Interested but not being served: mapping young people’s participation in informal STEM education through an equity lens

References

• Archer, L., S. Godec, A. Calabrese Barton, E. Dawson, A. Mau, and U. Patel. 2020. “Changing the Field: A Bourdieusian Analysis of Educational Practices that Support Equitable Outcomes among Minoritized Youth on Two Informal Science Learning Programs.” Science Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21602
   Google Scholar
• Archer, L., E. Dawson, A. Seakins, and B. Wong. 2016. “Disorientating, Fun or Meaningful? Disadvantaged Families’ Experiences of a Science Museum Visit.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 11 (4): 917–939. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9667-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., E. Dawson, A. Seakins, J. DeWitt, S. Godec, and C. Whitby. 2016. “‘I’m Being a Man Here’: Urban Boys’ Performances of Masculinity and Engagement with Science during a Science Museum Visit.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 25 (3): 438–485. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1187147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., E. Dawson, J. DeWitt, A. Seakins, and B. Wong. 2015. “‘Science Capital’: A Conceptual, Methodological, and Empirical Argument for Extending Bourdieusian Notions of Capital beyond the Arts.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52 (7): 922–948. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., E. Dawson, J. DeWitt, S. Godec, H. King, A. Mau, E. Nomikou, and A. Seakins. 2017. “Killing Curiosity? An Analysis of Celebrated Identity Performances among Teachers and Students in Nine London Secondary Science Classrooms.” Science Education 101 (5): 741–764. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., S. Godec, and J. Moote. Forthcoming. “‘My Love for it Just Wasn’t Enough to Get Me Through’: A Sociological Analysis of How School Science can Mitigate the Science Identities and Trajectories of Black British Young Women.” In Science Identities, edited by L. Archer and H. Tolstrup Holmegaard. NL: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, L., and M. Hutchings. 2000. “‘Bettering Yourself’? Discourses of Risk, Cost and Benefit in Ethnically Diverse, Young Working-Class Non-Participants’ Constructions of Higher Education.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 21 (4): 555–574. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/713655373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beasley, T. M., and R. E. Schumacker. 1995. “Multiple Regression Approach to Analyzing Contingency Tables: Post Hoc and Planned Comparison Procedures.” The Journal of Experimental Education 64 (1): 79–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1995.9943797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, P. C., and G. B. Willis. 2007. “Research Synthesis: The Practice of Cognitive Interviewing.” Public Opinion Quarterly 71 (2): 287–311. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, P., B. Lewenstein, A. W. Shouse, and M. A. Feder. 2009. Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, T., M. Savage, E. Silva, A. Warde, M. Gayo-Cal, and D. Wright. 2009. Class, Culture, Distinction. Abingdon: Routlege.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, B., A. Calabrese Barton, and C. Garibay. 2018. “Broadening Perspectives on Broadening Participation in STEM: A Summary Report.” Washington, DC: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction. Translated by R. Nice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1986. “The Forms of Capital.” In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by J. Richardson, 241–258. New York: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., and J.-C. Passeron. 1990. Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. Vol. 4. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese Barton, A., and E. Tan. 2010. “‘We Be Burnin’! Agency, Identity, and Science Learning.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 19 (2): 187–229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903530044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese Barton, A., and E. Tan. 2018. “A Longitudinal Study of Equity-oriented STEM-rich Making among Youth from Historically Marginalized Communities.” American Educational Research Journal 55 (4): 761–800. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218758668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, N., and S. Cohen. 2011. “The Public Face of Zoos: Images of Entertainment, Education and Conservation.” Anthrozoös 24 (2): 175–189. doi:https://doi.org/10.2752/175303711X12998632257620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, L. M., and S. T. Lanza. 2010. Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis: With Applications in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Das, S., and M. Lowe. 2017. “Nature Read in Black and White, or How to Stop Being Racist and Develop Meaningful Natural History Curation.” Paper presented at the Natural Sciences Collections Assocation (NatSCA) conference. Cambridge, UK: University Museum of Zoology.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, E. 2014a. “Equity in Informal Science Education: Developing an Access and Equity Framework for Science Museums and Science Centres.” Studies in Science Education 50 (2): 209–247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.957558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, E. 2014b. “‘Not Designed for Us’: How Science Museums and Science Centers Socially Exclude Low‐Income, Minority Ethnic Groups.” Science Education 98 (6): 981–1008. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, E. 2014c. “Reframing Social Exclusion from Science Communication: Moving Away from ‘Barriers’ Towards a More Complex Perspective.” Journal of Science Communication 13 (2): 1–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.22323/2.13020302.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, E. 2019. Equity, Exclusion & Everyday Science Learning: The Experiences of Minoritised Groups. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, E., L. Archer, A. Seakins, J. DeWitt, S. Godec, H. King, A. Mau, and E. Nomikou. 2020. “Selfies at a Science Museum: Exploring Girls’ Identity Performances in a Science Learning Setting.” Gender and Education 32 (5): 664–681. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2018.1557322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWitt, J., and L. Archer. 2017. “Participation in Informal Science Learning Experiences: The Rich Get Richer?” International Journal of Science Education, Part B 7 (4): 356–373. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2017.1360531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, C. A. 2012. “Decolonising the Museum: Cité Nationale De l’Histoire De l’Immigration.” Race & Class 53 (4): 78–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396811433115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecsite-UK. 2008. Inspiration, Engagement and Learning: The Value of Science & Discovery Centres in the UK, Working Towards and Benchmarking Framework. Bristol: Ecsite-UK.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J., N. Staus, L. Dierking, W. R. Penuel, J. Wyld, and D. Bailey. 2016. “Understanding Youth STEM Interest Pathways within a Single Community: The Synergies Project.” International Journal of Science Education, Part B 6 (4): 369–384. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2015.1093670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein, N. W. 2017. “Equity and the Meaning of Science Learning: A Defining Challenge for Science Museums.” Science Education 101: 533–538. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. 2013. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Luis, V., and T. Dancstep. 2019. “Straight from the Girls: The Importance of Incorporating the EDGE Design Attributes at Exhibits.” Curator: The Museum Journal 62 (2): 195–221. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garibay, C. 2009. “Latinos, Leisure Values, and Decisions: Implications for Informal Science Learning and Engagement.” The Informal Learning Review 94: 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Gonsalves, A., J. Rahm, and A. Carvalho. 2013. “We Could Think of Things that Could Be Science: Girls’ Re-Figuring of Science in an Out-of-School-Time Club.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50: 1068–1097. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlyn, R., P. Matthews, and M. Shanahan. 2017. “Young People’s Views on Science Education: Science Education Tracker Research Report.” Accessed 6 March 2019. https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/science-education-tracker-report-feb17.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hill Collins, P. 2002. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hyson, J. 2004. “Education, Entertainment, and Institutional Identity at the Zoo.” Curator: The Museum Journal 47 (3): 247–251. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2004.tb00122.x.
   Google Scholar
• Ipsos MORI. 2011. “Public Attitudes to Science 2011: Summary Report.” London: Ipsos MORI.
   Google Scholar
• Ipsos MORI. 2014. “Public Attitudes to Science 2014: Main Report.” London: Ipsos MORI.
   Google Scholar
• Katz-Gerro, T. 2004. “Cultural Consumption Research: Review of Methodology, Theory, and Consequence.” International Review of Sociology 14 (1): 11–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0390670042000186743.
   Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. 2006. “From the Achievement Gap to the Education Debt: Understanding Achievement in US Schools.” Educational Researcher 35 (7): 3–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035007003.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M., and A. Lareau. 1988. “Cultural Capital: Allusions, Gaps and Glissandos in Recent Theoretical Developments.” Sociological Theory 6 (2): 153–168. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/202113.
   Google Scholar
• Lareau, A. 2003. Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race and Family Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, A. K., ed. 2010. Gender, Sexuality and Museums. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Linzer, D. A., and J. B. Lewis. 2011. “poLCA: An R Package for Polytomous Variable Latent Class Analysis.” Journal of Statistical Software 42 (10): 1–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v042.i10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, B., and S. J. M. M. Alberti. 2010. “Legacies of Prejudice: Racism, Co-Production and Radical Trust in the Museum.” Museum Management and Curatorship 25 (1): 13–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770903529061.
   Google Scholar
• Massarani, L., and M. Merzagora. 2014. “Socially Inclusive Science Communication.” Journal of Science Communication 13 (2): 1–2. doi:https://doi.org/10.22323/2.13020301.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, A., and L. Gibson. 2016. “Everyday Participation and Cultural Value.” Cultural Trends 25 (3): 151–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2016.1204043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, L. C., C. Amanti, D. Neff, and N. Gonzalez. 1992. “Funds of Knowledge for Teaching: Using a Qualitative Approach to Connect Homes and Classrooms.” Theory into Practice 31 (2): 132–141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. A., and R. M. Kern. 1996. “Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore.” American Sociological Review 61 (5): 900–907. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2096460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahm, J. 2010. Science in the Making at the Margin: A Multisited Ethnography of Learning and Becoming in an Afterschool Program, A Garden and A Math and Science Upward Bound Program. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Sandell, R. 2007. Museums, Prejudice and the Reframing of Difference. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, M., F. Devine, N. Cunningham, M. Taylor, Y. Li, J. Hjellbrekke, B. Le Roux, et al. 2013. “A New Model of Social Class? Findings from the BBC’s Great British Class Survey Experiment.” Sociology 47 (2): 219–250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513481128.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, G. 1978. “Estimating the Dimension of a Model.” The Annals of Statistics 6: 461–464. doi:https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe, D. 2015. “Your Chi-Square Test Is Statistically Significant: Now What?” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 20 (8): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Skeggs, B. 2004. Class, Self, Culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, O., and T. Katz-Gerro. 2006. “The Omnivore Thesis Revisited: Voracious Cultural Consumers.” European Sociological Review 23 (2): 123–137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcl024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. 2016. “Nonparticipation or Different Styles of Participation? Alternative Interpretations from Taking Part.” Cultural Trends 25 (3): 169–181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2016.1204051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Association for Science and Discovery Centres. 2010. Assessing the Impact of UK Science and Discovery Centres: Towards a Set of Common Indicators. Bristol: ASDC.
   Google Scholar
• Yosso, T. J. 2005. “Whose Culture Has Capital? A Critical Race Theory Discussion of Community Cultural Wealth.” Race, Ethnicity and Education 8 (1): 69–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/136133205200034100.
   Google Scholar