Dynamic behaviour of miniature laser textured skis

References

• Andersson LO, Golander CG, Persson S. Ice adhesion to rubber materials. J Adhes Sci Technol. 1994;8:117–132. doi: 10.1163/156856194X00104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankenstein S, Tuthill AM. Ice adhesion to locks and dams: past work; future directions? J Cold Reg Eng. 2002;16:83–96. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-381X(2002)16:2(83)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laforte JL, Allaire MA, Laflamme J. State-of-the-art on power line de-icing. Atmos Res. 1998;46:143–158. doi: 10.1016/S0169-8095(97)00057-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croutch VK, Hartley RA. Adhesion of ice to coatings and the performance of ice release coatings. J Coat Technol. 1992;64:41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Golovin K, Kobaku SPR, Lee DH, et al. Designing durable icephobic surfaces. Sci Adv. 2016;2:e1501496. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzola L. Aeronautical livery coating with icephobic property. Surf Eng. 2016;32(10):733–744. 2016. doi: 10.1080/02670844.2015.1121319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden F, Hughes T. The mechanism of sliding on ice and snow. Proc R Soc London Ser A. 1939;172:280–298. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1939.0104
   Google Scholar
• Colbeck SC. A review of the friction of snow skis. J Sports Sci. 1994;3(12):285–295. doi: 10.1080/02640419408732174
   Google Scholar
• Kuzmin L. Interfacial kinetic ski friction [doctoral thesis]. Mid Sweden University; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• De Koning G, De Groot GJ, Schenau JVI. Ice friction during speed skating. J Biomech. 1992;25(6):565–571. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(92)90099-M
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slotfeldt-Ellingsen D, Torgersen L. Glide abilities of polyethylene ski base. Oslo: SINTEF; 1982. 62.
   Google Scholar
• Faraday M. On regelation, and on the conservation of force. Philosophical Magazine. Fourth Ser. 1859;17(I 13):162–69.
   Google Scholar
• Fierz C, Armstrong R L, Durand Y, et al. The international classification for seasonal snow on the ground. IHP-VII Tech Doc Hydrol. 2009;83(1):1–80.
   Google Scholar
• Kietzig AM, Hatzikiriakos SG, Englezos P. Physics of ice friction. J Appl Phys. 2010;107:081101. doi: 10.1063/1.3340792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhl D, Fauve MRH. The kinetic friction of polyethylene on snow: the influence of the snow temperature and the load. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 2001;33(2–3):133–140. doi: 10.1016/S0165-232X(01)00034-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden FP. Friction on snow and ice. Proc R Soc Lond A. 1953;217:462–478. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1953.0074
   Google Scholar
• Bäurle L, Szabò D, Fauve M, et al. Sliding friction of polyethilene on ice: tribometer measurements. Tribol Lett. 2006;24:77–84. doi: 10.1007/s11249-006-9147-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohm SHM, Knoflach C, Van Putten J, et al. Friction between steel and snow in dependence of the steel roughness. Tribol Lett. 2015;59:27. doi: 10.1007/s11249-015-0554-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang H, Martin JM, Mogne TL. Experimental investigation of friction in low-temperature ice. Acta Mater. 2003;51(9):2639–2646. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00061-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkok M, Ettles CMM, Calabrese SJ. Parameters affecting the kinetic friction on ice. J Tribol. 1987;109(3):552–561. doi: 10.1115/1.3261503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäurle L, Kaempfer U, Szabó D, et al. Sliding friction of polyethylene on snow and ice: Contact area and modelling. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 2007;47:276–289. doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2006.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans DCB, Nye JF, Cheeseman KJ. The kinetic friction of ice. Proc R Soc Lond. 1976;A 347:493–512.
   Google Scholar
• Makkonen M, Tikanmaki MM. Modeling the friction of ice. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 2014;102:84–93. doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2014.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itagaki K, Lemieux GE, Huber NP. Preliminary study of friction between ice and sled runners. J Phys Colloques. 1987;48:297–301.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts AD, Richardson JC. Interface study of rubber-ice friction. Wear. 1981;67(1):55–69. doi: 10.1016/0043-1648(81)90075-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuroiwa D. The kinetic friction on snow and ice. J Glaciol. 1977;19:141–152. doi: 10.1017/S0022143000029233
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese SJ, Buxton R, Marsh G. Frictional characteristics of materials sliding against ice. Lubr Eng. 1980;36(5):283–289.
   Google Scholar
• Albracht F, Reichel S, Winkler V, et al. On the influences of friction on ice. Materwiss und Werksttech. 2004;35(10–11):620–625. doi: 10.1002/mawe.200400822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montagnat M, Schulson EM. On friction and surface cracking during sliding of ice on ice. J Glaciol. 2003;49(166):391–396. doi: 10.3189/172756503781830647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oksanen P, Keinonen J. The mechanism of friction of ice. Wear. 1982;78(3):315–324. doi: 10.1016/0043-1648(82)90242-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones SJ, Kitagawa H, Izumiyama K, et al. Friction of melting ice. Ann Glaciol. 1994;19:7–12. doi: 10.3189/1994AoG19-1-7-12
   Google Scholar
• Marmo BA, Farrow IS, Buckingham MP, et al. Frictional heat. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L. 2006;220(4):189–197.
   Google Scholar
• Ducret S, Zahouani H, Midol A, et al. Friction and abrasive wear of UHMWPE sliding on ice. Wear. 2005;258:26–31. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2004.09.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kietzig AM, Hatzikiriakos SG, Englezos P. Ice friction: the effects of surface roughness, structure and hydrophobicity. J Appl Phys. 2009;106:024303. doi: 10.1063/1.3173346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kietzig AM, Hatzikiriakos SG, Englezos P. Patterned superhydrophobic metallic surfaces. Langmuir. 2009;25(8):4821–4827. doi: 10.1021/la8037582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Y, Zhang D, Xu X, et al. Precise cutting microstructured superhydrophobic surface. Surf Eng. 2016;32(2):119–124. doi: 10.1179/1743294415Y.0000000102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen N, Dotan A, Dodiuk H, et al. Superhydrophobic coatings and their durability. Mater Manuf Process. 2016;31(9):1143–1155. doi: 10.1080/10426914.2015.1090600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khagendra T, Joshi B, Amanov A, et al. A Study on the effect of laser surface texturing on friction and wear behavior of graphite cast iron. J Tribol. 2016;I(138):011601.
   Google Scholar
• Shum PW, Zhou ZF, Li KY. To increase the hydrophobicity and wear resistance of diamond-like carbon coatings by surface texturing using laser ablation process. Thin solid films. 2013;544:472–476. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.02.075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun D, Greinern C, Schneider J, et al. Efficiency of laser surface texturing in the reduction of friction under mixed lubrication. Tribol Int. 2014;77:142–147. doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2014.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Kato K, Koshi A, et al. The effect of laser texturing of SiC surface on the critical load for the transition of water lubrication mode from hydrodynamic to mixed. Tribol Int. 2001;34:703–711. doi: 10.1016/S0301-679X(01)00063-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandoni L, Demir AG, Previtali B, et al. Wear behavior of fiber laser textured TiN coatings in a heavy loaded sliding regime. Materials. 2012;5(11):2360–2382. doi: 10.3390/ma5112360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlak Z, Urbaniak W, Oloyede A. The relationship between friction and wettability in aqueous environment. Wear. 2011;271:1745–1749. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2010.12.084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YF, Chen YP, Zhang CB, et al. Influence of rough surface topography on wettability. J Eng Thermophys-Rus. 2011;32(7):1188–1190.
   Google Scholar
• Groten J, Rühe J. Surfaces with combined microscale and nanoscale structures: a route to mechanically stable superhydrophobic surfaces? Langmuir. 2013;29(11):3765–3772. doi: 10.1021/la304641q
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öner D, McCarthy TJ. Ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Effects of topography length scales on wettability. Langmuir. 2000;16(20):7777–7782. doi: 10.1021/la000598o
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jopp J, Grüll H, Yerushalmi-Rozen R. Wetting behavior of water droplets on hydrophobic microtextures of comparable size. Langmuir. 2004;20:10015–10019. doi: 10.1021/la0497651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo BH, Shum PW, Zhou ZF, et al. Surface geometrical model modification and contact angle prediction for the laser patterned steel surface. Surf Coat Tech. 2010;205:2597–2604. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence J, Li L. Wettability characteristics of polyethylene modified with CO2, Nd:YAG, excimer and high-power diode lasers. Proc Instn Mech Engrs. 2015;215(Part B):1735–1744.
   Google Scholar
• Semaltianos NG, Perrie W, French P, et al. Femtosecond laser surface texturing of a nickel-based superalloy. Appl Surf Sci. 2008;255:2796–2802. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.08.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ta DV, Dunn A, Wasley TJ, et al. Nanosecond laser textured superhydrophobic metallic surfaces and their chemical sensing applications. Appl Surf Sci. 2015;357:248–254. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.09.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang B, Wang X, Zheng H, et al. Surface wettability modification of cyclic olefin polymer by direct femtosecond laser irradiation. Nanomaterials. 2015;5:1442–1453. doi: 10.3390/nano5031442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YQ, Yang HF, Hao JB, et al. Experimental research on the fabrication and wettability of micro- and nano-scale surface textures produced on stainless steel using an ultrafast laser. Laser Eng. 2011;21:241–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang MZHF, Dai BJLJ, Cai ELZL. Forming mechanisms and wettability of double-scale structures fabricated by femtosecond laser. Appl Phys A. 2009;94(3):571–576. doi: 10.1007/s00339-008-4920-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir AG, Furlan V, Lecis N, et al. Laser surface structuring of AZ31 Mg alloy for controlled wettability. Biointerphases. 2014;9(2):0290091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlan V, Demir AG, Previtali B. Micro and sub-micron surface structuring of AZ31 by laser re-melting and dimpling. Opt Laser Technol. 2015;75:164–172. doi: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2015.06.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir AG, Taketa TB, Tolouei R, et al. Laser surface structuring affects polymer deposition, coating homogeneity, and degradation rate of Mg alloys. Materials Letters. 2015;160:359–362. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.07.159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir AG, Previtali B, Lecis N. Development of laser dimpling strategies on TiN coatings for tribological applications with a highly energetic Q-switched fibre laser. Opt Laser Technol. 2013;54:53–61. doi: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2013.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan Y, Lee TR. Contact angle and wetting properties. In: G Bracco, B Holst, editors. Surface science techniques. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. I–34.
   Google Scholar
• de Lara LR, Jagdheesh R, Ocaña JL. Corrosion resistance of laser patterned ultrahydrophobic aluminium surface. Mater Lett. 2016;184:100–103. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.08.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagdheesh R, García-Ballesteros JJ, Ocaña JL. One-step fabrication of near superhydrophobic aluminum surface by nanosecond laser ablation. Appl Surf Sci. 2016;374:2–11. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.06.104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzmin L. Interfacial kinetic ski friction [thesis for the degree of doctoral of philosophy]. Mid Sweden University; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Mannion PT, Magee J, Coyne E, et al. The effect of damage accumulation behaviour on ablation thresholds and damage morphology in ultrafast laser micro-machining of common metals in air. Appl Surf Sci. 2004;233:275–287. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.03.229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maressa P, Anodio L, Bernasconi A, et al. Effect of surface texture on the adhesion performance of laser treated Ti6Al4 V alloy. J Adhesion. 2015;91(7):518–537. doi: 10.1080/00218464.2014.933809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar