The pseudoscientist ‘priest’: religiously selling nanotechnology

References

• Aitken, R., & Campelo, A. (2011). The four Rs of place branding. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(11), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2011.560718
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M. (2003). Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: A reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 13–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/30040687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnlund, D. C., & Harland, C. (1963). Propinquity and prestige as determinants of communication networks. Sociometry, 26(4), 467–479. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2786149
   Google Scholar
• Barrette, C. M. (2015). Usefulness of technology adoption research in introducing an online workbook. System, 49, 133–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassett, D. R. (2012). Notions of identity, society, and rhetoric in a speech code of science among scientists and engineers working in nanotechnology. Science Communication, 34(1), 115–149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547011417891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W., Ger, G., & Askegaard, S. (2003). The fire of desire: A multisited inquiry into consumer passion. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 326–351. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/378613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W., Wallendorf, M., & Sherry, J. F., Jr. (1989). The sacred and the profane in consumer behaviour: Theodicy on the Odyssey. The Journal of Consumer Behavior, 16(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/209191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L. (1999). The desecularization of the world. Resurgent religion and world politics. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Bochner, A. P., & Ellis, C. (1995). Telling and living: Narrative co-construction and the practices of interpersonal relationships. In W. Leeds-Hurwitz (Ed.), Social approaches to communication (pp. 201–213). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, D. (2017). Modern miracle materials. Materials Today, 20(8), 401–402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2017.08.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, J. D. (2000). Ethnography. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. D. (2014). Identities and identity work in organizations. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. D., Stacey, P., & Nandhakumar, J. (2008). Making sense of sensemaking narratives. Human Relations, 61(8), 1035–1062. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C. G. (2009). The death of Christian Britain. Understanding secularisation 1800 – 2000. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Broyles, C. D. (2011). A model for considering different discourse communities within the toxicological and environmental sciences: An approach for addressing jargon and personally subjective vocabulary. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 254(2), 215–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2010.10.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkill, J. C. (1978). John Edensor Littlewood. 9 June 1885 – 6 September 1977. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, 24, 322–326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbm.1978.0010
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. A., & La Pastina, A. C. (2010). How the iPhone became divine: New media, religion and the intertextual circulation of meaning. New Media & Society, 12(7), 1191–1207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810362204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chittick, W. (2007). The essential Seyyed Hossein Nasr. World Wisdom.
   Google Scholar
• Chronis, A. (2008). Co-constructing the narrative experience of staging and consuming the American Civil War at Gettysburg. Journal of Marketing Management, 24(1–2), 5–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1362/026725708X273894
   Google Scholar
• Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2004). Identity and ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 173–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/4131471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corvellec, H., & Risberg, A. (2007). Sensegiving as mise-en-sens-The case of wind power development. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 23(3), 306–326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2007.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulson, C. A. (1966). Science & Christian belief. Fontana Books.
   Google Scholar
• Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a model of organisations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284–295. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1984.4277657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, H. (2019). Religious devices: A survey of technologies of worship. Communication +1, 7(2), 2. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7275/2f6f-w963
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S. R. (2011). How we talk when we talk about nano: The future in laypeople’s talk. Futures. Special Issue: Future-oriented Technology Analysis, 43(3), 317–326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2010.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, A. K. (2019). The enchanted snake and the forbidden fruit: The ayahuasca ‘fairy tale’ tourist. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(9–10), 818–844. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1601635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, A. K., Ellis, N., & Wells, V. K. (2017). Science ‘fact’ and science ‘fiction’: Homophilous communication in high-technology B2B selling. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(9–10), 764–788. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2017.1324895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney, A. E., & Hastie, J. E. (2007). Lost in translation: Differences in role identities between fisheries scientists and managers. Ocean & Coastal Management, 50(8), 661–682. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2007.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Deshmukh, S. P., Patil, S. M., Mullani, S. B., & Delekar, S. D. (2019). Silver nanoparticles as an effective disinfectant: A review. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 97(97), 954–965. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drexler, K. E. (1987). Engines of creation. The coming era of nanotechnology. Anchor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drexler, K. E. (2013). Radical abundance. How a revolution in nanotechnology will change civilization. Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1995/1912). The elementary forms of religious life. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ecklund, E. H. (2010). Science vs. Religion. What scientists really think. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Essers, C., & Benschop, Y. (2007). Enterprising identities: Female entrepreneurs of Moroccan or Turkish origin in the Netherlands. Organization Studies, 28(1), 49–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606068256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fausto-Sterling, A. (1992). Myths of gender: Biological theories about men and women. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fellows, R., & Liu, A. (2016). Sensemaking in the cross-cultural contexts of projects. International Journal of Project Management, 34(2), 246–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flower, M. J. (1995). Review of higher superstition. Contemporary Sociology, 24(1), 113–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2075146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1974). The history of sexuality: The will to knowledge v.1. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, G., & Mulkay, M. (2009). Opening Pandora’s box: A sociological analysis of scientists’ discourse. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golshani, M. (1998). Can science dispense with religion? Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Goodier, B. C., & Eisenberg, E. M. (2006). Seeking the spirit: Communication and the (re)development of a “spiritual” organization. Communication Studies, 57(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970500483413
   Google Scholar
• Gould, S. J. (2006). Cooptation through conflation: Spiritual materialism is not the same as spirituality. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 9(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10253860500481262
   Google Scholar
• Gounaris, S. (2016). Sales management. In M. J. Baker & S. Hart (Eds.), The marketing book (7th ed., pp. 362–393). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grech, V. (2020). Medical nanotechnology in star trek: A force for both good and evil. Early Human Development, 145, 105019. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.1050159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunton, C. E. (2010). The Cambridge companion to Christian doctrine. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallowell, I. A. (1960). Ojibwa ontology, behaviour, and world view. Bobs-Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. A. (2017). On rhetoric of science: Case studies (landmark essays series). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, B. J., & Ostberg, J. (2013). Authenticating by re-enchantment: The discursive making of craft production. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(7–8), 882–911. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2012.732596
   Google Scholar
• Haverila, M. J. (2013). Marketing variables when launching high-technology products into international markets: An empirical study on Finnish technology firms. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 24(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2013.02.004
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, R. D. (1994). From faust to strangelove: Representations of scientists in Western literature. John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helms Mills, J., & Mills, A. J. (2009). Critical sensemaking and workplace inequities. In M. F. Ozbilgin (Ed.), Equality, diversity and inclusion at work (pp. 171–178). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Henneberg, S. C., Naude, P., & Mouzas, S. (2010). Sense-making and management in business networks – Some observations, considerations and a research agenda. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(3), 355–360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, A. F. (2015). Communicating, sensemaking and (dis)organizing: Theorizing the complexity of polymediation. In A. Herbig, A. F. Herrmann, & A. W. Tyma (Eds.), Beyond new media: Discourse and critique in a polymediated age (pp. 61–82). Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hewlin, P. F. (2003). And the award for best actor goes to … : Facades of conformity on organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 633–642. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/30040752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinshelwood, C. (1954). Thoughts on the evolution of a scientific problem. School Science Review, 35, 300–308.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, M. (2005). Getting personal: Reflexivity and autoethnographic vignettes. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(6), 840–860. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800404269425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackelén, A. (2008). What theology can do for science. Theology and Science, 6(3), 287–303. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700802206941
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R., Suoranta, M., & Rowley, J. (2013). Strategic network marketing in technology SMEs. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(5–6), 671–697. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2013.797920
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (1960/1793). Religion within the limits of reason. Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. T. (2008). Getting counted: Markets, media, and reality. American Sociological Review, 73(2), 270–295. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240807300205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kottak, C. (2006). Mirror for humanity. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Krush, M. T., Agnihotri, R., Trainor, K. J., & Nowlin, E. L. (2013). Enhancing organizational sensemaking: An examination of the interactive effects of sales capabilities and marketing dashboards. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(5), 824–835. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.02.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layton, R. (1998). An introduction to theory in anthropology. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, N., Sandfield, A., & Dhaliwal, B. (2007). An empirical study of salesperson stereotypes amongst UK students and their implications for recruitment. Journal of Marketing Management, 23(7/8), 723–744. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1362/026725707X230018
   Google Scholar
• Lessl, T. M. (1996). Naturalizing science: Two episodes in the evolution of a rhetoric of scientism. Western Journal of Communication, 60(4), 379–396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319609374555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T. (1995). Qualitative communication research methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lott, A. J., & Lott, B. E. (1965). Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 64(4), 259–309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022386
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Louis, M. R. (1980). Surprise and sensemaking: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(2), 226–251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2392453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhrmann, T. M. (2012). When God talks back. Understanding the American evangelical relationship with God. Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2014.873177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, D., Naude, P., Salle, R., & Valla, J.-P. (2003). Business-to-business marketing: Strategies and implementation. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis, a sourcebook of new methods. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Milojević, S., Raddicchi, F., & Walsh, J. P. (2018). Changing demographics of scientist careers: The rise of the temporary workforce. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(50), 12616–12623. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800478115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milton, J. (1996). Paradise Lost. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Moffat, J., & Yoo, H. I. (2019). Religion, religiosity and educational attainment: Evidence from the compulsory education system in England. Applied Economics, 52(4), 430–442. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1646872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olawoyin, R. (2018). Nanotechnology: The future of fire safety. Safety Science, 110(A), 214–221. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.10.16/j.ssci.2018.08.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orman, J. (2016). Scientism in the language sciences. Language & Communication, 48, 28–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2016.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partridge, C. (2005). The re-enchantment of the West (Vol. 1). T & T Clark.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, G. R. (2003). Demarcation and the scientistic fallacy. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 38(4), 751–761. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2003.00536.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plantinga, A. (2012). Where the conflict really lies: Science, religion and naturalism. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, M. G. (1998). To be or not to be: Central questions in organizational identification. In D. Whetten & P. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Developing theory through conversations (pp. 171–207). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Prelli, L. J. (1989). The rhetorical construction of scientific ethos. In H. W. Simons (Ed.), Rhetoric in the human sciences (pp. 48–68). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Purchase, S., Ellis, N., Mallett, O., & Theingi, T. (2018). Religious social-identities in the hybrid self-presentations of Sikh business people. British Journal of Management, 9(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467–8551.12268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., & Krause, N. M. (2019). Science audiences, misinformation and fake news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(16), 7662–7669. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805871115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schouten, J. W., McAlexander, J. H., & Koenig, H. F. (2007). Transcendent consumer experience and brand community. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(3), 357–368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0034-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schummer, J. (2006). Historical roots of the “mad scientist”: Chemists in nineteenth-century literature. Ambix, 53(2), 99–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1179/174582306X117898
   Google Scholar
• Shineha, R., Inoue, Y., Ikka, T., Kishimoto, A., & Yashiro, Y. (2017). Science communication in regenerative medicine: Implications for the role of academic society and science policy. Regenerative Therapy, 7(7), 89–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reth.2017.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sierra, J. J., Hyman, M. R., & Turri, A. M. (2018). Determinants and outcomes of superstitious beliefs: A multi-study approach. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(15–16), 1397–1417. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1544923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simakova, E., & Neyland, D. (2008). Marketing mobile futures: Assembling constituencies and creating compelling stories for an emerging technology. Marketing Theory, 8(1), 91–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593107086486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. S. (2014). Marketing of high-technology. Products and innovations. Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., McPherson, M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (2014). Social distance in the United States: Sex, race, religion, age, and education homophily among confidants, 1985 to 2004. American Sociological Review, 79(3), 432–456. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414531776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 491–503. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/jcr.1994.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sztompka, P. (2007). Trust in science: Robert K. Merton’s inspirations. Journal of Classical Sociology, 7(2), 211–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X07078038
   Google Scholar
• Tolfree, D., & Jackson, M. J. (2008). Commercializing micro and nanotechnology products. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tracey, P. N., Phillips, & Lounsbury, M. (2014). Taking religion seriously in the study of organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 41, 3–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20140000041009
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Van Assche, J., Koç, Y., & Roets, A. (2019). Religiosity or ideology? On the individual differences predictors of sexism. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 191–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vydra, S., & Klievink, B. (2019). Techno-optimism and policy-pessimism in the public sector big data debate. Government Information Quarterly, 36 (4), 101383. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, T. (2008). Managing identity: Identity work, personal predicaments and structural circumstances. Organization, 15(1), 121–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508407084488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organisations. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wengraf, T. (2004). Qualitative research interviewing: Biographic narrative and semi structured methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteman, G., & Cooper, J. B. (2011). Ecological sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 889–911. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.0843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P. S. (2013). C. S. Lewis vs. the New Atheists. Paternoster.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. O. (1999). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, C., Nyberg, D., & Grant, D. (2012). ‘Hippies on the third floor’: Climate change, narrative identity and the micro-politics of corporate environmentalism. Organization Studies, 33(11), 1451–1475. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612463316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabusky, S. E., & Barley, S. R. (1997). “You can’t be a stone if you’re cement”: Re-evaluating the emic identities of scientists in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 361–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar