National literacy assessment: the identification of students ‘at risk’ in Cyprus

References

• Ahmed, M. 2011. “Defining and Measuring Literacy: Facing the Reality.” International Review Of Education/Internationale Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft 57 (1/2): 179–195.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, N. A., J. R. Donoghue, and T. L. Schoeps. 2001. The NAEP 1998 Technical Report (NCES 2001-452). Washington DC: United States Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, Department of Education, Office for Educational Research and Improvement.
   Google Scholar
• Andrich, D. 1978. “A Rating Scale Formulation for Ordered Response Categories.” Psychometrika 43 (4): 561–573.10.1007/BF02293814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, T. G., and C. M. Fox. 1999. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Carasco, J., N. Clair, and L. Kanyike. 2001. “Enhancing Dialogue among Researchers, Policy Makers, and Community Members in Uganda: Complexities, Possibilities, and Persistent Questions.” Comparative Education Review 45 (2): 257–279.10.1086/447664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catts, H., M. Fey, X. Zhang, and J. B. Tomblin. 2001. “Estimating the Risk of Future Reading Difficulties in Kindergarten Children: A Research-based Model and its Clinical Implementation.” Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools 32 (1): 38–50.10.1044/0161-1461(2001/004)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2004. “Standards, Accountability, and School Reform.” Teachers College Record 106 (6): 1047–1085.10.1111/tcre.2004.106.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M., and S. Elliott. 2012. “Inclusive Assessment and Accountability: Policy to Evidence-based Practices.” International Journal of Disability, Development and Education 59 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1080/1034912X.2012.654932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demetriou, D., and L. Kyriakides. 2006. “Investigating the Generalisability of Models of Educational Effectiveness: A Secondary Analysis of PISA Study.” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Downing, M. S., and M. T. Haladyna. 2006. Handbook of Test Development. Lawrence: Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Draney, K., and M. Wilson. 2007. “Application of the Saltus Model to Stage-Like Data: Some Applications and Current Developments.” In Multivariate and Mixture Distribution Rasch Models, edited by M. von Davier and C. H. Carstense, 119–130. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-49839-3
   Google Scholar
• Dreher, K. 2012. “Tests, Testing Times and Literacy Teaching.” Australian Journal of Language & Literacy 35 (3): 334–352.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, L., and M. Fullan. 2003. “Using Data in Leadership for Learning.” Cambridge journal of education 33 (3): 383–394.10.1080/0305764032000122023
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. “National Testing of Pupils in Europe: Objectives, Organisation and Use of Results.” Brussels: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency ( EACEA P9 Eurydice). Accessed July 4, 2016. http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/thematic_reports/109en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012a. “EU High Level Group of Experts on Literacy (Final report).” Accessed June 30, 2016. http://ec.europa.eu/education/policy/school/doc/literacy-report_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012b. Key Data on Education in Europe 2012. Brussels: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Eurydice. 2016. “Cyprus: Overview.” Accessed June 30, 2016. https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/fpfis/mwikis/eurydice/index.php/Cyprus:Redirect
   Google Scholar
• Faubert, B. 2012. “A Literature Review of School Practices to Overcome School Failure.” OECD Education Working Papers 68.10.1787/19939019
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: The Seabury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gambell, T., and D. Hunter. 2004. “Testing Scoring of Large-scale Assessment: Professional Developmet or Debilitation?” Journal of Curriculum Studies 3 (6): 697–724.10.1080/0022027032000190696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geijsel, F. P., M. L. Krüger, and P. C. Sleegers. 2010. “Data Feedback for School Improvement: The Role of Researchers and School Leaders.” Australian Educational Researcher 37 (2): 59–75.10.1007/BF03216922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillbourn, D., and D. Youdell. 2000. Rationing Education: Policy, Practice, Reform and Equity. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greaney, V., and T. Kellaghan. 2008. Assessing National Achievement Levels in Education. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, I. 2013. “Testing that Counts: Contesting National Literacy Assessment Policy in Complex Schooling Settings.” Australian Journal of Language & Literacy 36 (2): 67–77.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, I. 2015. “A Logic of Enumeration: the Nature and Effects of National Literacy and Numeracy Testing in Australia.” Journal of Education Policy 30 (3): 335–362.10.1080/02680939.2014.945964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hipwell, P., and V. Klenowski. 2011. “A Case for Addressing the Literacy Demands of Student Assessment.” Australian Journal of Language & Literacy 34 (2): 127–146.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, T., and N. S. Petersen 2009. Linking Item Parameters to a Base Scale. Paper presented at the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Keefe, E. B., and S. R. Copeland. 2011. “What Is Literacy? The Power of a Definition.” Research and Practice For Persons With Severe Disabilities 36 (3): 92–99.10.2511/027494811800824507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. S., and B. A. Hanson. 2002. “Test Equating Under the Multiple-Choice Model.” Applied Psychological Measurement 26 (3): 255–270.10.1177/0146621602026003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, C. H. 1990. “Literacy and the Politics of Education.” In The Right to Literacy, edited by A. A. Lumsford, H. Moglen and J. Slevin, 74–80. New York: The Modern Language Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., and B. P. M. Creemers. 2011. “Can Schools Achieve Both Quality and Equity? Investigating the Two Dimensions of Educational Effectiveness.” Journal of Education for Students Places at Risk 16 (4): 237–254.10.1080/10824669.2011.610269
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., B. P. M. Creemers, and P. Antoniou. 2009. “Teacher Behaviour and Student Outcomes: Suggestions for Research on Teacher Training and Professional Development.” Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (1): 12–23.10.1016/j.tate.2008.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., S. Sellar, and G. C. Savage. 2014. “Re-articulating Social Justice as Equity in Schooling Policy: The Effects of Testing and Data Infrastructures.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 35 (5): 710–730.10.1080/01425692.2014.919846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnakyla, P., A. Malin, and K. Taube. 2004. “Factors Behind Low Reading Literacy Achievement.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 48 (3): 231–249.10.1080/00313830410001695718
   Google Scholar
• Livingston, K., and J. McCall. 2005. “Evaluation: Judgmental or Developmental?” European Journal of Teacher Education 28 (2): 165–178.10.1080/02619760500093198
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. O., I. V. S. Mullis, and A. M. Kennedy. 2007. PIRLS 2006 Technical Report. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, K. 2008. “Will Large-scale Assessments Raise Literacy Standards in Australian schools?” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 31 (3): 211–225.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Culture. 2013. “Supporting Students At Risk For Functional Illiteracy.” Accessed June 10, 2016. http://egkyklioi.moec.gov.cy/Data/dde3723a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Culture. 2014. “Annual Report.” Accessed June 10, 2016. http://www.moec.gov.cy/en/annual_reports/annual_report_2014_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadpour, E. 2012. “A Multilevel Study on Trends in Malaysian Secondary School Students’ Science Achievement and Associated School and Student Predictors.” Science Education 96 (6): 1013–1046. doi:10.1002/sce.210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossi, P., C. Venuleo, P. Tondo, and S. Salvatore. 2012. “The Measurement of Students Performance, the Use of an Extended Rasch Model for the Analysis of Predictors of High Educational Performance.” Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis 5 (3): 393–399.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2006. Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literacy: A Framework for PISA 2006. Paris: OECD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2012a. Equity and Quality in Education: Supporting Disadvantaged Students and Schools, OECD Publishing. Accessed May 30, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264130852-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2012b. PISA 2009 Technical Report. PISA. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264167872-en
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, K., and J. Rowsell. 2005. Literacy and education: Understanding the New Literacy Studies in the Classroom. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Petridou, A., and Y. Karagiorgi. 2016. “Cross-sectional Predictors of ‘Risk’ for School Failure.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 39 (4): 365–382. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2016.1189896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillipson, S. N., and A. Tse. 2007. “Discovering Patterns of Achievement in Hong Kong Students: An Application of the Rasch Measurement Model.” High Ability Studies 18 (2): 173–190.10.1080/13598130701709640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scribner, S. 1984. “Literacy in Three Metaphors.” American Journal of Education 93: 6–21.10.1086/443783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. M. 1986. “Person Fit in the Rasch Model.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 46 (2): 359–372.10.1177/001316448604600210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2005. Aspects of Literacy Assessment. Topics and Issues from the UNESCO Expert Meeting. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO Institute for Statistics. 2008. International Literacy Statistics: A Review of Concepts, Methodology, and Current Data. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, L., and C. Eveline. 2009. “Bridging Multimodal Literacies and National Assessment Programs in Literacy.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 32 (3): 245–257.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, A. 2011. ““Not Just a ‘Boy Problem’: An Exploration of the Complexities Surrounding Literacy Under-Achievement.” Discourse: Studies in The Cultural Politics of Education 32 (5): 779–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehlage, G. G., R. A. Rutter, G. A. Smith, N. Lesko, and R. R. Fernandez. 1989. Reducing the Risk: Schools as Communities of Support. New York: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. 1984. A Psychometric Model of Hierarchical Development. PhD diss., University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. 1989. “Saltus: A Psychometric Model of Discontinuity in Cognitive Development.” Psychological Bulletin 105 (2): 276–289.10.1037/0033-2909.105.2.276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray, D. 2013. “Principles and Practice in Extending Literacy Skills.” Clearing House 86 (1): 11–16.10.1080/00098655.2012.718294
   Google Scholar