FE analysis of shot-peening-induced residual stresses of AISI 304 stainless steel by considering mesh density and friction coefficient

References

• Wang SP, Li YJ, Yao M, et al. Compressive residual stress introduced by shot peening. J Mater Process Technol. 1998;73:64–73. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(97)00213-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahagaonkar SB, Brahmankar PK, Seemikeri CY. Effect of shot peening parameters on microhardness of AISI 1045 and 316L material: an analysis using design of experiment . Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2008;38:563–574. doi: 10.1007/s00170-007-1222-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Luan WZ, Huang JJ, et al. XRD investigation of microstructure strengthening mechanism of shot peening on laser hardened 17-4PH. Mater Sci Eng A. 2011;528:6417–6425. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.03.098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leap MJ, Rankin J, Harrison J, et al. Effects of laser peening on fatigue life in an arrestment hook shank application for Naval aircraft. Int J Fatigue. 2011;33:788–799. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan J, Sun D, Wang Z, et al. The effect of shot peening on fatigue life of Q345D T-welded joint. J Constr Steel Res. 2016;126:74–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertz H. Uber die Beruhrung fester elastischer Korper (On the contact of elastic solids). J Reine Angew Math. 1882;92:156–171.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy C, Baronet CN, Tordion GV. The elasto-plastic indentation of a half-space by a rigid sphere. Int J Numer Meth Eng. 1971;3(4):451–462. doi: 10.1002/nme.1620030402
   Google Scholar
• Edberg J, Lindgren L, Mori K. Shot peening simulated by two different finite element formulations. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Numerical Methods in Industrial Forming Processes; 1995 Jun; New York, USA. p. 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Meguid SA, Shagal G, Stranart JC. Three-dimensional dynamic finite element analysis of shot-peening induced residual stresses. Finite Elem Anal Des. 1999;31(3):179–191. doi: 10.1016/S0168-874X(98)00057-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meguid SA, Shagal G, Stranart JC. 3D FE analysis of peening of strain-rate sensitive materials using multiple impingement model. Int J Impact Eng. 2002;27(2):119–134. doi: 10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00043-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemenz M, Schulze V, Rohr I, et al. Application of the FEM for the prediction of the surface layer characteristics after shot peening. J Mater Process Tech. 2009;209:4093–4102. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meguid SA, Shagal G, Stranart JC. Development and validation of novel FE models for 3D analysis of peening of strain-rate sensitive materials. J Eng Mater Technol. 2007;129(2):271–283. doi: 10.1115/1.2712469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlfahrt H. The influence of peening conditions on the resulting distribution of residual stress. Proceeding of the Second International Conference on Shot Peeing; 1984 May; Chicago, USA. p. 316–331.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzer J, Schulze V, Vöhringer O. Finite element simulation of shot peening – a method to evaluate the influence of peening parameters on surface characteristics. Proceeding of the 8th International Conference on Shot Peeing; 2002 Sep; Germany: Garmisch-Partenkirchen. p. 507–515.
   Google Scholar
• Hong T, Ooi JY, Shaw B. A numerical simulation to relate the shot peening parameters to the induced residual stresses. Eng Failure Anal. 2008;15:1097–1110. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2007.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim T, Lee H, Kim M, et al. A 3D FE model for evaluation of peening residual stress under angled multi-shot impacts. Surf Coat Technol. 2012;206:3981–3988. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.03.078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao HY, Larose S, Perron C, et al. On the potential applications of a 3D random finite element model for the simulation of shot peening. Adv Eng Softw. 2009;40:1023–1038. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z. Computer simulation and experiment investigation of Laser Hardening and Shot Peening process of Martensitic stainless steel [PhD-thesis]. Shanghai Jiao Tong University; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Murugaratnam K, Utili S, Petrinic N. A combined DEM-FEM numerical method for Shot Peening parameter optimisation. Adv Eng Softw. 2015;79:13–26. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu FB, Delbergue D, Miao HY, et al. A sequential DEM-FEM coupling method for shot peening simulation. Surf Coat Technol. 2017;319:200–212. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.03.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan K, Jiang CH, Ji V. Effect of prestress state on surface layer characteristic of S30432 austenitic stainless steel in shot peening process. Mater Design. 2012;42:89–93. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan K, Jiang CH, Ji V. Uniformity of residual stress distribution on the surface of S30432 austenitic stainless steel by different shot peening processes. Mater Lett. 2013;99:61–64. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.08.147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fargas G, Roa JJ, Mateo A. Effect of shot peening on metastable austenitic stainless steels. Mater Sci Eng. 2015;641:290–296. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.05.079
   Google Scholar
• Yang XJ. Effect of ultrasonic impact treatment on improvements of mechanical properties and surface integrity of AISI 304 stainless steel [PhD-thesis]. Nanjing Tech University; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Li YH, Wang F, Lü J, et al. Finite element analysis for shot peening models of single shot impact and multiple impingement. J Xi’An Jiaotong Univ. 2007;41(3):348–352.
   Google Scholar
• Zhan K. Investigation of Shot Peening Treatment on S30432 Austenitic Stainless Steel and its Characterization [PhD-thesis]. Shanghai Jiao Tong University; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmemann M, Schulze V, Hoffmeister J. Finite element modelling of coverage effects during shot peening of IN718. Int J Mater Res. 2010;101(08):951–962. doi: 10.3139/146.110375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasemi A, Hassani-Gangaraj SM, Mahmoudi AH, et al. Shot peening coverage effect on residual stress profile by FE random impact analysis. Surf Eng. 2016;32(11):861–870. doi: 10.1080/02670844.2016.1192336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemenz M. Anwendung der Simulation der Randschichtausbildung beim Kugelstrahlen auf die Abschätzung der Schwingfestigkeit gekerbter Bauteile [PhD-thesis]. Karlsruhe University; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Macherauch E, Müller P. Das sin2ψ-Verfahren der röntgenographischen Spannungsmessung. Z Angew Phys. 1961;13:340–345.
   Google Scholar
• Noyan IC, Cohen JB. Residual stress-measurement by diffraction and interpretation. New York: Springer Verlag; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Moore MG, Evans WP. Mathematical correction for stress in removed layers in X-ray diffraction RS analysis. SAE Trans. 1958;66:340–345.
   Google Scholar
• Pan J, Quan J. Fundamentals of materials science. Tsinghua University Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann M, Klemenz M, Schulze V, et al. Numerical studies on the influence of thickness on the residual stress development during shot peening. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 2009;1985:19–20.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang YY, Tu YQ. The latest handbook of practical metal materials. Jiangxi Science and Technology Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Gambirasio L, Rizzi E. On the calibration strategies of the Johnson-Cook strength model: discussion and applications to experimental data. Mater Sci Eng A. 2014;610:370–413. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ABAQUS Analysis User’s Manual, version 6.10, Johnson-Cook Plasticity, Section 20.2.7; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze V. Modern mechanical surface treatment. Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2006.
   Google Scholar