Peers, proactivity, and problem-solving: A multilevel study of team impacts on stress appraisals of problem-solving demands

References

• Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Culpepper, S. A. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1490–1528. doi: 10.1177/0149206313478188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity and innovation inorganizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 634–665. doi: 10.2307/2393475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspinwall, L. G., & Taylor, S. E. (1997). A stitch in time: Self-regulation and proactive coping. Psychological Bulletin, 121(3), 417–436. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins, P. W., & Wood, R. E. (2002). Self versus others’ ratings as predictors of assessmet center ratings: Validation evidence for 360-degree feedback programs. Personnel Psychology, 55(4), 871–904. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00133.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2018). Labour Force, Australia, Detailed, Quarterly, Feb 2018, cat. no. 6291.0.55.003. Retrieved from: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/mf/6291.0.55.003
   Google Scholar
• Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 45–68. doi: 10.1002/job.179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359–373. doi: 10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beehr, T. A., Glaser, K. M., Canali, K. G., & Wallwey, D. A. (2001). Back to basics: Re-examination of demand-control theory of occupational stress. Work & Stress, 15(2), 115–130. doi: 10.1080/02678370110067002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, W. R., Olson-Buchanan, J. B., & LePine, M. A. (2004). Relations between stress and work outcomes: The role of felt challenge, job control, and psychological strain. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 165–181. doi: 10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00049-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers.. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 65–74. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.85.1.65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234–246. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., Mathieu, J. E., & Bliese, P. D. (2005). A framework for conducting multi-level construct validation. In F. J. Yammarino, & F. Dansereau (Eds.), Multi-Level Issues in organizational Behavior and processes Vol. 3 (pp. 273–303). West Yorkshire: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, J. M., & Huffcutt, A. I. (1997). Psychometric properties of multisource performance ratings: A meta-analysis of subordinate, supervisor, peer, and self-ratings. Human Performance, 10(4), 331–360. doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup1004_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, K., Wimalasiri, V., Beesley, N., & Cheyne, A. (2012). Affective well-being and within-day beliefs about job demands’ influence on work performance: An experience sampling study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85(4), 666–674. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.2012.02062.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drach-Zahavy, A., & Erez, M. (2002). Challenge versus threat effects on the goal–performance relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88(2), 667–682. doi: 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00004-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druskat, V. U., & Kayes, D. C. (2000). Learning versus performance in short-term project teams. Small Group Research, 31(3), 328–353. doi: 10.1177/104649640003100304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, D., Schmidt, L. C., & Alexander, P. A. (2016). Predicting creative problem solving in engineering design. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 50–66. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. doi: 10.2307/2666999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrhart, M. G., Schneider, B., & Macey, W. H. (2014). Organizational climate and culture: An introduction to theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espedido, A., & Searle, B. J. (2018). Goal difficulty and creative performance: The mediating role of stress appraisal. Human Performance, 31(3), 179–196. doi: 10.1080/08959285.2018.1499024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrada, C. A., Isen, A. M., & Young, M. J. (1994). Positive affect improves creative problem solving and influences reported source of practice satisfaction in physicians. Motivation and Emotion, 18(4), 285–299. doi: 10.1007/BF02856470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck, M. W., & Calvo, M. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition & Emotion, 6, 409–434. doi: 10.1080/02699939208409696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, P. J., Cohen, S., Hamrick, N., & Lepore, S. J. (2004). Psychological stress, appraisal, emotion and cardiovascular response in a public speaking task. Psychology & Health, 19(3), 353–368. doi: 10.1080/0887044042000193497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). 4. Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23(1), 133–187. doi: 10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23005-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugate, M., Prussia, G. E., & Kinicki, A. J. (2012). Managing Employee Withdrawal During Organizational Change. Journal of Management, 38(3), 890–914. doi: 10.1177/0149206309352881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Chas, R., Neira-Fontela, E., & Varela-Neira, C. (2015). Comparing the explanatory capacity of three constructs in the prediction of engineers' proficiency, adaptivity, and proactivity. Human Resource Management, 54(4), 689–709. doi:10.1002/hrm.21639
   Google Scholar
• González-Morales, M. G., & Neves, P. (2015). When stressors make you work: Mechanisms linking challenge stressors to performance. Work & Stress, 29(3), 213–229. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2015.1074628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., & Parker, S. K. (2009). 7 Redesigning Work Design Theories: The Rise of Relational and Proactive Perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 317–375. doi: 10.1080/19416520903047327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenglass, E. R., & Fiksenbaum, L. (2009). Proactive Coping, Positive Affect, and Well-Being. European Psychologist, 14(1), 29–39. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040.14.1.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenglass, E. R., Fiksenbaum, L., & Eaton, J. (2006). The relationship between coping, social support, functional disability and depression in the elderly. Anxiety, Stress & Coping: An International Journal, 19(1), 15–31. doi: 10.1080/14659890500436430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, L., & Rosenblatt, Z. (1984). Job insecurity: Toward conceptual clarity. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 438–448. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1984.4279673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargadon, A. B., & Bechky, B. A. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17(4), 484–500. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1060.0200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlow, L. L. (2014). The essence of multivariate thinking: Basic themes and methods. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, M. M., & Schaubroeck, J. (1988). A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 43–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00631.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, A., Nathens, A. B., Bandiera, G., & LeBlanc, V. R. (2010). Threat and challenge: Cognitive appraisal and stress responses in simulated trauma resuscitations. Medical Education, 44(6), 587–594. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03634.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helgeson, V. S. (1993). Two Important Distinctions in Social Support: Kind of Support and Perceived Versus Received1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(10), 825–845. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01008.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, D. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23(6), 723–744. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2063(97)90026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holman, D., Totterdell, P., Axtell, C., Stride, C., Port, R., Svensson, R., & Zibarras, L. (2012). Job design and the employee innovation process: The mediating role of learning strategies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(2), 177–191. doi: 10.1007/s10869-011-9242-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Israelashvili, M., & Romano, J. L. (2017). The Cambridge handbook of international prevention science. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacko, J. A., & Ward, K. G. (1996). Toward establishing a link between psychomotor task complexity and human information processing. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 31(1), 533–536. doi: 10.1016/0360-8352(96)00192-
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions and new directions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kuenzi, M., & Schminke, M. (2009). Assembling fragments into a lens: A review, critique, and proposed research agenda for the organizational work climate literature. Journal of Management, 35(3), 634–717. doi: 10.1177/0149206308330559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lengua, L. J., & Long, A. C. (2002). The role of emotionality and self-regulation in the appraisal–coping process: Tests of direct and moderating effects. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 23(4), 471–493. doi: 10.1016/S0193-3973(02)00129-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LePine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & LePine, M. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor–hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 764–775. doi: 10.5465/amj.2005.18803921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madrid, H. P., Patterson, M. G., & Leiva, P. I. (2015). Negative core affect and employee silence: How differences in activation, cognitive rumination, and problem-solving demands matter. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(6), 1887–1898. doi: 10.1037/a0039380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. E., & Byrd, T. A. (1998). Perceived task complexity as a criterion for information support. Information & Management, 34(5), 251–263. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00057-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., Aguinis, H., Culpepper, S. A., & Chen, G. (2012). Understanding and estimating the power to detect cross-level interaction effects in multilevel modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 951–966. doi: 10.1037/a0028380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mechanic, D. (1978). Students under stress. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The work design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321–1339. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ohly, S., & Fritz, C. (2010). Work characteristics, challenge appraisal, creativity, and proactive behavior: A multi-level study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 543–565. doi: 10.1002/job.633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepinsky, P. N., Pepinsky, H. B., & Pavlik, W. B. (1960). The effects of task complexity and time pressure upon team productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 44(1), 34–38. doi: 10.1037/h0039877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227. doi: 10.1080/00273170701341316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter-Palmon, R., & Illies, J. J. (2004). Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from a creative problem-solving perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 55–77. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogelberg, S. G., & Stanton, J. M. (2007). Introduction. Organizational Research Methods, 10(2), 195–209. doi: 10.1177/1094428106294693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224–253. doi: 10.2307/2392563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schippers, M. C., West, M. A., & Dawson, J. F. (2015). Team Reflexivity and Innovation. Journal of Management, 41(3), 769–788. doi: 10.1177/0149206312441210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, A., Zacher, H., & Frese, M. (2012). The buffering effect of selection, optimization, and compensation strategy use on the relationship between problem solving demands and occupational well-being: A daily diary study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(2), 139–149. doi: 10.1037/a0027054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, B. J. (2008). Does personal initiative training work as a stress management intervention? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(3), 259–270. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.13.3.259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, B. J., & Auton, J. C. (2015). The merits of measuring challenge and hindrance appraisals. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 28(2), 121–143. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2014.931378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, B. J., & Lee, L. (2015). Proactive coping as a personal resource in the expanded job demands–resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 22(1), 46–69. doi: 10.1037/a0038439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1998). Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal conflict at work scale, organizational constraints scale, quantitative workload inventory, and physical symptoms inventory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3(4), 356–367. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.7.3.242
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spence, J. T., & Spence, K. W. (1966). The motivational components of manifest anxiety: Drive and drive stimuli. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Anxiety and Behavior (pp. 291–326). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, K., & Parker, S. K. (2015). Intervening to enhance proactivity in organizations: Improving the present or changing the future. Journal of Management, 1, 1–29. doi: 10.1177/0149206315602531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topi, H., Valacich, J. S., & Hoffer, J. A. (2005). The effects of task complexity and time availability limitations on human performance in database query tasks. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(3), 349–379. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tornau, K., & Frese, M. (2013). Construct Clean-Up in Proactivity Research: A Meta-Analysis on the Nomological Net of Work-Related Proactivity Concepts and their Incremental Validities. Applied Psychology, 62(1), 44–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00514.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckey, M. R., Searle, B. J., Boyd, C. M., Winefield, A. H., & Winefield, H. R. (2015). Hindrances are not threats: Advancing the multidimensionality of work stress. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20(2), 131–147. doi: 10.1037/a0038280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Aken, J. E., & Berends, H. (2018). Problem solving in organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vecchio, R. P. (1990). Theoretical and empirical examination of cognitive resource theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 141–147. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E. (1994). “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40(4), 429–439. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.40.4.429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, T. D., Jackson, P. R., Mullarkey, S., & Parker, S. K. (1996). The demands-control model of job strain: A more specific test. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69(2), 153–166. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1996.tb00607.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J. R., Beehr, T. A., & Love, K. (2011). Extending the challenge-hindrance model of occupational stress: The role of appraisal. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2), 505–516. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2011.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, H. M., Parker, S. K., & Turner, N. (2010). Proactively performing teams: The role of work design, transformational leadership, and team composition. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 301–324. doi:10.1348/096317910X502494
   Google Scholar
• Wood, R. E. (1986). Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37(1), 60–82. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(86)90044-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C., & Parker, S. K. (2011). Proactivity in the work place: Looking back and looking forward. In K. Cameron, & G. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of positive organizational Scholarship (pp. 84–96). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Q., Hirst, G., & Shipton, H. (2012). Promoting creativity at work: The role of problem-solving demand. Applied Psychology, 61(1), 56–80. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00455.x
   Google Scholar