‘English has 100+ phonemes’: some errors and confusions in contemporary commercial phonics schemes

References

• Beard, R., G. Brooks, and J. Ampaw-Farr. 2019. “How Linguistically-informed are Phonics Programmes?” Literacy (journal of UK Literacy Association) 53 (2): 86–94. doi:10.1111/lit.12147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beard, R., and J. Oakhill. 1994. Reading by Apprenticeship?: Critique of the Apprenticeship Approach to the Teaching of Reading. Slough: NFER.
   Google Scholar
• Beard, R., and J. Willcocks. 2002. “The National Literacy Strategy in England: Changing Phonics Teaching?” In 51st Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, edited by D. L. Schallert, C. M. Fairbanks, J. Worthy, B. Maloch, and J. V. Hoffman, 94–105. Wisconsin: National Reading Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, G. 2015. Dictionary of the British English Spelling System. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. http://www.openbookpublishers.com/reader/325
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, G. 2016. What Works for Children and Young People with Literacy Difficulties? the Effectiveness of Intervention Schemes. 5th ed. Frensham: Dyslexia-SpLD Trust. http://www.interventionsforliteracy.org.uk/assets/What-Works-5th-edition.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Burton, M. 2011. Phonetics for Phonics. Leicester: NIACE.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, E. 1994. A Survey of English Spelling. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, M., ed. 2002. Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Phonics. Royston, Herts: UK Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• DES (Department of Education and Science). 1989. English in the National Curriculum. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• DfE (Department for Education). 2013. English Programmes of Study: Key Stages 1 and 2 National Curriculum in England. London: DfE.
   Google Scholar
• DfEE (Department for Education and Employment). 1999. The National Curriculum Handbook for Primary Teachers in England. London: DfEE and Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
   Google Scholar
• DfES (Department for Education and Skills). 2007. Letters and Sounds: Principles and Practice of High Quality Phonics. London: DfES.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, M. 1993. Sense and Sensibility: Some Thoughts on the Teaching of Literacy (occasional Paper No. 3). Reading: Reading and Language Information Centre, University of Reading.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. 2007. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• EEF (Educational Endowment Foundation), 2018. “Projects and Evaluation Projects: Language and Literacy.” Online. Accessed 12 October 2018. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/projects-and-evaluation/projects
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C., S. R. Nunes, S. A. Stahl, and D. M. Willows. 2001. “Systematic Phonics Instruction Helps Students Learn to Read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s Metaanalysis.” Review of Educational Research 71 (3): 393–447. doi:10.3102/00346543071003393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimson, A. C. 1962. An Introduction to the Pronunciation of English. London: Edward Arnold. 8th edition published as Cruttenden, A. (ed.) 2014. Gimson’s Pronunciation of English. London Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203784969.
   Google Scholar
• Gubb, J. 1982. “‘A Dog I Wons New’ - the Logic of Non-standard Spelling.” Remedial Education, Journal of the National Association for Remedial Education 17 (2): 70–74.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E. H., and L. A. Martin. 2002. “The Texts of Beginning Reading Instruction.” In Handbook of Early Literacy Research, edited by S. B. Neuman and D. K. Dickinson, 361–376. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• HMI (Her Majesty’s Inspectorate). 2002. The National Literacy Strategy: The First Four Years. London: Office for Standards in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, J. V., M. Sailors, and E. U. Patterson. 2002. “Decodable Texts for Beginning Reading Instruction: The Year 2000 Basals.” Journal of Literacy Research 34 (3): 269–298. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3403_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Commons Education and Skills Committee. 2005. Teaching Children to Read (Eighth Report of Session 2004–05). London: Stationery Office Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. S., S. McGeown, and J. E. Watson. 2012. “Long-term Effects of Synthetic versus Analytic Phonics Teaching on the Reading and Spelling Ability of 10 Year Old Boys and Girls.” Reading and Writing 25 (6): 1365–1384. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9323-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. S., and J. E. Watson. 2004. “Accelerating the Development of Reading, Spelling and Phonemic Awareness Skills in Initial Readers.” Reading and Writing 17 (4): 327–357. doi:10.1023/B:READ.0000032666.66359.62.
   Google Scholar
• Macmillan, B. M. 2002. “Rhyme and Reading: A Critical Review of the Research Methodology.” Journal of Research in Reading 25 (1): 4–42. doi:10.1111/jrir.2002.25.issue-1.
   Google Scholar
• Meek, M. 1988. How Texts Teach What Readers Learn. Stroud: Thimble Press.
   Google Scholar
• NICHD (National Reading Panel). 2000. Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
   Google Scholar
• Perera, K. 1993. “The ‘good Book’: Linguistic Aspects.” In Teaching Literacy: Balancing Perspectives, edited by R. Beard, 95–113. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Root, B. 1988. Defence of Reading Schemes. Reading: Reading and Language Information Centre, University of Reading.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, J. 2006. Independent Review of the Teaching of Early Reading. London: Department for Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Spielman, A. 2018. “HMCI Commentary: Curriculum and the New Education Inspection Framework (speech Delivered 18/9/18).” (accessed 18 October 2018). https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/hmci-commentary-curriculum-and-the-new-education-inspection-framework
   Google Scholar
• Spolsky, B. 1978. Educational Linguistics: An Introduction. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A., A. M. Duffy-Hester, and K. A. D. Stahl. 1998. “Everything You Wanted to Know about Phonics (but Were Afraid to Ask).” Reading Research Quarterly 33 (3): 338–355. doi:10.1598/RRQ.33.3.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strickland, D.S. 1998. Teaching Phonics Today: A Primer for Educators. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, M. 1999. “Getting Ready for Reading: Early Phoneme Awareness and Phonics Teaching Improves Reading and Spelling in Inner-city Second Language Learners.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 69 (December): 587–605. doi:10.1348/000709999157914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgerson, C. J., G. Brooks, L. Gascoine, and S. Higgins. 2019. “Phonics: Reading Policy and the Evidence of Effectiveness from a Systematic ‘tertiary’ Review.” Research Papers in Education 34 (2): 208–238. doi:10.1080/02671522.2017.1420816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgerson, C. J., G. Brooks, and J. Hall. 2006. A Systematic Review of the Research Literature on the Use of Phonics in the Teaching of Reading and Spelling. London: Department for Education and Skills Research Brief 711. http://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/RB711.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wardhaugh, R. 1969. Reading: A Linguistic Perspective. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
   Google Scholar
• Wyse, D., and U. Goswami. 2008. “Synthetic Phonics and the Teaching of Reading.” British Educational Research Journal 34 (6): 691–710. doi:10.1080/01411920802268912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar