Patterns of discursive interactions in primary classrooms: an application of social network analysis

References

• Aguiar, O. G., E. F. Mortimer, and P. Scott. 2010. “Learning from and Responding to Students’ Questions: The Authoritative and Dialogic Tension.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (2): 174–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. J. 2006. Towards Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking Classroom Talk. New York: Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. J. 2008. Essays on Pedagogy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bacher, J., K. Wenzig, and M. Vogler. 2004. “SPSS Two Step Clustering – A First Evaluation.” In Recent Developments and Applications in Social Research Methodology: Proceedings of the RC33 Sixth International Conference on Social Science Methodology, edited by C. van Dijkum, J. Blasius, and C. Durand, 1–20. Leverkusen: Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Brühwiler, C., and P. Blatchford. 2011. “Effects of Class Size and Adaptive Teaching Competency on Classroom Processes and Academic Outcome.” Learning and Instruction 21 (1): 95–108.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, C., and D. Myhill. 2004. “Interactive or Inactive? A Consideration of the Nature of Interaction in Whole Class Teaching.” Cambridge Journal of Education 34 (1): 35–49.10.1080/0305764042000183115
   Google Scholar
• Bush, E. S., G. W. Ladd, and S. L. Herald. 2006. “Peer Exclusion and Victimization: Processes That Mediate the Relation between Peer Group Rejection and Children’s Classroom Engagement and Achievement?” Journal of Educational Psychology 98 (1): 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candela, A. 1998. “Students’ Power in Classroom Discourse.” Linguistics and Education 10 (2): 139–163.10.1016/S0898-5898(99)80107-7
   Google Scholar
• Candela, A. 2005. “Students’ Participation as Co-authoring of School Institutional Practices.” Culture & Psychology 11 (3): 321–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, L. 2008. “Encouraging Students’ Contribution to Dialogue during Science.” School Science Review 90 (331): 101–107.
   Google Scholar
• De Laat, M., V. Lally, L. Lipponen, and R.-J. Simons. 2007. “Investigating Patterns of Interaction in Networked Learning and Computer Supported Collaborative Learning: A Role for Social Network Analysis.” International Journal of Computer-supported Collaborative Learning 2 (1): 87–103.10.1007/s11412-007-9006-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dymnicki, A. B., and D. B. Henry. 2011. “Use of Clustering Methods to Understand More About the Case.” Methodological Innovations Online 6 (2): 6–26.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. D., and D. P. Westgate. 1994. Investigating Classroom Talk. London: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• English, E., L. Hargreaves, and J. Hislam. 2002. “Pedagogical Dilemmas in the National Literacy Strategy: Primary Teachers’ Perceptions, Reflections and Classroom Behaviour.” Cambridge Journal of Education 32 (1): 9–26.10.1080/03057640220116409
   Google Scholar
• Evertson, C. M., and C. H. Randolph. 1989. “Teaching Practices and Class Size: A New Look at an Old Issue.” Peabody Journal of Education 67 (1): 85–105.10.1080/01619569209538671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fantuzzo, J., Y. Sekino, and H. L. Cohen. 2004. “An Examination of the Contributions of Interactive Peer Play to Salient Classroom Competencies for Urban Head Start Children.” Psychology in the Schools 41 (3): 323–336.10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galton, M. 2007. Learning and Teaching in the Primary Classroom. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Galton, M., L. Hargreaves, C. Comber, D. Wall, and T. Pell. 1999. “Changes in Patterns of Teacher Interaction in Primary Classrooms: 1976–96.” British Educational Research Journal 25 (1): 23–37.10.1080/0141192990250103
   Google Scholar
• Garton, L., C. Haythornthwaite, and B. Wellman. 1997. “Studying Online Social Networks.” Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 3 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, L. R., R. Pea, B. Barron, and S. J. Derry. 2007. Video Research in the Learning Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G. 2006. “Authoritative, Accountable Positioning and Connected, General Knowing: Progressive Themes in Understanding Transfer.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 15 (4): 537–547.10.1207/s15327809jls1504_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grøver Aukrust, V. 2008. “Boys’ and Girls’ Conversational Participation Across Four Grade Levels in Norwegian Classrooms: Taking the Floor or Being given the Floor?” Gender and Education 20 (3): 237–252.10.1080/09540250802000413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen, K., and T. Palonen. 2003. “Patterns of Female and Male Students’ Participation in Peer Interaction in Computer-supported Learning.” Computers & Education 40 (4): 327–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haneda, M. 2005. “Some Functions of Triadic Dialogue in the Classroom: Examples from L2 Research.” Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes 62 (2): 313–333.10.3138/cmlr.62.2.313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanneman, R. A., and M. Riddle. 2005. Introduction to Social Network Methods. Riverside: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Hardman, F. 2011. “Promoting a Dialogic Pedagogy in English Teaching.” In Debates in English Teaching, edited by J. Davison, C. Daly, and J. Moss, 36–47. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, L., J. Moyles, R. Merry, F. Paterson, A. Pell, and V. Esarte-Sarries. 2003. “How do Primary School Teachers Define and Implement ‘Interactive Teaching’ in the National Literacy Strategy in England?” Research Papers in Education 18 (3): 217–236.10.1080/0267152032000107301
   Google Scholar
• Howe, C., and M. Abedin. 2013. “Classroom Dialogue: A Systematic Review Across Four Decades of Research.” Cambridge Journal of Education 43 (3): 325–356.10.1080/0305764X.2013.786024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovalainen, M., and K. Kumpulainen. 2007. “The Social Construction of Participation in an Elementary Classroom Community.” International Journal of Educational Research 46 (3–4): 141–158.10.1016/j.ijer.2007.09.011
   Google Scholar
• Krummheuer, G. 2011. “Representation of the Notion “Learning-as-participation” in Everyday Situations of Mathematics Classes.” ZDM 43 (1): 81–90.10.1007/s11858-010-0294-1
   Google Scholar
• Kumpulainen, K., and D. Wray, eds. 2002. Classroom Interaction and Social Learning. London: Routledge Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• Lin, A. M. Y. 2007. “What’s the Use of “Triadic Dialogue”? Activity Theory, Conversation Analysis, and Analysis of Pedagogical Practices.” Pedagogies: An International Journal 2 (2): 77–94.10.1080/15544800701343943
   Google Scholar
• Lipponen, L., and K. Kumpulainen. 2011. “Acting as Accountable Authors: Creating Interactional Spaces for Agency Work in Teacher Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27 (5): 812–819.10.1016/j.tate.2011.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipponen, L., M. Rahikainen, J. Lallimo, and K. Hakkarainen. 2003. “Patterns of Participation and Discourse in Elementary Students’ Computer-supported Collaborative Learning.” Learning and Instruction 13 (5): 487–509.10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00042-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubbers, M. J., M. P. Van Der Werf, T. A. Snijders, B. P. Creemers, and H. Kuyper. 2006. “The Impact of Peer Relations on Academic Progress in Junior High.” Journal of School Psychology 44 (6): 491–512.10.1016/j.jsp.2006.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyle, S. 2008. “Dialogic Teaching: Discussing Theoretical Contexts and Reviewing Evidence from Classroom Practice.” Language and Education 22 (3): 222–240.10.1080/09500780802152499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maine, F. 2013. “How Children Talk Together to Make Meaning from Texts: A Dialogic Perspective on Reading Comprehension Strategies.” Literacy 47 (3): 150–156.10.1111/lit.12010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mameli, C., and L. Molinari. 2013. “Interactive Micro-processes in Classroom Discourse: Turning Points and Emergent Meanings.” Research Papers in Education 28 (2): 196–211.10.1080/02671522.2011.610900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mameli, C., and L. Molinari. 2014. “Seeking Educational Quality in the Unfolding of Classroom Discourse: A Focus on Microtransitions.” Language and Education 28 (2): 103–119.10.1080/09500782.2013.771654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manca, S., M. Delfino, and E. Mazzoni. 2009. “Coding Procedures to Analyze Interaction Patterns in Educational Web Forums.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 25 (2): 189–200.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00296.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margutti, P. 2010. “On Designedly Incomplete Utterance: What Counts as Learning for Teacher and Students in Primary Classroom Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43: 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavrou, K., G. Douglas, and A. Lewis. 2007. “The Use of Transana as a Video Analysis Tool in Researching Computer-based Collaborative Learning in Inclusive Classrooms in Cyprus.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 30 (2): 163–178.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoni, E. 2014. “The Cliques Participation Index (CPI) as an Indicator of Creativity in Online Collaborative Groups.” Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology 13 (1): 32–52.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. 1995. The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk Amongst Teachers and Learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. 2004. “Sociocultural Discourse Analysis: Analysing Classroom Talk as a Social Mode of Thinking.” Journal of Applied Linguistics 1 (2): 37–68.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. 2008. “Talk and the Development of Reasoning and Understanding.” Human Development 51 (1): 90–100.10.1159/000113158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. 2010. “Annual Review ‘The Analysis of Classroom Talk: Methods and Methodologies’.” Education 80 (1): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., L. Dawes, and J. K. Staarman. 2009. “Dialogic Teaching in the Primary Science Classroom.” Language and Education 23 (4): 353–369.10.1080/09500780902954273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., R. Wegerif, and L. Dawes. 1999. “Children’s Talk and the Development of Reasoning in the Classroom.” British Educational Research Journal 25 (1): 95–112.10.1080/0141192990250107
   Google Scholar
• Molinari, L., C. Mameli, and A. Gnisci. 2013. “A Sequential Analysis of Classroom Discourse in Italian Primary Schools. The Many Faces of the IRF Pattern.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 83 (3): 414–430.10.1111/bjep.2013.83.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. 2002. “Bad Boys and Good Girls? Patterns of Interaction and Response in Whole Class Teaching.” British Educational Research Journal 28 (3): 339–352.10.1080/01411920220137430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. 2006. “Talk, Talk, Talk: Teaching and Learning in Whole Class Discourse.” Research Papers in Education 21 (1): 19–41.10.1080/02671520500445425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H., and G. Wells. 2000. “What’s the Use of ‘triadic Dialogue’?: An Investigation of Teacher-student Interaction.” Applied Linguistics 21 (3): 376–406.10.1093/applin/21.3.376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M. 1997. Opening Dialogue: Understanding the Dynamics of Language and Learning in the English Classroom. Language and Literacy Series. Williston: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, M. 2006. “Lesson Observation and Quality in Primary Education as Contextual Teaching and Learning Processes.” International Journal of Educational Development 26: 246–260.10.1016/j.ijedudev.2005.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrides, K. V., Y. Sangareau, A. Furnham, and N. Frederickson. 2006. “Trait Emotional Intelligence and Children’s Peer Relations at School.” Social Development 15 (3): 537–547.10.1111/sode.2006.15.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas-Drummond, S. M., C. D. Albarrán, and K. S. Littleton. 2008. “Collaboration, Creativity and the Co-construction of Oral and Written Texts.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 3 (3): 177–191.10.1016/j.tsc.2008.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas-Drummond, S., N. Mazón, M. Fernández, and R. Wegerif. 2006. “Explicit Reasoning, Creativity and Co-construction in Primary School Children’s Collaborative Activities.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 1 (2): 84–94.10.1016/j.tsc.2006.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, K. H., W. M. Bukowski, and J. G. Parker. 2006. “Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups.” In Handbook of Child Psychology, edited by W. Damon, R. M. Lerner, and N. Eisenberg, 571–645. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. 2000. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P. H., E. F. Mortimer, and O. F. Aguiar. 2006. “The Tension between Authoritative and Dialogic Discourse: A Fundamental Characteristic of Meaning Making Interactions in High School Science Lessons.” Science Education 90 (4): 605–631.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel, T., and M. Prenzel. 2006. “Stability of Teaching Patterns in Physics Instruction: Findings from a Video Study.” Learning and Instruction 16 (3): 228–240.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. 2008. Thinking as Communicating. Human Development, the Growth of Discourses, and Mathematizing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511499944
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815478
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R., and N. Mercer. 1997. “Using Computer-based Text Analysis to Integrate Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in the Investigation of Collaborative Learning.” Language and Education 11 (4): 271–286.10.1080/09500789708666733
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. 2007. “Semiotic Mediation, Dialogue and the Construction of Knowledge.” Human Development 50 (5): 244–274.10.1159/000106414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G., and R. M. Arauz. 2006. “Dialogue in the Classroom.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 15 (3): 379–428.10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentzel, K. R. 2003. “Sociometric Status and Adjustment in Middle School: A Longitudinal Study.” Journal of Early Adolescence 23 (1): 5–28.10.1177/0272431602239128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentzel, K. R. 2005. “Peer Relationships, Motivation, and Academic Performance at School.” In Handbook of Competence and Motivation, edited by A. Elliot and C. Dweck, 279–296. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Wentzel, K. R., and D. E. Watkins. 2002. “Peer Relationships and Collaborative Learning as Contexts for Academic Enablers.” School Psychology Review 31: 366–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. 2011. “Using Social Network Graphs as Visualization Tools to Influence Peer Selection Decision-making Strategies to Access Information about Complex Socioscientific Issues.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 20 (4): 549–588.10.1080/10508406.2011.563655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar