Moving to Opportunity? An Examination of Housing Choice Vouchers on Urban Poverty Deconcentration in South Florida

References

• AndersonE. F. (2009) Vouching for landlords: Withdrawing from the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program and resulting disparate impact claims—Graoch Associates #33, L.P.v. Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Human Relations Commission, 508 F.3D 366 (6th Cir. 2007), University of Cincinnati Law Review, 78, pp. 371–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AnderssonR., MusterdS., GalsterG. & KauppinenT. M. (2007) What mix matters? Exploring the relationships between individuals' incomes and different measures of their neighbourhood context, Housing Studies, 22(5), pp. 637–660, doi:10.1080/02673030701474602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BanzhafH. S. & WalshR. P. (2013) Segregation and Tiebout sorting: The link between place-based investments and neighborhood tipping, Journal of Urban Economics, 74, pp. 83–98. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2012.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BasoloV. & NguyenM. T. (2005) Does mobility matter? The neighborhood conditions of housing voucher holders by race and ethnicity, Housing Policy Debate, 16(3–4), pp. 297–324. doi:10.1080/10511482.2005.9521546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BriggsX. de S. (1997) Moving up versus moving out: Neighborhood effects in housing mobility programs, Housing Policy Debate, 8(1), pp. 195–234. doi:10.1080/10511482.1997.9521252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BriggsX. de S., ComeyJ. & WeismannG. (2010) Struggling to stay out of high-poverty neighborhoods: Housing choice and locations in moving to opportunity's first decade, Housing Policy Debate, 20(3), pp. 383–427. doi:10.1080/10511481003788745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrooksF., LewinsonT., AszmanJ. & WolkJ. (2012) Voucher users and revitalized public-housing residents 6 years after displacement, Research on Social Work Practice, 22(1), pp. 10–19. doi:10.1177/1049731511412198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrownL. A. & ChungS.-Y. (2006) Spatial segregation, segregation indices and the geographical perspective, Population, Space and Place, 12(2), pp. 125–143. doi:10.1002/psp.403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BuronL. F., PopkmS., LevyD. K., HamsL. E. & KhaddunJ. (2002) The HOPE VI Resident Tracking Study: A Snapshot of the Current Living Situation of Original Residents from Eight Sites (Washington, DC: The Urban Institute)
   Google Scholar
• CarlsonD., HavemanR., KaplanT. & WolfeB. (2011) The benefits and costs of the Section 8 housing subsidy program: A framework and estimates of first-year effects, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(2), pp. 233–255. doi:10.1002/pam.20561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ComeyJ., BriggsX. de S. & WeismannG. (2008) Struggling to Stay Out of High-Poverty Neighborhoods: Lessons from Moving to Opportunity Experiment (Washington, DC: The Urban Institute)
   Google Scholar
• CrawfordW. G. (2007) The long hard fight for equal rights: A history of Broward County's colored beach and the Fort Lauderdale Beach “wade-ins” of the summer of 1961, Tequesta, 67, pp. 19–51.
   Google Scholar
• CrowleyS. (2003) The affordable housing crisis: Residential mobility of poor families and school mobility of poor children, The Journal of Negro Education, 72(1), pp. 22–38. doi:10.2307/3211288.
   Google Scholar
• DanielT. H. (2010) Bringing real choice to the Housing Choice Voucher program: Addressing voucher discrimination under the federal Fair Housing Act, The Georgetown Law Journal, 98, pp. 769–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLucaS., GarbodenP. M. E. & RosenblattP. (2013) Segregating shelter: How housing policies shape the residential locations of low-income minority families, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 647(1), pp. 268–299. doi:10.1177/0002716213479310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DevineD. J., GrayR. W., RubinL. & TaghaviL. B. (2003) Housing Choice Voucher Location Patterns: Implications for Participants and Neighborhood Welfare (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research)
   Google Scholar
• DuncanG. J. & ZuberiA. (2006) Mobility lessons from Gautreaux and moving to opportunity, Northwest Journal of Law and Social Policy, 1(1), pp. 110–126.
   Google Scholar
• EllenI. G. & TurnerM. A. (1997) Does neighborhood matter? Assessing recent evidence, Housing Policy Debate, 8(4), pp. 833–866. doi:10.1080/10511482.1997.9521280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EriksenM. D. & RossA. (2013) The impact of housing vouchers on mobility and neighborhood attributes, Real Estate Economics, 41(2), pp. 255–277. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6229.2012.00342.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FeinsJ. D. & PattersonR. (2005) Geographic mobility in the Housing Choice Voucher program: A study of families entering the program, 1995–2002, Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 8(2), pp. 21–47.
   Google Scholar
• GalsterG. & KillenS. (1995) The geography of metropolitan opportunity: A reconnaissance and conceptual framework, Housing Policy Debate, 6(1), pp. 7–43. doi:10.1080/10511482.1995.9521180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GalvezM. M. (2011) Defining “choice” in the Housing Choice Voucher program: The role of market constraints and household preferences in location outcomes, Doctoral dissertation, New York University, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• GayC. (2012) Moving to opportunity: The political effects of a housing mobility experiment, Urban Affairs Review, 48(2), pp. 147–179. doi:10.1177/1078087411426399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GennetianL., SanbonmatsuL., KatzL. F., KlingJ. R., SciandraM., LudwigJ., DuncanG. J. & KesslerR. C. (2012) The long-term effects of moving to opportunity on youth outcomes, Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 14(2), pp. 137–168.
   Google Scholar
• GoeringJ., FeinsJ. D. & RichardsonT. M. (2003) What have we learned about housing mobility and poverty deconcentration? in: J.Goering & J.Feins (Eds) Choosing a Better Life?: Evaluating the Moving to Opportunity Experiment, pp. 3–36 (Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press)
   Google Scholar
• GoetzE. G. (2002) Forced relocation vs. voluntary mobility: The effects of dispersal programmes on households, Housing Studies, 17(1), pp. 107–123. doi:10.1080/02673030120105938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoetzE. G. (2003) Housing dispersal programs, Journal of Planning Literature, 18(1), pp. 3–16. doi:10.1177/0885412203251339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HairJ. F., AndersonR. E., TathamR. L. & BlackW. C. (1992) Multivariate data analysis (New York: Macmillan)
   Google Scholar
• HartungJ. M. & HenigJ. R. (1997) Housing vouchers and certificates as a vehicle for deconcentrating the poor: Evidence from the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area, Urban Affairs Review, 32(3), pp. 403–419. doi:10.1177/107808749703200305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HornK. M. & O'ReganK. M. (2011) The low income housing tax credit and racial segregation, Housing Policy Debate, 21(3), pp. 443–473. doi:10.1080/10511482.2011.591536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illinois Assisted Housing Action Research Project (IHARP) (2011) Moving or Moving Up? Understanding Residential Mobility for Housing Choice Voucher Families in Illinois (Chicago, IL: Housing Action Illinois; Center for Neighborhood and Community Improvement, University of Illinois at Chicago; National Center on Poverty Law)
   Google Scholar
• KhadduriJ. (2001) Deconcentration: What do we mean? What do we want?Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 5(2), pp. 69–84.
   Google Scholar
• LaddH. F. & LudwigJ. (1997) Federal housing assistance, residential relocation, and educational opportunities: Evidence from Baltimore, American Economic Review, 87(2), pp. 272–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LichterD. T., ParisiD. & TaquinoM. C. (2012) The geography of exclusion, Social Problems, 59(3), pp. 364–388. doi:10.1525/sp.2012.59.3.364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MasseyD. S., RothwellJ. & DominaT. (2009) The changing bases of segregation in the United States, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 626(1), pp. 74–90. doi:10.1177/0002716209343558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClureK. (2005) Rent burden in the Housing Choice Voucher program, Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 8(2), pp. 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• McClureK. (2010) The prospects for guiding Housing Choice Voucher households to high-opportunity neighborhoods, Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 12(3), pp. 101–122.
   Google Scholar
• McClureK. (2013) Which metropolitan areas work best for poverty deconcentration with Housing Choice Vouchers?Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 15(3), pp. 209–236.
   Google Scholar
• NewmanS. J. & SchnareA. B. (1997) “… and a suitable living environment”: The failure of housing programs to deliver on neighborhood quality, Housing Policy Debate, 8(4), pp. 703–741. doi:10.1080/10511482.1997.9521275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OakleyD. & BurchfieldK. (2009) Out of the projects, still in the hood: The spatial constraints on public-housing residents' relocation in Chicago, Journal of Urban Affairs, 31(5), pp. 589–614. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2009.00454.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OwensA. (2012) Neighborhoods on the rise: A typology of neighborhoods experiencing socioeconomic ascent, City & Community, 11(4), pp. 345–369. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6040.2012.01412.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ParkM. (2013) Housing vouchers as a means of poverty deconcentration and race desegregation: Patterns and factors of voucher recipients' spatial concentration in Cleveland, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 28(3), pp. 451–468. doi:10.1007/s10901-012-9319-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PendallR. (2000) Why voucher and certificate users live in distressed neighborhoods, Housing Policy Debate, 11(4), pp. 881–910. doi:10.1080/10511482.2000.9521391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PopkinS. & CunninghamK. (2000) Searching for Rental Housing with Section 8 in the Chicago Region (Washington, DC: The Urban Institute)
   Google Scholar
• PRRAC (2013) Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing at HUD: A First Term Report Card (Washington, DC: Poverty & Race Research Action Council)
   Google Scholar
• RosenblattP. & DeLucaS. (2012) “We don't live outside, we live in here”: Neighborhood and residential mobility decisions among low-income families, City and Community, 11(3), pp. 254–284. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6040.2012.01413.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimberg Center for Housing Studies (2013) 2013 Rental Market Study: Affordable Rental Housing Needs (Gainesville, FL: University of Florida)
   Google Scholar
• SobelM. E. (2006) What do randomized studies of housing mobility demonstrate?, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101(476), pp. 1398–1407. doi:10.1198/016214506000000636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TeaterB. (2008) Residential mobility of Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program recipients: Assessing changes in poverty and racial composition in neighborhoods, Journal of Poverty, 12(3), pp. 351–371. doi:10.1080/10875540802198651.
   Google Scholar
• TeaterB. (2009) Factors predicting residential mobility among the recipients of the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program, Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 36(3), pp. 159–178.
   Google Scholar
• TurnerM. A. (1998) Moving out of poverty: Expanding mobility and choice through tenant-based housing assistance, Housing Policy Debate, 9(2), pp. 373–394. doi:10.1080/10511482.1998.9521299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TurnerM. A., PopkinS. & CunninghamM. (1999) Section 8 Mobility and Neighborhood Health: Emerging Issues and Policy Challenges (Washington, DC: The Urban Institute)
   Google Scholar
• TurnerM. A. & WilsonC. (1998) Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing: Neighborhood Outcomes for Tenant-Based Assistance in Six Metropolitan Areas (Washington, DC: The Urban Institute)
   Google Scholar
• VaradyD. P. & WalkerC. C. (2000) Vouchering out distressed subsidized developments: Does moving lead to improvements in housing and neighborhood conditions?Housing Policy Debate, 11(1), pp. 115–162. doi:10.1080/10511482.2000.9521365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VaradyD. P. & WalkerC. C. (2007) Neighborhood Choices: Section 8 Housing Vouchers and Residential Mobility (New Brunswick, NJ: CURP Press)
   Google Scholar
• VaradyD., WalkerC. & WangX. (2001) Voucher recipient achievement of improved housing conditions in the US: Do moving distance and relocation services matter?Urban Studies, 38(8), pp. 1273–1304. doi:10.1080/00420980124918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangX. & VaradyD. P. (2005) Using hot-spot analysis to study the clustering of Section 8 housing voucher families, Housing Studies, 20(1), pp. 29–48. doi:10.1080/0267303042000308714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangX., VaradyD. P. & WangY. (2008) Measuring the deconcentration of Housing Choice Voucher program recipients in eight U.S. metropolitan areas using hot spot analysis, Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 10(1), pp. 65–90.
   Google Scholar
• WoodM., TurnhamJ. & MillsG. (2008) Housing affordability and family well-being: Results from the housing voucher evaluation, Housing Policy Debate, 19(2), pp. 367–412. doi:10.1080/10511482.2008.9521639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WylyE. & DeFilippisJ. (2010) Mapping public housing: The case of New York City, City & Community, 9(1), pp. 61–86. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6040.2009.01306.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar