The effect of market conditions on the housing outcomes of subsidized households: the case of the US voucher programme

References

• Basolo, V. & Nguyen, M. T. (2005) Does mobility matter? The neighborhood conditions of housing voucher holders by race and ethnicity, Housing Policy Debate, 16(3–4), pp. 297–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatman, D. G., Broaddus, A., Young, C. & Brill, M. (2013) The Role of Behavioral Economics in Residential Choice: A Pilot Study of Travel Patterns, Housing Characteristics, Social Connections, and Subjective Well-Being. (Berkeley, CA: University of California Transportation Center).
   Google Scholar
• Collinson, R. & Ganong, P. (2016) The incidence of housing voucher generosity, (April). Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=2255799 (accessed 2 November 2016).
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, S., Garboden, P. M. E. & Rosenblatt, P. (2013) Segregating shelter: How housing policies shape the residential locations of low-income minority families, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 647(1), pp. 268–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, D., Gray, R. W., Rubin, L. & Taghavi, L. B. (2003) Housing Choice Voucher Location Patterns: Implications for Participants and Neighborhood Welfare (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research).
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, T. (2016) Red hot Bay Area housing puts chill on Section 8, Oakland Tribune, 17 June.
   Google Scholar
• Edin, K., DeLuca, S. & Owens, A. (2012) Constrained compliance: Solving the puzzle of MTO’s lease-up rates and why mobility matters, Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 14(2), pp. 181–194.
   Google Scholar
• Eggers, F. J. & Moumen, F. (2013) American Housing Survey: Housing Adequacy and Quality as Measured by the AHS (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research).
   Google Scholar
• Ellen, I. G., Horn, K. M. & Schwartz, A. E. (2014) Why don’t Housing Choice Voucher recipients live near better schools? Insights from big data, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(4), pp. 1047–1049.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, M. D. & Ross, A. (2013) The impact of housing vouchers on mobility and neighborhood attributes, Real Estate Economics, 41(2), pp. 255–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feins, J. D. & Patterson, R. (2005) Geographic mobility in the Housing Choice Voucher Program: A study of families entering the program, 1995–2002, Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 8(2), pp. 21–47.
   Google Scholar
• Galvez, M. M. (2011) Defining “Choice” in the Housing Choice Voucher Program: The Role of Market Constraints and Household Preferences in Location Outcomes (New York: New York University).
   Google Scholar
• Graves, E. (2016) Rooms for improvement: A qualitative metasynthesis of the Housing Choice Voucher Program, Housing Policy Debate, 26(2), pp. 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, K. M., Ellen, I. G. & Schwartz, A. E. (2013) Do Housing choice voucher holders live near good schools? Journal of Housing Economics, 23, pp. 28–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, B. J. & Turner, M. A. (2001) Who should run the housing voucher program ? A reform proposal, Housing Policy Debate, 12(2), pp. 239–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleit, R. G., Kang, S. & Scally, C. P. (2016) Why do housing mobility programs fail in moving households to better neighborhoods? Housing Policy Debate, 26(1), pp. 188–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lens, M. (2014) Employment accessibility among housing subsidy recipients, Housing Policy Debate, 24(4), pp. 671–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lens, M. C. (2013) Safe, but could be safer: Why do HCVP households live in higher crime neighborhoods, Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 15(3), pp. 131–152.
   Google Scholar
• Lussier, J. (2013) Section 8 Housing Vouchers : Better Neighborhoods, Greater Mobility for Low-Income Households? Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations (1536655).
   Google Scholar
• McClure, K. (2017) The future of housing policy: Fungibility of rental housing programs to better fit with market need, Housing Policy Debate, 27(3), pp. 486–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure, K. & Johnson, B. (2015). Housing programs fail to deliver on neighborhood quality, reexamined, Housing Policy Debate, 25(3), pp. 463–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. W. (2014) The reconcentration of poverty: Patterns of Housing Voucher use, 2000 to 2008, Housing Policy Debate, 3(24), pp. 544–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, S. J. & Garboden, P. M. E. (2013) Psychometrics of housing quality measurement in the American Housing Survey, Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 15(1), pp. 293–306.
   Google Scholar
• O’Regan, K. (2017) People and place in low-income housing policy, Housing Policy Debate, 27(2), pp. 315–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, E. O., Tyler, C. A., King, J. W. & Carrilo, P. E. (2005) The effects of different types of housing assistance on earnings and employment, Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 8(2), pp. 163–187.
   Google Scholar
• Pashup, J., Edin, K., Duncan, G. & Burke, K. (2005) Participation in a residential mobility program from the client’s perspective: Findings from Gautreaux Two, Housing Policy Debate, 16(3–4), pp. 361–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendall, R. (2000) Why voucher and certificate users live in distressed neighborhoods, Housing Policy Debate, 11(4), pp. 881–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, C. (2017) The Relationship Between Participation in the Housing Choice Voucher Program and Neighborhood Satisfaction Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations Publishing (10267702).
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, P. & DeLuca, S. (2012) “We don’t live outside, we live in here”: Neighborhood and residential mobility decisions among low-income families? City and Community, 11(3), pp. 254–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, L. M., Shlay, A. B. & Picon, M. G. (2012) You can’t always get what you want : The role of Public Housing and Vouchers in achieving residential satisfaction, Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 14(1), pp. 35–54.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. F. (2015) Housing Policy in the United States (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. & Mcclure, K. (2016) Vouchers and Neighborhood Distress : The Unrealized Potential for Families With Housing Choice Vouchers To Reside in Neighborhoods With Low Levels of Distress, Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 18(3), pp. 207–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. E., Naparstek, A., Popkin, S., Bartlett, L., Bates, L., Cigna, J., Crane, R. & Vinson, E. (2002). Housing Choice for HOPE VI Relocatees (Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Teater, B. (2009) A place to call “home”: Exploring the experiences of Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program recipients in their efforts to find housing, Families in Society, 90(3), pp. 271–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, R. J., Li, Y. & Atherwood, S. (2015) Moving to opportunity? An examination of Housing Choice Vouchers on urban poverty deconcentration in South Florida’, Housing Studies, 30(7), pp. 1064–1091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, R., Larsen, K. & Ray, A. (2015) Rethinking locational outcomes for housing choice vouchers: A case study in Duval County, Florida’, Housing Policy Debate, 25(4), pp. 715–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, H. (2014) When only a house makes a home: How home selection matters in the residential mobility decisions of lower-income, inner-city African American families, Social Service Review, 88(2), pp. 264–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshihama, M. & Gillespie, B. W. (2002) Age adjustment and recall bias in the analysis of domestic violence data: Methodological improvements through the application of survival analysis methods, Journal of Family Violence, 17(3), pp. 199–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar