Making decisions about attainment grouping in mathematics: teacher agency and autonomy in Norway

References

• Aasen, P., T. Prøitz, and E. Rye. 2015. “Nasjonal læreplan som utdanningspolitisk dokument.” Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift 99 (6): 417–433. doi:10.18261/1504-2987-2015-06-03.
   Google Scholar
• Askew, M. 2015. “Diversity, Inclusion and Equity in Mathematics Classrooms: From Individual Problems to Collective Possibility.” In Diversity in Mathematics Education, edited by A. Bishop, H. Tan, and T. N. Barkatas, 129–145. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Askew, M., J. Hodgen, S. Hossain, and N. Bretscher. 2010. Values and Variables: Mathematics Education in high-performing Countries. London: Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Bakken, A. S. 2019. “Questions of Autonomy in English Teachers’ Discursive Practices.” Educational Research 61 (1): 105–122. doi:10.1080/00131881.2018.1561202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., M. Priestley, and S. Robinson. 2015. “The Role of Beliefs in Teacher Agency.” Teachers and Teaching 21 (6): 624–640. doi:10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cong-Lem, N. 2021. “Teacher Agency: A Systematic Review of International Literature.” Issues in Educational Research 31 (3): 718–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cribb, A., and S. Gewirtz. 2007. “Unpacking Autonomy and Control in Education: Some Conceptual and Normative Groundwork for a Comparative Analysis.” European Educational Research Journal 6 (3): 203–213. doi:10.2304/eerj.2007.6.3.203.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B., and E. Simmt. 2003. “Understanding Learning Systems: Mathematics Education and Complexity Science.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 34 (2): 137–167. doi:10.2307/30034903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M., and A. Mische. 1998. “What Is Agency?” American Journal of Sociology 103 (4): 962–1023. doi:10.1086/231294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasting, R. B. 2013. “Adapted Education: The Norwegian Pathway to Inclusive and Efficient Education.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 17 (3): 263–276. doi:10.1080/13603116.2012.676083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, B., L. Archer, J. Hodgen, D. Pepper, B. Taylor, and M.-C. Travers. 2017. “Exploring the Relative Lack of Impact of Research on ‘Ability Grouping’in England: A Discourse Analytic Account.” Cambridge Journal of Education 47 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2015.1093095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, J.-E., and S. Blömeke. 2018. “Development of School Achievement in the Nordic Countries during Half a Century.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 62 (3): 386–406. doi:10.1080/00313831.2018.1434829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helgøy, I., and A. Homme. 2007. “Towards A New Professionalism in School? A Comparative Study of Teacher Autonomy in Norway and Sweden.” European Educational Research Journal 6 (3): 232–249. doi:10.2304/eerj.2007.6.3.232.
   Google Scholar
• Hermansen, H. 2017. “Knowledge Relations and Epistemic Infrastructures as Mediators of Teachers’ Collective Autonomy.” Teaching and Teacher Education 65: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyle, E., and P. D. John. 1995. Professional Knowledge and Professional Practice. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, J., R. Hunter, and G. Anthony. 2020. “Shifting Towards Equity: Challenging Teacher Views about Student Capability in Mathematics.” Mathematics Education Research Journal 32 (1): 37–55. doi:10.1007/s13394-019-00293-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenssen, E., and S. Lillejord. 2009. “Tilpasset opplæring: Politisk dragkamp om pedagogisk praksis.” Acta Didactica Norge 3 (1). doi:10.5617/adno.1040.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, E., J. Møller, and R. Jensen. 2022. “Constructions of Professionalism and the Democratic Mandate in Education A Discourse Analysis of Norwegian Public Policy Documents.” Journal of Education Policy 37 (1): 106–125. doi:10.1080/02680939.2020.1774807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, R. 2014. “Educational Triage and ability-grouping in Primary Mathematics: A case-study of the Impacts on low-attaining Pupils.” Research in Mathematics Education 16 (1): 38–53. doi:10.1080/14794802.2013.874095.
   Google Scholar
• Mausethagen, S., and C. Elde Mølstad. 2015. “Shifts in Curriculum Control: Contesting Ideas of Teacher Autonomy.” Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy 2015 (2): 30–41. doi:10.3402/nstep.v1.28520.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Research. 2020. “Læreplanverket. Overordnet del – verdier og prinsipper for grunnopplæringen.” https://www.udir.no/lk20/overordnet-del/
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., M. O. Martin, S. Goh, and K. Cotter. 2016. TIMSS 2015 Encyclopedia: Education Policy and Curriculum in Mathematics and Science. Boston College: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center website. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/encyclopedia/
   Google Scholar
• National Centre for Science Education. 2015. Rapport fra ekspertgruppa for realfagene. ( Nasjonalt senter for naturfag i opplæringa). http://www.naturfagsenteret.no/binfil/download2.php?tid=2101889
   Google Scholar
• Nortvedt, G. A., and A. Pettersen. 2016. “Matematikk.“ In Stø kurs. Norske elevers kompetanse i naturfag, matematikk og lesing i PISA 2015, edited by M. Kjærnsli, and F. Jensen, 107–135. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Research Council. 2019. “Inclusive Mathematics Teaching: Understanding and Developing School and Classroom Strategies for Raising Attainment.” https://prosjektbanken.forskningsradet.no/project/FORISS/287132
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2016. PISA 2015 Results: Excellence and Equity in Education. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, G. 2015. “Teachers’ Autonomy.” Research in Education 93 (1): 19–33. doi:10.7227/RIE.0008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., and V. Drew. 2019. “Professional Enquiry: An Ecological Approach to Developing Teacher Agency.” In An Eco-System for Research-Engaged Schools: Reforming Education through Research, edited by D. Godfrey, and C. Brown, 154–169. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Salokangas, M., and W. Wermke. 2020. “Unpacking Autonomy for Empirical Comparative Investigation.” Oxford Review of Education 46 (5): 563–581. doi:10.1080/03054985.2020.1733514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenbergen-Hu, S., M. C. Makel, and P. Olszewski-Kubilius. 2016. “What One Hundred Years of Research Says about the Effects of Ability Grouping and Acceleration on K–12 Students’ Academic Achievement: Findings of Two second-order meta-analyses.” Review of Educational Research 86 (4): 849–899. doi:10.1002/curj.139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steve, H., -A. B. V.-A. Maria Katsipataki, P. H. Robbie Coleman, L. E. Major, R. Coe, and D. Mason. 2016. “The Sutton Trust-Education Endowment Foundation Teaching and Learning Toolkit.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 371 (1696). doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, K. L. 2018. “Brief Report: The Role of Mathematics Teaching in Fostering Student Growth Mindset.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 49 (3): 330–335. doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.49.3.0330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundby, A. H., and B. Karseth. 2021. “‘The Knowledge Question’in the Norwegian Curriculum.” The Curriculum Journal. doi:10.1002/curj.139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B., B. Francis, L. Archer, J. Hodgen, D. Pepper, A. Tereshchenko, and M.-C. Travers. 2017. “Factors Deterring Schools from Mixed Attainment Teaching Practice.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 25 (3): 327–345. doi:10.1080/14681366.2016.1256908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B., J. Hodgen, A. Tereshchenko, and G. Gutiérrez. 2022. “Attainment Grouping in English Secondary Schools: A National Survey of Current Practices.” Research Papers in Education 37 (2): 199–220. doi:10.1080/02671522.2020.1836517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuen, H. 2010. “Skolen–et liberalistisk prosjekt? 1860–2010.” Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift 94 (4): 273–287. doi:10.18261/1504-2987-2010-04-02.
   Google Scholar
• Towers, E., B. Taylor, A. Tereshchenko, and A. Mazenod. 2020. “‘The Reality Is Complex’: Teachers’ and School Leaders’ Accounts and Justifications of Grouping Practices in the English Key Stage 2 Classroom.” Education 3-13 48 (1): 22–36. doi:10.1080/03004279.2019.1569707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usma Wilches, J. 2007. “Teacher Autonomy: A Critical Review of the Research and Concept beyond Applied Linguistics.” Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura 12 (18): 245–275.
   Google Scholar
• Van Zanten, M., and M. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen. 2021. “Mathematics Curriculum Reform and Its Implementation in Textbooks: Early Addition and Subtraction in Realistic Mathematics Education.” Mathematics 9 (7): 752. doi:10.3390/math9070752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vika, K. S., S. Wollscheid, O. Sevaldson Lillebø, and A. Cecilie Bergene. 2021. “Spørsmål til Skole-Norge: Analyser og resultater fra Utdanningsdirektoratets spørreundersøkelse til skoler og skoleeiere høsten 2020.” (NIFU). https://www.nifu.no/publications/1886613/
   Google Scholar
• Welle-Strand, A., and A. Tjeldvoll. 2002. “The Norwegian Unified school-a Paradise Lost?” Journal of Education Policy 17 (6): 673–686. doi:10.1080/0268093022000032319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar