8606. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.06.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surmenev RA, Surmeneva MA, Ivanova AA. Significance of calcium phosphate coatings for the enhancement of new bone osteogenesis – a review. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:557–579. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnedenkov SV, Sinebryukhov SL, Zavidnaya AG, et al. Composite hydroxyapatite–PTFE coatings on Mg–Mn–Ce alloy for resorbable implant applications via a plasma electrolytic oxidation-based route. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2014;45:3104–3109. doi: 10.1016/j.jtice.2014.03.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnedenkov SV, Sinebryukhov SL, Khrisanfova OA, et al. Formation of bioactive anticorrosion coatings on resorbable implants by plasma electrolytic oxidation. Prot Met Phys Chem Surf. 2013;49:874–879. doi: 10.1134/S2070205113070071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O Brien FJ, Harley BA, Yannas IV, et al. The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2005;26:433–441. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Tienen TG, Heijkants RG, Buma P, et al. Tissue ingrowth and degradation of two biodegradable porous polymers with different porosities and pore sizes. Biomaterials. 2002;23:1731–1738. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00280-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo H, Cai Q, Wei B, et al. Effect of (NaPO3)6 concentrations on corrosion resistance of plasma electrolytic oxidation coatings formed on AZ91D magnesium alloy. J Alloys Compd. 2008;464:537–543. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.10.072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen Q, Cao FH, Shi YY, et al. The effect of phosphate on MAO of AZ91D magnesium using AC power source. Mater Corros. 2008;59:819–824. doi: 10.1002/maco.200804169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman SB, Yao Z, Keeney M, et al. The future of biologic coatings for orthopaedic implants. Biomaterials. 2013;34:3174–3183. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benini O, D Alessandro C, Gianfaldoni D, et al. Extra-phosphate load from food additives in commonly eaten foods: a real and insidious danger for renal patients. J Ren Nutr. 2011;21:303–308. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2010.06.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang J, Hu L, Hao J. Characterization of microarc oxidation coatings formed on AM60B magnesium alloy in silicate and phosphate electrolytes. Appl Surf Sci. 2007;253:4490–4496. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.09.064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori Y, Koshi A, Liao J, et al. Characteristics and corrosion resistance of plasma electrolytic oxidation coatings on AZ31B Mg alloy formed in phosphate – silicate mixture electrolytes. Corros Sci. 2014;88:254–262. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2014.07.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yagi S, Kuwabara K, Fukuta Y, et al. Formation of self-repairing anodized film on ACM522 magnesium alloy by plasma electrolytic oxidation. Corros Sci. 2013;73:188–195. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2013.03.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murakami K, Hino M, Nakai K, et al. Mechanism of corrosion protection of anodized magnesium alloys. Mater Trans. 2008;49:1057–1064. doi: 10.2320/matertrans.MC200718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan L, Wang Q, Lin X, et al. Loss of mechanical properties in vivo and bone–implant interface strength of AZ31B magnesium alloy screws with Si-containing coating. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:2333–2340. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Lv G, Zhang G, et al. Corrosion performance of plasma electrolytic oxidized AZ31 magnesium alloy in silicate solutions with different additives. Surf Coat Technol. 2010;205:S32–S35. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.03.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang HM, Chen ZH, Cheng YL. Optimisation of anodising electrolyte for magnesium alloy AZ31 and characteristics of anodic film. Surf Eng. 2010;26:334–339. doi: 10.1179/026708409X363219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sreekanth D, Rameshbabu N, Venkateswarlu K. Effect of various additives on morphology and corrosion behavior of ceramic coatings developed on AZ31 magnesium alloy by plasma electrolytic oxidation. Ceram Int. 2012;38:4607–4615. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.02.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sreekanth D, Rameshbabu N, Venkateswarlu K, et al. Effect of K2TiF6 and Na2B4O7 as electrolyte additives on pore morphology and corrosion properties of plasma electrolytic oxidation coatings on ZM21 magnesium alloy. Surf Coat Technol. 2013;222:31–37. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.01.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi L, Xu Y, Li K, et al. Effect of additives on structure and corrosion resistance of ceramic coatings on Mg–Li alloy by micro-arc oxidation. Curr Appl Phys. 2010;10:719–723. doi: 10.1016/j.cap.2009.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Němcová A, Skeldon P, Thompson GE, et al. Effect of fluoride on plasma electrolytic oxidation of AZ61 magnesium alloy. Surf Coat Technol. 2013;232:827–838. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.06.107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu D, Liu X, Lu K, et al. Influence of C3H8O3 in the electrolyte on characteristics and corrosion resistance of the microarc oxidation coatings formed on AZ91D magnesium alloy surface. Appl Surf Sci. 2009;255:7115–7120. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.02.087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang RF, Zhang SF, Yang N, et al. Influence of 8-hydroxyquinoline on properties of anodic coatings obtained by micro arc oxidation on AZ91 magnesium alloys. J Alloys Compd. 2012;539:249–255. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.04.120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo H, An M. Effect of surfactants on surface morphology of ceramic coatings fabricated on magnesium alloys by micro-arc oxidation. Thin Solid Films. 2006;500:186–189. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.11.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laleh M, Rouhaghdam AS, Shahrabi T, et al. Effect of alumina sol addition to micro-arc oxidation electrolyte on the properties of MAO coatings formed on magnesium alloy AZ91D. J Alloys Compd. 2010;496:548–552. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.02.098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang M, Liu H, Li W, et al. Effect of zirconia sol in electrolyte on the characteristics of microarc oxidation coating on AZ91D magnesium. Mater Lett. 2011;65:413–415. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2010.09.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Lu Y, Jing X, et al. Characterization of plasma electrolytic oxidation coatings formed on Mg–Li alloy in an alkaline silicate electrolyte containing silica sol. Mater Corros. 2009;60:865–870. doi: 10.1002/maco.200805204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrabal R, Matykina E, Skeldon P, et al. Incorporation of zirconia particles into coatings formed on magnesium by plasma electrolytic oxidation. J Mater Sci. 2008;43:1532–1538. doi: 10.1007/s10853-007-2360-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim TS, Ryu HS, Hong S. Electrochemical corrosion properties of CeO2-containing coatings on AZ31 magnesium alloys prepared by plasma electrolytic oxidation. Corros Sci. 2012;62:104–111. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2012.04.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blawert C, Sah SP, Liang J, et al. Role of sintering and clay particle additions on coating formation during PEO processing of AM50 magnesium alloy. Surf Coat Technol. 2012;213:48–58. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snizhko LO, Yerokhin AL, Pilkington A, et al. Anodic processes in plasma electrolytic oxidation of aluminium in alkaline solutions. Electrochim Acta. 2004;49:2085–2095. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2003.11.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monfort F, Berkani A, Matykina E, et al. A tracer study of oxide growth during spark anodizing of aluminum. J Electrochem Soc. 2005;152:C382. doi: 10.1149/1.1905968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matykina E, Berkani A, Skeldon P, et al. Real-time imaging of coating growth during plasma electrolytic oxidation of titanium. Electrochim Acta. 2007;53:1987–1994. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.08.074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monfort F, Berkani A, Matykina E, et al. Development of anodic coatings on aluminium under sparking conditions in silicate electrolyte. Corros Sci. 2007;49:672–693. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2006.05.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerokhin AL, Leyland A, Matthews A. Kinetic aspects of aluminium titanate layer formation on titanium alloys by plasma electrolytic oxidation. Appl Surf Sci. 2002;200:172–184. doi: 10.1016/S0169-4332(02)00848-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar