Images of the desired teacher in practicum observation protocols

References

• Allen, J. M., A. Ambrosetti, and D. Turner. 2013. “How School and University Supervising Staff Perceive the Pre-service Teacher Education Practicum: A Comparative Study.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 38 (4): 108–128. doi:10.14221/ajte.2013v38n4.9.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Malki, M. A., and K. Weir. 2014. “A Comparative Analysis between the Assessment Criteria Used to Assess Graduating Teachers at Rustaq College (oman) and Griffith University (australia) during the Teaching Practicum.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 39 (12): 28–42. doi:10.14221/ajte.2014v39n12.3.
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, F., D. L. Ball, P. Grossman, D. E. Heller, and D. Monk. 2015. “Deans’ Corner: Views on the State of Teacher Education in 2015.” Journal of Teacher Education 66 (5): 435–445. doi:10.1177/0022487115602314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, D., and C. Bagley. 2013. “Changing Professional Discourses in Teacher Education Policy Back Towards A Training Paradigm: A Comparative Study.” European Journal of Teacher Education 36 (4): 379–392. doi:10.1080/02619768.2013.815162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. 2000. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique (revised Edition). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. 2015. “How Does a Competent Teacher Become a Good Teacher? on Judgement, Wisdom and Virtuosity in Teaching and Teacher Education.” In Philosophical Perspectives on Teacher Education, edited by R. Heilbronn and L. Foreman-Peck, 1–22. West Sussex: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bullough, J. R. 2016. “Status and Quality of Teacher Education in the US: Neoliberal and Professional Tensions.” In Quality and Change in Teacher Education, edited by J. C. Lin and C. Day, 59–75. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, E. M., and C. F. DiCarlo. 2018. “Early Childhood Education Teachers’ Constructs of Teacher Quality in Belize.” Early Child Development and Care 188 (9): 1302–1316. doi:10.1080/03004430.2017.1337009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, E., R. Hoz, and H. Kaplan. 2013. “The Practicum in Preservice Teacher Education: A Review of Empirical Studies.” Teaching Education 24 (4): 345–380. doi:10.1080/10476210.2012.711815.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. 2009. “Good Teachers on Dangerous Ground: Towards a New View of Teacher Quality and Professionalism.” Critical Studies in Education 50 (3): 213–229. doi:10.1080/17508480902998421.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., and A. Lieberman, eds. 2013. Teacher Education around the World: Changing Policies and Practices. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Z., J. Adler, and D. Parker. 2007. “Identification with Images of the Teacher and Teaching in Formalised In-service Mathematics Teacher Education and the Constitution of Mathematics for Teaching.” Journal of Education 42: 33–60.
   Google Scholar
• Fenstermacher, G. D., and V. Richardson. 2005. “On Making Determinations of Quality in Teaching.” Teachers College Record 107 (1): 186–213. doi:10.1111/tcre.2005.107.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, K. A. 2015. “From Lists to Images: Exploring the Concept of the Good Teacher in Teacher Education.” Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies 13 (1): 36–59.
   Google Scholar
• Haigh, M., F. Ell, and V. Mackisack. 2013. “Judging Teacher Candidates’ Readiness to Teach.” Teaching and Teacher Education 34: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. 2000. “Four Ages of Professionalism and Professional Learning.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 6 (2): 151–182. doi:10.1080/713698714.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmi, K., and A. Ryve. 2015. “Effective Mathematics Teaching in Finnish and Swedish Teacher Education Discourses.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 18 (6): 501–521. doi:10.1007/s10857-014-9293-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, A. 2010. “The Use of Transparency in the ‘interactive Examination’ for Student Teachers.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 17 (2): 183–197.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, D., J. Mitchell, D. Macdonald, and R. Bell. 2005. “Professional Standards for Teachers: A Case Study of Professional Learning.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 33 (2): 159–179. doi:10.1080/13598660500121977.
   Google Scholar
• Meng, L., M. A. Muñoz, and D. Wu. 2016. “Teachers’ Perceptions of Effective Teaching: A Theory-based Exploratory Study of Teachers from China.” Educational Psychology 36 (3): 461–480. doi:10.1080/01443410.2015.1008402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montecino, A., and P. Valero. 2015. “Product and Agent: Two Faces of the Mathematics Teacher.” In Proceedings of the Eighth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference, edited by S. Mukhopadhyay and B. Greer, 794–806. Portland, Oregon: MES8.
   Google Scholar
• Morais, A. M. 2002. “Basil Bernstein at the Micro Level of the Classroom.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 23 (4): 559–569. doi:10.1080/0142569022000038413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, C. M. 2016. “Purpose, Practice and Theory: Teacher Educators’ Beliefs about Professional Experience.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 41 (3): 105–125. doi:10.14221/ajte.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Österling, L. 2016. “(In)visible Theory in Mathematics Teacher Education.” Paper presented at the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Hamburg, July 24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Österling, L. in progress. Confessions of Mathematics Student Teachers. Sweden: University of Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, W. J., E. McNess, S. Thomas, X. R. Wu, C. Zhang, J. Z. Li, and H. S. Tian. 2014. “Emerging Perceptions of Teacher Quality and Teacher Development in China.” International Journal of Educational Development 34: 77–89. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2013.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusznyak, L. 2012. “Summative Assessment of Student Teaching: A Proposed Approach for Quantifying Practice.” Journal of Education 56: 91–115.
   Google Scholar
• Rusznyak, L., and C. Bertram. 2015. “Knowledge and Judgement for Assessing Student Teaching: A Cross-institutional Analysis of Teaching Practicum Assessment.” Journal of Education 60: 31–61.
   Google Scholar
• Shalem, Y., and L. Rusznyak. 2013. “‘Theory’ for Teacher Practice: A Typology of Application Tasks in Teacher Education.” South African Journal of Higher Education 27 (5): 1118–1134.
   Google Scholar
• Shalem, Y., and L. Slonimsky. 2013. “Practical Knowledge of Teaching Practice: What Counts.” Journal of Education 58: 67–86.
   Google Scholar
• Tatto, M. T., R. Peck, J. Schwille, K. Bankov, S. L. Senk, M. Rodriguez, and G. Rowley. 2012. Policy, Practice, and Readiness to Teach Primary and Secondary Mathematics in 17 Countries: Findings from the IEA Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-MM). Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. 2002. “Which Road to Follow? the Moral Complexity of an ‘equipped’ Humanity.” In Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices, edited by J. Law and A. Mol, 53–87. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. A. 2016. “Perspectives of Teacher Quality: Perceptions from Secondary Educators in Private and Public Schools.” Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 27. University of Portland. https://pilotscholars.up.edu/etd/27
   Google Scholar
• Tillema, H. H., K. Smith, and S. Leshem. 2011. “Dual Roles – Conflicting Purposes: A Comparative Study on Perceptions on Assessment in Mentoring Relations during Practicum.” European Journal of Teacher Education 34 (2): 139–159. doi:10.1080/02619768.2010.543672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winch, C., A. Oancea, and J. Orchard. 2015. “The Contribution of Educational Research to Teachers’ Professional Learning: Philosophical Understandings.” Oxford Review of Education 41 (2): 202–216. doi:10.1080/03054985.2015.1017406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt-Smith, C., and V. Klenowski. 2013. “Explicit, Latent and Meta-Criteria: Types of Criteria at Play in Professional Judgement Practice.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 20 (1): 35–52.
   Google Scholar