232
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentary

The distributed body

References

  • Alaimo, S. (2008). Trans-corporeal feminisms and the ethical space of nature. In S. Alaimo & S. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminism (pp. 237–263). Indiana University Press.
  • Bajde, D. (2013). Consumer culture theory (re) visits actor–network theory: Flattening consumption studies. Marketing Theory, 13(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593113477887
  • Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168. https://doi.org/10.1086/209154
  • Bettany, S. (2007). The material semiotics of consumption or where (and what) are the objects in consumer culture theory? In R. W. Belk & J. F. Sherry (Eds.), Consumer culture theory (pp. 41–56). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2111(06)11003-0
  • Bettany, S. (2015). A commentary: Where (and what) is the critical in consumer-oriented actor-network theory? In R. Canniford & D. Bajde (Eds.), Assembling consumption (pp. 187–197). Routledge.
  • Bettany, S., & Daly, R. (2008). Figuring companion-species consumption: A multi-site ethnography of the post-canine Afghan hound. Journal of Business Research, 61(5), 408–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.08.010
  • Bettany, S., & Kerrane, B. (2011). The (post‐human) consumer, the (post‐avian) chicken and the (post‐object) Eglu: Towards a material‐semiotics of anti‐consumption. European Journal of Marketing, 45(11/12), 1746–1756. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561111167388
  • Bettany, S. M., Kerrane, B., & Hogg, M. K. (2014). The material-semiotics of fatherhood: The co-emergence of technology and contemporary fatherhood. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1544–1551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.01.012
  • Borgerson, J. L. (2005). Materiality, agency, and the constitution of consuming subjects: Insights for consumer research. Advances in Consumer Research, 32, 439–443.
  • Borghini, S., Sherry, J. F., Joy, A., Fischer, E., Price, L. L., & Ger, G. (2021). Attachment to and detachment from favorite stores: An affordance theory perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(6), 890–913. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucaa044
  • Butler, J. (1992). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
  • Butler, J. (2009). Wise distinctions. London Review of Books Blog. https://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2009/november/wise-distinctions
  • Butler, J. (2011). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. Taylor & Francis.
  • Campbell, N., O’Driscoll, A., & Saren, M. (2010). The posthuman: The end and the beginning of the human. Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 9(2), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.306
  • Canniford, R., & Shankar, A. (2015). Post-dualistic consumer research: Nature-cultures and cyborg consumption. In R. Canniford & D. Bajde (Eds.), Assembling consumption (pp. 135–151). Routledge.
  • Denegri-Knott, J., Jenkins, R., Molesworth, M., & Grigore, G. (2023). Platformised possessions and relational labour. Marketing Theory, 24(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/14705931231201783
  • Emontspool, J., & Smaniotto, C. (2020). Thingification: Interrupting subject and object. In J. Argo, T. M. Lowrey, & H. J. Schau (Eds.), NA - Advances in consumer research volume 48 (pp. 57–61). Association for Consumer Research.
  • Eveleth, R. (2012). Should Oscar Pistorius’s prosthetic legs disqualify him from the Olympics. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/scientists-debate-oscar-pistorius-prosthetic-legs-disqualify-him-olympics/
  • Franco, P., Canniford, R., & Phipps, M. (2022). Object-oriented marketing theory. Marketing Theory, 22(3), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/14705931221079407
  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
  • Giesler, M., & Venkatesh, A. (2004). Consuming cyborgs: Researching posthuman consumer culture. Advances in Consumer Research, 31, 400–402.
  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
  • Haraway, D. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.
  • Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the chthulucene. Duke University Press.
  • Harris, O. J., & Robb, J. (2012). Multiple ontologies and the problem of the body in history. American Anthropologist, 114(4), 668–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2012.01513.x
  • Hill, T., Canniford, R., & Mol, J. (2014). Non-representational marketing theory. Marketing Theory, 14(4), 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593114533232
  • Kristensen, D. B., Kuruoglu, A. P., & Banke, S. (2021). Tracking towards care: Relational affordances of self‐tracking in gym culture. Sociology of Health & Illness, 43(7), 1598–1613. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13352
  • Kristensen, D. B., & Ruckenstein, M. (2018). Co-evolving with self-tracking technologies. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3624–3640. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818755650
  • Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. Bijker, J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: studies in socio-technical change (pp. 225-264). MIT Press.
  • Law, J., & Mol, A. (2011). Veterinary realities: What is foot and mouth disease? Sociologia ruralis, 51(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00520.x
  • Lima, V., & Belk, R. (2023). Bodies as machines. Machines as bodies. Consumption Markets & Culture, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2023.2206128
  • Lima, V. M., Pessôa, L. A., & Belk, R. W. (2022). The Promethean biohacker: On consumer biohacking as a labour of love. Journal of Marketing Management, 38(5–6), 483–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2022.2070239
  • Magubane, Z. (2014). Spectacles and scholarship: Caster Semenya, intersex studies, and the problem of race in feminist theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 39(3), 761–785. https://doi.org/10.1086/674301
  • Mokoena, T. (2023, October 28). Athlete Caster Semenya: ‘I’m a woman. I’m a different woman’. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2023/oct/28/athlete-caster-semenya-interview-im-a-woman-im-a-different-woman
  • Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics. A word and some questions. The Sociological Review, 47(1_suppl), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03483.x
  • Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press.
  • Mol, A., & Law, J. (2004). Embodied action, enacted bodies: The example of hypoglycaemia. Body & Society, 10(2–3), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042932
  • Moser, I. (2006). Disability and the promises of technology: Technology, subjectivity and embodiment within an order of the normal. Information, Communication & Society, 9(3), 373–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180600751348
  • Pape, M. (2019). Expertise and non-binary bodies: Sex, gender and the case of Dutee Chand. Body & Society, 25(4), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X19865940
  • Pieper, L. P. (2014). Sex testing and the maintenance of western femininity in international sport. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 31(13), 1557–1576. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2014.927184
  • Roux, D., & Belk, R. (2019). The body as (another) place: Producing embodied heterotopias through tattooing. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(3), 483–507. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucy081
  • Sayes, E. (2014). Actor–network theory and methodology: Just what does it mean to say that nonhumans have agency? Social Studies of Science, 44(1), 134–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713511867
  • Shamayleh, G., & Arsel, Z. (2022). From blogs to platforms. In L. Rosa & B. Russell (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of digital consumption (pp. 111–123). Routledge.
  • Tadajewski, M. (2023). Rethinking Harlow Gale: The psychical influences on his contributions to advertising and their enduring reverberations. Journal of Advertising, 53(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2023.2249055
  • Tadajewski, M, & Higgins, M. (2023). The porosity of the consumer. Consumption Markets & Culture, 26(5), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2023.2201444
  • Thompson, C. J. (2024). Towards an ontology of consumers as distributed networks (or the end of ‘Consumer research’ as we know it?): Retrospective insights from the praxeomorphism of Russell Belk’s ‘Extended self’. Journal of Marketing Management, 40(7–8), 555–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2024.2345320
  • Valtonen, A. (2013). Height matters: Practicing consumer agency, gender, and body politics. Consumption Markets & Culture, 16(2), 196–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2012.662831
  • Valtonen, A., & Närvänen, E. (2015). Gendered reading of the body in the bed. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(15–16), 1583–1601. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1061038
  • Valtonen, A., & Närvänen, E. (2022). Materializing the body: A feminist perspective. In P. Maclaran, L. Stevens, & O. Kravets (Eds.), The Routledge companion to marketing and feminism (pp. 159–170). Routledge.
  • Valtonen, A., Salmela, T., & Rantala, O. (2020). Living with mosquitoes. Annals of Tourism Research, 83, 102945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.102945
  • Will, S. (2019). World athletics body says study shows Semenya has advantage. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN1WV285/
  • Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 109(1), 121–136.