The importance of psychological need satisfaction in educational re-engagement

References

• Appleton, J. J., S. L. Christenson, and M. J. Furlong. 2008. “Student Engagement with School: Critical Conceptual and Methodological Issues of the Construct.” Psychology in the Schools 45: 369–386. doi:10.1002/pits.20303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appleton, J. J., S. L. Christenson, D. Kim, and A. L. Reschly. 2006. “Measuring Cognitive and Psychological Engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument.” Journal of School Psychology 44: 427–445. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attwood, G., P. Croll, and J. Hamilton. 2003. “Re-Engaging with Education.” Research Papers in Education 18 (1): 75–95. doi:10.1080/0267152032000048596.
   Google Scholar
• Baard, P. P., E. L. Deci, and R. M. Ryan. 2004. “Intrinsic Need Satisfaction: A Motivational Basis of Performance and Well-Being in Two Work Settings.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 34: 2045–2068.10.1111/jasp.2004.34.issue-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J. A. 1999. “Teacher–Student Interaction in Urban at-Risk Classrooms: Differential Behavior, Relationship Quality, and Student Satisfaction with School.” The Elementary School Journal 100: 57–70. doi:10.1086/461943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., and J. C. Passeron. 1977. Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S., and S. Kvale. 2014. Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. London: Sage.10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7
   Google Scholar
• Connell, J. P., and J. G. Wellborn. 1991. “Competence, Autonomy, and Relatedness: A Motivational Analysis of Self-System Processes.” Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology 23: 43–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, L. 2005. “School without Walls: Reconnecting the Disconnected at 14.” Support for Learning 20: 90–95. doi:10.1111/j.0268-2141.2005.00367.x.
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, D. R. E., A. Stokes, and P. A. Cotton. 2010. “Using Observational Methods to Research the Student Experience.” Journal of Geography in Higher Education 34: 463–473. doi:10.1080/03098265.2010.501541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Angelo, F., and R. Zemanick. 2009. “The Twilight Academy: An Alternative Education Program That Works.” Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth 53: 211–218. doi:10.3200/PSFL.53.4.211-218.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., R. J. Vallerand, L. G. Pelletier, and R. M. Ryan. 1991. “Motivation and Education – The Self-Determination Perspective.” Educational Psychologist 26: 325–346. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2603and4_6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker, D. M., D. P. Dona, and S. L. Christenson. 2007. “Behaviorally at-Risk African American Students: The Importance of Student–Teacher Relationships for Student Outcomes.” Journal of School Psychology 45: 83–109. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DfE (Department for Education) 2013a. Alternative Provision: Statutory Guidance for Local Authorities. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• DfE (Department for Education) 2013b. Ensuring a Good Education for Children Who Cannot Attend School because of Health Needs: Statutory Guidance for Local Authorities. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• DfE (Department for Education) 2015a. 2010 to 2015 Government Policy: Academies and Free Schools. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• DfE (Department for Education) 2015b. 2010 to 2015 Government Policy: Children outside Mainstream Education. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Dotterer, A. M., and K. Lowe. 2011. “Classroom Context, School Engagement, and Academic Achievement in Early Adolescence.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 40: 1649–1660. doi:10.1007/s10964-011-9647-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupont, S., B. Galand, F. Nils, and V. Hospel. 2014. “Social Context, Self-Perceptions and Student Engagement: A SEM Investigation of the Self-System Model of Motivational Development (SSMMD).” Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology 12: 5–32. doi:10.14204/ejrep.32.13081.
   Google Scholar
• Frankham, J., D. Edwards-Kerr, N. Humphrey, and L. Roberts. 2007. School Exclusions: Learning Partnerships outside Mainstream Education. https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/school-exclusions-learning-partnerships-outside-mainstream-education.
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. H. Paris. 2004. “School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence.” Review of Educational Research 74: 59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frelin, A., and J. Grannas. 2015. “Direct and Indirect Educational Relationships: Developing a Typology for the Contribution of Different Categories of School Staff in Relation to Students’ Educational Experiences.” Improving Schools 18: 56–68. doi:10.1177/1365480214562124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furrer, C., and E. Skinner. 2003. “Sense of Relatedness as a Factor in Children’s Academic Engagement and Performance.” Journal of Educational Psychology 95: 148–162. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furrer, C. J., E. A. Skinner, and J. R. Pitzer. 2014. “The Influence of Teacher and Peer Relationships on Students’ Classroom Engagement and Everyday Motivational Resilience.” National Society for the Study of Education 113: 101–123.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, B. A. 2015. “Measuring Cognitive Engagement with Self-Report Scales: Reflections from over 20 Years of Research.” Educational Psychologist 50: 14–30. doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.989230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallam, S., L. Rogers, J. Rhamie, J. Shaw, E. Rees, H. Haskins, J. Blackmore, and J. Hallam. 2007. “Pupils’ Perceptions of an Alternative Curriculum: Skill Force.” Research Papers in Education 22 (1): 43–63. doi:10.1080/02671520601152078.
   Google Scholar
• Hodkinson, P., and A. C. Sparkes. 1997. “Careership: A Sociological Theory of Career Decision Making.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 18: 29–44. doi:10.1080/0142569970180102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. N., J. Y. Wu, O. M. Kwok, V. Villarreal, and A. Y. Johnson. 2012. “Indirect Effects of Child Reports of Teacher–Student Relationship on Achievement.” Journal of Educational Psychology 104: 350–365. doi:10.1037/a0026339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, J. 2011. “Narratives of Student Engagement in an Alternative Learning Context.” Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR) 16: 219–236. doi:10.1080/10824669.2011.586299.
   Google Scholar
• Knesting, K., and N. Waldron. 2006. “Willing to Play the Game: How at-Risk Students Persist in School.” Psychology in the Schools 43: 599–611. doi:10.1002/pits.20174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lent, R. W., S. D. Brown, and G. Hackett. 1994. “Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 45: 79–122. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Madill, A., and B. Gough. 2008. “Qualitative Research and Its Place in Psychological Science.” Psychological Methods 13: 254–271. doi:10.1037/a0013220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J. 2007. “Examining a Multidimensional Model of Student Motivation and Engagement Using a Construct Validation Approach.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 77: 413–440. doi:10.1348/000709906X118036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, C. 2001. “The Role of Caring in the Teacher–Student Relationship for at-Risk Students.” Sociological Inquiry 71: 241–255. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.2001.tb01110.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofsted (Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills) 2016. Alternative Provision: The Findings from Ofsted’s Three-Year Survey of School’s Use of off-Site Alternative Provision. Manchester: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S., S. D. Holloway, A. Arendtsz, J. Bempechat, and J. Li. 2012. “What Makes Students Engaged in Learning? A Time-Use Study of within- and between-Individual Predictors of Emotional Engagement in Low-Performing High Schools.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 41: 390–401. doi:10.1007/s10964-011-9738-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pianta, R., B. Hamre, and J. Allen. 2012. “Teacher–Student Relationships and Engagement: Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Improving the Capacity of Classroom Interactions.” In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, edited by S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, and C. Wylie, 365–386. Boston, MA: Springer US. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_17.
   Google Scholar
• Pietkiewicz, I., and J. A. Smith. 2014. “A Practical Guide to Using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis in Qualitative Research Psychology.” Czasopismo Psychologiczne – Psychological Journal 20: 7–14. doi:10.14691/CPPJ.20.1.7.
   Google Scholar
• Pirrie, A., G. Macleod, M. A. Cullen, and G. McCluskey. 2011. “What Happens to Pupils Permanently Excluded from Special Schools and Pupil Referral Units in England?” British Educational Research Journal 37: 519–538. doi:10.1080/01411926.2010.481724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putwain, D. W., L. J. Nicholson, and J. L. Edwards. 2015. “Hard to Reach and Hard to Teach: Supporting the Self-Regulation of Learning in an Alternative Provision Secondary School.” Educational Studies 42 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1080/03055698.2015.1108839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. 2012. “A Self-Determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement.” In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, edited by S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, and C. Wylie, 365–386. Boston, MA: Springer US. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7.
   Google Scholar
• Reschly, A., and S. Christenson. 2012. “Jingle, Jangle, and Conceptual Haziness: Evolution and Future Directions of the Engagement Construct.” In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, edited by S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, and C. Wylie, 365–386. Boston, MA: Springer US. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_1.
   Google Scholar
• Roehrig, A. D., and E. Christesen. 2010. “Development and Use of a Tool for Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness in Grades K-12.” In Innovative Assessment for the 21st Century, edited by V. J. Shute and B. J. Becker, 207–228. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6530-1_12.
   Google Scholar
• Roeser, R. W., J. S. Eccles, and A. J. Sameroff. 1998. “Academic and Emotional Functioning in Early Adolescence: Longitudinal Relations, Patterns, and Prediction by Experience in Middle School.” Development and Psychopathology 10: 321–352. doi:10.1017/S0954579498001631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roorda, D. L., H. M. Y. Koomen, J. L. Spilt, and F. J. Oort. 2011. “The Influence of Affective Teacher–Student Relationships on Students’ School Engagement and Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Approach.” Review of Educational Research 81: 493–529. doi:10.3102/0034654311421793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., and E. L. Deci. 2000. “Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being.” American Psychologist 55: 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., and E. L. Deci. 2009. “Promoting Self-Determined School Engagement: Motivation, Learning, and Well-Being.” In Handbook on Motivation at School, edited by K. R. Wentzel and A. Wigfield, 171–195. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schussler, D. 2009. “Beyond Content: How Teachers Manage Classrooms to Facilitate Intellectual Engagement for Disengaged Students.” Theory into Practice 48: 114–121. doi:10.1080/00405840902776376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., B. C. Heddy, and D. Lombardi. 2015. “The Challenges of Defining and Measuring Student Engagement in Science.” Educational Psychologist 50: 1–13. doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., and M. J. Belmont. 1993. “Motivation in the Classroom: Reciprocal Effects of Teacher Behavior and Student Engagement across the School Year.” Journal of Educational Psychology 85: 571–581. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., T. A. Kindermann, and C. J. Furrer. 2009. “A Motivational Perspective on Engagement and Disaffection: Conceptualization and Assessment of Children’s Behavioral and Emotional Participation in Academic Activities in the Classroom.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 69: 493–525.10.1177/0013164408323233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., P. Flowers, and M. Larkin. 2009. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., and M. Osborn. 2003. “Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.” In Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Methods, edited by J. A. Smith, 51–80. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tobin, T., and J. Sprague. 2000. “Alternative Education Strategies: Reducing Violence in School and the Community.” Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders 8: 177–186. doi:10.1177/106342660000800305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ryzin, M. J., A. A. Gravely, and C. J. Roseth. 2009. “Autonomy, Belongingness, and Engagement in School as Contributors to Adolescent Psychological Well-Being.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 38: 1–12. doi:10.1007/s10964-007-9257-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R., K. Martin, and J. Jeffes. 2010. The Back on Track Alternative Provision Pilots: Final Report. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/183516/DFE-RR250.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., H. M. Chipuer, M. Hanisch, P. A. Creed, and L. McGregor. 2006. “Relationships at School and Stage-Environment Fit as Resources for Adolescent Engagement and Achievement.” Journal of Adolescence 29: 911–933. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.04.00.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar