386
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

It takes more than an interest in STEM: students’ experience of transition to study in STEM disciplines at university

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 400-419 | Received 09 Jun 2022, Accepted 08 Oct 2022, Published online: 17 Oct 2022

References

  • ACARA. 2018. “National Assessment Program Sample Assessment ICT Literacy Years 6 & 10 Report 2017.” Sydney, Australia: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA).
  • ACARA. 2019. “National Assessment Program Science Literacy 2018 Public Report.” Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority.
  • Apps, T., K. Beckman, and S. Bennett. 2019. “Engaging with Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice: An Empirical Tool for Exploring School Students’ Technology Practice.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 28 (4): 413–423. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2019.1657934.
  • Archer, L., J. DeWitt, J. Osborne, J. Dillon, B. Willis, and B. Wong. 2012. “Science Aspirations, Capital, and Family Habitus: How Families Shape Children’s Engagement and Identification with Science.” American Educational Research Journal 49 (5): 881–908. doi:10.3102/0002831211433290.
  • Archer, L., J. DeWitt, J. Osborne, J. Dillon, B. Willis, and B. Wong. 2013. “‘Not Girly, Not Sexy, Not Glamorous’: Primary School Girls’ and Parents’ Constructions of Science Aspirations 1.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 21 (1): 171–194. doi:10.1080/14681366.2012.748676.
  • Ball, S. J., D. Reay, and M. David. 2002. “‘Ethnic Choosing’: Minority Ethnic Students, Social Class and Higher Education Choice.” Race Ethnicity and Education 5 (4): 333–357. doi:10.1080/1361332022000030879.
  • Bieri Buschor, C., S. Berweger, A. Keck Frei, and C. Kappler. 2014. “Majoring in STEM—What Accounts for Women’s Career Decision Making? A Mixed Methods Study.” The Journal of Educational Research 107 (3): 167–176. doi:10.1080/00220671.2013.788989.
  • Borlagdan, J. 2015. “Inequality and 21-Year-Olds’ Negotiation of Uncertain Transitions to Employment: A Bourdieusian Approach.” Journal of Youth Studies 18 (7): 839–854. doi:10.1080/13676261.2014.992327.
  • Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. 1986. “The Forms of Capital.” In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by J. Richardson, 241–258. Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
  • Bourdieu, P., and L. J. D. Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology/Pierre Bourdieu and Loïc J.D. Wacquant. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
  • Briggs, A. R. J., J. Clark, and I. Hall. 2012. “Building Bridges: Understanding Student Transition to University.” Quality in Higher Education 18 (1): 3–21. doi:10.1080/13538322.2011.614468.
  • Castles, I. 1986. Australian Standard Classification of Occupations: Statistical Classification (ABS Catalogue 1220.0). Australian Bureau of Statistics.
  • Chan, H.-Y., and X. Wang. 2020. “Reconciling Intent with Action: Factors Associated with the Alignment between Transfer Intent and Coursework Completion Patterns among Two-Year College Students in STEM.” The Journal of Higher Education 91 (7): 1–29. doi:10.1080/00221546.2020.1740533.
  • Clark Blickenstaff, J. 2005. “Women and Science Careers: Leaky Pipeline or Gender Filter?” Gender and Education 17 (4): 369–386. doi:10.1080/09540250500145072.
  • Dasgupta, N., and J. G. Stout. 2014. “Girls and Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: STEMing the Tide and Broadening Participation in STEM Careers.” Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 (1): 21–29. doi:10.1177/2372732214549471.
  • Deer, C. 2003. “Bourdieu on Higher Education: The Meaning of the Growing Integration of Educational Systems and Self-Reflective Practice.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 24 (2): 195–206. doi:10.1080/01425690301904.
  • Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources. 2020. “Action Area: Enabling STEM Potential through Education.” Text. Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources. Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources. Accessed 2 March 2020. https://www.industry.gov.au/data-and-publications/advancing-women-in-stem-strategy/vision-for-equal-opportunity-in-stem/action-area-enabling-stem-potential-through-education
  • DeWitt, J., L. Archer, and A. Mau. 2016. “Dimensions of Science Capital: Exploring Its Potential for Understanding Students’ Science Participation.” International Journal of Science Education 38 (16): 2431–2449. doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1248520.
  • Donovan, F. 2018. “Living Class in a ‘Meritocratic’ Australia: The Burdens of Class and Choice on Young People’s End-of-School Transitions.” Journal of Sociology 54 (3): 396–411. doi:10.1177/1440783317726374.
  • Education Council. 2015. “National STEM School Education Strategy, 2016-2026.” http://www.educationcouncil.edu.au/site/DefaultSite/filesystem/documents/National%20STEM%20School%20Education%20Strategy.pdf
  • Elliott, S. W. 2017. Computers and the Future of Skill Demand. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264284395-en.
  • Everett, J. 2002. “Organizational Research and the Praxeology of Pierre Bourdieu.” Organizational Research Methods 5 (1): 56–80. doi:10.1177/1094428102051005.
  • Fisher, C. R., C. D. Thompson, and R. H. Brookes. 2020. “Gender Differences in the Australian Undergraduate STEM Student Experience: A Systematic Review.” Higher Education Research & Development 39 (6): 1155–1168. doi:10.1080/07294360.2020.1721441.
  • Godec, S., L. Archer, and E. Dawson. 2022. “Interested but Not Being Served: Mapping Young People’s Participation in Informal STEM Education through an Equity Lens.” Research Papers in Education 37 (2): 221–248. doi:10.1080/02671522.2020.1849365.
  • Gravett, K. 2021. “Troubling Transitions and Celebrating Becomings: From Pathway to Rhizome.” Studies in Higher Education 46 (8): 1506–1517. doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1691162.
  • Grenfell, M. 2014. Pierre Bourdieu: Key Concepts. London: Routledge.
  • Holmegaard, H. T., L. Møller Madsen, and L. Ulriksen. 2014. “To Choose or Not to Choose Science: Constructions of Desirable Identities among Young People considering a STEM Higher Education Programme.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (2): 186–215. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.749362.
  • Hordósy, R. 2021. “‘I’ve Changed in Every Possible Way Someone Could Change’ – Transformative University Transitions.” Research Papers in Education 1–21. doi:10.1080/02671522.2021.1961296.
  • Hoyle, P. 2016. “Must Try Harder: An Evaluation of the UK Government’s Policy Directions in STEM Education.“ [Paper presentation]. Research Conference 2016 - Improving STEM Learning, 11.
  • Johnston, O., H. Wildy, and J. Shand. 2021. “Student Voices That Resonate – Constructing Composite Narratives That Represent Students’ Classroom Experiences.” Qualitative Research June 146879412110161. doi:10.1177/14687941211016158.
  • Korpershoek, H., H. Kuyper, R. Bosker, and G. van der Werf. 2013. “Students Leaving the STEM Pipeline: An Investigation of Their Attitudes and the Influence of Significant Others on Their Study Choice.” Research Papers in Education 28 (4): 483–505. doi:10.1080/02671522.2012.698299.
  • Lawson, K. M., A. C. Crouter, and S. M. McHale. 2015. “Links between Family Gender Socialization Experiences in Childhood and Gendered Occupational Attainment in Young Adulthood.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 90 (October): 26–35. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2015.07.003.
  • Lee, A. 2015. “Determining the Effects of Computer Science Education at the Secondary Level on STEM Major Choices in Postsecondary Institutions in the United States.” Computers & Education 88 (October): 241–255. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.019.
  • Luo, F., P. D. Antonenko, and E. Christine Davis. 2020. “Exploring the Evolution of Two Girls’ Conceptions and Practices in Computational Thinking in Science.” Computers & Education 146 (March): 103759. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103759.
  • Marsh, H. W., B. Van Zanden, P. D. Parker, J. Guo, J. Conigrave, and M. Seaton. 2019. “Young Women Face Disadvantage to Enrollment in University STEM Coursework Regardless of Prior Achievement and Attitudes.” American Educational Research Journal 56 (5): 1629–1680. doi:10.3102/0002831218824111.
  • Maton, K. 2012. “Habitus.” In Pierre Bourdieu: Key Concepts, edited by M. Grenfell, 48–64. 2nd ed. Durham: Acumen.
  • Mau, W.-C. J., and L. Jiaqi. 2018. “Factors Influencing STEM Career Aspirations of Underrepresented High School Students.” The Career Development Quarterly 66 (3): 246–258. doi:10.1002/cdq.12146.
  • Miles, M., M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña. 2013. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
  • Milner-Bolotin, M. 2018. “Evidence-Based Research in STEM Teacher Education: From Theory to Practice.” Frontiers in Education 3. doi:10.3389/feduc.2018.00092.
  • Moote, J., L. Archer, J. DeWitt, and E. MacLeod. 2020. “Science Capital or STEM Capital? Exploring Relationships between Science Capital and Technology, Engineering, and Maths Aspirations and Attitudes among Young People Aged 17/18.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 57 (8): 1228–1249. doi:10.1002/tea.21628.
  • Mu, G. M. 2020. “Sociologising Resilience through Bourdieu’s Field Analysis: Misconceptualisation, Conceptualisation, and Reconceptualisation.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 42 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1080/01425692.2020.1847634.
  • O’Connor, P., C. O’Hagan, E. Sophia Myers, L. Baisner, G. Apostolov, I. Topuzova, G. Saglamer, M. G. Tan, and H. Caglayan. 2020. “Mentoring and Sponsorship in Higher Education Institutions: Men’s Invisible Advantage in STEM?” Higher Education Research & Development 39 (4): 764–777. doi:10.1080/07294360.2019.1686468.
  • O’Shea, S. 2016. “Avoiding the Manufacture of ‘Sameness’: First-in-Family Students, Cultural Capital and the Higher Education Environment.” Higher Education 72 (1): 59–78. doi:10.1007/s10734-015-9938-y.
  • O’Shea, S. 2020. “Crossing Boundaries: Rethinking the Ways that First-in-Family Students Navigate ‘Barriers’ to Higher Education.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 41 (1): 95–110. doi:10.1080/01425692.2019.1668746.
  • O’Shea, S. E., J. May, and C. Stone. 2015. Breaking the Barriers: Supporting and Engaging First-in-Family University Learners and Their Families. Office for Learning and Teaching Australia.
  • Pierre, B., and L. J. D. Wacquant. 1992a. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Raabe, I. J., Z. Boda, and C. Stadtfeld. 2019. “The Social Pipeline: How Friend Influence and Peer Exposure Widen the STEM Gender Gap.” Sociology of Education 92 (2): 105–123. doi:10.1177/0038040718824095.
  • Reay, D. 2013. “Social Mobility, a Panacea for Austere Times: Tales of Emperors, Frogs, and Tadpoles.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 34 (5–6): 660–677. doi:10.1080/01425692.2013.816035.
  • Reay, D., G. Crozier, and J. Clayton. 2009. “‘Strangers in Paradise’?: Working-Class Students in Elite Universities.” Sociology 43 (6): 1103–1121. doi:10.1177/0038038509345700.
  • Redmond, P., and H. Gutke. 2020. “STEMming the Flow: Supporting Females in STEM.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 18 (18): 221–237. doi:10.1007/s10763-019-09963-6.
  • Stoet, G., and D. C. Geary. 2018. “The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science,Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics Education.” Psychological Science 29 (4) (February): 581–593. doi:10.1177/0956797617741719.
  • Timms, M. J., K. Moyle, P. R. Weldon, and P. Mitchell. 2018. “Challenges in STEM Learning in Australian Schools: Literature and Policy Review.” Camberwall: Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).
  • van den Hurk, A., M. Meelissen, and A. van Langen. 2019. “Interventions in Education to Prevent STEM Pipeline Leakage.” International Journal of Science Education 41 (2): 150–164. doi:10.1080/09500693.2018.1540897.
  • Wang, X. 2013. “Why Students Choose STEM Majors: Motivation, High School Learning, and Postsecondary Context of Support.” American Educational Research Journal 50 (5): 1081–1121. doi:10.3102/0002831213488622.
  • Webb, S., P. Jane Burke, S. Nichols, S. Roberts, G. Stahl, S. Threadgold, and J. Wilkinson. 2017. “Thinking with and beyond Bourdieu in Widening Higher Education Participation.” Studies in Continuing Education 39 (2): 138–160. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2017.1302926.
  • Yin, R. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.