Apples, oranges, and self

References

• Ahuvia, A. (2005). Beyond the extended self: Loved objects and consumers’ identity narratives. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1086/429607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appau, S., Ozanne, J., Klein, J., Price, L. L., & Crockett, D. (2020). Understanding difficult consumer transitions: The in/dividual consumer in permanent liminality. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(2), 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucaa010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, J., Graesch, A., Ragazzine, E., & Ochs, E. (2013). Life at home in the twenty-first century: 32 families open their doors. University of California Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Arnould, E., Price, L., & Curasi, C. (2009). Cherished possessions. Anthropology News, 40(2), 17–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/an.1999.40.2.17
   Google Scholar
• Aron, A., Aron, E., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron, A., Aron, E., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahl, S., & Milne, G. (2010). Talking to ourselves: A dialogical exploration of consumption experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(1), 176–195. https://doi.org/10.1086/650000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakpayev, M., & Belk, R. (2020). Consumer interactions with artificial intelligence agents – a historical perspective. Advances in Consumer Research, 48, 836–841.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, J. M. (1897). Social and ethical interpretations in mental development: A study in social psychology. MacMillan Co.
   Google Scholar
• Bassett, D. (2015). Who wants to live forever? Living, dying and grieving in our digital society. Social Sciences, 4(4), 1127–1139. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci4041127
   Google Scholar
• Bassett, D. (2022). The creation and inheritance of digital afterlives: You only live twice. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (1975). Situational variables and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(3), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1086/208627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168. https://doi.org/10.1086/209154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (1996). The perfect gift. In C. Otnes & R. F. Beltramini (Eds.), Gift giving: A research anthology (pp. 59–84). Bowling Green University Popular Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 715–734. https://doi.org/10.1086/612649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (2012). Who are you when you’re online? The digital extended self. Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research, 82–84.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (2013). Extended self in a digital world. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 477–500. https://doi.org/10.1086/671052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (2014a). Alternative conceptualizations of the extended self. Advances in Consumer Research, 42, 251–254.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (2014b). Digital consumption and the extended self. Journal of Marketing Management, 30(11–12), 1101–1118. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2014.939217
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (2014c). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595–1600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (2015a). Co-construction of the digital self. Advances in Consumer Research, 43, 111–116.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (2015b). Object agency and the extended self. Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 21–23.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (2017). Consumers in an age of autonomous and semi-autonomous machines. In J. Sherry Jr. & E. Fischer (Eds.), Currents in consumer culture theory (pp. 5–32). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (2018). Ownership, the extended self, and the extended object. In J. Peck & S. Shu (Eds.), Ownership and consumption (pp. 53–67). Springer (Cham, Switzerland).
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (2022a). Artificial emotions and love and sex doll service workers. Journal of Service Research, 25(4), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705211063692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (2022b). Transhumanism in speculative fiction. Journal of Marketing Management, 38(5–6), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2021.1900894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R., Ger, G., & Askegaard, S. (2003). The fire of desire: A multi-sited inquiry into consumer passion. The Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1086/378613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R., & Humayun, M. (2018). When objects trump subjects. European Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 280–286.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R., Humayun, M., & Gopaldas, A. (2020). Artificial life. Journal of Macromarketing, 40(2), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146719897361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R., Wallendorf, M., & Sherry, J. F., Jr. (1989). The sacred and the profane in consumer behavior: Theodicy on the odyssey. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1086/209191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooker, C., & Jones, A. (2018). Inside black mirror. House of Tomorrow, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, E., & Romano, J. (2011). Your digital afterlife: When Facebook, Flickr and Twitter are your estate, what is your legacy? New Riders.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, K. (2012). Ideas versus things: The balancing act of interpreting historic house museums. In S. Dudley (Ed.), Museum objects: Experiencing the properties of things (pp. 173–187). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Conn, S. (2010). Do museums still need objects? University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, P., & Schau, H. (2013). The symbiosis model of identity augmentation: Self-expansion and self-extension as distinct strategies. In A. Ruvio & R. Belk (Eds.), The Routledge companion to identity and consumption (pp. 21–30). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cooley, C. (1902). Looking-glass self. In The production of reality: Essays and readings onsocial interaction (Vol. 6, pp. 126–128).
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, W. E. (1992). William James’s theory of the self. The Monist, 75(4), 504–520. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist199275425
   Google Scholar
• Crossland, Z. (2017). The agency of the dead. In N. J. Enfield & P. Kockelman (Eds.), Distributed agency (pp. 181–190). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curasi, C. (1999). In hope of an enduring gift: The intergenerational transfer of cherished possessions; a special case of gift giving. Advances in Consumer Research, 26, 125–132.
   Google Scholar
• Curasi, C., Price, L., & Arnould, E. (2003). Understanding the intergenerational transfer of cherished possessions: Insights for estate planning officers and end-of-life professionals. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 7(4), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fsm.4770101
   Google Scholar
• Davenne, C. (2011/2012). Cabinets of wonder. Abrams.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, M. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59(Winter), 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Ekerdt, D. (2018). Two: Things and possessions. In S. Katz (Ed.), Aging in everyday life: Materialities and embodiments (pp. 29–44). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J. (2017). Distributed agency. In N. J. Enfield & P. Kockelman (Eds.), Distributed agency (pp. 9–14). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epp, A., & Price, L. (2010). The storied life of singularized objects: Forces of agency and network transformation. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 820–837. https://doi.org/10.1086/603547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, C. (2004). The archaeology of personhood: An anthropological approach. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency: An anthropological theory. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregson, M., & Crewe, L. (2003). Second-hand cultures. Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Guillard, V. (2017). Understanding the process of the disposition of a loved One’s possessions using a theoretical framework of grief. Consumption Markets & Culture, 20(5), 477–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2017.1367677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrickson, L. (2023). Chatting with the dead: The hermeneutics of thanabots. Media, Culture, and Society, 45(5), 949–966. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221147626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hietanen, J., Ahlberg, O., & Botez, A. (2022). The ‘dividual’ in semiocapitalist consumer culture. Journal of Marketing Management, 38(1–2), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2022.2036519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, E., Ruvio, A., & Belk, R. (2012). Exploring space and place in marketing research: Excavating the garage. Marketing Theory, 12(4), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593112457736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. (2012). The outsourced self: Intimate life in market times. Metropolitan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Humayun, M., & Belk, R. (2016). From nothingness into being: Creation and resilience of a decentralized brand. Advances in Consumer Research, 44, 495–496.
   Google Scholar
• Humayun, M., & Belk, R. (2021). Brand Hive Mind: Building the Bitcoin decentralized brand. Advances in Consumer Research, 49, 266–267.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, T. (2017). Augmented graves and virtual bibles. In T. Hutchings & J. McKenzie (Eds.), Materiality and religion: The study of the sacred (pp. 85–99). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Henry Holt and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Karanika, K., & Hogg, M. (2013). Trajectories across the lifespan of possession-self relationships. Journal of Business Research, 66(7), 910–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasket, E. (2019). All the ghosts in the machine: The digital afterlife of your personal data. Robinson.
   Google Scholar
• Kopytoff, I. (1986). The cultural biographpy of things: Commoitization as process. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective (pp. 64–91). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lastovicka, J., & Fernandez, K. (2005). Three paths to disposition: The movement of meaningful possessions to strangers. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 813–823. https://doi.org/10.1086/426616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima, V., & Belk, R. (2022). Harder, better, faster, stronger: Human enhancement technologies and the future of consumer well-being. The Journal of Services Marketing, 36(7), 885–894. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-09-2021-0363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malraux, A. (1947/1967). Museum without walls. Secker and Warburg.
   Google Scholar
• Mauriès, P. (2002). Cabinets of curiosities. Thames and Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• McCracken, G. (1986). Culture and consumption: A theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1086/209048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCracken, G. (1988). Culture and consumption: New approaches to the symbolic character of consumer goods and activities. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marriott, M. (1976). Hindu transactions: Diversity without dualism. In B. Kapferer (Ed.), Transaction and meaning: Directions in the anthropology of exchange and symbolic behavior (pp. 109–142). Institute for the Study of Human Issues.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, G., Diesendruck, G., & Bloom, P. (2011). Celebrity contagion and the value of objects. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1086/658999
   Google Scholar
• Pineto-Padoch, S. (2022). Tome after death: Material afterlives in the work of estate administration. Journal of Material Culture, 27(4), 432–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591835221132187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Possati, L. (2023). Psychoanalyzing artificial intelligence: The case of Replika. AI and Society, 38(4), 1724–1738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01379-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, L., Arnould, E., & Curasi, C. (2000). Older consumers’ disposition of special possessions. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1086/314319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartre, J.-P. (1943). Being and nothingness: A phenomenological inquiry on ontology. Philosophical Library.
   Google Scholar
• Sisto, D. (2020). Online afterlives: Immortality, memory, and grief in digital culture. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sisto, D. (2021). Remember me: Memory and forgetting in the digital age. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. (1988). The gender of the gift. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. (1999). Property, substance, and effect: Anthropological essays on persons and things. Athlone.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. J. (2024). Towards an ontology of consumers as distributed networks (or the end of ‘consumer research’ as we know it?): Retrospective insights from the praxeomorphism of Russell Belk’s ‘extended self’. Journal of Marketing Management, 40(7–8), 555–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2024.2345320
   Google Scholar
• Tian, K., & Belk, R. (2005). Extended self and possessions in the workplace. The Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 297–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winterich, K., Reczek, R., & Irwin, J. (2017). Keeping the memory but not the possession: Memory preservation mitigates identity loss from product disposition. Journal of Marketing, 81(5), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.16.0311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1958). The blue and Brown Books: Preliminary studies for the “philosophical investigations”. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar