1,151
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Large-scale assessments of students’ learning and education policy: synthesising evidence across world regions

, &

References

  • Abdul-Hamid, Husein, Khattab M. Abu-Lebdeh, and Harry A. Patrinos. 2011. “Assessment Testing Can Be Used to Inform Policy Decisions: The Case of Jordan.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, No. 5890. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Ainley, John, and Eveline Gebhardt. 2013. “Measure for Measure: A Review of Outcomes of School Education in Australia.” Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.
  • Arancibia, V. 1997. Los sistemas de medición y evaluación de la calidad de la educación  [Educational quality measurement and evaluation systems]. Santiago de Chile: OREALC-UNESCO.
  • Attfield, Ian, and Binh Thanh Vu. 2013. “A Rising Tide of Primary School Standards – The Role of Data Systems in Improving Equitable Access for All to Quality Education in Vietnam.” International Journal of Educational Development 33 (1): 74–87.10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.02.003
  • Benavot, Aaron, and Nihan Köseleci. 2015. “Seeking Quality in Education: The Growth of National Learning Assessments, 1990–2013.” Paper commissioned for the EFA Global Monitoring Report 2015, Education for All 2000–2015: Achievements and Challenges. Paris:UNESCO.
  • Benveniste, Luis. 2000. “Student Assessment as a Political Construction: The Case of Uruguay.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 8: 1–40.10.14507/epaa.v8n32.2000
  • Bernard, J. M., and K. Michaelowa. 2016. “Managing the Impact of PASEC Projects in Francophone Sub-Saharan Africa.” In Cross-national Studies of the Quality of Education: Planning Their Design and Managing Their Impact, edited by K. Ross and I. Jurgens Genevois, 229–240. Paris: IIEP UNESCO.
  • Best, Maura, Pat Knight, Petra Lietz, Craig Lockwood, Dita Nugroho, and Mollie Tobin. 2013. The Impact of National and International Assessment Programmes on Education Policy, Particularly Policies regarding Resource Allocation and Teaching and Learning Practices in Developing Countries.  London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
  • Bolotov, Viktor, Galina Kovaleva, Marina Pinskaya, and Igor Valdman. 2013. Developing the Enabling Context for Student Assessment in Russia.  Washington, DC: The World Bank.
  • Breakspear, Simon. 2012. “The Policy Impact of PISA: An Exploration of the Normative Effects of International Benchmarking in School System Performance.” OECD Education Working Papers, No. 71. Paris: OECD Publishing (NJ1).
  • Cariola, L., C. Covacevich, J. Grubler, E. Lagos, and M. Oritz. 2011. “Chilean Participation in IEA Studies.” In IEA 1958–2008: 50 Years of Experiences and Memories, edited by C. Papanastasiou, T. Plomb, and E. Papanastasiou, 373–387. Nicosia: Cultural Center of the Kykkos Monastery.
  • Crespo, Manuel, José Francisco Soares, and Alberto de Mello e Souza. 2000. “The Brazilian National Evaluation System of Basic Education: Context, Process, and Impact.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 26 (2): 105–125.10.1016/S0191-491X(00)00011-0
  • Department of Basic Education. 2011. Delivery Agreement for Outcome 1: Improved Quality of Basic Education. Edited by Department of Basic Education.  South Africa: Ministry of Education.
  • Elley, Warwick B. 2005. “How Timss-R Contributed to Education in Eighteen Developing Countries.” Prospects 35 (2): 199–212.10.1007/s11125-005-1822-6
  • Ferrer, J. Guillermo. 2006. Educational Assessment Systems in Latin America: Current Practice and Future Challenges. Washington, DC: Partnership for Educational Revitalization in the Americas (PREAL).
  • Ford, Margot. 2013. “Achievement Gaps in Australia: What NAPLAN Reveals About Education Inequality in Australia.” Race Ethnicity and Education 16 (1): 80–102.10.1080/13613324.2011.645570
  • Foshay, Arthur Wellesley. 1962. Educational Achievements of Thirteen-Year Olds in Twelve Countries: Results of an International Research Project, 1959–61. Vol. 4. Hamburg: UNESCO.
  • Fullan, Michael. 2007. The New Meaning of Educational Change. Routledge.
  • Gilmore, Alison. 2005. The Impact of PIRLS (2001) and TIMSS (2003) in Low-and Middle-income Countries. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
  • Greaney, Vincent, and Thomas Kellaghan. 2008. Assessing National Achievement Levels in Education. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
  • Gür, Bekir S., Zafer Çelik, and Murat Özoğlu. 2012. “Policy Options for Turkey: A Critique of the Interpretation and Utilization of PISA Results in Turkey.” Journal of Education Policy 27 (1): 1–21.10.1080/02680939.2011.595509
  • Heyneman, Stephen P., and Bommi Lee. 2014. “The Impact of International Studies of Academic Achievement on Policy and Research.” In Handbook of International Large Scale Assessment: Background, Technical Issues, and Methods of Data Analysis, edited by Leslie Rutkowski, Matthias von Davier, and David Rutkowski, 37–74. London: Chapman and Hall.
  • Husen, Torsten. 1967. “International Study of Achievement in Mathematics, a Comparison of Twelve Countries, Volume 1.”  New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Jones, Alister, and Cathy Buntting. 2013. “International, National and Classroom Assessment: Potent Factors in Shaping What Counts in School Science.” In Valuing Assessment in Science Education: Pedagogy, Curriculum, Policy, edited by D. Corrigan, R. Gunstone, and A. Jones, 33–53. Netherlands: Springer.
  • Kamens, David H., and Aaron Benavot. 2011. “National, Regional and International Learning Assessments: Trends Among Developing Countries, 1960–2009.” Globalisation, Societies and Education 9 (2): 285–300.10.1080/14767724.2011.577337
  • Kamens, David H., and Connie L. McNeely. 2010. “Globalization and the Growth of International Educational Testing and National Assessment.” Comparative Education Review 54 (1): 5–25.10.1086/648471
  • Keeves, John Philip. 1995. The World of School Learning: Selected Key Findings from 35 Years of IEA Research. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Amsterdam: IEA.
  • Knipprath, Heidi, and Masahiro Arimoto. 2007. “The Impact of Education Reform on the Quality Assurance System in Japan.” Educational Research for Policy and Practice 6 (3): 205–217.10.1007/s10671-007-9019-9
  • Leste, André. 2005. “Streaming in Seychelles: From SACMEQ Research to Policy Reform.” SACMEQ Research Conference. Paris: UNESCO.
  • Levine, Victor. 2013. Education in Pacific Island States: Reflections on the Failure of ‘Grand Remedies’. Honolulu, HI: East-West Center.
  • Meckes, Lorena, and Rafael Carrasco. 2010. “Two Decades of SIMCE: An Overview of the National Assessment System in Chile.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 17 (2): 233–248.10.1080/09695941003696214
  • Mourshed, Mona, Chinezi Chijioke, and Michael Barber. 2010. How the World’s Most Improved School Systems Keep Getting Better. London: McKinsey and Company.
  • Mutch, Carol. 2012. “Assessment for, of and as Learning: Developing a Sustainable Assessment Culture in New Zealand Schools.” Policy Futures in Education 10 (4): 374–385.10.2304/pfie
  • Ninomiya, Akira, and Masashi Urabe. 2011. “Impact of PISA on Education Policy – The Case of Japan.” Pacific-Asian Education 23 (1): 23–30.
  • Nzomo, Juliana, and Demus Makuwa. 2006. “How Can Countries Move from Cross-national Research Results to Dissemination, and Then to Policy Reform? (Case Studies from Kenya and Namibia).” In Cross-national Studies of the Quality of Education: Planning Their Design and Managing Their Impact, edited by K. Ross and I. Jurgens Genevois, 213–228.
  • Postlethwaite, Neville. 1967. School Organization and Student Achievement. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
  • Ravela, Pedro. 2005. “A Formative Approach to National Assessments: The Case of Uruguay.” Prospects 35 (1): 21–43.10.1007/s11125-005-6816-x
  • Reddy, Vijay. 2005. “Cross-national Achievement Studies: Learning from South Africa’s Participation in the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS).” Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 35 (1): 63–77.
  • Saito, Mioko, and Frank van Cappelle. 2010. “Monitoring the Quality of Education: Exploration of Concept, Methodology, and the Link between Research and Policy.” International Perspectives on Education and Society 13: 3–34.10.1108/ipes
  • Santiago, Paulo, Graham Donaldson, Joan Herman, and Claire Shewbridge. 2011. OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Australia. Paris: OECD Publishing (NJ1).
  • Saracho Martínez, Alberto. 2007. Casos de Estudio de Reacciones a PISA 2000 y 2003: Alemania, Polonia, Brasil y Otros [Case Study of Reactions to PISA 2000 and 2003: Germany, Poland, Brazil and Others]. México, DF: Fundación IDEA Mexiko: IDEA.
  • Shamatov, D., and K. Sainazarov, eds. 2010. “The Impact of Standardized Testing on Education in Kyrgyzstan: The Case of the Program for International Student Asessment (PISA) 2006”. In The Impact of International Achievement Studies on National Education Policymaking, edited by A. W. Wiseman, Vol. 13,  145–179. Bingley: Emerald Group.
  • Sung, Youl-Kwan, and Mi Ok Kang. 2012. “The Cultural Politics of National Testing and Test Result Release Policy in South Korea: A Critical Discourse Analysis.” Asia Pacific Journal of Education 32 (1): 53–73.10.1080/02188791.2011.621691
  • Sutcliffe, S., and J. Court. 2005. Evidence-based Policymaking: What is It? How Does It Work? What Relevance for Developing Countries. London: Overseas Development Institute.
  • Suzuki, Kan. 2011. “PISA Survey and Education Reform in Japan.” 14th OECD Japan Seminar, ‘Strong Performers, Successful Reformers in Education’, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Tanaka, Koji. 2009. “Academic Achievement Survey and Educational Assessment Research.” Educational Studies in Japan: International Yearbook 4: 79–89.
  • Tobin, Mollie, Petra Lietz, Dita Nugroho, Ramya Vivekanandan, and Tserennadmid Nyamkhuu. 2015. Using Large-scale Assessments of Students’ Learning to Inform Education Policy: Insights from the Asia-Pacific Region.  Melbourne: ACER and Bangkok: UNESCO.
  • Tyumeneva, Yulia. 2013. Disseminating and Using Student Assessment Information in Russia. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
  • Van Klinken, Eduarda. 2010. “Utilising Year Three NAPLAN Results to Improve Queensland Teachers’ Mathematical Pedagogical Content Knowledge.”In Shaping the future of mathematics education: Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, edited by L. Sparrow, B. Kissane, and C. Hurst. Fremantle: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
  • Wagemaker, Hans. 2014. “International Large-Scale Assessments: From Research to Policy.” In Handbook of International Large-Scale Assessment: Background, Technical Issues, and Methods of Data Analysis, edited by Leslie Rutkowski, Matthias von Davier, and David Rutkowski, 11–37.
  • Wiseman, Alexander W. 2010. “The Uses of Evidence for Educational Policymaking: Global Contexts and International Trends.” Review of Research in Education 34 (1): 1–24.10.3102/0091732X09350472
  • Zanderigo, Tony, Elizabeth Dowd, and Sarah Turner. 2012. Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education Delivering School Transparency in Australia National Reporting through My School: National Reporting Through My School. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.