Nuancing the international debate on social mix: evidence from Copenhagen

References

• Allen, C., Powell, R., Casey, R, Coward, S. (2007) ‘Ordinary, the same as anywhere else' notes on the management of spoiled identity in `marginal' middle-class neighbourhoods, Sociology, 41(2), pp. 239–258.
   Google Scholar
• Alves, S. (2015) Welfare state changes and outcomes: The cases of Portugal and Denmark from a comparative perspective. Social Policy & Administration, 49(1), pp. 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves, S. (2016), Spaces of inequality: It’s not differentiation, it is inequality! A socio-spatial analysis of the City of Porto, Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 15(3), pp. 409–431, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/pjss.15.3.409_1
   Google Scholar
• Alves, S. (2017a) Assessing the impact of area-based initiatives in deprived neighborhoods: The example of S. João de Deus in Porto, Portugal. Journal of Urban Affairs, 39(3), pp. 381–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves, S. (2017b) Poles apart? A comparative study of housing policies and outcomes in Portugal and Denmark. Housing, Theory and Society, 37(2), pp. 221–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, H. T. (2012) The solidity of urban socio-spatial structures, in: T. Maloutas, & K. Fujita (Eds.) Residential Segregation in Comparative Perspective: Making Sense of Contextual Diversity, pp. 177–196 (Copenhagen: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, H. T., Blach, V., Nielsen, R. S., & Beckman, A. W. (2014) Assessment of Urban Policies on Diversity in Copenhagen (Copenhagen: Danish Building Research Institute, Aalborg University).
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, E., Malmberg, B., Costa, R., Sleutjes, B, Stonawski, M., Valk, H. (2017) A comparative study of segregation patterns in Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands and Sweden: Neighbourhood Concentration and Representation of Non-European Migrants, ResSegr Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, R., Bråmå, Å. & Holmqvist, E. (2010) Counteracting segregation: Swedish policies and experiences. Housing studies 25(2), pp. 237–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthurson, K. (2008) Australian public housing and the diverse histories of social mix, Journal of Urban History, 34(3), pp. 484–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthurson, K., Levin, I, & Ziersch, A. (2015) What is the meaning of ‘social mix’? Shifting perspectives in planning and implementing public housing estate redevelopment, Australian Geographer, 46(4), pp. 491–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolt, G. (2009) Combating residential segregation of ethnic minorities in European cities, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24, pp. 397–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolt, G., & van Kempen, R (2013). Introduction special issue: Mixing neighbourhoods: Success or failure? Cities, 35, 391–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1999) Site effects, in: Bourdieu et al. (Eds). The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society, pp. 123–129. (Cambridge: Polity Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bridge, G., Butler, T. & Le Galès, P. (2014) Power relations and social mix in metropolitan neighbourhoods in North America and Europe: Moving beyond gentrification? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(4), pp. 1133–1141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, H., Larsen, H. G. & Olesen, K. (2015) A planning palimpsest: Neoliberal planning in a welfare state intervention, European Journal of Spatial Development, 58, pp. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, G. (2015) A Danish tale of why social mix is so difficult to increase, Housing Studies, 30(2), pp. 252–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, I., & Etherington, D. (2005) Neighbourhood renewal policy and spatial differentiation in housing markets: Recent trends in England and Denmark. European Journal of Housing Policy, 5(1), pp. 75–77.
   Google Scholar
• Colomb, C. (2007) Unpacking new labour's ‘Urban Renaissance’ agenda: Towards a socially sustainable reurbanization of British cities?, Planning Practice & Research, 22(1), pp. 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Doucet, B., & Koenders, D. (2018) ‘At least it's not a ghetto anymore’: Experiencing gentrification and ‘false choice urbanism’ in Rotterdam's Afrikaanderwijk. Urban Studies, 55(16), pp. 3631–3649.
   Google Scholar
• Engberg, L. and Larsen, J. N. (2010) Context-orientated meta-governance in Danish Urban regeneration, Planning Theory & Practice, 11(4), pp. 549–571.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. (2005) Cities and diversity should we want it? Can we plan for it? Urban affairs Review, 41(1), pp. 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincher, R., Iveson, K., Leitner, H., & Preston, V. (2014) Planning in the multicultural city: Celebrating diversity or reinforcing difference? Progress in Planning, 92, pp. 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galland, D. (2012) Understanding the reorientations and roles of spatial planning: The case of national planning policy in Denmark, European Planning Studies, 20(8), pp. 1359–1392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G. & Friedrichs, J. (2015) The dialectic of neighborhood social mix: Editors' introduction to the special issue, Housing Studies, 30(2), pp. 175–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society, Outline of the Theory of Structuration (Cambridge: Polity Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, A. L., Andersen, H. T., & Clark, E. (2001) Creative Copenhagen: Globalization, urban governance and social change, European Planning Studies, 9(7), 851–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heringa, A., Bolt, B. & Dijst, M. (2017) Path-dependency in segregation and social networks in the Netherlands, Social & Cultural Geography, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2017.1301541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, E. and Bergsten, Z. (2009) Swedish social mix policy: A general policy without an explicit ethnic focus, Journal of the Housing and the Built Environment, 24, pp. 477–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, T. G. (2016) Neither trust nor distrust: Social relations in a multi-ethnic neighbourhood in Copenhagen. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 6(1), pp. 25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen and Stensgaard. (2016) Creating Affordable Housing through self-management: Experiences from a Danish concept, Paper presented at Boligforskerseminar, København.
   Google Scholar
• Joans, H. and Knobl, W. (2009) Social Theory. Twenty Introductory Lectures (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, G, AErø, T. (2008) Urban Policy in the Nordic Countries—National Foci and Strategies for Implementation. European Planning Studies, 16(1), pp. 23–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Galès, P. and Therborn, G. (2009) ‘Cities’, in: S. Immerfall and G. Therborn (Eds.), Handbook of European Societies: Social Transformations in the 21st Century, pp. 59–89 (New York, NY: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Lees, L. (2008) Gentrification and social mixing: Towards an inclusive urban renaissance? Urban Studies, 45(12), pp. 2449–2470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lelévrier, C. (2013) Social mix neighbourhood policies and social interaction: The experience of newcomers in three new renewal developments in France. Cities, 35, pp. 409–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malheiros, J., Carvalho, R., & Mendes, L. (2013) Gentrification, residential ethnicization and the social production of fragmented space: A comparison between two multi-ethnic neighbourhoods in Lisbon and Bilbao. Finisterra: Revista Portuguesa de Geografia, 48(96), pp. 109–135.
   Google Scholar
• Manley, D., & van Ham, M. (2012) Neighbourhood effects, housing tenure and individual employment outcomes, in: Neighbourhood Effects Research: New Perspectives, pp. 147–173 (Netherlands: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Monk, S., Clarke, A. & Tang, C. P. Y. (2011) Mixed Communities Literature Review. Scottish Government Social Research, The Scottish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, N., & Burgess, G. (2014) Inclusionary housing policy in England: The impact of the downturn on the delivery of affordable housing through Section 106. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29(3), pp. 423–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munk, A. (2007) Ten years of integrated urban regeneration, in: Jensen, E. and Munk, A. (Eds.), KVARTERLØFT 10 Years of Urban Regeneration, pp. 9–12 (The Ministry of Refugees, Immigration and Integration Affairs).
   Google Scholar
• Musterd, S. & Ostendorf, W. (2012) Inequalities in European cities, in: S. J. Smith, M. Elsinga, L. F. O’Mahony, O. S. Eng, S. Wachter, and D. Clapham (Eds.) International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home, pp. 49–55. (Oxford, UK: Elsevier).
   Google Scholar
• Municipality of Copenhagen. (2011) Policy for Disadvantaged Areas, The Technical & Environmental Administration. Accessed at: http://kk.sites.itera.dk/apps/kk_pub2/pdf/869_yNq8vh4bJF.pdf, 29 May 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, A., McKee, M. J., Sautkina, E., Cox, J. & Bond, L. (2013) How to mix? Spatial configurations, modes of production and resident perceptions of mixed tenure neighbourhoods”, Cities, 35, pp. 397–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilminster, R. (2013) Critique and overcritique in sociology, Human Figurations: Long-term Perspectives on the Human Condition, 2(2), Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.11217607.0002.205
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, H. (2002) Social housing policy and the welfare state: A Danish perspective. Urban Studies, 39(2), pp. 255–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, J. N., & Nørgaard, H. (2003) From Slum Clearance and Housing Renewal to Networking and Area-based Approaches on the Origins of Contemporary Danish Urban Development Programmes, pp. 43–57. (Antwerp: Garant).
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, H. G., & Hansen, A. L. (2008) Gentrification—Gentle or traumatic? Urban renewal policies and socioeconomic transformations in Copenhagen. Urban Studies, 45(12), pp. 2429–2448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olesen, K., & Carter, H. (2018) Planning as a barrier for growth: Analysing storylines on the reform of the Danish Planning Act. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(4), pp. 689–707.
   Google Scholar
• Peral, E. B. & Ramos, A. (2014) Neighbours: Determinants of whom Europeans want to keep a distance, in: W. Arts & L. Halman (Eds.) Value contrasts and consensus in present-day Europe: Painting Europe's moral landscapes, pp. 117–141 (Leiden: Brill).
   Google Scholar
• Pugalis, Lee (2016) Austere state strategies: Regenerating for recovery and the resignification of regeneration. Local Government Studies, 42(1), pp. 52–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rangvid, B. S. (2007) Living and learning separately? Ethnic segregation of school children in Copenhagen. Urban studies, 44(7), pp. 1329–1354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer, M. & Blotevogel, H. (2012) Comparing spatial planning practice in Europe: A plea for cultural sensitization, Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), pp. 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D., Germain, A., Bacqué, M. H., Bridge, G., Fijalkow, Y., & Slater, T. (2013) ‘Social mix’ and neighbourhood revitalization in a transatlantic perspective: Comparing local policy discourses and expectations in Paris (France), Bristol (UK) and Montréal (Canada). International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(2), pp. 430–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkissian, W. (1976) The idea of social mix in town planning: An historical review, Urban Studies, 13(23), pp. 1–246.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, M., Cunningham, N., Devine, F., Friedman, S., Laurison, D., Mckenzie, L., Miles, A., Snee, H. and Wakeling, P. (2015) Social Class in the 21st century, Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schnell, I. & Ostendorf, W. (2002) Studies in Segregation and Desegregation (London: Ashgate Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Selim, G. (2015) The landscape of differences: Contact and segregation in the everyday encounters. Cities, 46, pp. 16–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skifter-Andersen, H. (2002) Can deprived housing areas be revitalised? Efforts against segregation neighbourhood decay in Denmark and Europe. Urban Studies, 39(4), 767–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skifter-Andersen, H. (2012) Housing Policy in the Nordic Countries and its Implication for the Housing of Immigrants (Aalborg University: Danish Building Research Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Skifter-Andersen, H. (2016) Selective moving behaviour in ethnic neighbourhoods: White flight, white avoidance, ethnic attraction or ethnic retention? Housing Studies DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2016.1208161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørvoll, J. & Bengtsson, B. (2018) Mechanisms of solidarity in collaborative housing – The case of co-operative housing in Denmark 1980–2017, Housing, Theory and Society, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2018.1467341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tersteeg, A. K. & Pinkster, F. M. (2015) “Us up here and them down there”: How design, management, and neighbourhood facilities shape social distance in a mixed-tenure housing development, Urban Affairs Review, pp. 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. (2018) Bourdieu comes to town: Pertinence, principles, applications, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 42(1), pp. 90–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L., Slater, T., & Pereira, V. B. (2014) Territorial stigmatization in action, Environment and Planning A, 46(6), pp. 1270–1280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warr, D., Davern, M., Mann, R. & Gunn, L. (2017) Diversifying experiences of community and the implications for addressing place-based poverty, Urban Policy and Research, 35(2) pp. 150–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessel, T. (2009) Does diversity in urban space enhance intergroup contact and tolerance? Geografiska Annaler: Series B. Human Geography, 91(1), pp. 5–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2002) Inclusion and Democracy (Oxford: University Press Scholarship Online).
   Google Scholar
• Ziersch, A., Arthurson, K & Levin, I. (2018) Support for tenure mix by residents local to the Carlton Housing Estate, Melbourne, Australia, Housing Studies, 33(1), pp. 58–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar