Fall of the public teacher – discourse of intimacy and the teaching profession in Denmark

References

• Abbott, A. 1988. The System of Professions. Chicago, IL: The University Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Appleton, S. F. 2005. “Missing in Action?: Searching for Gender Talk in the Same-sex Marriage Debate.” Stanford Law & Policy Review 16 (1): 97–134.
   Google Scholar
• Bakken, R. 2004. Mann i ingenmannsland [Man in Nomansland]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, A., and G. Mercer. 2000. “Reconceptualising Discourses of Power in Postgraduate Pedagogies.” Teaching in Higher Education 5 (2): 195–204.10.1080/135625100114849
   Google Scholar
• Bassey, M. 1999. Case Study Research in Educational Settings. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baszanger, I., and N. Dodier. 2004. “Ethnography: Relating the Part to the Whole.” In Qualitative Research – Theory, Method and Practice, edited by D. Silverman, 9–34. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Berryhill, J., J. A. Linney, and J. Fromewick. 2009. “The Effects of Education Accountability on Teachers.” International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership 4 (5): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, J. M. 2008. “Gender Role Orientation and Relational Closeness: Self-disclosive Behavior in Same-sex Male Friendships.” The Journal of Men’s Studies 16 (3): 316–330.10.3149/jms.1603.316
   Google Scholar
• Brante, T. 1988. “Sociological Approaches to the Professions.” Acta Sociologica 31 (2): 119–142.10.1177/000169938803100202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruney, G. 2012. “The Importance of Developing Trust and Fostering Emotional Intelligence in the Classroom.” Ontario Institute for Studies in Education. Accessed March 5, 2014. https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/35096/1/Glenda%20MTRP%20Complete.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. 1994. “Burnout: Testing for the Validity, Replication, and Invariance of Causal Structure Across Elementary, Intermediate, and Secondary Teachers.” American Educational Research Journal 31: 645–673. doi:10.3102/00028312031003645.10.3102/00028312031003645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campoy, R. 2005. Case Study Analysis in the Classroom: Becoming a Reflective Teacher. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cevik, Y. D., and T. Andre. 2014. “Studying the Impact of Three Different Instructional Methods on Preservice Teachers’ Decision-making.” Research Papers in Education 29 (1): 44–68. doi:10.1080/02671522.2012.742923.10.1080/02671522.2012.742923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. 2005. Situational Analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Colnerud, G., and K. Granström. 1998. Respekt for lærere [Respect for Teachers]. Aarhus: Klim.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., and A. E. Wise. 1985. “Beyond Standardization: State Standards and School Improvement.” The Elementary School Journal 85 (3): 315–336.10.1086/esj.1985.85.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A. D. 2010. “Regulating Polygamy: Intimacy, Default Rules, and Bargaining for Equality.” Columbia Law Review 110 (8): 1955–2046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dent, G. W. 1999. “The Defense of Traditional Marriage.” The Journal of Law & Politics 15 (4): 581–644.
   Google Scholar
• DLF (Danmarks Lærerforening) 2002. “Professionsideal for Danmarks Lærerforening.” Accessed August 11, 2014. www.folkeskolen.dk/~/Documents/148/58948.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, A. S. 2012. “Capturing the Object of Initial Teacher Education by Studying Tools-in-use in Four School Subject Departments.” Research Papers in Education 27 (3): 285–302. doi:10.1080/02671522.2010.535614.10.1080/02671522.2010.535614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. F., C. H. Abelmann, and S. H. Fuhrman. 1996. “The New Accountability in State Education Reform: From Process To Performance.” In Holding Schools Accountable: Performance-based Reform in Education, edited by H. F. Ladd, 65–98. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Emens, E. F. 2004. “Monogamy’s Law: Compulsory Monogamy and Polyamorous Existence.” New York University Review of Law & Social Change 29: 276–376. doi:10.2139/ssrn.506242.
   Google Scholar
• Farber, B. A. 1991. Crisis in Education: Stress and Burnout in the American Teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Fehr, B. 2004. “Intimacy Expectations in Same-sex Friendships: A Prototype Interaction-pattern Model.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86: 265–284. doi:10.1037/0022-3-514.86.2.265.10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitz, J., C. Taylor, and S. Gorard. 2002. “Local Education Authorities and the Regulation of Educational Markets: Four Case Studies.” Research Papers in Education 17 (2): 125–146.10.1080/02671520210122900
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings About Case-study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12: 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363.10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2005. Overvågning og straf [Discipline and Punish]. København: Det lille forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2008. Ordene og tingene [The Order of Things]. København: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2009. Talens forfatning [Orders of Discourse]. København: Hans Reitzel.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2011. Viljen til viden: Seksualitetens historie I [The History of Sexuality]. København: Det lille Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Freidson, E. 2001. Professionalism. Chicago, IL: The University Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, I. A. 1991. “High and Low-burnout Schools: School Culture Aspects of Teacher Burnout.” The Journal of Educational Research 84: 325–333. doi:10.1080/00220671.1991.9941813.10.1080/00220671.1991.9941813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. 2007. Case Study Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goode, W. J. 1957. “Community Within a Community: The Professions.” American Sociological Review 22 (2): 194–200.10.2307/2088857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregersen, K. 1992. “Dansk standard for udskrivning og registrering af talesprog [Danish Standard for Transcribing].” SNAK 5: 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Gruschka, A. 2011. Verstehen Lehren [Understanding Learning]. Stuttgart: Reclam.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 1993. “Minimal Selves.” In Studying Culture: An Introductory Reader, edited by A. Gray and J. McGuigan, 134–138. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hallett, F. 2010. “Do We Practice What We Preach? An Examination of the Pedagogical Beliefs of Teacher Educators.” Teaching in Higher Education 15 (4): 435–448.10.1080/13562517.2010.493347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. 2010. “Reproducing or Constructing? Some Questions About Transcription in Social Research.” Qualitative Research 10 (5): 553–569.10.1177/1468794110375230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heggen, K. 2000. “Romantisering av sykepleiefaget.” [The Romantization of the Nursing Profession]. Utdannelsesnytt 11 (3): 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, P. E., B. Wood. 2000. “The Influence of Religious and Ethnic Differences on Marital Intimacy: Intermarriage Versus Intramarriage.” Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 26: 241–252. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2000.tb00293.x.10.1111/jmft.2000.26.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. 1983. The Managed Heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K., and P. R. Pintrich. 2002. Personal Epistemology: The Psychology Of Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., and G. M. Vaughan. 2002. Social Psychology. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y.-P., and S. Ariogul. 2006. “Metaphors and Cross-cultural Stories of Learning to Teach.” Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue 8 (1–2): 225–238.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, D. 2006. “Metaphors as a Bridge to Understanding Educational and Social Contexts.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (1): 23–46.
   Google Scholar
• Joinson, A. N. 2001. “Knowing Me, Knowing You.” CyberPsychology & Behavior 4: 587–591. doi:10.1089/109493101753235179.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jordansen, B. 2010. “Observation.” In Paradigmer i praksis, edited by P. Darmer, B. Jordansen, J. A. Madsen and J. Thomsen, 257–282. København: Handelshøjskolens Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kosnick, C., and C. Beck. 2011. Teaching in a Nutshell: Navigating Your Teacher Education Program as a Student Teacher. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Labaree, D. 2000. “On the Nature of Teaching and Teacher Education: Difficult Practices that Look Easy.” Journal of Teacher Education 51: 228–233. doi:10.1177/0022487100051003011.10.1177/0022487100051003011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., and O. Kwon. 2011. “Intimacy, Familiarity and Continuance Intention: An Extended Expectation–Confirmation Model in Web-based Services.” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 10: 342–357. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2010.11.005.10.1016/j.elerap.2010.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitão, N., and R. F. Waugh. 2007. “Teachers’ Views of Teacher-student Relationships in the Primary School.” Accessed March 5, 2014. http://publications.aare.edu.au/07pap/lei07022.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, S.-Å. 2007. “Michel Foucault.” In Klassisk og moderne samfundsteori, edited by H. Andersen and L. B. Kaspersen, 314–329. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lippert, T., and K. J. Prager. 2001. “Daily Experiences of Intimacy: A Study of Couples.” Personal Relationships 8: 283–298. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00041.x.10.1111/pere.2001.8.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. 5th ed. 2009. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C. 1988. “Bridging the Chasm Between Policymakers and Educators.” Theory Into Practice 27: 98–105. doi:10.1080/00405848809543337.10.1080/00405848809543337
   Google Scholar
• Mattiasson, A.-C., and M. Hemberg. 1998. “Intimacy: Meeting Needs and Respecting Privacy in the Care of Elderly People.” Ethics 5: 527–534. doi:10.1177/096973309800500607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, M. 1989. Sociological Theory. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, L. M. 2000. Contradictions of Reform: The educational Costs of Standardized Testing. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mendler, A. N. 2001. Connecting With Students. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• MFVI. 2014. Teacher Education Programme. Accessed August 11, 2014. http://www.ucsyd.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/international/internationalt_2014/Teacher_training_-_B__Ed__programme_for_primary_and_lower_secondary_school.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G., and K. J. Fox. 2004. “Building Bridges. The Possibility of Analytic Dialogue between Ethnography, Conversation Analysis and Foucault?” In Qualitative Research. Theory, Method and Practice, edited by D. Silverman, 35–55. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Millerson, G. 1964. The Qualifying Associations. A Study in Professionalization. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Mottelson, M. 2010. Lærerens praksis [Teacher Practice]. København: Hans Reitzel.
   Google Scholar
• Neidel, A. 2011. På vej?! [On the Road?!]. Roskilde: Forskerskolen i Livslang Læring.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. 2003. Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. 2005. The Challenge to Care in Schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Øverbye, E. 2013. “Velferdsprofesjonene i aktiveringsstaten.” [The Professions of Welfare in the Activation State]. In Profesjonsstudier II, edited by A. Molander and J.-C. Smeby, 107–121. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. 1968. “Professions.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, edited by D. L. Sills and R. K. Merton, 536–547. New York: Macmillan and Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. 1991. The Social System. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pianta, R. C. 1999. Enhancing Relationships Between Children and Teachers. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.10.1037/10314-000
   Google Scholar
• Prior, L. 2003. Using Documents in Social Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, L. 2008. “Repositioning Documents in Social Research.” Sociology 42 (5): 821–836.10.1177/0038038508094564
   Google Scholar
• Prior, L. 2012. “The Role of Documents in Social Research.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research in Education, edited by S. Delamont, 426–438. Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Prusak, K. A., S. D. Vincent, and R. P. Pangrazi. 2005. “Teacher Talk.” Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance 76 (5): 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Riesman, D. 1985. Det ensomme massemenneske [The Lonely Crowd]. København: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Roseneil, S., and S. Budgeon. 2004. “Cultures of Intimacy and Care Beyond ‘the Family’: Personal Life and Social Change in the Early 21st Century.” Current Sociology 52: 135–159. doi:10.1177/0011392104041798.10.1177/0011392104041798
   Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., and P. Glick. 2008. The Social Psychology of Gender: How Power and Intimacy Shape Gender Relations. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Saugstad, T. 2004. “Vejledning og intimitetstyranniet.” [Guidance and the Tyranny of Intimacy]. In Pædagogikken og kampen om individet, edited by J. Krejsler, 88–106. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Seki, K., D. Matsumoto, and T. T. Imahori. 2002. “The Conceptualization and Expression of Intimacy in Japan and the United States.” Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology 33: 303–319. doi:10.1177/0022022102033003006.10.1177/0022022102033003006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 1992. The Fall of Public Man. London: Faber and Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. 1993. Interpreting Qualitative Data. Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P., A. Masterson, and S. L. Smith. 1999. “Health Promotion Versus Disease and Care: Failure to Establish “Blissful Clarity” in British Nurse Education and Practice.” Social Science and Medicine 48 (2): 227–239.10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00318-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staugård, H. J. 2014. “Kaldet på institution.” [A sense of Vocation at the Institution]. In Professioner under pres, edited by G. S. Harrits, M. B. Johansen, J. E. Kristensen, L. T. Larsen, and S. G. Olesen, 271–285. Aarhus: Systime.
   Google Scholar
• Staunæs, D. 2007. “Subversive analysestrategier.” [Subversive Analytical Strategies]. In Magtballader, edited by J. Kofoed and D. Staunæs, 252–268. København: Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitets-forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Steensig, J. 2001. Sprog i virkeligheden [Language in Reality]. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitets-forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Tolstedt, B. E., and J. P. Stokes. 1984. “Self-disclosure, Intimacy, and the Depenetration Process.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 (1): 84–90.10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. 1998. “Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe’s Discourse Theory.” [Ernesto Laclau og Chantal Mouffes diskursteori.] Arbejderhistorie 2: 32–44.
   Google Scholar
• Toshalis, E. 2012. “The Rhetoric of Care: Preservice Teacher Discourses that Depoliticize, Deflect, and Deceive.” The Urban Review 44: 1–35. doi:10.1007/s11256-011-0177-y.10.1007/s11256-011-0177-y
   Google Scholar
• UVM. 2008. The Folkeskole. Accessed August 11, 2014. http://eng.uvm.dk/~/media/UVM/Filer/English/Fact%20sheets/080101_fact_sheet_the_folkeskole.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Walker, L. M., and J. W. Robinson. 2010. “The Unique Needs of Couples Experiencing Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer.” Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy 36: 154–165. doi:10.1080/00926230903554552.10.1080/00926230903554552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 2002. Makt og Byråkrati [Power and Bureaucracy]. Oslo: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Weingarten, K. 1991. “The Discourses of Intimacy: Adding A Social Constructionist and Feminist View.” Family Process 30: 285–305. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1991.00285.x.10.1111/famp.1991.30.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfinger, N. H. 2002. “On Writing Fieldnotes: Collection Strategies and Background Expectancies.” Qualitative Research 2 (1): 85–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, H. 1981. “Typologies of Intimacy.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 5 (3): 435–443.10.1111/j.1471-6402.1981.tb00584.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar