On the pitfalls and promises of using mixed methods in literacy research: perceptions of reviewers

References

• Alton-Lee, A. 1998. “A Troubleshooter’s Checklist for Prospective Authors Derived from Reviewers’ Critical Feedback.” Teaching and Teacher Education 14 (8): 887–890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association. 2006. “Standards for Reporting on Empirical Social Science Research in AERA Publications.” Educational Researcher 35 (6): 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. 2012. “Integrative Analysis Strategies for Mixed Data Sources.” American Behavioral Scientist 56 (6): 814–828.10.1177/0002764211426330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birdwhistell, R. 1977. “Some Discussion of Ethnography, Theory, and Method.” In About Bateson: Essays on Gregory Bateson, edited by J. Brockman, 101–141. New York: Dutton.
   Google Scholar
• Brannen, J. 2005. “Mixing Methods: The Entry of Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches into the Research Process.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8 (3): 173–184.10.1080/13645570500154642
   Google Scholar
• Brannen, J., and G. Moss. 2012. “Critical Issues in Designing Mixed Methods Policy Research.” American Behavioral Scientist 56 (6): 789–801.10.1177/0002764211433796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. 2006. “Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research: How is It Done?” Qualitative Research 6 (1): 97–113.10.1177/1468794106058877
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. 2007. “Barriers to Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 (1): 8–22.10.1177/1558689806290531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. 2008. “Why Do Researchers Integrate/Combine/Mesh/Blend/Mix/Merge/Fuse Quantitative and Qualitative Research?” In Advances in Mixed Methods Research, edited by M. Bergman, 87–100. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Calfee, R., and M. Sperling. 2010. Mixed Methods: Approaches to Language and Literacy Research (an NCRLL Volume). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, R. 2011. “Mixed Methods Research: The Five Ps Framework.” Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 9 (2): 96–108.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, K. M. T., A. J. Onwuegbuzie, and Q. G. Jiao. 2007. “A Mixed Methods Investigation of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social and Health Science Research.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 (3): 267–294.10.1177/1558689807299526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2016. “Reflections on the MMIRA the Future of Mixed Methods Task Force Report.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 10 (3): 215–219.10.1177/1558689816650298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and V. L. Plano Clark. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dressman, M. 2007. “Theoretically Framed: Argument and Desire in the Production of General Knowledge about Literacy.” Reading Research Quarterly 42: 332–363.10.1598/RRQ.42.3.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetters, M. D., and D. Freshwater. 2015a. “The 1 + 1 = 3 Integration Challenge.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 9 (2): 115–117.10.1177/1558689815581222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetters, M. D., and D. Freshwater. 2015b. “Publishing a Methodological Mixed Methods Research Article.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 9 (3): 203–213.10.1177/1558689815594687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., and A. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. L., C. N. Dixon, and A. Zaharlick. 2003. “Ethnography as a Logic of Inquiry.” In Handbook of Research on the Teaching of the English Language Arts, edited by J. Flood, D. Lapp, J. R. Squire and J. M. Jenson, 2nd ed., 201–224. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C., V. J. Caracelli, and W. F. Graham. 1989. “Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 11 (3): 255–274.10.3102/01623737011003255
   Google Scholar
• Howe, K., and M. Eisenhart. 1990. “Standards for Qualitative (and Quantitative) Research: A Prolegomenon.” Educational Researcher 19 (4): 2–9.10.3102/0013189X019004002
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B. 2012. “Dialectical Pluralism and Mixed Research.” American Behavioral Scientist 56 (6): 751–754.10.1177/0002764212442494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., and A. J. Onwuegbuzie. 2004. “Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come.” Educational Researcher 33 (7): 14–26.10.3102/0013189X033007014
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B., and L. A. Turner. 2003. “Data Collection Strategies in Mixed Methods Research.” In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research, edited by C. Teddlie and A. Tashakkori, 297–319. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, S. 1997. “Examining the Examiners: An Analysis of Examiners’ Reports on Doctoral Theses.” Studies in Higher Education 22 (3): 333–347.10.1080/03075079712331380936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leech, N. L. 2012. “Writing Mixed Research Reports.” American Behavioral Scientist 56 (6): 866–881.10.1177/0002764211433800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesaux, N., M. J. Kieffer, S. E. Faller, and J. G. Kelley. 2010. “The Effectiveness and Ease of Implementation of an Academic Vocabulary Intervention for Linguistically Diverse Students in Urban Middle Schools.” Reading Research Quarterly 45 (2): 196–228.10.1598/RRQ.45.2.3
   Google Scholar
• Mallette, M. H., C. A. Moffit, A. J. Onwuegbuzie, and K. Wheeler. 2008. “Early Literacy Research: Exploring Trends and Political Influences.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Orlando, FL, December.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J., and D. Loomis. 2003. “Mixed Methods Design: An Alternative Approach.” In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research, edited by A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, 241–271. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. 2009. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. M., P. Bazeley, L. Bowleg, N. Fielding, J. Maxwell, J. F. Molina-Azorin, and K. Niglas. 2016. The Future of Mixed Methods: A Five-Year Projection to 2020 ( Report of the task force of the Mixed Methods International Research Association on the future of mixed methods). http://www.mmira.wildapricot.org.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. 2003. “Impact of Mixed Methods and Design on Inference Quality.” In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research, edited by A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, 423–456. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mutch, C. 2009. “Mixed Method Research: Methodological Eclecticism or Muddled Thinking?” Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice 24 (2): 18–30.
   Google Scholar
• Niglas, K. 2004. “The Combined Use of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Educational Research.” Doctoral diss., Abstract, Tallinn Pedagogical University, Estonia.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., and M. H. Mallette. 2011. “Mixed Research Techniques in Literacy Research.” In Literacy Research Methodologies, edited by N. Duke and M. H. Mallette, 301–330. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, L. D. 2012. “Mixed Methods Inquiry in Sociology.” American Behavioral Scientist 56 (6): 829–848.10.1177/0002764211433798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plano Clark, V. L., and N. V. Ivankova. 2016. Mixed Methods Research: A Guide to the Field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• QSR International. 2014. “NVivo 10.” Computer software. http://www.qsrinternational.com.
   Google Scholar
• Reinking, D., and D. E. Alvermann. 2007. “Reflections on Our Editorship.” Reading Research Quarterly 42 (4): 460–466.10.1598/RRQ.42.4.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reutzel, D. R., and K. A. J. Mohr. 2014. “50 Years of Reading Research Quarterly (1965–2014): Looking Back, Moving Forward.” Reading Research Quarterly 50 (1): 13–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes, I., and P. Azuara. 2008. “Emergent Biliteracy in Young Mexican Immigrant Children.” Reading Research Quarterly 43 (4): 374–398.10.1598/RRQ.43.4.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B., and R. S. Siegler. 1999. “Learning to Spell: Variability, Choice, and Change in Children's Strategy Use.” Child Development 70 (2): 332–348.10.1111/cdev.1999.70.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocco, T. S., L. A. Bliss, S. Gallagher, A. Perez-Prado, C. Alacaci, E. S. Dweyer, J. C. Fine, and N. E. Pappamihiel. 2003. “The Paradigmatic and Dialectical Lenses: Two Views of Mixed Methods Use in Education.” In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research, edited by A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, 595–618. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sale, J. E. M., L. H. Lohfeld, and K. Brazil. 2002. “Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research.” Quality & Quantity 36: 43–53.10.1023/A:1014301607592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, A. C., G. M. Sinatra, and R. E. Reynolds. 2008. “The Development of Children's Orthographic Knowledge: A Microgenetic Perspective.” Reading Research Quarterly 43 (3): 206–226.10.1598/RRQ.43.3.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., and L. Towne, eds. 2002. Scientific Research in Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1997. “Disciplines of Inquiry in Education: A New Overview.” In Complementary Methods for Research in Education, edited by R. M. Jaeger, 2nd ed., 3–29. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. P. 1980. Participant Observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., and J. W. Creswell. 2007. “Editorial: The New Era of Mixed Methods.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 (1): 3–7.10.1177/2345678906293042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., and A. Tashakkori. 2012. “Common ‘Core’ Characteristics of Mixed Methods Research.” American Behavioral Scientist 56 (6): 774–788.10.1177/0002764211433795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truscott, D. M., S. Swars, S. Smith, F. Thornton-Reid, Y. Zhao, C. Dooley, B. Williams, L. Hart, and M. Matthews. 2010. “A Cross-Disciplinary Examination of the Prevalence of Mixed Methods in Educational Research: 1995–2005.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 13 (4): 317–328.10.1080/13645570903097950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twinn, S. 2003. “Status of Mixed Methods in Nursing.” In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research, edited by A. Tashakkori, and C. Teddlie, 541–556. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, I. A. G., and D. Bloome. 2008. “Research as Principled, Pluralistic Argument.” Reading Research Quarterly 43: 6–8.10.1598/RRQ.43.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanchar, S. C., and D. D. Williams. 2006. “Reconsidering the Compatibility Thesis and Eclecticism: Five Proposed Guidelines for Method Use.” Educational Researcher 35 (9): 3–12.10.3102/0013189X035009003
   Google Scholar
• Yoshikawa, H., T. S. Weisner, A. Kalil, and N. Way. 2008. “Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Research in Developmental Science: Uses and Methodological Choices.” Developmental Psychology 44 (2): 344–354.10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar