Bridging the communication gap between Generation Y and the Baby Boomer generation

References

• Bente, G., & Krämer, N. C. (2011). Virtual gestures: Embodiment and nonverbal behaviour in computer-mediated communication. In A. Kappas & N. C. Kramer (Eds.), Face-to-face communication over the internet (pp. 176–210). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511977589
   Google Scholar
• Black, A. (2010). Gen Y: Who they are and how they learn. Educational Horizons, 88(2), 92–101.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, A., Martin, C. A., & Bush, V. D. (2004). Sports celebrity influence on the behavioural intentions of Generation Y. Journal of Advertising Research, 44, 108–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duck, S., & McMahan, D. T. (2009). The basics of communication – A relational perspective. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eckleberry-Hunt, J., & Tucciarone, J. (2011). The challenges and opportunities of teaching “Generation Y”. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 3(4), 458–461.10.4300/JGME-03-04-15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edmund, J., & Turner, B. (2002). Generations: Culture and society. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enrico, P., Bitti R., & Garotti, P. L. (2011). Nonverbal communication and cultural differences: Issues for face-to-face communication over the internet. In A. Kappas & N. C. Kramer (Eds.), Face-to-face communication over the internet (pp. 81–99). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511977589
   Google Scholar
• Feiertag, J., & Berge, Z. L. (2008). Training Generation N: How educators should approach the net generation. Education + Training, 50(6), 457–464.10.1108/00400910810901782
   Google Scholar
• Glass, A. (2007). Understanding generational differences for competitive success. Industrial and Commercial Training, 39, 98–103.10.1108/00197850710732424
   Google Scholar
• Guy, R. (2012). The use of social media for academic practice: A review of literature. Kentucky Journal of Higher Education Policy and Practice, 1(2) Article 7, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, J. L., & McCambridge, J. (2011). Optimizing millennials’ communication styles. Business Communication Quarterly, 74(1), 22–44.10.1177/1080569910395564
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, M. (2003). The Web Generation? The (de) construction of users, morals and consumption. Retrieved February 02, 2012, from http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/EMTEL/reports/h2003_emtel.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Helsper, E., & Enyon, R. (2009). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520. doi:10.1080/01411920902989227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helyer, R., & Lee, D. (2012). The twenty‐first century multiple generation workforce. Education + Training, 54(7), 565–578.10.1108/00400911211265611
   Google Scholar
• Heng, C. Y., & Yazdanifard, R. (2013). Generation gap: Is there a solid solution? From human relation point of view. International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sciences, 2(10), 837–840.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next greatest generation. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, S. (2012). Technology and generations. India: SHRM.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., & knight, D. K., & Crutsinger, C., (2009). Generation Y employee retail work experience: the mediating effect of job characteristics. Journal of Business Research, 62, 548–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutropoulos, A. (2011). Digital natives: Ten years after. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(4), 525–538.
   Google Scholar
• Krohn, F. B. (2004). A generational approach to using emoticons as nonverbal communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 34(4), 321–328.10.2190/9EQH-DE81-CWG1-QLL9
   Google Scholar
• Liu, W., Pasman, G., Stappers, P. J., & Taal-Fokker, J. (2012). Making the office catch up: Comparing Generation Y interactions at home and at work (pp. 349–352). Newcastle: DIS 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, S. K. (2008). The nonverbal communication functions of emoticons in computer-mediated communication. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 11(5), 595–597. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0132
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lui, W. (2012). Generation Y interactions. Doctoral consortium, IUI’12, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 349–352.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. T. (2013). Increasing student participation in online group discussions via Facebook. AER (Astronomy Education Review), 12(1), 0010103. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/AER2012031
   Google Scholar
• Nichol, J., & Watson, K. (2000). Videotutoring, non-verbal communication and initial teacher training. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(2), 135–144.10.1111/bjet.2000.31.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, S. M., & Schewe, C. D. (2003). Cohort segmentation: an exploration of its validity. Journal of Business Research, 56, 979–987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, S. M., Schewe, C. D., & Kuhr, M. (2004). Preferences in health care service and treatment: a generational perspective. Journal of Business Research, 57, 1033–1041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosko, A., Wood, E., Zivcakova, L., Molema, S., De Pasquale, D., & Archer, K. (2013). Disclosure and use of privacy settings in FacebookTM profiles: Evaluating the impact of media context and gender. Social Networking, 2, 1–8. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/s.2013.2100110.4236/sn.2013.21001
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, B., & Lea, M. (2011). Video-linking emotions. In A. Kappas & N. C. Kramer (Eds.), Face-to-face communication over the internet (pp. 100–126). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511977589
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants: Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, P. (2012). Understanding and teaching Generation Y. English Teaching Forum, 1, 2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Rindfleisch, A. (1994). Cohort generational influences on consumer socialization. In C. T. Allen & D. J. Roedder (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research (pp. 470–476). Duluth: Association of Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Sherblom, J. C. (2010). The computer-mediated communication (CMC) classroom: A challenge of medium, presence, interaction, identity, and relationship. Communication Education, 59(4), 497–523.10.1080/03634523.2010.486440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, D., & Theiss, J. (2013). Interpersonal communication – Putting theory into practice. New York, NY: Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group).
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, P. (2012). Social networking and its impact on education-system in contemporary era. International Journal of Information Technology Infrastructure, 1(2), 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. (Ed.). (2002a). Bridge not walls – A book about interpersonal communication (pp. 3–13). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. (2002b). Communicating and interpersonal communicating. In J. Stewart (Ed.), Bridge not walls – A book about interpersonal communication (pp. 16–45). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J., & Logan, C. (2002). Verbal and nonverbal dimensions of talk. In J. Stewart (Ed.), Bridge not walls – A book about interpersonal communication (pp. 117–143). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, C. F. (2010). Mom just Facebooked me and dad knows how to text: The influences of computer-mediated communication on interpersonal communication and differences through generations. Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications (Elon University), 1, 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Urbain, C., Gonzalez, C., & Le Gall-Ely, M. (2013). What does the future hold for giving? An approach using the social representations of Generation Y. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 18, 159–171. doi:10.1002/nvsm.1448
   Google Scholar
• Walmsley, A. L. E. (2011, October/November). Closing the communication gap. Educational Horizons, 90(1), 25–26.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (2011). Visual cues in computer-mediated communication: Sometimes less is more. In A. Kappas & N. C. Kramer (Eds.), Face-to-face communication over the internet (pp. 17–38). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511977589
   Google Scholar
• Wolberg, J. M., & Pokrywczynski, J. (2001). A psychographic analysis of Generation Y college students. Journal of Advertising Research, September-October, 33–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen, C., & Tu, C. (2008). Online social presence – A study in score validity of the computer-mediated communication questionnaire. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9, 297–310.
   Google Scholar
• Yuasa, M., Saito, K., & Mukawa, N. (2011). Brain activity when reading sentences and emoticons: An fMRI study of verbal and nonverbal communication. Electronics and Communications in Japan, 94, 17–24.10.1002/ecj.v94.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar